NationStates Jolt Archive


Muslim extremists in Indonesia turn up the hate.

Drunk commies deleted
10-10-2005, 20:29
Indonesia is no stranger to Islamist violence. Christians have been harrased, villages attacked, tourists bombed, and it's apparently getting worse.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,16865601%255E2703,00.html
Swimmingpool
10-10-2005, 20:44
Muslim Youth everywhere seems to be getting more extreme.
Yeru Shalayim
11-10-2005, 01:15
They are always made more bold by their victories. It does not help when they have sympathizers in the west encouraging them. They will not suffer defeat until we fight them, openly and without sparing their Mosques.
AllCoolNamesAreTaken
11-10-2005, 01:30
They are always made more bold by their victories. It does not help when they have sympathizers in the west encouraging them. They will not suffer defeat until we fight them, openly and without sparing their Mosques.

Amen, brother. I'm all for the Swordfish approach.

"Anyone who impinges on America's freedom. Terrorist states, Stanley. Someone must bring their war to them. They bomb a church, we bomb 10. They hijack a plane, we take out an airport. They execute American tourist, we tactically nuke an entire city. Our job is to make terrorism so horrific that is becomes unthinkable to attack Americans."
Keruvalia
11-10-2005, 01:38
They will not suffer defeat until we fight them, openly and without sparing their Mosques.

You bomb my Mosque and I'll bomb you. :p
Psychotic Mongooses
11-10-2005, 01:39
What...the...hell... :eek:
Posthumananity
11-10-2005, 01:40
Amen, brother. I'm all for the Swordfish approach.

"Anyone who impinges on America's freedom. Terrorist states, Stanley. Someone must bring their war to them. They bomb a church, we bomb 10. They hijack a plane, we take out an airport. They execute American tourist, we tactically nuke an entire city. Our job is to make terrorism so horrific that is becomes unthinkable to attack Americans."
You would seriously support nuking an entire city, most likely full of people who had nothing to do with the terrorists?
I suppose that would make terrorism horrific, in that it would be in and of itself horrific terrorism.
AllCoolNamesAreTaken
11-10-2005, 01:49
You would seriously support nuking an entire city, most likely full of people who had nothing to do with the terrorists?
I suppose that would make terrorism horrific, in that it would be in and of itself horrific terrorism.

No, I would not support using nukes, I was just using the quote to illustrate my point- that terrorists will not stop- unless they are forced to. As for the rest...well, I would give a polite warning first, that terrorism will no longer be tolerated. Reprisals will be harsh and decisive.
Psychotic Mongooses
11-10-2005, 01:56
No, I would not support using nukes, I was just using the quote to illustrate my point- that terrorists will not stop- unless they are forced to. As for the rest...well, I would give a polite warning first, that terrorism will no longer be tolerated. Reprisals will be harsh and decisive.
How can you hit something you can't catch?

;)
Vetalia
11-10-2005, 01:58
How can you hit something you can't catch?

Quite easy: You bomb everything and everyone. :p
B0zzy
11-10-2005, 01:59
Whom would you nuke in response to TIm Mcveigh @ Oklahoma City?
AllCoolNamesAreTaken
11-10-2005, 02:02
How can you hit something you can't catch?

;)

Just because I do not support using nukes, does not mean that I do not support a war where civilians can be killed. By definition, terrorists have declared "all out war" by attacking civilian targets. In the last "all out war", targets were no longer limited to strict military targets. Bombings of Berlin, Tokyo, etc...I agree with the rest of the quote.
-Destroying mosques that preach hate in reprisal to bombings of churches/temples, for example.
Psychotic Mongooses
11-10-2005, 02:05
Just because I do not support using nukes, does not mean that I do not support a war where civilians can be killed. By definition, terrorists have declared "all out war" by attacking civilian targets.

The population of whom? What 'people' did this? becuase they would not be representative of the entire population.
You advocate exterminating entire peoples?

Ok then.... :(
The Lone Alliance
11-10-2005, 02:07
You bomb my Mosque and I'll bomb you. :p
Aren't the other radicals in your religion already doing that anyway? It's kind of an empty threat when it's already being done.
(To make a parallel, I'm not condimning the Muslim Religion, Christan Bishops did the same thing that these Muslim Clerics are doing now, in other words, Cleric wanting a Jihad= Bishop wanting a Crusade.)

Whom would you nuke in response to TIm Mcveigh @ Oklahoma City?

No you do the 'Man on Fire' tactic, anyone who knew about it and told no one, anyone who was in on it, will be killed in horrifying ways.