NationStates Jolt Archive


County Threatens to Take Baby

Ommbababamow
26-10-2005, 21:18
This is happening in my county.
County Threatens to Take Baby Because Dad Is a Sex Offender

Case Could Have Nationwide Impact

Oct. 17, 2005 — - Melissa WolfHawk, who is expecting the birth of a son later this week, fears that the state will take her child away because her husband is a convicted sex offender.

WolfHawk's husband of three years, DaiShin WolfHawk, 53, admitted raping two teenage girls more than 20 years ago, and county officials have warned the couple they may take the child into custody. The move could be the first of its kind in the country.

Melissa WolfHawk is scheduled to appear in court today in Pennsylvania, and the results of the case could have nationwide consequences.

"If we create an environment in which someone convicted of a sexual offense effectively cannot live in society in a normal way, what we're doing is forcing them out," said Ernie Allen of the Center for Missing and Exploited Children. "We may even be increasing the likelihood of their re-offense."

County officials say there is much more to the case. They told the court they've heard reports the WolfHawks have a history of mental illness and drug and alcohol abuse. The county has also accused DaiShin WolfHawk of sexually abusing his three children. WolfHawk denies the allegations.

The American Civil Liberties Union is defending Melissa WolfHawk, 31, arguing that the county was too aggressive in monitoring her pregnancy. Melissa WolfHawk is also fighting to regain custody of her 21-month-old daughter who is now living with family in Maryland after a case that began with questions of DaiShin WolfHawk's fitness as a father.

WolfHawk won a restraining order on Sept. 30 keeping child-welfare workers from asking about her pregnancy, at least until today's hearing. She is still required to notify the Schuylkill County Department of Children and Youth Services within 24 hours of giving birth.

"I am living every woman's worst nightmare that when your child is born and you close your eyes for one second, if that baby isn't sleeping on your chest, you open your eyes and that child isn't going to be there," Melissa WolfHawk told The Associated Press.

DaiShin WolfHawk was known as John Joseph Lentini when he pleaded guilty to rape, attempted rape, sodomy and attempted sodomy in 1983, serving more than a decade in prison in New York.

DaiShin WolfHawk, who is unemployed, said he lives about 20 miles from the home Melissa shares with her father. He says he is the chief of the Unole E Quoni, an American Indian tribe, which he says has 175 families in eight states, but is not recognized by any state or the federal government. http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=1222311
Am the only one who thinks this is bs?
Dempublicents1
26-10-2005, 21:21
As an update - I read the other day that they actually did take the infant as soon as it was born, and the mother has visitation rights.

Personally, I would have to know more about the case. If the sex offense of the father involved children, or if he is under court order not to have unsupervised contact with children, then I would say they could uphold this until they could set up a way to monitor his contact with the child.

If his sex offense did not involve children, and he is not thought to be a pedophile, I don't see how they can back it up.
Super-power
26-10-2005, 21:23
Waitwaitwaitwait, they're taking the baby away from the mom coz of what the dad did?! wtf....
Sinuhue
26-10-2005, 21:29
There are a lot of ifs in this case, and a lot of things we don't know.

However, if there have been complaints about him already abusing his other kids, and those have been investigated, they should be taken seriously. If violence, or abuse is suspected to be a high risk, then that needs to be taken seriously as well. It's a tough thing...but so often they don't step in, and people scream afterwards that there were warning signs and why didn't they do something...

She apparently lives with him, by the way...so it's not just a case of someone who is separated from a sex-offender being penalised for his crimes.
Teh_pantless_hero
26-10-2005, 22:17
Due to the nature of his sex crime, they have no right to take the child.

Sex offenders are terrible, horrible people, but cannot all be put into the same category. Emotions sadly run the majority of the "justice" system.

If he is accused of abusing previous children, they should've already proved that claim. If child services there is anything like it is in Alabama, they can all go to hell anyway.