NationStates Jolt Archive

There's a debate going on in the Star Trek vs Star Wars thread about nerds as lovers. What do you think!!!!????

No, they're not better in bed than non-nerds. Why? Overall less practice.

"Jocks only think about sports... Nerds think of nothing but sex."
Revenge of the Nerds when asked if all Nerds are great in bed.

I guess nerds also do alot of solo practice... ;)

I guess nerds also do alot of solo practice... ;)

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!!!! SICK SICK!!! :sniper:

"Jocks only think about sports... Nerds think of nothing but sex."
Revenge of the Nerds when asked if all Nerds are great in bed.
heh awesome movie :cool:

not all nerds rule in bed, just trekkies ;)

There's a debate going on in the Star Trek vs Star Wars thread about nerds as lovers. What do you think!!!!????

Of course we're better. Trust us. :D

I have no idea...:confused: I wish I were a nerd :(

Well, let's wait for one of them to lose their virginity, at the moment it's pure speculation.

I don't really have enough experience to base a response on.

I've dated like 3 people seriously in my whole life. One guy was kinda nerdy (in that he could kick ass in a star trek trivia challenge/most trivia challenges/is beyond smart) and was great at the realtionship. One guy was into sports and a complete dumbass and terrible at the relationship. One guy is a nerd and sucks at the relationship for the most part.

ive slept with one non-nerd and one nerd, the nerd was better, altho there is a fair age gap between (8yrs) the two which probably counted for something, also, i think that nerds have a habit of being more creative, and god damn it they're good with their hands :D ... i dont know why that is but generally theyre more responsive and get more responses out of me, :rolleyes:

for the record alot of nerds are good looking, you just have to find them :cool:

:fluffle: I Love my Geek! http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/generic/5c89/ :fluffle:

Erm.. how, apart from those rare exceptions that prove the rule, are nerds good looking? Surely being a nerd excludes them from that? Unless your standards are ridiculously low?

You're asking this question on an internet forum. Of course nerds are better in bed--you're asking us, aren't you? :fluffle:

There's a debate going on in the Star Trek vs Star Wars thread about nerds as lovers. What do you think!!!!????
No, nerds are not better in bed. And I say this as a graduate student in Neuroscience...I am a nerd, and I know my people.

In my experience, nerds are generally on par with "average" people in bed. See, nerds are generally less likely to get sex, so they have less experience, so they don't have quite as much practice. On the other hand, nerds are less likely to get sex, so they are much happier when they DO get sex, so they are more likely to want to go out of their way to please their partner. They also tend to be fast learners.

No, nerds are not better in bed. And I say this as a graduate student in Neuroscience...I am a nerd, and I know my people.

In my experience, nerds are generally on par with "average" people in bed. See, nerds are generally less likely to get sex, so they have less experience, so they don't have quite as much practice. On the other hand, nerds are less likely to get sex, so they are much happier when they DO get sex, so they are more likely to want to go out of their way to please their partner. They also tend to be fast learners.

My girlfriend agrees with that last portion. And nerds are better with our hands. ;)

My girlfriend agrees with that last portion.

Yay for her! :)


And nerds are better with our hands. ;)
Must be all the typing...

heh awesome movie :cool:

not all nerds rule in bed, just trekkies ;)trekkies? you mean people into "Star Trek?"

the show that has them...
1) Going to 'Warp Speed' every chance they get?
2) Reluctant to use their 'Weapons'
3) When they use their 'Weapons' takes several tries to 'hit the target'
4) Would rather Talk than take Action.
5) Would impose their lifestyle (Federation Laws) over the indiviual (planets) desires.
6) would attempt to rewrite their history to cover up any Factual Mistakes
7) can't make a move without consulting more knowledgable people (Starfleet)
8) Always 'Feeling something' but never knows what it is.

then again, for Star Wars...
1) we all know the real hero isn't Luke, Ben Kenobi or Anakin... but R2D2, a short, stubby, neutered robot.
2) they like to buck and weave in their seats... (think about it... on second thought DON'T)
3) they like to handle their 'LightSabers' alot.
4) Lots of Hand waving without actually touching anything...
5) they Jump to Light Speed every chance they get
6) "Judge me by size, do you?"
7) They dive in at fulll speed.
8) They will change thier current story when their past is revealed.

No, nerds are not better in bed. And I say this as a graduate student in Neuroscience...I am a nerd, and I know my people.

In my experience, nerds are generally on par with "average" people in bed. See, nerds are generally less likely to get sex, so they have less experience, so they don't have quite as much practice. On the other hand, nerds are less likely to get sex, so they are much happier when they DO get sex, so they are more likely to want to go out of their way to please their partner. They also tend to be fast learners. :confused:
so wouldn't the facts that they tend to be fast learners, care more about their partner's enjoyment and "By Inference" are willing to experiment make them, overall, better?

or are we just counting the first time only?

then again, don't Nerds do alot of self-study also? ;)

ive slept with one non-nerd and one nerd, the nerd was better, altho there is a fair age gap between (8yrs) the two which probably counted for something, also, i think that nerds have a habit of being more creative, and god damn it they're good with their hands :D ... i dont know why that is but generally theyre more responsive and get more responses out of me, :rolleyes:

for the record alot of nerds are good looking, you just have to find them :cool:

:fluffle: I Love my Geek! http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/generic/5c89/ :fluffle:

I wish I was in Australia. :p

:confused:
so wouldn't the facts that they tend to be fast learners, care more about their partner's enjoyment and "By Inference" are willing to experiment make them, overall, better?

No, because they don't have as wide a sampling. For instance, a given nerd may have been a very nice and generous lover to the one other person he/she has been with, but we all know that each person will be different in the sack. What really works for one person may not work at all for another.


or are we just counting the first time only?

Well, I guess I would say that nerds probably have a first-time rating lower than average, but a rate of improvement that is higher than average. So it depends on how long you intend to be sleeping with your nerd.


then again, don't Nerds do alot of self-study also? ;)
I choose not to answer that question, as my answer may serve to incriminate me...

Nerds are better cause they feel they have more to prove so they try harder to please.

No, because they don't have as wide a sampling. For instance, a given nerd may have been a very nice and generous lover to the one other person he/she has been with, but we all know that each person will be different in the sack. What really works for one person may not work at all for another. *notes down to takes notes...* wait a minute... isn't that the employment catch 22... "we need someone with job experience... (so how can I get Job experience if you don't give me the job to get the experience...) :D

Well, I guess I would say that nerds probably have a first-time rating lower than average, but a rate of improvement that is higher than average. So it depends on how long you intend to be sleeping with your nerd.well, considering the movie "the 40 year old Virgin" is almost a biography of me... [not 40... yet... and yes for the rest of the title...] guess I need experience first.. :(

I choose not to answer that question, as my answer may serve to incriminate me...damn... gotta hit the library then... or wherever one goes to learn some tricks.... :D

*notes down to takes notes...* wait a minute... isn't that the employment catch 22... "we need someone with job experience... (so how can I get Job experience if you don't give me the job to get the experience...) :D

Believe me, I feel the pain of this particular catch-22. We nerds get far too little lovin'.


well, considering the movie "the 40 year old Virgin" is almost a biography of me... [not 40... yet... and yes for the rest of the title...] guess I need experience first.. :(

damn... gotta hit the library then... or wherever one goes to learn some tricks.... :D

I know this is going to sound lame, but you honestly can find some pretty good books on the subject. It's never quite as good as "first hand" experience, just like how reading never can quite substitute for a quality lab course, but the reading doesn't hurt. Just make sure you look for books written by the sex you wish to attract. Don't waste your time reading books on "How To Please Women" that were written by men, or "How To Please Men" books that were written by women. That was my mistake. It turns out that women are not pleased by all the things that men THINK please women...

Nerds...are...sexy! End of discussion!

Nothing's more attractive than an intelligent lady.

I don't know if Nerds are better in bed than non-Nerds. However, if you are looking to conduct a scientific experiment this male oversexed senior citizen is willing to rate any young, vivacious, female nerds who want to go to bed with him. Although I do have some limited experience with non-nerd female types, I could be convinced to rate some of them too. Oh, any females participating in the above scientific experiment must be willing to deal with my wife. :D :D

All theory...

*wonders if nerd equates to above average intelligence*
*doubts*

nerds tend to be intellectual.. doesn't make *us* intelligent, empathic, anything other than isolationist.

imo nerds are likely to be "better" at relationships they do form, assuming they have some level of >15yr ability to control their emotions... which, when you spend twenty minutes looking at your average forum, you can see alot of *them* don't.
What's the saying... something like "constant exposure to danger breeds contempt for it" ..overexposure to anything inures one to it...swimmng into the same person's eyes gets samey after a couple of years.

imo nerds are obsessive and isolationist enough, on average; to beable to sustain the love (empathic) for longer, keener with wit to seduce, given confidence to try.. there's no *average* to physical attractiveness, ppl decide they look like a freak and become a nerd, or they don't and become a normal person, simple. It's a decision - no real connection to the way they look :p ...and more stubborn on average.. (yes i know i'm god..) so will maintain the pretense of love for longer.

As far as sex is concerned, there isn't a guarantee of satisfaction with anyone. Mindset, effort and experience, the 3 primaries of sex ;-) nerds try harder, manipulate harder and still feel guilty afterwards :D

Oh yeh, and don't try that neuroscience malarky on meh, noobs don't use neuros.

And for what it's worth; i lub j00 bolol.

I'm a super-nerd, and my girlfriend thinks I'm the shit in bed... of course, her past two boyfriends were nerds and she says they were terrible, so I don't think the nerdiness of the individual is any basis for comparison

Nerds...are...sexy! End of discussion!

Nothing's more attractive than an intelligent lady.

Bolol, what do you knw about attractive ladies? :D

Colin, interesting experiment for you, get her to "shagaround" and see if she still says your the shitin bed...

:p

Colin, interesting experiment for you, get her to "shagaround" and see if she still says your the shitin bed...

:p

I expect she will as we're now on a 'friends with benifits' term of relations, and I've been tellin her that she only thinks I'm good because she doesn't have enough experience

There's a debate going on in the Star Trek vs Star Wars thread about nerds as lovers. What do you think!!!!????

Alright, Star Wars is capitalistic and promotes a republic. And we all know for a fact capitalist **** people harder and better than anybody else period.

Star Trek on the other hand is a communist paradise. And we all know communists are just lazy people who are emo and only end up ****ing themselves.

VERDICT: Star Wars ****s Star Trek in every one of its orfices that can support massive wangage.

Alright, Star Wars is capitalistic and promotes a republic. And we all know for a fact capitalist **** people harder and better than anybody else period.

Star Trek on the other hand is a communist paradise. And we all know communists are just lazy people who are emo and only end up ****ing themselves.

VERDICT: Star Wars ****s Star Trek in every one of its orfices that can support massive wangage.

I'm totally for Star Wars, but you can't honestly stereotype communists as lazy. Communists nowadays may be lazy, but the intent of communism was to promote the community so that everyone would work for free, to be provided for for free. It's not laziness, it's social responsibility

If you enjoy a capitalist socviety it means you enjoy hasving big privatized corporations boss you around. Freedom my ass.

Actually I want financial independence. The only way to get that is to found my own companIES, work hard to make them work, and use the monies for my independence of corporations, and help promote REAL political reform.

I could not do that or HAVE that chance with communism. I'd be subjected to equality without any achievements for my hard work. I'd be a ****ing sheep.

With the keynesian from we have, we CAN change the government. If more reformers got of their ass, organized, and learned how to work as a organization for benevolent political reform.

What does your goddamned communism offer me but **** and loads of it? I'll answer that for you. NOTHING.

With communism, we can explore ourselves without being bound by some corporate dictatorship, whether influenced from within or without. My opinion, so as not to upset some as to think it's my ultimate decision for the course of humaity (being a corporate and capitalist notion), is that humanity be explored through the individual, and shred communally, so as to combine enperience to better ourselves as a culture/race

Although I wouldmn't expect communism to be understood by a right-wing political as caltalism only encompasses selfishness and greed

With communism, we can explore ourselves without being bound by some corporate dictatorship, whether influenced from within or without. My opinion, so as not to upset some as to think it's my ultimate decision for the course of humaity (being a corporate and capitalist notion), is that humanity be explored through the individual, and shred communally, so as to combine enperience to better ourselves as a culture/race

So, you propose in short:

1. We should be regulated to nothing more than people who have no ambition to do greater things in life. My ambition to promote the re-enlightenment of American citizens should be put aside and just do what government tells me, because governments and politicans ALWAYS KNOW WHAT IS GOOD FOR US.

2. Be bound by the system. Even if you wish for something better for your community, culture, and way of life. IF THE COMMIES DON'T AGREE, YOU MUST FLEE.

So, you propose in short:

1. We should be regulated to nothing more than people who have no ambition to do greater things in life. My ambition to promote the re-enlightenment of American citizens should be put aside and just do what government tells me, because governments and politicans ALWAYS KNOW WHAT IS GOOD FOR US.

2. Be bound by the system. Even if you wish for something better for your community, culture, and way of life. IF THE COMMIES DON'T AGREE, YOU MUST FLEE.

Not at all! I feel that government is a hinderance to the community. People can have ambition, even if there's no system to back it. The community should be in power, not the majority; the individual should be allowed to share experience with everyone so that actions can be (continually) refined so as to incorporate being into a way of life, instead of doing, which is basically what capitalism is

Not at all! I feel that government is a hinderance to the community. People can have ambition, even if there's no system to back it. The community should be in power, not the majority; the individual should be allowed to share experience with everyone so that actions can be (continually) refined so as to incorporate being into a way of life, instead of doing, which is basically what capitalism is

I see so you promote:

1. The lack of an organized system to not prevent potentially never ending warring states and towns as before the Roman republic due to the WRONG kind of ambition and sides of human nature. The ability for a community to bone another and many other communities because of that communities' power.

Then we must re-analize humanity. Such hope can never exist for those who lust for power, and thus, humanity is not ready for communism. Although I feel we'll never surivie the tyrannical grip of millitarialistic capitalism that exists today.

....... Although I feel we'll never surivie the tyrannical grip of millitarialistic capitalism that exists today.

HUH???????

HUH???????

As of this moment, societies (more than just the western (American, for you arrogants who refuse to acknowledge anybody else) society) are governed by militarilly obsessed governments where power is equaed to how many people it can kill. Power should not be defined by death, but by life.

As of this moment, societies (more than just the western (American, for you arrogants who refuse to acknowledge anybody else) society) are governed by militarilly obsessed governments where power is equaed to how many people it can kill. Power should not be defined by death, but by life.


So China should be the highest Society, since they have the most people?

I like the dorky jocks. :eek: Like the literary society guys who play rugby. *Greooowl* They're the guys who are hot and don't even know it. Also, having been with one of those literature-obsessed rugby dorks... so far, so good in the sack. Way good. :fluffle:

It's that, or I just love geeks. ;)

As of this moment, societies (more than just the western (American, for you arrogants who refuse to acknowledge anybody else) society) are governed by militarilly obsessed governments where power is equaed to how many people it can kill. Power should not be defined by death, but by life.
ok well your steriotyping, iam an american and i do care about other societies.
any way i was just confused becaus you were supporting comunism and then you were talking about how a gov. distorys comunity.

ok well your steriotyping, iam an american and i do care about other societies.
any way i was just confused becaus you were supporting comunism and then you were talking about how a gov. distorys comunity.

Communism is community based, not government based. It'd be called something like governmentism if it was based on the few governing the many. And yes, I was stereotyping, and for that I apologize.

Communism is community based, not government based. It'd be called something like governmentism if it was based on the few governing the many. And yes, I was stereotyping, and for that I apologize.
appolige accepted
but comunism may theoretiaaly be baised on the comunity but it never worked- it turned into a few governing the many

And that's the problem! Too many seek power over others. Communism doesn't work unless everyone agrees to submit to a communal form, which won't happen anytime soon because there are too many people who want to hold themselves above others. The doctrine of communism 'dictates' (for lack of a better term) that power be shed from every idwea so that humanity can be uniformily equal, so that no matter the race or orientation or whatever of the individual, they are not excluded from any sort of 'power'.

And that's the problem! Too many seek power over others. Communism doesn't work unless everyone agrees to submit to a communal form, which won't happen anytime soon because there are too many people who want to hold themselves above others. The doctrine of communism 'dictates' (for lack of a better term) that power be shed from every idwea so that humanity can be uniformily equal, so that no matter the race or orientation or whatever of the individual, they are not excluded from any sort of 'power'.

but you see that will never happen because humans and are social, we have to have a "pecking order" if one is not suplyed we create one.....

true, but I don't uderstand the 'pcking order' as it only negates equality

You'll have to forgive me, I'm a hippy

true, but I don't uderstand the 'pcking order' as it only negates equality

exacty, we are wired to have someone leading us
becaues I am a christian i belive that God meets that need, but i know that not all people would agree with me and i dont want to force them to, it needs to be their choice what they do or dont belive

You'll have to forgive me, I'm a hippy
dont worry about it..... just look at your close group of friends if you really think about it thier is most likely some one in that group that acts as a leader, they wont order you about but its who you go to for advice and when you all go aout to eat or see a movie and every one elce is indiferant makes the choice and every one elce goes along

You'll have to forgive me, I'm a hippy

Forgiveness? IS THE FORCE STRONG WITH YOU?

If yes, then no worries.

It's peoples beliefs, I believe, that seperate us the most. But no one has any power to take that away from anyone! Christian, Muslim, Jew, Hindi, aethiest: we are all entitled to our beliefs, which communism would hope to supplant. As such, I have avoided communism as a system, but focused on the community as a whole to better my understanding of sociality, which has always seemed odd to me as I've been an outsider for the majority of my life.

Nerdy guys usually treat their partners better than jock types. Never trust a guy that looks at himself more than at you.

Nerdy guys usually treat their partners better than jock types. Never trust a guy that looks at himself more than at you.

hahaha, too true! Too true!

Nerdy guys usually treat their partners better than jock types. Never trust a guy that looks at himself more than at you.
it scares me when that happens, its unnatural lololol
they need little signs that flash ego alerton their forheads

You know, this is quite probably the weirdest thread topic I have ever come across...

And a topic about nerds delves into the various idelogies of fictional universes.

Typical.. :rolleyes: