NationStates Jolt Archive


Iranian President: "Israel should be wiped off the map"

Axis Nova
27-10-2005, 02:31
This, ladies and gentlemen, is an excellent example of why Iran should not have nukes, ever.


Link: http://news.ft.com/cms/s/14ee1ccc-465b-11da-8880-00000e2511c8.html

Wipe Israel from map, says Iran’s president
By Gareth Smyth in Tehran
Published: October 26 2005 21:26 | Last updated: October 27 2005 00:00

Middle EastMahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad, Iran’s fundamentalist president, on Wednesday declared that Israel should be “wiped off the map” and warned Arab countries against developing economic ties with Israel in response to its withdrawal from Gaza.

His remarks, delivered at a conference in Tehran entitled “A World without Zionism”, led to diplomatic protests by the UK, France and Spain, while Shimon Peres, Israel’s deputy prime minister, said Iran should be expelled from the United Nations.

In Washington, spokesmen for the Bush administration said the statement underscored US concern over Iran’s nuclear weapons programme.

Mr Ahmadi-Nejad’s comments came as Islamic Jihad, a militant Palestinian group allied to Iran, killed at least five Israelis with a bombing in the Israeli town of Hedera. Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility, saying it was avenging Israel’s killing of a West Bank commander on Monday.

US analysts noted that the president’s remarks were not a departure from hardline Iranian rhetoric and did not represent new policy.

But they said the rhetoric was aggressive and badly timed, and would serve to confirm western suspicions of Iran’s more confrontational approach that were raised by the new president’s speeches at the United Nations last month.

However, European diplomats suggested the comments would not derail efforts by France, Germany and the UK to get Iran to return to the negotiating table and halt work at its Isfahan uranium conversion facility. One diplomat said the EU3 had made a point of keeping the nuclear issue separate from Iranian support for militant Palestinian groups during two years of talks.

“As the Imam said, Israel must be wiped off the map,” Mr Ahmadi-Nejad said, citing Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of Iran’s Islamic revolution.

The president told an audience of students there was “no doubt the new wave [of attacks] in Palestine will soon wipe off this disgraceful blot from the face of the Islamic world”.

“Anybody who recognises Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation’s fury,” he said, in remarks aimed at Arab states.

Mr Ahmadi-Nejad, who took office in August, was departing from the moderate line of his reformist predecessor, Mohammad Khatami, who argued Iran should be no more radical about Israel than the Palestinians themselves. Reformist figures in Iran have recently warned that Mr Ahmadi-Nejad’s stern rhetoric endangers Iran’s national interest and could encourage the referral of Tehran’s nuclear programme to the UN Security Council. Iran denies its development of the nuclear fuel cycle is for military use.
Stoesser
27-10-2005, 02:37
this is a great example of why no one should have nukes ever
Fass
27-10-2005, 02:38
This has already been posted several times today. The search function is there to be used, not neglected!
The Class A Cows
27-10-2005, 02:47
Iran is funny, they do not really pose a terrorist threat to the US since the government is sympathetic to the same breeds of Islam that are not attacking the US. They are no threat to Israel either because Israel will wipe them off the map if they try to perform any sort of nuclear attack, and any irani incursion on israeli territory would be military and international relations suicide. It is all smoke and thunder, just like how China threatened to nuke the US if they intervened in the Taiwan strait a short while ago (the US responded by sending US military vessels on a tour of the Taiwan Strait.) These leaders want to keep up their image among their own people and they are highly deluded by visions of world power which are extremely outdated (in the case of Iran this backwardsness in worldviews can actually stretch back almost a thosand years ago and even further.)

Their main objective in making these comments pretty much seems to be revulsion at the fact that commercial and cultural exchanges are promoting peace between Israel and the sorrounding arab nations, especially Egypt, Palestine, and Syria, all which have drastically softened towards Israel recently despite having almost destroyed the Israeli nation not to long ago simply on the basis that it existed (although the Israeli military did end up with a historically recognizable victory due to extremely good tactics and pre-emptive air-superiority denial on Egyptian after Syria began its shelling... another entire story though.)

Israel is not a country which sits well with very religious Muslim governments, not the least because of their conflict with the palestinians, they simply have bought a very westernized, cosmopolitan, society to a region where intellectuals and politicians oft have extremely hard-line religious views and an expanded worldview of themselves as a power which has been undermined and needs to rise at all costs to their neighbors. Things change though, and I think the Irani response is in part due to resistance to that change.