NationStates Jolt Archive


New U.S. ambassador appointment under investigation

Knootian East Indies
26-10-2005, 20:10
The Netherlands has been without a United States ambassador for three months now. Recently the Dutch gov't motioned the US to appoint someone at least but the candidate the White House wants is in trouble. This article is three months old, but the problems talked about in it have *still* not been resolved and the Senate seems unwilling to approve this guy as ambassador.

Maybe I'm not nice to ask, but with 300 million Americans availiable maybe you could ask your President not to pick someone who is under criminal investigation in 30 states for predatory lending tactics. And maybe also someone who is an, ah.. diplomat... instead of someone whose main contribution to life has been selling high-interest loans using online pop-up advertising and giving a lot of that money to the Bush presidential campaign. :(

Bush Picks Ameriquest Owner as Ambassador
Firm's Lending Tactics Investigated

On the same day that the White House announced that President Bush is nominating California billionaire Roland E. Arnall to be ambassador to the Netherlands, the company he controls said it would set aside $325 million for a possible settlement of allegations of predatory lending tactics.

Arnall's company, Ameriquest Mortgage Co., is being investigated by regulators in 30 states. A $325 million settlement would be one of the largest ever in a predatory lending case.

Ameriquest is the nation's biggest privately held mortgage company. The company, which is in negotiations with a group of attorneys general to resolve the investigations, said in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission yesterday that the amount "represents the company's best estimate of its maximum financial liability for a comprehensive resolution of this matter."

Arnall is the firm's principal shareholder. He, his wife and their companies have been the biggest political contributors to Bush since 2002.

Speaking about the ambassadorial nomination, White House spokeswoman Erin Healy said: "The president . . . feels Mr. Arnall is well qualified for the position. He had a long career in the private sector and has contributed a great deal to his community."

In a written statement, Arnall said he was "humbled and honored" to be nominated.

Ameriquest is facing complaints of wrongdoing from coast to coast, with thousands of customers seeking restitution. The Connecticut Banking Commission settled cases two weeks ago for $7 million, and a private class-action lawsuit in California, representing about 62,000 claimants, was recently settled for as much as $50 million.

"We've made a lot of progress, but the talks are continuing," said Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, who is in the group negotiating with Ameriquest. He said his office had received hundreds of complaints, "numerous and long-standing," about the lender.

In response to requests for comment, Ameriquest yesterday issued a statement that said it "continues to be engaged in discussions with a number of state attorneys general and regulators about the company's business practices. We are focused on resolving the issues under discussion with these agencies and hope to reach a reasonable resolution that is fair to our customers and fair to the company. We do not comment on the specifics of regulatory or legal matters."

In depositions, Ameriquest customers have alleged that they were promised good loan terms but instead got high rates, sometimes higher than they had previously been paying; that their incomes were overstated so they could qualify for the high-price loans; that appraisers overvalued their homes so they seemed valuable enough to secure the loan; and that they learned only after closing that they would be required to pay steep prepayment penalties if they sought to move to other lenders.

Patti Thompson, a secretary, was paying 6.1 percent on the $175,000 loan on her Minneapolis home when a pop-up ad on her computer offered the chance to reduce her monthly payments. She clicked on the ad, filled out a questionnaire and 24 hours later, she was contacted by an Ameriquest employee, who said he could lower her monthly payments and pay off her high-interest credit cards. Within about a week, a closing officer came to her home with documents for her to sign.

The hastiness of the transaction raised "red flags" for the Thompsons, and they tried unsuccessfully to cancel the transaction. They went to another lender, who reviewed their documents and told them their interest rate had been increased to 9.1 percent and that they had been charged $17,000 in settlement costs, bringing their new loan total to $193,000. Their monthly payment rose from $1,300 a month to $1,700 a month. The company did not pay off the credit cards, according to Thompson, and she and her husband filed for bankruptcy in April.

An Ameriquest spokesman said the company would not discuss specific cases but "works very hard" to resolve problems.

Thompson was stunned to learn that the White House would consider Arnall for such a prominent post.

"Does Bush realize what they are doing?" she said. "I hope not. This guy is ripping off people, hardworking people."


Linky (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/28/AR2005072801842.html)
Fass
26-10-2005, 20:18
Bush doesn't seem to be having luck with appointees lately.
Knootian East Indies
26-10-2005, 22:22
Indeed not. Ironically, this man seems to have caused more of an uproar in Arab papers than here in the Netherlands because of his backround (Wiesenthal institute and Jewish lobby). I guess the stereotype is popular over there. I kinda mind the whole pseudo-criminal thing though, irregardless of what the man might believe otherwise.
Neu Leonstein
27-10-2005, 00:44
What the f***?!

I thought this was only a bad coincidence:
Washington's choice for future US ambassador to Germany has all the makings of a political bombshell. For years, a company owned by the multimillionaire and newly-appointed diplomat William Timken, Jr. has been profiting from anticompetitive tariffs -- at the direct expense of German companies.
http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/spiegel/0,1518,367881,00.html
Don't worry, it's in English

Is he making a point or something? :mad:
Knootian East Indies
27-10-2005, 00:45
Makes you wonder if it is a deliberate strategy to piss people off, or a staunch refusal to care in the face of mounting opposition. :eek: I still think the one we get is worse, though.
Teh_pantless_hero
27-10-2005, 01:02
I could make a clever remark about the effects of Bush's past on his present train of action, but that would be poor taste.
Colin World
27-10-2005, 02:35
Is he making a point or something? :mad:

Sounds to me like he's gloating, while trying to maintain economic dominance
Knootian East Indies
27-10-2005, 12:09
How does appointing a hated ambassador make one maintain economic "dominance"?
Myrmidonisia
27-10-2005, 12:33
Makes you wonder if it is a deliberate strategy to piss people off, or a staunch refusal to care in the face of mounting opposition. :eek: I still think the one we get is worse, though.
It's called political patronage. That's what ambassador positions are for. How else could Shirley Temple have ever become an ambassador?
New Watenho
27-10-2005, 12:43
Here's two of the Three Dirty Cronies of the folk song. I can't wait to see whom he appoints ambassador to France.
Neu Leonstein
27-10-2005, 13:07
I can't wait to see whom he appoints ambassador to France.
http://www.tpj.org/pioneers/howard_leach.html
I think it's still him, an agricultural magnate (and here goes the "free trade" joke again) and another big sponsor for the Republican cause.
Non Aligned States
27-10-2005, 13:17
Here's two of the Three Dirty Cronies of the folk song. I can't wait to see whom he appoints ambassador to France.

Heh, if he could somehow ressurect him, I think this might be a candidate :p

http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/images/hitler/hitleroval.jpg

Given how some people complain about France being so 'ungrateful', it might get more approval than one might think.
Fass
27-10-2005, 13:22
Heh, if he could somehow ressurect him, I think this might be a candidate :p

http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/images/hitler/hitleroval.jpg

Given how some people complain about France being so 'ungrateful', it might get more approval than one might think.

Forbidden

You don't have permission to access /academic/cas/gpa/images/hitler/hitleroval.jpg on this server.
Non Aligned States
27-10-2005, 13:59
That's odd Fass. I'm not having any problems clicking on the link.
Pure Metal
27-10-2005, 14:03
Makes you wonder if it is a deliberate strategy to piss people off
nah its just republicans and right-wingers are generally a bunch of money-grubbing, power-hungry, backstabbing and corrupt assholes. well, the ones in power are anyway ;)

frankly i'm not too suprised
Tekania
27-10-2005, 14:17
I could make a clever remark about the effects of Bush's past on his present train of action, but that would be poor taste.

You're a genius!

You're the first one I have seen who has effectively included the words "Bush" and "clever" in the same sentence without being contradictory!
Biotopia
27-10-2005, 14:26
well really, if you click on a pop up you get what you deserve but that aside it goes to show that at least Bush is consistent with his crony... i mean policies
Knootian East Indies
27-10-2005, 14:46
Look I understand the whole "political patronage" thing. I disagree with it, but I can *understand* it at least. The original idea being, of course, that you try to advance your views by appointing people you share ideas with.

However, I would hope that if you're giving someone a job that besides the political convenience these people are also actually more or less competent. Political patronage backfires completely when "competence" isn't a factor at all any more and people can just essentially buy a political office. We actually had the whole "buying offices" practice here in the 17th and 18th centuries but got rid of it when Napoleon invaded.

I really don't understand why Americans are putting up with their President appointing this row of essentially incompetent people just because he likes them or they give him money. Not just this case, but others too. I mean, even Republicans ought to dislike that!

Maybe this guy also applied on http://www.cronyjobs.com/ :(
Knootian East Indies
27-10-2005, 14:48
well really, if you click on a pop up you get what you deserve but that aside it goes to show that at least Bush is consistent with his crony... i mean policies

I agree that the people that allow themselves to be cheated like this aren't the smartest in the bush, but if people have to file bancrupcy because of predatory lending practices I don't think it is a case of "tough luck", nor are the sharks who do this to people particularly praiseworthy.
Myrmidonisia
27-10-2005, 15:10
Look I understand the whole "political patronage" thing. I disagree with it, but I can *understand* it at least. The original idea being, of course, that you try to advance your views by appointing people you share ideas with.

However, I would hope that if you're giving someone a job that besides the political convenience these people are also actually more or less competent. Political patronage backfires completely when "competence" isn't a factor at all any more and people can just essentially buy a political office. We actually had the whole "buying offices" practice here in the 17th and 18th centuries but got rid of it when Napoleon invaded.

I really don't understand why Americans are putting up with their President appointing this row of essentially incompetent people just because he likes them or they give him money. Not just this case, but others too. I mean, even Republicans ought to dislike that!

Maybe this guy also applied on http://www.cronyjobs.com/ :(

I'm sure the reason is that a lot of these appointments are to places that are obscure enough that they don't demand much attention. What does the Netherlands do for the U.S. besides grow tulips? Okay, that was facetious. But the root of the answer is that elections have consequences. In a represenative government, one of those consequences is that the elected gets to make his own decisions.

When there is a bad appointment to a visible position like the Supreme Court, public opinion does come into play. And can have an effect, right?
Knootian East Indies
27-10-2005, 15:21
We were the first country to recognise your flags and salute your ships at sea, and have been longstanding allies on almost every issue. We are also the fourth-largest direct foreign investor in the United States. The following is taken from the website of your U.S. State Department.


U.S. RELATIONS
The U.S. partnership with the Netherlands is one of its oldest continuous relationships and dates back to the American Revolution. The excellent bilateral relations are based on close historical and cultural ties as well as a common dedication to individual freedom and human rights. The Netherlands shares with the United States a liberal economic outlook and is firmly committed to free trade. The United States attaches great value to its strong economic and commercial ties with the Dutch. The Netherlands is the fourth-largest direct foreign investor in the United States, and the United States is the largest direct foreign investor in the Netherlands.

The United States and the Netherlands often have similar positions on issues and work together both bilaterally and multilaterally in such institutions as the United Nations and NATO. The Dutch have worked with the United States at the WTO, in the OECD, as well as within the EU to advance the shared U.S. goal of a more open, honest, and market-led global economy. The Dutch, like the United States, supported the recent accession of 10 new members to the EU.

The United States and the Netherlands joined NATO as charter members in 1949. The Dutch fought alongside the United States in the Korean War and the first Gulf War and have been active in global peacekeeping efforts in the former Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and Iraq. The Netherlands played a leading role in the 1999 Kosovo air campaign. They currently are contributing to EU peacekeeping forces in Bosnia. They have been active participants in the International Security Assistance Force and Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan. In the initial phase of the recent Iraq conflict, the Dutch deployed Patriot missiles to protect NATO ally Turkey, and sent a battalion of troops to Iraq to participate in stabilization operations. The Dutch also support and participate in NATO and EU training efforts in Iraq.

We don't just grow flowers for you. With all the shit we pulled for the US in foreign policy we deserve an ambassador who isn't a shithead.
Myrmidonisia
27-10-2005, 15:25
We don't just grow flowers for you. With all the shit we pulled for the US in foreign policy we deserve an ambassador who isn't a shithead.
Alleged shithead ... Remember, he hasn't been indicted, tried, or convicted.
Knootian East Indies
27-10-2005, 15:29
No... he settles with thousands of complaining people for millions of dollars. Really, there is little "alledged" about it.
The Lone Alliance
27-10-2005, 15:56
I think since Bush knows that we're stuck with him 3 more years and the current system of Checks and Balances are off, he's seeing how far he can get away with screwing up the Government and this Nation's Morale and Morals.

The Netherlands deserve better.
Amoebistan
27-10-2005, 16:01
We don't just grow flowers for you. With all the shit we pulled for the US in foreign policy we deserve an ambassador who isn't a shithead.
QFE.

Besides, no ambassadorial position should be manned by a shithead, regardless of the relationship between the host country and the one with the embassy there. It's incredibly bad tactics, politically speaking. Your ambassador to Country X is your main representative there. If he's a shithead, you're telling everyone there that everyone in your country is a shithead.

Now, that may be just the thing you're trying to do - I'm not sure what Mr Bush is up to, except helping make this country look bad and himself look worse.
Muravyets
27-10-2005, 19:43
QFE.

Besides, no ambassadorial position should be manned by a shithead, regardless of the relationship between the host country and the one with the embassy there. It's incredibly bad tactics, politically speaking. Your ambassador to Country X is your main representative there. If he's a shithead, you're telling everyone there that everyone in your country is a shithead.

Now, that may be just the thing you're trying to do - I'm not sure what Mr Bush is up to, except helping make this country look bad and himself look worse.
Well....yes.
Muravyets
27-10-2005, 19:46
Look I understand the whole "political patronage" thing. I disagree with it, but I can *understand* it at least. The original idea being, of course, that you try to advance your views by appointing people you share ideas with.

However, I would hope that if you're giving someone a job that besides the political convenience these people are also actually more or less competent. Political patronage backfires completely when "competence" isn't a factor at all any more and people can just essentially buy a political office. We actually had the whole "buying offices" practice here in the 17th and 18th centuries but got rid of it when Napoleon invaded.

I really don't understand why Americans are putting up with their President appointing this row of essentially incompetent people just because he likes them or they give him money. Not just this case, but others too. I mean, even Republicans ought to dislike that!

Maybe this guy also applied on http://www.cronyjobs.com/ :(
You just don't get it, do you? Obviously, if our leader and our entire government is a bunch of incompetent crooks, that lowers the bar for everyone, making it that much easier to coast on into the American Dream (cue music/salute!) without any effort or talent whatsoever.

The President's right to fuck up is everyone's right to fuck up.
Knootian East Indies
27-10-2005, 20:01
You just don't get it, do you? Obviously, if our leader and our entire government is a bunch of incompetent crooks, that lowers the bar for everyone, making it that much easier to coast on into the American Dream (cue music/salute!) without any effort or talent whatsoever.

The President's right to fuck up is everyone's right to fuck up.

Well... you do have to give a lot of money to the President. So its not availiable to everyone, per se. ;)
Muravyets
27-10-2005, 21:51
Well... you do have to give a lot of money to the President. So its not availiable to everyone, per se. ;)
Ah, but there's the rub, ain't it, 'cause you see, the ones with the cash and the privileges have persuaded a narrow majority of the rest that, if they play along, they might get cash and privileges too some day, and they toss out little benefits and political victories to get them hooked. You know, like heroin dealers. The first taste is free.

Of all the dumbasses in my country the ones I loathe the most are the working and middle class dumbasses, often of minority races or religions, who actually think those country club bastards are going to make room at the power table for them. It's junkie thinking -- if I just keep shooting up, someday I'll get straight.
Canada6
28-10-2005, 03:55
Bush doesn't seem to be having luck with appointees lately.Or with anything else for that matter. There's not one single thing he can get right the first time. This includes his re-election...