What are the absolute lowest and absolute highest ages you'd consider in a GF?
Serapindal
09-10-2005, 03:48
What?
Gruenberg
09-10-2005, 03:50
Plus/minus a year, I'd say. On the one hand, I can't really get that hyped about age; it wouldn't matter. On the other hand, I've never really been attracted to anyone outside a fairly narrow range of my own age.
In a BF, my age span is I would say 17-40. The 17 is a hard cut-off, while the 40 and up is negotiable, depending on the person. But, yeah, generally.
Neo Kervoskia
09-10-2005, 03:52
It would depend, is she rich?
18 to 38, 10 years either way of what my age is.
Gruenberg
09-10-2005, 03:55
In a BF, my age span is I would say 17-40. The 17 is a hard cut-off, while the 40 and up is negotiable, depending on the person. But, yeah, generally.
What's the age of consent in Sweden? I think it's still 18 here for homosexuals. (I'm not suggesting anything: just a thought your post provoked.)
Super-power
09-10-2005, 03:56
+/- 2 years probably
What's the age of consent in Sweden? I think it's still 18 here for homosexuals. (I'm not suggesting anything: just a thought your post provoked.)
15, for both sexes, and all sexualities. Anything else would be discriminatory and unconstitutional. *loves Swedish constitution*
Where is "here" by the way?
Ashmoria
09-10-2005, 03:57
45-55
but dont tell my husband.
Pepe Dominguez
09-10-2005, 03:58
I'm 21, so.. between 19 and 25 would be my limit.
Serapindal
09-10-2005, 03:59
10-40. :p
Gruenberg
09-10-2005, 04:02
Where is "here" by the way?
UK. But I'm wrong: it is 16 for both, I think. So, no matter in any case.
Ashmoria, you may well be the first NSer to make me spurt beer back through my nose. Well done, ma'am, well done.
Utopiapolis
09-10-2005, 04:04
16-39
Absolute minimum - 15. I've found that below that, females tend to become a little bit crazy and far too interested in sex. Of course, anyone who would like me at all would be crazy anyway, so I don't suppose it'd be too much of a difference.
Absolute maximum - 21. If only because of the age of a certain NS poster ;) ( :fluffle: ), as well as the fact that beyond that would be massive age differences which could cause relationship problems.
Galloism
09-10-2005, 04:06
15-25.
I'm not picky.
Monkeypimp
09-10-2005, 04:27
16-21. Possibly higher, but the thought of going out with a 22 year old just seems.... strange for some reason.
Well, so far my patern has been to date girls slightly older than myself. But I guess I am comfortable with someone any where between 17 and 21. I am 19 btw.
Mich selbst und ich
09-10-2005, 04:32
I'm 14
13-16 in a girl
I probably should have stated how old I am, but it doesn't matter. Those who know, know. The rest of you, well... figure it out! ;)
ORamaland
09-10-2005, 04:43
At 16, I was involved with a 41 y/o woman with 2 sons older than myself, and a 13 y/o daughter. I ended it not because of the age difference, but her irrationality and pushing of religion was aggravating.
Now at 17, I'm happy with my 20 y/o girlfriend. If I was single, I may aim as low as a highschool freshman (if she was physically and emotionally very well developed).
Armandian Cheese
09-10-2005, 05:16
At 16, I was involved with a 41 y/o woman with 2 sons older than myself, and a 13 y/o daughter. I ended it not because of the age difference, but her irrationality and pushing of religion was aggravating.
Now at 17, I'm happy with my 20 y/o girlfriend. If I was single, I may aim as low as a highschool freshman (if she was physically and emotionally very well developed).
Funny how a woman in an essentially pedophilic relationship would be concerned about pushing religion and morality...
New Granada
09-10-2005, 05:22
17 on the low end, above say... 22 it is mostly a function of how much money she has.
Heron-Marked Warriors
09-10-2005, 05:26
17 on the low end, above say... 22 it is mostly a function of how much money she has.
I'm 18 and I'd stretch from 15 to 30, but I wouldn't sleep with her unless she was 16 (age of consent).
Or if she was really hot.
Longhorn country
09-10-2005, 05:28
13-980. :fluffle:
13-980. :fluffle:
:fluffle:
Closed Caskets
09-10-2005, 05:31
15 at the very (and I mean very) lowest and they'd have to be pretty damn interesting 15 year old and possibly 21 at the highest (I'm 16 btw).
Osutoria-Hangarii
09-10-2005, 05:34
70-90
Tactical Grace
09-10-2005, 05:34
16-26, I'd say. I'm roughly in the middle of that range.
Erastide
09-10-2005, 05:36
13-they're dead. After all, as a GF they'd be my friend, and friendship has no age limits. :)
For a BF... 20-30ish.
Eutrusca
09-10-2005, 05:39
"What are the absolute lowest and absolute highest ages you'd consider in a GF?"
A mature 23, to a 50-year-old who has taken good care of herself. :D
at 20 myself, I would say 18-25.
Demented Hamsters
09-10-2005, 06:49
What are the absolute lowest and absolute highest ages you'd consider in a GF?
Yo mamma.
Iztatepopotla
09-10-2005, 07:09
I'm 34. It would be 22-ish to 42-ish.
AllCoolNamesAreTaken
09-10-2005, 07:19
I'm 29, so I keep myself to the 21-29 range.
I'm 19...give or take two years probably....three maybe, but that's a long shot.
The Chinese Republics
09-10-2005, 08:50
Hmm... for a GF. Lowest would be -4 my age and highest would be +1. If I go anywhere below -10 my age, I consider myself a pedophile :eek: .
The Squeaky Rat
09-10-2005, 08:51
What?
*Absolute* lowest is 16 (9 years younger), but that needs to be one very, VERY mature and special girl then - and she can forget about sex until our relationship has lasted 1 year at least.
18+ would be much looser.
Max age.. around 35 I think.
SimNewtonia
09-10-2005, 09:10
18-24. I'm currently 20. I MIGHT go down to 17, but no lower. And I like to have the person close to my age (for the purposes of understanding where the hell I'm coming from), so within a year either way is most preferable.
Swimmingpool
09-10-2005, 13:07
I am 19, so I say 17 to 21.
BackwoodsSquatches
09-10-2005, 13:10
Are we talking a relationship?
Or just sex?
Fingolfin Unleashed
09-10-2005, 13:12
The lowest for a girlfriend would be 14, and the highest would be 24. I myself am 46 years old.
The lowest for a girlfriend would be 14, and the highest would be 24. I myself am 46 years old.
o.O
Peisandros
09-10-2005, 13:14
Are we talking a relationship?
Or just sex?
Hmm good point.
I'm 15 (16 in 2 days though) so..
14-18 for a relationship.
15-35 for sex.. Nothing wrong with older women heh :fluffle:
Peisandros
09-10-2005, 13:16
The lowest for a girlfriend would be 14, and the highest would be 24. I myself am 46 years old.
Yes... That sounds perfect. 32 years younger is the youngest.. And 22 years differnce is the oldest. Or oldest youngest. Wait youngest oldest. Or... Something. Strange.
Cheese penguins
09-10-2005, 13:28
15 - 19 at the moment never go below 15 and that is just a year younger than me, so i think that figure will rise as my age does.
Pure Metal
09-10-2005, 13:30
i'm 20, so 16/17 to 24/25 i guess
i'm not exactly in a position to be picky :headbang:
Peisandros
09-10-2005, 13:34
i'm 20, so 16/17 to 24/25 i guess
i'm not exactly in a position to be picky :headbang:
Fair point. For me, I've just never really wanted to exlpore outside of my earlier given range. Nothings come up or interested that's been out of the ordinary or strange in the sense that a 51 yr old has been flirting with me or something.
Edit: It's a fair point because I understand where you're coming from. Not being mean/cruel.
Gogol Bordello
09-10-2005, 13:36
16 - 40
My girlfriend right now is 16, and I'm 19.
DrunkenDove
09-10-2005, 13:38
Half plus seven has never steered me wrong so far.
Mythotic Kelkia
09-10-2005, 13:39
13-22
Age shouldn't matter
especially not if she's rich
Gogol Bordello
09-10-2005, 14:02
Age shouldn't matter
While I believe this is true, you could take this too far. I'm 19, I certainly wouldn't have any interest in a 14 year old, for example. Same for people over 40, that's just pushing it a bit haha.
Liskeinland
09-10-2005, 14:16
Depends. Is she obedient?
Swimmingpool
09-10-2005, 15:22
Depends. Is she obedient?
ooh, a dominator!
Hobbesianland
09-10-2005, 15:27
Half plus seven has never steered me wrong so far.
Absolutely! This is a great rule of thumb for young people.
Wellllll, I'm 17 and have dated women up to the age of 38 so I'm going to have to say that 40 is my maximum. Now when it comes to girls I can't go that low because I can't stand immature and non-intellectual conversations all the damn time, so I'm going to say 16.
Baran-Duine
09-10-2005, 16:18
18-40ish
Serapindal
09-10-2005, 16:21
I'm too picky.
10-40ish.
I'm too picky.
10-40ish.
How old are you?
Eutrusca
09-10-2005, 16:37
Hmm... for a GF. Lowest would be -4 my age and highest would be +1. If I go anywhere below -10 my age, I consider myself a pedophile :eek: .
Horsecrap. Over 18 is an adult. :p
OceanDrive2
09-10-2005, 16:37
Age does not matter !
I had sex with my teacher...she was hot...best sex I ever had :D
Age does not matter !
Yes it does.
Eutrusca
09-10-2005, 16:40
Age shouldn't matter.
I agree, to a point. Over 18 is an adult, but many younger women are too immature for my tastes. And I don't much like most women close to my age, because many of them are too inhibited or haven't taken care of themselves.
OceanDrive2
09-10-2005, 16:54
Yes it does.it does to you...NOT TO ME.
it does to you...NOT TO ME.
So in that case you'd date 4 year olds all willy nilly? :p
Anglo-Saxon England
09-10-2005, 16:56
1 year older, or 2 years younger.
OceanDrive2
09-10-2005, 16:59
So in that case you'd date 4 year olds all willy nilly? :pno...and I dont think anyone would.
no...and I dont think anyone would.
AHA! Thus age DOES matter. *chalks up another one on the scoreboard* :D
OceanDrive2
09-10-2005, 17:02
AHA! Thus age DOES matter. It does to you... NOT TO ME.
Celtlund
09-10-2005, 17:03
As an oversexed senior citizen, otherwise known as an HOB I would have to say the youngest would be the leagal age, and the oldest about 65. But it is a moot issue as my wife won't let me have any of them. :eek:
OceanDrive2
09-10-2005, 17:04
As an oversexed senior citizen, otherwise known as an HOB I would have to say the youngest would be the leagal age, and the oldest about 65. But it is a moot issue as my wife won't let me have any of them. :eek:HAHAHAHA good one.
It does to you... NOT TO ME.
So you would date a 4 year old? With all seriousness, when you say age doesn't matter to you, you have to mean it or use a better description of your statement that truly reflects your feelings towards age.
So what is it. Age doesn't matter to you when you're talking about people who have experience puberty? Or age doesn't matter to you COMPLETELY?
OceanDrive2
09-10-2005, 17:09
So you would date a 4 year old? look up...I already answered. (post #68)
asking me the same question.. over and over... is not going to get you any-where...not with with me.
look up...I already answered. (post #68)
asking the same question.. over and over... is not going to get you any-where...
Then I rest my case. Age does matter to you, you just have a more broad sense of acceptance towards those who have experienced puberty. Would that statement be correct?
OceanDrive2
09-10-2005, 17:14
....when you say age doesn't matter to you, you have to mean it or use a better description of your statement that truly reflects your feelings towards age.yep....my "statement" does not carry a "love for dummies" book attached...
Usually my statements are just like that.
I don't have time to babysit. ;)
Marrakech II
09-10-2005, 17:14
Well when I was 19 I dated a 33 year old. Alot of fun and gained some valuable experience. My wife is 10 years younger than I. So thats the extremes in my life.
Eutrusca
09-10-2005, 17:16
As an oversexed senior citizen, otherwise known as an HOB I would have to say the youngest would be the leagal age, and the oldest about 65. But it is a moot issue as my wife won't let me have any of them. :eek:
ROFLMAO! Tsk! :D
OceanDrive2
09-10-2005, 17:18
Would that statement be correct?Feel free to interpret my statement anyway you want...
Its impossible your you to have a 4 years old GirlFriend or Boyfriend...
The fact you even think about that is fucking insane...
yep....my "statement" does not carry a "love for dummies" book attached...
Usually my statements are just like that.
I don't have time to babysit. ;)
These days (well nothing has really changed since ancient times) you have to be careful, I've known people who really WOULD date a 4 year old if the chance popped up. So when someone says to me they would date ANY age, that tells me they really would date ANY age.
*throws a copy of "The Dictionary For Dummies" at you open to the page pertaining to the word "all"*
"Babysit" on that page, let it marinate for a while. ;)
OceanDrive2
09-10-2005, 17:24
.... I've known people who really WOULD date a 4 year old.... ...and what did they say?
...and what did they say?
I believe the conversation went something like this...
Me: Does age matter to you?
Them: Nope, I don't care about age at all.
Me: What's the lowest you'd go?
Them: Doesn't matter, I really don't care.
Me: So you'd date a 4 year old?
Them: Yep, I don't see why not.
Me:...*looks around* yeaaaah look at the time, gotta go.
OceanDrive2
09-10-2005, 17:35
QUOTE=Kejott << "I've known people who really WOULD date a 4 year old."
QUOTE=Ocean2 << "..and what did they say?"
I believe the conversation went something like this...
...
Me:...*looks around* yeaaaah look at the time, gotta go.
...
:confused:
...
hmmm...
...
When I said "What did they say?"
I meant...what did the PSYCHIATRISTS (and the Police) say when you called them?
Because I am sure you called them...Didn't You? :mad:
QUOTE=Kejott << "I've known people who really WOULD date a 4 year old."
QUOTE=Ocean2 << "..and what did they say?"
...
:confused:
...
hmmm...
...
When I said "What did they say?"
I meant...what did the PSYCHIATRISTS (and the Police) say when you called them?
Because I am sure you called them...Didn't You? :mad:
I'm not one to meddle in other people's affairs, but if I ever did see them with a kid I'd kick their ass and drag them to the police station myself.
Taverham high
09-10-2005, 17:40
im 18 and my girlfreinds 16, thats about the way i like it. im not into older women really.
OceanDrive2
09-10-2005, 17:51
I'm not one to meddle in other people's affairs.....WTF?
We are talking about 4 years old Children here...
You should stop posting now...and call this number 800/969-NMHA
...if you are too lazy...just call the 3 digit number...
Just do it.
WTF?
We are talking about 4 years old Children here...
You should stop posting now...and call this number 800/969-NMHA
...if you are too lazy...just call the 3 digit number...
Just do it.
Fine, fine.
Allow me to clarify my earlier message. While I would accept anyone from 15-21 (or even 25), it would have to be someone of great emotional/intellectual maturity, someone who could really understand me and accept me for who I am, as well as someone who isn't materialistic, greedy, hypocritical, etc. like the rest of humanity.
Eutrusca
09-10-2005, 17:59
Allow me to clarify my earlier message. While I would accept anyone from 15-21 (or even 25), it would have to be someone of great emotional/intellectual maturity, someone who could really understand me and accept me for who I am, as well as someone who isn't materialistic, greedy, hypocritical, etc. like the rest of humanity.
You don't go out much, do you! :D
Zolworld
09-10-2005, 18:01
Well I'm 23, so it would probly be 17-24. but im not really picky.
You don't go out much, do you! :D
No, I don't. I spend most of my time inside talking to people on NS about how I ought to do something with my life. :(
But what I said there is the truth. I won't accept anyone who can't see me for what I am, or can't understand my view of the universe. (I mean, it is a plus if I find someone like that who happens to be a young, attractive female. But still.)
At 16, I was involved with a 41 y/o woman with 2 sons older than myself, and a 13 y/o daughter. I ended it not because of the age difference, but her irrationality and pushing of religion was aggravating.
Now at 17, I'm happy with my 20 y/o girlfriend. If I was single, I may aim as low as a highschool freshman (if she was physically and emotionally very well developed).
Well, please don't take this as a comment on your sophistication at 16, but any 41 year-old who dates a 16 year old probably has serious issues. Not shutting up about religion is a nice way for people who are insane to smear that insanity out over a range as large as their vocal chords can reach rather than concentrating it all up inside their skulls. Like how very large chemically-grown fruit has so much less flavor than small specimens grown organicly.
I think that if all the insanity that Pat Robertson spreads out all over the 700 Club were suddenly forced back on him (by canceling the show for example) then he'd probably trigger a nuclear reaction.
Pure Metal
09-10-2005, 18:57
Allow me to clarify my earlier message. While I would accept anyone from 15-21 (or even 25), it would have to be someone of great emotional/intellectual maturity, someone who could really understand me and accept me for who I am, as well as someone who isn't materialistic, greedy, hypocritical, etc. like the rest of humanity.
you and me both man...
(I mean, it is a plus if I find someone like that who happens to be a young, attractive female. But still.)
...and i think i might well have found someone just like that superw00t :)
(but i'm not telling ;))
Eutrusca
09-10-2005, 20:12
No, I don't. I spend most of my time inside talking to people on NS about how I ought to do something with my life. :(
But what I said there is the truth. I won't accept anyone who can't see me for what I am, or can't understand my view of the universe. (I mean, it is a plus if I find someone like that who happens to be a young, attractive female. But still.)
So you've joined the ranks of the wise and particular but lonely. I know the feeling, although I often make exceptions! :D
Bersabia
09-10-2005, 21:11
16-22 id say, im 17 i think going older or younger is kinda sick for me, im a conservative when it comes to this stuff. The lines tend to get blurred the older you get though. i mean say a 35 y/o man got married to a 21 y/o woman, it would be no big story but its like 14yrs age difference.
PaulJeekistan
09-10-2005, 21:11
28-35
Rather that's the range I won't date. I never ever have a good time with a woman my own age. Older and younger is fine. Younger women are less serious and more fun. Older women don't take me seriously. And I am not a serious person.....
Skull Islands
09-10-2005, 22:02
I'm 28, and I consider my range to be 21-31.
I prefer women who are a little younger than me, though. They tend to have less baggage.
However, Elizabeth Hurley is forty and I would gladly date her. ;)
(x/2)+6, where x represents my age
Florence Firenze
09-10-2005, 22:18
Absolute minimum - 15. I've found that below that, females tend to become a little bit crazy and far too interested in sex. Of course, anyone who would like me at all would be crazy anyway, so I don't suppose it'd be too much of a difference.
And might I enquire to where you are finding these 'sex crazed' 14 year olds? There is quite an acute disctinction between post-pubescent curiosity and nymphomania. Or do you just have a lolita complex?
Arribastan
09-10-2005, 22:31
the two criteria:
Is she breathing? Hell, is she alive?
Is she mature?
Eutrusca
09-10-2005, 22:35
(x/2)+6, where x represents my age
For me, that would be 37! :eek:
What about in the other direction? Is there a span of ages that would be acceptable?
Coliness
09-10-2005, 22:40
5 years either way
im 21
i'd say 15-21.although if she was 15 she'd have to be damn hot,and have the worlds greatest personality.
Eutrusca
09-10-2005, 22:51
5 years either way
im 21
Five years on either side of the result? Eg: 32 to 42 since my result on the equation was 37?
Mazalandia
10-10-2005, 15:56
I say Mininum Age 16 but general rule - 5 to +10
21 Here so 16-31
Maturity plays a big part
Stelleriana
10-10-2005, 16:19
It goes like this: Half your age plus seven. I didn't make this up, it comes down from antiquity. People may have other names for it.
Glitziness
10-10-2005, 16:52
Five years on either side of the result? Eg: 32 to 42 since my result on the equation was 37?
I think he was talking about himself i.e. he would date someone five years either way of his own age. I don't think he was answering your question about the equation.
Eutrusca
10-10-2005, 16:56
I think he was talking about himself i.e. he would date someone five years either way of his own age. I don't think he was answering your question about the equation.
Um ... no I wouldn't date anyone older than me, or even most women fairly close to my age. As I said earlier in this thread, most women over about 45 either are too inhibited by the way they were raised, or haven't taken very good care of themselves. Either is a "show-stopper" for me. ;)
Eutrusca
10-10-2005, 16:58
It goes like this: Half your age plus seven. I didn't make this up, it comes down from antiquity. People may have other names for it.
Horsecrap. That would mean I wouldn't be dating anyone under the age of 38, something that just isn't going to happen! ;)
The Downmarching Void
10-10-2005, 17:03
I'm 31. So 21 to 34
Glitziness
10-10-2005, 17:08
Um ... no I wouldn't date anyone older than me, or even most women fairly close to my age. As I said earlier in this thread, most women over about 45 either are too inhibited by the way they were raised, or haven't taken very good care of themselves. Either is a "show-stopper" for me. ;)
No, you replied to the equation by Billus with a question about the upper limit and when Coliness replied you assumed he was answering your question saying "five years either way" but he was talking aout himself and who he would date. I was trying to unconfuse the situation by explaining that but made it even more confused!
Confusing.... :p
SEO Kingdom
10-10-2005, 17:16
14-16 (I'm 15)
So 1 year either way I suppose
Eutrusca
10-10-2005, 17:17
No, you replied to the equation by Billus with a question about the upper limit and when Coliness replied you assumed he was answering your question saying "five years either way" but he was talking aout himself and who he would date. I was trying to unconfuse the situation by explaining that but made it even more confused!
Confusing.... :p
Uh ... yeah. What ... EVER! :D
At 22 (almost 23 in a month! haha) I would say 20-45 :)
Edit: Though I've never actually dated someone younger.....
Pythonius
10-10-2005, 17:27
At my age, +/- a year.
At 22 (almost 23 in a month! haha) I would say 20-45 :)
Edit: Though I've never actually dated someone younger.....
*pouts*
*pouts*
Awwwww, there are exceptions to every rule ;)
I remember that I broke my rules when I set them, so I've stopped bothering...