Vote for a historical leader...
The Parkus Empire
31-10-2005, 21:22
If you had to choose between the three, who would you pick? Niccolo Machaveli, Gengis Khan, or Cardinal Richeleu? If there is no poll here, please wait a sec for it to appear, and then answer it. Well, debate, minlgle, have some fun!
Instead of Genghis who probably wouldnt know what to do and just neglect us put Stalin.
Praudatz
31-10-2005, 21:28
gengis khan kicks ass
Eutrusca
31-10-2005, 21:29
If you had to choose between the three, who would you pick? Niccolo Machaveli, Gengis Khan, or Cardinal Richeleu? If there is no poll here, please wait a sec for it to appear, and then answer it. Well, debate, minlgle, have some fun!
The poll needs an "other" option. :p
Praudatz
31-10-2005, 21:30
at least he would lay waste to things
Drunk commies deleted
31-10-2005, 21:41
Genghis Kahn would kick ass. Hell, we're involved in two wars with maybe three more brewing, we need a wartime dictator.
The Parkus Empire
31-10-2005, 21:47
I'd pick Nick. But Temujan comes in my very close second.
Kazcaper
31-10-2005, 22:21
Machiavelli. Loved The Prince; so cynical and and cold. Great stuff.
Machiavelli. Loved The Prince; so cynical and and cold. Great stuff.
Then read "Discourses on Levy", wherein he espouses a tri-parate government not unlike the US.
Callisdrun
31-10-2005, 23:26
Khan.
Because if he's the leader, it means I get to be on his side, which is infinitely better than being a citizen of one of the poor villages about to get sacked by the mongol hordes.
H N Fiddlebottoms VIII
01-11-2005, 00:13
I don't know. Machiavelli deserves some good to come his way after the shit that the papists and governments of his time put him through, and he is a pretty clever guy.
On the other hand, I like the economic policies that Mr. Put to Death was aspousing in his speech the other night. Desicions, desicions.