NationStates Jolt Archive


Vote for a historical leader...

The Parkus Empire
31-10-2005, 21:22
If you had to choose between the three, who would you pick? Niccolo Machaveli, Gengis Khan, or Cardinal Richeleu? If there is no poll here, please wait a sec for it to appear, and then answer it. Well, debate, minlgle, have some fun!
Aklekia
31-10-2005, 21:28
Instead of Genghis who probably wouldnt know what to do and just neglect us put Stalin.
Praudatz
31-10-2005, 21:28
gengis khan kicks ass
Eutrusca
31-10-2005, 21:29
If you had to choose between the three, who would you pick? Niccolo Machaveli, Gengis Khan, or Cardinal Richeleu? If there is no poll here, please wait a sec for it to appear, and then answer it. Well, debate, minlgle, have some fun!
The poll needs an "other" option. :p
Praudatz
31-10-2005, 21:30
at least he would lay waste to things
Drunk commies deleted
31-10-2005, 21:41
Genghis Kahn would kick ass. Hell, we're involved in two wars with maybe three more brewing, we need a wartime dictator.
The Parkus Empire
31-10-2005, 21:47
I'd pick Nick. But Temujan comes in my very close second.
Kazcaper
31-10-2005, 22:21
Machiavelli. Loved The Prince; so cynical and and cold. Great stuff.
Syniks
31-10-2005, 23:24
Machiavelli. Loved The Prince; so cynical and and cold. Great stuff.
Then read "Discourses on Levy", wherein he espouses a tri-parate government not unlike the US.
Callisdrun
31-10-2005, 23:26
Khan.

Because if he's the leader, it means I get to be on his side, which is infinitely better than being a citizen of one of the poor villages about to get sacked by the mongol hordes.
H N Fiddlebottoms VIII
01-11-2005, 00:13
I don't know. Machiavelli deserves some good to come his way after the shit that the papists and governments of his time put him through, and he is a pretty clever guy.
On the other hand, I like the economic policies that Mr. Put to Death was aspousing in his speech the other night. Desicions, desicions.