NationStates Jolt Archive

This is the name: We Can Compromise Because We Haven't Been Brainwashed. (Not a very exciting name I know, but the person who thought up the name was tired.)

Article 1: We are people who believe that God does not exclude science and science does not exclude God.

If ya wanna join ya gotta accept Article 1. That's about it. We are gonna have hats with propellers and other neat things. Oh ya, girls can join too. Check out the thread about creationism and evolution if you want to see how the club started. There are about four or five charter members. Oh, ya, no dues either.

This is the name: We Can Compromise Because We Haven't Been Brainwashed. (Not a very exciting name I know, but the person who thought up the name was tired.)

Article 1: We are people who believe that God does not exclude science and science does not exclude God.

If ya wanna join ya gotta accept Article 1. That's about it. We are gonna have hats with propellers and other neat things. Oh ya, girls can join too. Check out the thread about creationism and evolution if you want to see how the club started. There are about four or five charter members. Oh, ya, no dues either.

I, too, am a charter member of said club. And I thought up the name.

This is the name: We Can Compromise Because We Haven't Been Brainwashed. (Not a very exciting name I know, but the person who thought up the name was tired.)

Article 1: We are people who believe that God does not exclude science and science does not exclude God.

If ya wanna join ya gotta accept Article 1. That's about it. We are gonna have hats with propellers and other neat things. Oh ya, girls can join too. Check out the thread about creationism and evolution if you want to see how the club started. There are about four or five charter members. Oh, ya, no dues either.
no dues? how will we pay for the holiday party?!

oh okay no party........... I guess I will join anyway.

I'm in :D .. unless this means I agree with things other than evolution.

no dues? how will we pay for the holiday party?!

oh okay no party........... I guess I will join anyway.

So, you accept Article 1, yes?

I'm in :D .. unless this means I agree with thing other than evolution.

Just one rule. Accept Article 1. Yes, or no?

I'm in :D .. unless this means I agree with things other than evolution.
It means that you acknowledge that Evolution doesn't disprove the existence of a Supreme Being.
Also, I'll join. I'm still going to eat ape brains, though.

It means that you acknowledge that Evolution doesn't disprove the existence of a Supreme Being.
Also, I'll join. I'm still going to eat ape brains, though.

I just hope you brought enough for everyone

I'll concede that absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence...
But as an atheist/Buddhist, I have no desire to join a religious club.

So, you accept Article 1, yes?
yes.

Just one rule. Accept Article 1. Yes, or no?
yeah yeah yesh I'm in!

You know.. I was going to start a thread tonight titled "I believe in god.. and evolution" but I think 2 threads is enough for 1 night.

weird eh?

Ok, club members take good care of the club. Don't fight. Laugh at yourselves often. Stay cool. And don't stay up past your bedtime.

Goodthoughts

I just hope you brought enough for everyone
Hell, no. You have any idea what this stuff costs?
Get your own illegal delicasses, and quit trying to piss around with mine, commie!

I'll concede that absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence...
But as an atheist/Buddhist, I have no desire to join a religious club.

It ain't religious. It's just a club with hats with propellers and other cool stuff.

Hell, no. You have any idea what this stuff costs?
Get your own illegal delicasses, and quit trying to piss around with mine, commie!

Now, now club members don't fight. Heron, your in charge in my absence. Cause youse a charter member.

I'll concede that absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence...
But as an atheist/Buddhist, I have no desire to join a religious club.
I'm an agnostic and I joined. I'm tired of people pretending that Evolution pwns Christianity, because it really doesn't.

I'm an agnostic and I joined. I'm tired of people pretending that Evolution pwns Christianity, because it really doesn't.

Agreed, but it is funny to watch the fundies go mental.

I'll consider joining if you will accept Article II.

Article II: Evolution and Creationism are not mutually exclusive.

I'll consider joining if you will accept Article II.

Article II: Evolution and Creationism are not mutually exclusive.

I would say that's the spirit of Article I. No problems that I can see.

I would say that's the spirit of Article I. No problems that I can see.

If you call for a vote on Article II, and it is accepted, I'll join but if the article is defeated, I'll pout. Maybe even, cry.

I would say that's the spirit of Article I. No problems that I can see.
I think he has come up with the best way to pad our charter. Just say the same thing 5-6 times, but with slightly different phrasing each time and one of them (3 or 4) should say exactly what the preceding one said, but translated into Spanish.

This is the name: We Can Compromise Because We Haven't Been Brainwashed. (Not a very exciting name I know, but the person who thought up the name was tired.)

Article 1: We are people who believe that God does not exclude science and science does not exclude God.

If ya wanna join ya gotta accept Article 1. That's about it. We are gonna have hats with propellers and other neat things. Oh ya, girls can join too. Check out the thread about creationism and evolution if you want to see how the club started. There are about four or five charter members. Oh, ya, no dues either.

Does this have anything to do with my thread about what I think of the Creationism vs. Evolutionism debate?

Damn Straight I'll join. I've been arguing this idea forever. Finally, a club for the intelligent that excluded idealouges on both sides.!!!

Yaay!!!!!!!!! ::: puts on beanie with propellor :::

Does this have anything to do with my thread about what I think of the Creationism vs. Evolutionism debate?

Yes.

Yes.

I'm flattered.

Article 1: We are people who believe that God does not exclude science and science does not exclude God.

If ya wanna join ya gotta accept Article 1.
How are you defining God? If I accept that it's possible the universe was started by some intelligent being, but that being has only watched since, can I still join?

Finally, a group who aren't blind to the obvious. Mark this on your calendars. I'm in if you don't make me wear a beanie...my hair is bad enough as it is.

If I join can I still antagonise the both sets of fundementalists? Please?

I'll join. When do I get my hat? I'll be a lazy member. I'm lazy and won't do much accept argue with ignorant people on both sides of the issue when I'm bored now and then.

Should we have an official stance to as if intelligent design is taught in highschool? I'd actually perfer we didn't have a stance since it would divide the group. I can see people intellgent enough to realize that God and evolution aren't imcompatible, but who have different ideas on what should be taught in science class.

Your club remindes me a little of the American Scientific Affiliation. Though it has some major differences. The ASA is an organization of Christians who are scientists (so you have to be both a Christian and a scientist to join). But they do not take an official stance on the evolution vs. ID debate because they recognize the two aren't exclussive. Though they do allow individual members who feel that their interpretation of the Bible excludes evolution, but they at least recognize that one can believe in God and evolution if they interpret the Bible differently. I don't know a whole lot more about them, but I think they mostly get together to debate theology and science. Though I think they have other purposes that have nothing to do with evolution.

I'm an agnostic and I joined. I'm tired of people pretending that Evolution pwns Christianity, because it really doesn't.

HERE HERE!

With this, i'm sold. I'll join.

Article 1: We are people who believe that God does not exclude science and science does not exclude God.

Science does indeed exclude the super-natural. You don't know science if you think it doesn't.

Science does indeed exclude the super-natural. You don't know science if you think it doesn't.

So, in other words, you don't want one of our kick-ass propellor hats. Fair enough.

Science does indeed exclude the super-natural. You don't know science if you think it doesn't.

And yet science is proving more of ID than anything else :D

*note* this isn't to high jack the thread.

And yet science is proving more of ID than anything else :D

That sentence makes, not much unlike ID, no sense.

Science does indeed exclude the super-natural. You don't know science if you think it doesn't.
It aint' not science club either. No beanie hat for you.

It aint' not science club either. No beanie hat for you.

No, it's an "I'm happy and proud of not knowing what science is" club. You can keep your beanies.

Does this have anything to do with my thread about what I think of the Creationism vs. Evolutionism debate?

This idea was hatched in your thread. Ya, wanna join? You can be a charter member.

Hell yeah! Finally some people who actually realise the blindingly obvious! I'll join - and not just for the propellor beanies! (But for them too :D)

Hey can I join?
*takes a beanie propeller hat* :D

Science does indeed exclude the super-natural. You don't know science if you think it doesn't.

Are you saying science doesn't deal with the supernatural, or that science proves the supernatural doesn't exist?

I don't want to put words in the mouth of the original poster, but I'm assuming he means that science doesn't disprove God. I don't think he means that science is able to deal with the supernatural.

No, it's an "I'm happy and proud of not knowing what science is" club. You can keep your beanies.


Now, now don't go away mad. I think I know what science is, and its more that what you say it is. If you change your mind there is a beanie hat waiting for you.

Hell yeah! Finally some people who actually realise the blindingly obvious! I'll join - and not just for the propellor beanies! (But for them too :D)

Ok, you're in dude.

Hey can I join?
*takes a beanie propeller hat* :D
Gotta order more hats. Consider yourself a member.

Are you saying science doesn't deal with the supernatural, or that science proves the supernatural doesn't exist?

I don't want to put words in the mouth of the original poster, but I'm assuming he means that science doesn't disprove God. I don't think he means that science is able to deal with the supernatural.

Go ahead put some words in there. My mouth is beg enough and my brain is small enough.

I'm an atheist-agnostic but I accept that I'm only human so I could be totally wrong. Can I join?

I'll join for the hell of it. I have nothing better to do, and parties and beanie hats with a twistie top will make me special! Weeeee!

BTW, I believe I knew FASS when he was someone else way back when...., or maybe not. Perhaps he Remembers Nodea Rudav, perhaps not. Either way I really need to get his opinions on things, cause I'm frakkin tired of hearing them from others.

Now, now don't go away mad. I think I know what science is, and its more that what you say it is.

It's gracious of you to admit that I am right, but it is because I am right that I cannot accept your beanie of intellectual indolence and lassitude.

BTW, I believe I knew FASS when he was someone else way back when...., or maybe not.

I haven't been anyone else.

I'll join for the hell of it. I have nothing better to do, and parties and beanie hats with a twistie top will make me special! Weeeee!

BTW, I believe I knew FASS when he was someone else way back when...., or maybe not. Perhaps he Remembers Nodea Rudav, perhaps not. Either way I really need to get his opinions on things, cause I'm frakkin tired of hearing them from others.


Ya, gotta accept Article 1. If ya don't know what it is go back and look.

It's gracious of you to admit that I am right, but it is because I am right that I cannot accept your beanie of intellectual indolence and lassitude.

Whatever!!

Whatever!!

There it is again, that languor of yours.

OH, wait, are you THE Fass that always thinks he's right, even when he's wrong? Arn't you him? Or are you just an imposter of someone before you, which would make me angry, very angry. I would snatch the flames of hell upon you for trying to be like someone! Ardy Har Har Har!

Of course I've heard you just never back down and stick your nose into everything. But thats basically why I don't accept those accusations because I have no idea WHO you are Fass.

Anywho, I need to stop hijacking this thread.

Sure, I'll accept article one. But there very well be parties and this better not die, or I'm tearing my hat up.

OH, wait, are you THE Fass that always thinks he's right, even when he's wrong? Arn't you him?

Nope. The times I've been wrong, I've admitted it. I have nothing against admitting when I am wrong - I've been wrong plenty of times. This is not one of them, though.

Or are you just an imposter of someone before you, which would make me angry, very angry. I would snatch the flames of hell upon you for trying to be like someone! Ardy Har Har Har!

What?

Of course I've heard you just never back down and stick your nose into everything.

Threads are supposed to be commented on, if that's what you mean?

But thats basically why I don't accept those accusations because I have no idea WHO you are Fass.

Apparently.

Nope. The times I've been wrong, I've admitted it. I have nothing against admitting when I am wrong - I've been wrong plenty of times. This is not one of them, though.



What?



Threads are supposed to be commented on, if that's what you mean?



Apparently.

Hoorah! Thanks for answering! I was just purposly poking at you, I think I like you now. :D

Anywho.

Ok, boys adn girls the club house is open. Put on your beanie propeller hats and lets have fun.

*puts on his hat*

Lets party party party :)

is this a club for those who don't accept or deny the existence of God?

*puts on his hat*

Lets party party party :)

Ok. But I gotta go make a real serious post. Be back in minute.

This is the name: We Can Compromise Because We Haven't Been Brainwashed. (Not a very exciting name I know, but the person who thought up the name was tired.)

Article 1: We are people who believe that God does not exclude science and science does not exclude God.

If ya wanna join ya gotta accept Article 1. That's about it. We are gonna have hats with propellers and other neat things. Oh ya, girls can join too. Check out the thread about creationism and evolution if you want to see how the club started. There are about four or five charter members. Oh, ya, no dues either.

Sorry, can't join. However, I am very impressed that I managed to brainwash myself :rolleyes:

Sorry, can't join. However, I am very impressed that I managed to brainwash myself :rolleyes:

That's ok we are a friendly bunch when we are in the clubhouse anyway. Need a towel to dry off the brain?

That's ok we are a friendly bunch when we are in the clubhouse anyway. Need a towel to dry off the brain?

No thanks. Dehydration of the brain causes malfunction. I'm friendly too, but doesn't mean I have to believe in God or any other form of assigning human qualities to the forces of nature.

is this a club for those who don't accept or deny the existence of God?

All you gotta do to join is accept Article 1. I would say that Article 1 allows you the above freedom of choice. I believe in God. Some other club members I believe don't. Its ok. We have a right to our opinions here.

No thanks. Dehydration of the brain causes malfunction. I'm friendly too, but doesn't mean I have to believe in God or any other form of assigning human qualities to the forces of nature.

That's ok. We are running short of hats anyway.

That's ok. We are running short of hats anyway.

Fortunately, I don't like wearing hats.

*begins to twirl the propellers on his hat as he begins to dance*

*can I buy you a root beer, or a lemonaide?*

*can I buy you a root beer, or a lemonaide?*

I'll take a lemonaide my dear chap.

I'll take a lemonaide my dear chap.

Oh, good. That leaves that last root beer for me. Works out perfect that way.

I accept! puts on propeller hat who's up for twister?

I accept! puts on propeller hat who's up for twister?

Great! Want a lemonaide. Or, should I go out for some more root beer? I love twister.

I'll play twister too. It is a heck of a game to play. Especially after watching my favorite football team winning a key game :)

I'll play twister too. It is a heck of a game to play. Especially after watching my favorite football team winning a key game :)

Denver? *spins pointer. Red, it is.*

I want beer!

Denver? *spins pointer. Red, it is.*

Yep!! :) :)

*puts right foot on red*

Yep!! :) :)

*puts right foot on red*

*face turns very, very, very, red, almost purple-red. mine is the Viqueens.*

*spins pointer, color is, oh, no, purple!!!!*

*takes a deep swig of his root beer*

There is no purple goodthoughts.

*I have to go now. Work time :(*

There is no purple goodthoughts.

*I have to go now. Work time :(*

Ok, almost time for me to go to. No, purple!! Maybe I'm playing a different game.;)

http://www.blcmusic.com/images/blc.jpg
http://www.allhatnocattle.net/BushPropellerHeadDebates.jpg
http://www.smalldogmall.com/shop.aspx?pgid=LP&pid=PROPELLARHAT

:p :fluffle: :D

Il Ruffino, You the man.

http://www.blcmusic.com/images/blc.jpg
http://www.allhatnocattle.net/BushPropellerHeadDebates.jpg
http://www.smalldogmall.com/shop.aspx?pgid=LP&pid=PROPELLARHAT

:p :fluffle: :D

Quit spamming, NOW.

Il Ruffino, You the man.
Thank you. Please tell that to upwardthrust. :rolleyes:

:fluffle:

Quit spamming, NOW.

Is that for all of us, or just Il Ruffino?

Is that for all of us, or just Il Ruffino?

Seeing as I quoted him, yes, it's only for him.

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9858701&postcount=5 :rolleyes:

Seeing as I quoted him, yes, it's only for him.

Thanks. But, I really like the hats he brought to the party.

Finally, a group who aren't blind to the obvious. Mark this on your calendars. I'm in if you don't make me wear a beanie...my hair is bad enough as it is.

you're in Zooke. Of course your in.

If I join can I still antagonise the both sets of fundementalists? Please?

All you have to do is agree with Article 1.

I'll join. When do I get my hat? I'll be a lazy member. I'm lazy and won't do much accept argue with ignorant people on both sides of the issue when I'm bored now and then.

Should we have an official stance to as if intelligent design is taught in highschool? I'd actually perfer we didn't have a stance since it would divide the group. I can see people intellgent enough to realize that God and evolution aren't imcompatible, but who have different ideas on what should be taught in science class.

Your club remindes me a little of the American Scientific Affiliation. Though it has some major differences. The ASA is an organization of Christians who are scientists (so you have to be both a Christian and a scientist to join). But they do not take an official stance on the evolution vs. ID debate because they recognize the two aren't exclussive. Though they do allow individual members who feel that their interpretation of the Bible excludes evolution, but they at least recognize that one can believe in God and evolution if they interpret the Bible differently. I don't know a whole lot more about them, but I think they mostly get together to debate theology and science. Though I think they have other purposes that have nothing to do with evolution.

any body can join of any religion or no religion. All you have to do is agree with article 1.

*puts on hat*
*flicks switch and propellor spins*

Sorry I'm late ::: spins propellor ::: but I brought more Lemonade and some buffalo wings
:)

Article 1: We are people who believe that God does not exclude science and science does not exclude God.

Article 2: In cases where God/Religion and Science directly contradict (such as literal Young Earth Creationism vs. Physics, Chemistry, Astronomy and Geology.) Science will hold sway.

Without that, I cannot consider this club.

Article 2: In cases where God/Religion and Science directly contradict (such as literal Young Earth Creationism vs. Physics, Chemistry, Astronomy and Geology.) Science will hold sway.

Without that, I cannot consider this club.
No, you cannot complicate the club with other rules! Our attention spans are short, and we have not the memory for more than two concepts to be held simultaneously.

No, you cannot complicate the club with other rules! Our attention spans are short, and we have not the memory for more than two concepts to be held simultaneously.

Very good Mr Fidddlebottoms VIII you are correct about our attention spans. No need to complicate the rules when the first article says all we need to say.

Club is open. I brought a case of gingerale. You you like one?

Very good Mr Fidddlebottoms VIII you are correct about our attention spans. No need to complicate the rules when the first article says all we need to say.

Club is open. I brought a case of gingerale. You you like one?

So, you disagree with my suggestion? Very well, then that tells me all I need to know. Good day.

No, no, my dear friend, I don't disagree with you. In fact I probably agree with you. But I don't want the intent of the club to be diverted into other areas. I think that Article 1 really says it all:God and Science do not exclude each other. Both sides of the religion, science debate tend to want to find things to fight about which really does not help science or religion. In the past science and religion did not oppose each other they worked together. The sciences you mentioned have opened vast areas of human understanding in especially the past 180 years or so. Religion has in many cases not done the same. But that does not mean that the two should exclude each other, only that religions that are current and popular today have reached the bottom or cellar of their influence.

This is the name: We Can Compromise Because We Haven't Been Brainwashed. (Not a very exciting name I know, but the person who thought up the name was tired.)

Article 1: We are people who believe that God does not exclude science and science does not exclude God.

If ya wanna join ya gotta accept Article 1. That's about it. We are gonna have hats with propellers and other neat things. Oh ya, girls can join too. Check out the thread about creationism and evolution if you want to see how the club started. There are about four or five charter members. Oh, ya, no dues either.
Yay! Can I join.

Yay! Can I join.

Great, have a gingerale. *pops open a fizzy bottle of gingerale and hands it to Branin*

You know, eventually someone's gonna get pissed about this......okay, I want in.

You know, eventually someone's gonna get pissed about this......okay, I want in.

Do you accept Article 1?

Article 2: In cases where God/Religion and Science directly contradict (such as literal Young Earth Creationism vs. Physics, Chemistry, Astronomy and Geology.) Science will hold sway.

Without that, I cannot consider this club.

I would oppose such an article.

I accept Article I, but I don't like to join clubs and I never wear propellors. Can I be a club guest -- just stop in now and then, drink your gingerale, say "here, here" or "nay, nay" now and then, and use your bathroom?

EDIT: I'll bring chips.

Article 2: In cases where God/Religion and Science directly contradict (such as literal Young Earth Creationism vs. Physics, Chemistry, Astronomy and Geology.) Science will hold sway.

Without that, I cannot consider this club.

You know if they put that Article in, this would turn into a very large flame war. And isnt that contradictory to Article 1?

Oh, as a rational anarchist, I agree with Article 1. Mind if I join?

I would oppose such an article.

Good. Article 2 is voted down.

You know if they put that Article in, this would turn into a very large flame war. And isnt that contradictory to Article 1?

Oh, as a rational anarchist, I agree with Article 1. Mind if I join?

Sure, you can drop by now and then as long as you promise not to burn the place down.

I accept Article I, but I don't like to join clubs and I never wear propellors. Can I be a club guest -- just stop in now and then, drink your gingerale, say "here, here" or "nay, nay" now and then, and use your bathroom?

EDIT: I'll bring chips.
If you're bringing chips I'll give the invite.

*swigs gingerale*

Thanks guys.

*drops in from above via spinning rotor blade hat*

Hey, its me... the other charter member from back in the day! Good to see how the club has grown and prospered.... I've brought cake if anybody fancies it?

Yay! Cake! I'll bring something nexttime. I didn't know I was supposed to.

If you're bringing chips I'll give the invite.

*swigs gingerale*

Thanks guys.
Why, thank-ya! I got the chips. I got all kinds chips -- BBQ flavor, onion flavor, pickle flavor, crab flavor. I got the Four Seasons menu in chip form.

Begins to dance with a lemonade in his hand.

I would oppose such an article.

Why?

OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! this is a club for me(since my existence is living proof of Art. 1)!!!!!!!!!!


If im accepted, i would like to propose Art 2:

THERE SHALT BE NO ARTICLE OTHER THAN ART1!!!!!

i brought my margarita supplies!

and i dont need a full hat *creates an uber hair weave containing a propeller, creating the world's first propeller-beanie-hat weave*

Unflexibility :mp5:

OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! this is a club for me(since my existence is living proof of Art. 1)!!!!!!!!!!


If im accepted, i would like to propose Art 2:

THERE SHALT BE NO ARTICLE OTHER THAN ART1!!!!!

i brought my margarita supplies!

and i dont need a full hat *creates an uber hair weave containing a propeller, creating the world's first propeller-beanie-hat weave*

Unflexibility :mp5:

I think we can vote on that. Club members what do you think.

I just got back from Turtle Mt and I am happy to see that the club has been active. I was in a sweat lodge last night and i would love some ginger ale and cake.

Just got back from arguing in the new evolution vs. creationism thread.

Just got back from arguing in the new evolution vs. creationism thread.

Glutton for punishment are you?

I thought we had an article 2 - Evolution does not disprove the existence of God and the existence of God does not disprove the validity of Evolution.

or something like that.

EDIT: Yeah, here it is:
Article 2 proposal (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9854645&postcount=18)

And here is the reply: Reply (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9854654&postcount=19)

I think my wording is better than the original post due to the baggage the words "creationism" and "Intelligent Design" carry with them though.

I would say that beyond my proposal, no more articles should be permitted, otherwise we become like congress, mired in our own rules. :)

You know if they put that Article in, this would turn into a very large flame war. And isnt that contradictory to Article 1?

Oh, as a rational anarchist, I agree with Article 1. Mind if I join?

Why would this start a flame war? It's perfectly rational.

I thought we had an article 2 - Evolution does not disprove the existence of God and the existence of God does not disprove the validity of Evolution.

or something like that.

EDIT: Yeah, here it is:
Article 2 proposal (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9854645&postcount=18)

And here is the reply: Reply (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9854654&postcount=19)

I think my wording is better than the original post due to the baggage the words "creationism" and "Intelligent Design" carry with them though.

I would say that beyond my proposal, no more articles should be permitted, otherwise we become like congress, mired in our own rules. :)

There is only one Article--Article 1.

I'll join only if there are lots of parties with lots of beer and lots and lots of girls.

I'm still waiting for an answer to my reasonable question. Heck, even the Catholic Church takes a step back when science and an overly literal interpretation of religious dogma directly contradict.

there's too much talk of ginger ale and other soft drinks for my liking... Think I'll grab myself a beer :)

Gymoor, get over yourself, go debate elswhere.... sorry, please go elsewhere

and i'd love to join, as long as i can choose the colour of my propellor

you can choose any colour as long as it isnt purple!

I don't like purple.

Gymoor, get over yourself, go debate elswhere.... sorry, please go elsewhere

and i'd love to join, as long as i can choose the colour of my propellor

This has nothing to do with me or with debate. All I did was ask a question, and I wasn't even rude about it (unlike you, newbie,) and no one answered with a reason. What's so unreasonable about that, and why did you feel it necessary to insult me? Why don't YOU go elsewhere, since you don't seem to understand basic manners? No one likes a skulker who only comes out of the shadows to talk big.

Edit: Ah, now I see.

Location: Under the Swanston St. Bridge

That indicates that you're a troll, correct?

and I wasn't even rude about it (unlike you, newbie)

To be fair, in using the term 'newbie' to address svalbardania merely reinforces the idea that you are in fact trying to be rude, with your emphasis on the term newbie having the purpose of trying to reinforce your own superiority.

Have a nice day.

To be fair, in using the term 'newbie' to address svalbardania merely reinforces the idea that you are in fact trying to be rude, with your emphasis on the term newbie having the purpose of trying to reinforce your own superiority.

Have a nice day.

Ah, but I was merely responding to his telling me to get over himself. He initiated the rudeness and I responded in kind. So, while I do see your point, I feel I was justified in my response. I was indeed rude in my response to his rudeness.

My superiority needs no reinforcement. :D

That being seaid, I don't want to be a thread-party pooper.

Shots of jager to all the peeps of drinking age!

This has nothing to do with me or with debate. All I did was ask a question, and I wasn't even rude about it (unlike you, newbie,) and no one answered with a reason. What's so unreasonable about that, and why did you feel it necessary to insult me? Why don't YOU go elsewhere, since you don't seem to understand basic manners? No one likes a skulker who only comes out of the shadows to talk big.

Edit: Ah, now I see.

That indicates that you're a troll, correct?


I suppose I did sort of bring that upon myself didn't I.

But to be fair, you were pushing the point when it was obvious no one really wanted to reply to you. Previous posters had set out all the necessary details and you were just asserting superiority and demanding attention.

Oh, and Ive been around for a year, I just dont forum much

Ok boys and girls the club is open again. I see the cuboards are bare so I brought some snacks.