George W. Bush is the worst president ever in the 21st century.
The Chinese Republics
10-10-2005, 07:45
Can anyone refute that? Don't think so.
Holy Santo
10-10-2005, 07:52
"George W. Bush is the worst president ever the 21st century."
You might want to re-read your statement.
Terrorist Cakes
10-10-2005, 07:59
The worst American president in the 21st century. No one can refute that.
Philthealbino
10-10-2005, 08:01
Sounds about right.
The Chinese Republics
10-10-2005, 08:01
"George W. Bush is the worst president ever the 21st century."
You might want to re-read your statement.
Oops, heh heh. I just copy + paste from another thread title "George W. Bush is the greatest president ever the 21st century."
My bad
The Chinese Republics
10-10-2005, 08:03
Sounds about right.Heh heh almost
George W. Bush is the worst president ever "__" the 21st century.
guess what's the missing word
oh well, the thread title is getting fixed
Svalbardania
10-10-2005, 08:04
"George W. Bush is the worst president ever the 21st century."
You might want to re-read your statement.
hehheh, this thread was dead before it started
Strobovia
10-10-2005, 08:04
Well he DID free the Iraqi people... but at what cost and for what reason? :(
Klotzenstonia
10-10-2005, 08:07
I believe you mean Wilson. He is the crap.
Dobbsworld
10-10-2005, 08:08
I believe you mean Wilson. He is the crap.
George W. Wilson? What's he president of?
Bush is the only president of the 21 century so therefore he is the best and the worst
Strobovia
10-10-2005, 08:11
Bush is the only president of the 21 century so therefore he is the best and the worst
Great point!
ROFLMAO! :D
Potato Poop
10-10-2005, 08:12
I tend to disagree, because of Bush, we still haven't found Osama :headbang:
Gymoor II The Return
10-10-2005, 08:15
Well he DID free the Iraqi people... but at what cost and for what reason? :(
Yes. Bush freed the Iraqis from organized violence and replaced it with random violence.
The Iraqi people aren't exactly free at the moment by any standards other than in name only.
Gymoor II The Return
10-10-2005, 08:16
I tend to disagree, because of Bush, we still haven't found Osama :headbang:
So, you're saying Bush ISN'T the worst BECAUSE we haven't found Osama?
Twinzoria
10-10-2005, 08:16
I tend to disagree, because of Bush, we still haven't found Osama :headbang:
You disagree that he's the worst because you haven't found Osama yet?
Greater Valia
10-10-2005, 08:17
Can anyone refute that? Don't think so.
Really? He's the only president of the 21st century.
Mariehamn
10-10-2005, 08:18
You disagree that he's the worst because you haven't found Osama yet?
Well, we actually did find Osama, but we decided to outsource the problem to "friendly" Afghan warlords and he got away in some mountains.
Or, at least thats what the Democrats say. ;)
Leonstein
10-10-2005, 08:18
He's also the most obese US President we've had in the 21st century!
Greater Valia
10-10-2005, 08:20
He's also the most obese US President we've had in the 21st century!
And the oldest, and the youngest, and the only male president, and the only caucasian president, etc. etc.
This whole thread is silly...
Gymoor II The Return
10-10-2005, 08:20
Really? He's the only president of the 21st century.
Well, TECHNICALLY, since Clinton was still President after January 1st, 2001 (not to mention that other countries have their own Presidents,) it can't accurately be said that he's the only President of the 21st Century.
Still, he is the worst...
Greater Valia
10-10-2005, 08:20
Well, TECHNICALLY, since Clinton was still President after January 1st, 2001 (not to mention that other countries have their own Presidents,) it can't accurately be said that he's the only President of the 21st Century.
Still, he is the worst...
Well, TECHNICALLY, Gore should be president. But, hey. Shit happens!
Klotzenstonia
10-10-2005, 08:22
I'm saying Wilson sucks so bad it doesn't matter what century it is.
Strobovia
10-10-2005, 08:23
Yes. Bush freed the Iraqis from organized violence and replaced it with random violence.
The Iraqi people aren't exactly free at the moment by any standards other than in name only.
I know but freedom and democracy don't flourish overnight... It takes time.
Non Aligned States
10-10-2005, 08:28
I know but freedom and democracy don't flourish overnight... It takes time.
Somehow, if by some miracle of coincidence people remember, I imagine that they'd still say that 5 years or 50 years down the line.
Gymoor II The Return
10-10-2005, 08:32
I know but freedom and democracy don't flourish overnight... It takes time.
Then you can't say he's freed them yet, can you?
Hobovillia
10-10-2005, 08:35
Really? He's the only president of the 21st century.
The only AMERICAN president of the 21st century.
Leonstein
10-10-2005, 08:36
I know but freedom and democracy don't flourish overnight... It takes time.
I reckon my lecturer decribed it best when he said that this whole Iraq business is an excellent example of a mechanistic world view.
You change a little lever here, and there and swoosh! you get freedom and democracy.
These things don't just take time - they evolve like a living organism. You can't force a child to function like an adult from the outside either, can you.
Brego Omega
10-10-2005, 08:37
What do you mean worst president in the 21st century? He's the worst anything in any century!! How :headbang: did he get :headbang: elected :headbang: AGAIN?!?!?!?! :headbang:
Hobovillia
10-10-2005, 08:39
What do you mean worst president in the 21st century? He's the worst anything in any century!! How :headbang: did he get :headbang: elected :headbang: AGAIN?!?!?!?! :headbang:
Just gotta say, half of the U.S. is a fuckin' idiot
Gymoor II The Return
10-10-2005, 08:40
The only AMERICAN president of the 21st century.
No, he's not. See above.
Strobovia
10-10-2005, 08:41
Then you can't say he's freed them yet, can you?
Ok he haven't freed them then. But he certanly helped them on the way.
Hobovillia
10-10-2005, 08:43
No, he's not. See above.
I saw that after I posted
Greater Valia
10-10-2005, 08:46
The only AMERICAN president of the 21st century.
Really? Because I thought we were talking about France.
Leonstein
10-10-2005, 08:46
Ok he haven't freed them then. But he certanly helped them on the way.
Unless civil war follows once the US declares mission accomplished and leaves.
Because they said they would start next year, and going back on that would be accepting that the terrorists have achieved their goals, right?
Plus it would make many Americans unhappy.
Strobovia
10-10-2005, 08:48
Unless civil war follows once the US declares mission accomplished and leaves.
Because they said they would start next year, and going back on that would be accepting that the terrorists have achieved their goals, right?
Plus it would make many Americans unhappy.
US bail out but UN probably stay for a while...
Leonstein
10-10-2005, 08:48
Really? Because I thought we were talking about France.
Jacques Chirac was the best President France ever had in the 21st century!
And...Osama Bin Laden was the nicest and most popular top man Al-Qaeda's ever had in the 21st century!
Oooh, I love it. :D
Hobovillia
10-10-2005, 08:49
Really? Because I thought we were talking about France.
NOT THEM AGAIN... :headbang:
Leonstein
10-10-2005, 08:50
US bail out but UN probably stay for a while...
They're not there now - do you think they could get a "take your dudes and get them blown up in urban guerilla warfare"-resolution passed?
No, this is a Yankee-Mess, and no one but them can clear it up. Except that there is a chance that not even they can.
Hobovillia
10-10-2005, 08:56
They're not there now - do you think they could get a "take your dudes and get them blown up in urban guerilla warfare"-resolution passed?
No, this is a Yankee-Mess, and no one but them can clear it up. Except that there is a chance that not even they can.
Hehehe, Yankee clean up mess? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA Don't worry, *cough*Vietnam*cough*
Leonstein
10-10-2005, 09:00
Hehehe, Yankee clean up mess? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA Don't worry, *cough*Vietnam*cough*
Hmm, I know the chances are small, but if they could somehow stabilise security for long enough without antagonising even more people for a change...maybe...
But at any rate, the UN isn't going to send troops, and so the Coalition is the only force capable of doing anything at all.
If you leave the Iraqis to it now, they'll sort it out all right, but only after a few years and a few hundred thousand people dead.
Gymoor II The Return
10-10-2005, 09:01
Ok he haven't freed them then. But he certanly helped them on the way.
It's too early to tell that either. What if the current government collapses, anarchy runs rampant and the whole place turns into a big Taliban-style theocracy mess...except funded by oil? Hell, a Shiite Theocracy could even be voted into power.
I'm not saying it will. All I'm saying is that it's too early to tell.
Hobovillia
10-10-2005, 09:03
Hmm, I know the chances are small, but if they could somehow stabilise security for long enough without antagonising even more people for a change...maybe...
But at any rate, the UN isn't going to send troops, and so the Coalition is the only force capable of doing anything at all.
If you leave the Iraqis to it now, they'll sort it out all right, but only after a few years and a few hundred thousand people dead.
Meh, we all screw up sometmes
Mjc Land
10-10-2005, 09:16
I tend to disagree, because of Bush, we still haven't found Osama :headbang:
Agreed. Bush sucks. I cringe whenever I hear someone say they like Bush... Hello?! Are you even paying attention? Osama's 9-11 attacks on America = Operation Iraqi Freedom? That doesn't even make any sense. Osama is out there laughing at us as I type this.
And then America re-elected that dumb bastard. Well... I'd like to apologize to the victims of the 9-11 attacks and the Iraqi war: I tried to vote Bush out of office so that maybe we could have a president that would actually try to capture Osama, but there are too many idiots in my country and I failed. You have my sincerest apologies.
Strobovia
10-10-2005, 09:48
They're not there now - do you think they could get a "take your dudes and get them blown up in urban guerilla warfare"-resolution passed?
No, this is a Yankee-Mess, and no one but them can clear it up. Except that there is a chance that not even they can.
They aren't even there?! Man I'm misinformed badly! Sorry!! :headbang: :headbang: :headbang:
Straughn
11-10-2005, 09:08
Well, this thread is equitable in interest to the "Bush is the best president" thread....