NationStates Jolt Archive


Bananas face extinction claim scientists!

Dougal McKilty
23-09-2005, 03:08
That's right, a killer fungus is threatening to wipe out banana production as we know it, potentially leading to a bananaless future!!!!

Yes, we have no banana's (http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/5a4d4c3ee4d05010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html)

But in 1992, a new strain of the fungus—one that can affect the Cavendish type of banana we all eat]—was discovered in Asia. Since then, Panama disease Race 4 has wiped out plantations in Indonesia, Malaysia, Australia and Taiwan, and it is now spreading through much of Southeast Asia. It has yet to hit Africa or Latin America, but most experts agree that it is coming. “Given today’s modes of travel, there’s almost no doubt that it will hit the major Cavendish crops,” says Randy Ploetz, the University of Florida plant pathologist who identified the first Sumatran samples of the fungus.

Forget the oil shortage, this is serious.
CSW
23-09-2005, 03:12
One kind of banana. This has happened before, you know.
Dougal McKilty
23-09-2005, 03:37
Mock all you want, but when you only have those little pink things or plantains to slice on your oatmeal, don't say you weren't warned.
Thekalu
23-09-2005, 03:45
Oh my god!!! :eek:
save the bananas!
Murderous maniacs
23-09-2005, 03:48
it's ok, though it says some types of banana will die, not all of them will. you'll just have to get used to a different banana species
Dougal McKilty
23-09-2005, 03:50
Yeah, the bad tasting bananas. There is a reason why we eat the cavendish.
Murderous maniacs
23-09-2005, 03:53
Yeah, the bad tasting bananas. There is a reason why we eat the cavendish.
as i recall, there are other tasty banana types, like lady fingers (not that i eat many bananas)
Dougal McKilty
23-09-2005, 03:56
as i recall, there are other tasty banana types, like lady fingers (not that i eat many bananas)

Are those the little pink ones. 'cos I don't like them. Nor do I care for the dwarf bananas either.

Dammit, the government needs to do something.
Legless Pirates
23-09-2005, 03:58
those poor women :(
Murderous maniacs
23-09-2005, 03:58
Are those the little pink ones. 'cos I don't like them. Nor do I care for the dwarf bananas either.

Dammit, the government needs to do something.
i dunno, i think they're like the normal ones, try google, it knows all
Bonferoni
23-09-2005, 04:07
I'm going to miss my potassium containing mushy friends
Kroisistan
23-09-2005, 04:10
NOT THE BANANAS!!! DEAR JESUS PLEASE NO!!! :eek: :eek:

Well okay I don't eat bananas. But my roommate does. He might be pissed if all bananas were killed.
Planners
23-09-2005, 04:45
Where is the dancing banana for a thread like this? :p
Vaitupu
23-09-2005, 23:24
Where is the dancing banana for a thread like this? :p
this is the best I can do

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v670/George_ln420/raffi.gif
Eh-oh
23-09-2005, 23:36
perhaps not (http://www.snopes.com/food/warnings/bananas.asp)
Ruloah
23-09-2005, 23:41
perhaps not (http://www.snopes.com/food/warnings/bananas.asp)

Thanx Eh-oh!

Almost lost my bananas there!
Harlesburg
23-09-2005, 23:47
This is old news yet none the less disturbing.
Stupid Bananas why cant you cross polinate(Or whatever is the technical term)
Drunk commies deleted
23-09-2005, 23:49
Yuck! I hate bananas. The only good thing about bananas is this. Click here (http://users.bigpond.net.au/filmbuffs/)
Eh-oh
23-09-2005, 23:53
This is old news yet none the less disturbing.
Stupid Bananas why cant you cross polinate(Or whatever is the technical term)

copulate? procreate? stipulate? hallucinate? :p

ahh, well, even if bananas go away, they'll never truly be ggone, what with the wonderful thing that is genetic engineering :D
Mesatecala
24-09-2005, 00:00
Mock all you want, but when you only have those little pink things or plantains to slice on your oatmeal, don't say you weren't warned.

There are other types of bananas that are not effected.

Why do you post these threads? I'm serious.. your credibility is just shot.
Harlesburg
24-09-2005, 00:12
copulate? procreate? stipulate? hallucinate? :p

ahh, well, even if bananas go away, they'll never truly be ggone, what with the wonderful thing that is genetic engineering :D
Dont say such things!
GE is bad.
Eh-oh
24-09-2005, 00:16
Dont say such things!
GE is bad.

oh come now, i was only being sarcastic :p
Warrigal
24-09-2005, 00:40
Dont say such things!
GE is bad.
I hope you don't have a pet dog or cat, then. Or eat corn. Or wheat. Or beef. Or broccoli, cauliflower, cabbage, or carrots. Or need insulin.
Good Lifes
24-09-2005, 06:29
There is a serious side to this. ALL bananas are FEMALE. Somewhere in the past all the male bananas died off. Because of this bananas can't adapt. They depend wholly on humans to survive. A disease could easily kill the bananas. Their only hope would be human genetic engineering.
Dougal McKilty
24-09-2005, 06:45
There are other types of bananas that are not effected.

Why do you post these threads? I'm serious.. your credibility is just shot.

Everyone else recognizes that this is just a bit of fun, why can't you? I knew that your stupid apology thread was all lies.
Mesatecala
24-09-2005, 06:50
Everyone else recognizes that this is just a bit of fun, why can't you? I knew that your stupid apology thread was all lies.

stop being so offensive. i'm just wondering why you are so self-degrading? And my apology was never directed at you. It was directed at decent and kind people here.
Dougal McKilty
24-09-2005, 07:04
stop being so offensive. i'm just wondering why you are so self-degrading? And my apology was never directed at you. It was directed at decent and kind people here.

I don't go around accusing people I don't know very well of heavy drug use; nor do I by implication suggest that they are not kind and decent

And the only person here who is self degrading is you, with your ill-informed, and uncalled for, unpleasantries. I am sure in some sense acting this way makes you feel better about yourself, but I, for one, find your whole act risible.

(What's more, if you actually read the article I linked to, you would know that there is a problem with future banana supply to the US in general because of ripening/flavor issues.)
Mesatecala
24-09-2005, 07:05
And the only person here who is self degrading is you, with your ill-informed, and uncalled for, unpleasantries. I am sure in some sense acting this way makes you feel better about yourself, but I, for one, find your whole act risible.

No. It is actually you who is very self-degrading. And no, I'm not ill-informed (another inaccurate accusation on your part), and you are the one who is unpleasant. But I'm not going to get into thisagain.
Keruvalia
24-09-2005, 07:06
Shit ... so much for daiquiris ....
Dougal McKilty
24-09-2005, 07:12
No. It is actually you who is very self-degrading. And no, I'm not ill-informed (another inaccurate accusation on your part), and you are the one who is unpleasant. But I'm not going to get into thisagain.

Then why did you start it? Not only are you ill-informed, but also self-contradictory. Do you suffer from some form of mental impairment?

I also fail to see how I am the unpleasant one? Did I accuse you of mental impairment caused by heavy drug use? No! Did I accuse you of being unkind or indecent? No! Did I accuse you self degradation prior to your most recent personal attack? No!

I really think you need to examine your own attitude before you start to critique mine.

Edit: And see, that Keruvalia guy seems to get it. I also understand - as you probably do not - that he is not in fact beneath my mother.
BackwoodsSquatches
24-09-2005, 07:24
perhaps not (http://www.snopes.com/food/warnings/bananas.asp)


Wait, that doesnt say that the cavendish couldnt be wiped out, it just states that there are other varieties.

However, Im thinking you could hothouse grow quite a few cavendish trees, and clone many more from those.
Mesatecala
24-09-2005, 07:31
Then why did you start it? Not only are you ill-informed, but also self-contradictory. Do you suffer from some form of mental impairment?

Now you have to fall to ad hominems. That's rich. I'm not the one who is ill-informed or self contradictory.

I also fail to see how I am the unpleasant one? Did I accuse you of mental impairment caused by heavy drug use? No! Did I accuse you of being unkind or indecent? No! Did I accuse you self degradation prior to your most recent personal attack? No!

WAKE UP! YOU JUST DID YOUR OWN PERSONAL ATTACKS! IF somebody doesn't agree with your bogus sources, they must have a mental impairment.

I really think you need to examine your own attitude before you start to critique mine.

you are the one who should examine your own attitude and how you treat people around here.
Leonstein
24-09-2005, 07:40
----Is Not!!!----
----Is Too!!!----
A fight about Bananas? Isn't that beneath the both of you?

That being said:
a) The people in former East Germany didn't have Bananas...

b) I don't like Bananas!
Naturality
24-09-2005, 08:12
those poor women :(

Rofl
Dougal McKilty
24-09-2005, 08:14
Now you have to fall to ad hominems. That's rich. I'm not the one who is ill-informed or self contradictory.

I'll post what this is a response to in order to make it clear how ridiculous this is.


Then why did you start it? Not only are you ill-informed, but also self-contradictory. Do you suffer from some form of mental impairment?

Apart from the fact that you are plainly incapable of answering a direct question, it is quite obvious to anyone with a rudimentary education that this is not an argument ad hominem. At best, it could be described as a poor opinon of you. But because you are quite clearly incapable of discerning what is and is not an ad hominem, and insist upon using the term incorrectly, then your own response proves the assertation contained therein. And thus the clause "Not only are you ill informed" can be taken as more than subjective judgment: but in actuality a statment of fact.

Moreover, my statement that you are self-contradictory - as intial question poses -, references your penultimate post wherein you stated "But I'm not going to get into thisagain." Quite reasonably I posited that your position that "But I'm not going to get into thisagain" is self contradictory in light of the fact that you started this whole line of conversation in the first place.

As you fail appreciate either of these points, my final question in respect of your mental condition seems entirely appropriate. In contrast you based your accusations of my heavy drug use and lack of credibility upon precisely nothing other than desperation at your lack of sucess in countering my entirely reasonable arguments in respect of the possible veracity of stories contained in the National Enquirer. Indeed, you chose to wholesale ignore anything and everything that may have threatened your interpretation of events, and instead reponded only with sly innuendo or a childish "because I say so."

WAKE UP! YOU JUST DID YOUR OWN PERSONAL ATTACKS! IF somebody doesn't agree with your bogus sources, they must have a mental impairment.

Which was in repsonse to:

I also fail to see how I am the unpleasant one? Did I accuse you of mental impairment caused by heavy drug use? No! Did I accuse you of being unkind or indecent? No! Did I accuse you self degradation prior to your most recent personal attack? No!

Again, your thoughts lack any logical consistency. I never suggested that if someone disagrees with my "bogus" sources - amongst them slate magazine - they must be mentally impaired. I am simply asking whether or not I have in the past accused you of the very self-same things you have of which you have accused me. (Though doubtless you will deny that any of those things were said).

In fact, in your earlier disscussion with me - which you obliquely reference here - quite the opposite was true. You accused me of drug use and having no credibilty for posting those sources. You then went on to imply that nothing I said in support of my position could be true because I was taking drugs. (Which incidently, for your edification and future reference, is an argument ad hominem).


you are the one who should examine your own attitude and how you treat people around here.

Not a single time in any post you have made to me have you ever addressed or refuted a specific point that has been raised. You ignore them, and choose instead to indulge in infantile name calling. I am respectful of people, I don't belittle them, nor do I try to "score" points at their expense, which is in sharp contrast to the way you have treated me.

You have constistently posted sly and sneering accusations about my character, and repeatedly called my credibility into question. Furthermore, in a thread wholly unrelated to to our intial discussion, and which I started because of an interesting article I found as a bit of fun, - a fact which had not escaped others - you then go on to accuse me of self-degredation.

At this point, I am still holding my temper. But I warn you, if you continue with this, I shall not be accountable for the things I may say. However, if you wish to continue making a fool of yourself - a fact that did not escape other people in our previous encounter - then by all means carry on.
Naturality
24-09-2005, 08:16
There is a serious side to this. ALL bananas are FEMALE. Somewhere in the past all the male bananas died off. Because of this bananas can't adapt. They depend wholly on humans to survive. A disease could easily kill the bananas. Their only hope would be human genetic engineering.


They are all duplicates of one another. I read about this a while back. I hope we can do something about it.
Dougal McKilty
24-09-2005, 08:17
A fight about Bananas? Isn't that beneath the both of you?


Not like I started it.
Laerod
24-09-2005, 08:18
Forget the oil shortage, this is serious.I can live quite well without bananas... I hate the damn things.
Leonstein
24-09-2005, 08:26
Not like I started it.
Perhaps not, but there is no point in making that your reason not to be the one who ends it.

Now, Mesa knows that we had our fair share of unpleasantness too. I think I made it on his ignore list twice. But that doesn't mean I don't respect his ability.
In the few times when he does engage into a serious argument, he does it well. The guy is not stupid! It's just that he seems to let his emotions get the better of him a few times too many, and once that happens, he becomes completely inaccessible to anything you say, and the ridiculousness of it all doesn't seem to matter anymore.
If that happens, you just need to keep your cool, either walk away from the PC for a few minutes, or simply don't respond to any accusations that you think are unreasonable.

I'd like to think that Mesa's apology was sincere, and that he was serious when he said he'd be more balanced in the future. That isn't going to happen from one day to the next, especially if some grudges still aren't buried.
Think of it as a statement of intent, and try not to deliver reasons for him to lose it.

Sorry if I offended either of you with this, but I just think that if we follow these few lines, we'll turn this into a much more pleasant place to educate ourselves. Which is what I think these forums are.
Dougal McKilty
24-09-2005, 08:29
Perhaps not, but there is no point in making that your reason not to be the one who ends it.

Now, Mesa knows that we had our fair share of unpleasantness too. I think I made it on his ignore list twice. But that doesn't mean I don't respect his ability.
In the few times when he does engage into a serious argument, he does it well. The guy is not stupid! It's just that he seems to let his emotions get the better of him a few times too many, and once that happens, he becomes completely inaccessible to anything you say, and the ridiculousness of it all doesn't seem to matter anymore.
If that happens, you just need to keep your cool, either walk away from the PC for a few minutes, or simply don't respond to any accusations that you think are unreasonable.

I'd like to think that Mesa's apology was sincere, and that he was serious when he said he'd be more balanced in the future. That isn't going to happen from one day to the next, especially if some grudges still aren't buried.
Think of it as a statement of intent, and try not to deliver reasons for him to lose it.

Sorry if I offended either of you with this, but I just think that if we follow these few lines, we'll turn this into a much more pleasant place to educate ourselves. Which is what I think these forums are.

Fair enough, I'll put him on ignore for a few days until we both calm down. I just thought the self-degradation comment was way out of line, and totally unprovoked.

But you are right.