NationStates Jolt Archive


Katrina: Message of "brotherhood" or "racism?"

Eutrusca
16-09-2005, 22:28
NOTE: Got this in an email. No source. Your thoughts on the topic are humbly solicited.


In Katrina I Didn't See Racism, I Saw Brotherhood

by Rabbi Aryeh Spero
Posted Sep 7, 2005

In New Orleans, beginning Tuesday morning, August 30, I saw men in helicopters risking their lives to save stranded flood victims from rooftops. The rescuers were White, the stranded Black. I saw Caucasians navigating their small, private boats in violent, swirling, toxic floodwaters to find fellow citizens trapped in their houses. Those they saved were Black.

I saw Brotherhood. New York Congressman Charlie Rangel saw Racism.

Yes, there are Two Americas. One is the real America, where virtually every person I know sends money, food or clothes to those in need -- now and in other crises -- regardless of color. This America is colorblind.

The other is the America fantasized and manufactured by Charlie Rangel, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, who constantly cry "racism!" even in situations where it does not exist, even when undeniable images illustrate love, compassion and concern. These three men, together with today's NAACP, want to continue the notion of Racist America. It is their Mantra, their calling card. Their power, money, and continued media appearances depend on it.

Often, people caught up in accusing others of sin neglect to undergo their own personal introspection. They begin to think they alone inhabit the moral high ground. It is high time these men peered into their own hearts at the dark chamber that causes this unceasing labeling of their fellow Americans as "racist." They may find in that chamber their own racism -- against Whites.

There is only one real America. Beginning Friday morning in Houston, thousands of regular citizens poured into the Astrodome offering water, food, clean clothes, personal items, baby diapers and toys, love and even their homes to the evacuees who had been bused in from New Orleans. Most of the givers were White, most of those being helped were Black. But there was Jesse Jackson, busy on TV, accusing the country of not putting Blacks -- i.e., him -- on some type of Commission he is demanding. Where was he early in the week? Not sweating with others from around the country who had scraped their last dollar to come help. With Jesse, it's always about Jesse.

After decades of hearing accusations from Jesse, Al, Charlie, the NAACP and certain elitists about how racist America is, it would have been refreshing to hear them for once give thanks to those they for years have been maligning. These self-anointed spokesmen for the Black community lead only when it comes to foisting guilt and condemnation, and not when it comes to acknowledging the good in those they have made a career in castigating.

As a Rabbi I have a message I wish to offer to my fellow members of the cloth, Reverends Jackson and Sharpton: It is time to do some soul searching. Your continued efforts to tear this country apart, even in light of the monumental goodness shown by your White brothers, is a sin.

There are no churches in the world like the American churches. And there are no better parishioners and members of churches anywhere in the world. These churches are saving the day. Their members -- infused by the special and singular teachings of our unique American Judeo-Christian understanding of the Bible -- are, at this moment, writing an historic chapter in giving, initiative, and selflessness. They are opening their homes to strangers. They are doing what government is incapable of doing.

America works because of its faith-based institutions. It always has. That is what makes it America. So next time the ACLU tries to diminish and marginalize the churches, saying there is no role for religion in American public life, that an impenetrable wall must be erected separating the citizens from their faith, cry out "Katrina."

Next time the ACLU goes to court asking that U.S. soldiers not be allowed to say Grace in the Mess Hall and that communities be forbidden from setting up a nativity scene, ask yourself: without the motivation of Goodness sourced in Faith, would people offer such sacrifice? Where else does this Brotherhood come from but the Bible which teaches "Thou Shall Love Thy Neighbor as Yourself."

I saw brotherhood on Fox News, where 24/7 reporters used their perch as a clearing-house for search-and-rescue missions and communication between the stranded and those in position to save. In contrast, the Old-line networks continued with their usual foolish, brain-numbing programming. Those who always preach "compassion" chose profit over people.

The New York Times has utterly failed America. Its columnists could have used their talents and word skills to inspire and unite a nation. Columnists such as Frank Rich and Paul Krugman, however, revealed their true colors by evading their once-in-a-lifetime chance to help and instead chose to divide, condemn, and fuel the fires and poison the waters of Louisiana. In them, I saw no Brotherhood. The newspaper always preaching "compassion" verifies Shakespeare's "They protest too much."

Similar elitists here in the northeast and on the west coast have over the years expressed their view of the South as "unsophisticated" and Texans as "cowboys." Well, the South has come through, especially Houston and other parts of Texas, whereas, as I write this on Labor Day, the limousine moralizers are lying on east and west coast beaches thinking they're doing their part by reading Times' editorials and calling George Bush "racist." How sanctimonious life becomes when proving you are not a racist depends not on living in a truly integrated neighborhood, but by simply calling others racist.

Like so often in history, facts trump platitudes. Reality reigns. Those who always preach brotherhood, thus far have acted devoid of it. Those who for decades have been accused by elitists of not having compassion are the ones living it. They are: the churches, the military, and the sons and daughters of the South.
ARF-COM and IBTL
16-09-2005, 22:35
Too true.
Stinky Head Cheese
16-09-2005, 22:39
The reports soming in from the volunteers is of Brotherhood, no the racism that Charlie Rangle finds everywhere. Ignore Rangle, and continue to volunteer time and whatever else to the people affected by the storm.
The Cat-Tribe
16-09-2005, 22:42
I'm staying out of this, but Rabbi Aryeh Spero is a well-known right-wing crank and cheerleader for the Bush Administration. He is a conservative pundit.
The Cat-Tribe
16-09-2005, 22:43
Says a well known (around here) left wing apologist.

Thank you.

But Google him yourself.
Stinky Head Cheese
16-09-2005, 22:46
I'm staying out of this, but Rabbi Aryeh Spero is a well-known right-wing crank and cheerleader for the Bush Administration. He is a conservative pundit.
Says a well known (around here) left wing apologist.
Sumamba Buwhan
16-09-2005, 22:49
wrong thread
Jacob_is_our_king
16-09-2005, 22:51
Too true.

I agree 100%
Eutrusca
17-09-2005, 00:08
I'm staying out of this, but Rabbi Aryeh Spero is a well-known right-wing crank and cheerleader for the Bush Administration. He is a conservative pundit.
Perhaps he is. I don't really know. But is what he says true?
Evil Woody Thoughts
17-09-2005, 00:15
I would like to submit an observation. Seldom have I heard of allegations of racism against concerned citizens trying to deliver relief out of their own pockets. The allegations in question seem to center on the government's slow response (especially FEMA).

I personally am neutral on the allegations of racism; however, I will say that I have the distinct impression that the government only bothered to respond at all when the public pressure for response became too great for the government to bear. The rabbi who wrote this completely missed the point.
Morvonia
17-09-2005, 00:22
i find it stupid that people say that...race had nothin to do...it was that bastard at FEMA.......it was the national hurricain center and the coast guard that did their jobs the best.but race IMO had 0% to do with it.
Eutrusca
17-09-2005, 00:23
... I have the distinct impression that the government only bothered to respond at all when the public pressure for response became too great for the government to bear.
I didn't see this, but then you and I tend to define "reality" quite differently.
Sumamba Buwhan
17-09-2005, 00:25
I would like to submit an observation. Seldom have I heard of allegations of racism against concerned citizens trying to deliver relief out of their own pockets. The allegations in question seem to center on the government's slow response (especially FEMA).

I personally am neutral on the allegations of racism; however, I will say that I have the distinct impression that the government only bothered to respond at all when the public pressure for response became too great for the government to bear. The rabbi who wrote this completely missed the point.

ditto - well said
Evil Woody Thoughts
17-09-2005, 00:30
I didn't see this, but then you and I tend to define "reality" quite differently.

I suppose I should have been more specific. The state and local governments, although not perfect, responded before the disaster, issuing an evacuation order, giving instructions to those who could not evacuate, and asking for federal assistance, for the local governments knew they would not have sufficient resources to deal with the aftermath by themselves.

Yes, Bush issued an emergency declaration before landfall; this I will concede. However, apparently he assumed that everything else was automatic, for the lack of a significant response for more than a day indicates to me that the agencies that should have been involved (mostly FEMA, possibly HS) were clearly lacking direction or leadership. Of course, it doesn't help that Bush had birthday parties (for McCain) and fundraisers to attend while Katrina made her statement.

Edit: Yes, the feds eventually came, but it took a great deal of public pressure for Bush to realize that his subordinates didn't know specifically what to do with a couple of sentences worth of an emergency declaration. There was little or no executive oversight or leadership until Bush ended his vacation.
Ravenshrike
17-09-2005, 00:39
I would like to submit an observation. Seldom have I heard of allegations of racism against concerned citizens trying to deliver relief out of their own pockets. The allegations in question seem to center on the government's slow response (especially FEMA).
Slow compared to what exactly? You've got military logistics officers noting that FEMA reacted damned quickly considering the situation down there. Of course, once they got their their hands were effectively tied because of restraints on federal authority. There are two ways that this could be solved. Option A, Bush invokes the Inssurection Act, thereby taking command of Louisiana. Option B, that silly twit Blanco gets out of the fucking way and lets the Feds do their job. As of yet, option B still hasn't happened. She is still in the command loop and any major decision has to route through her.
Evil Woody Thoughts
17-09-2005, 00:49
Slow compared to what exactly? You've got military logistics officers noting that FEMA reacted damned quickly considering the situation down there. Of course, once they got their their hands were effectively tied because of restraints on federal authority. There are two ways that this could be solved. Option A, Bush invokes the Inssurection Act, thereby taking command of Louisiana. Option B, that silly twit Blanco gets out of the fucking way and lets the Feds do their job. As of yet, option B still hasn't happened. She is still in the command loop and any major decision has to route through her.

Well, considering Bush wanted Blanco to submit to Option A before receiving federal help, no wonder Governor Blanco was so hesitant!

Oh, and you might want to take a look at this: the government could have started its response a hell of a lot earlier than it did.
Chertoff (Homeland Security chief) delayed federal response (http://www.timesleader.com/mld/timesleader/news/politics/12637130.htm)

Nonpartisan Report finds Blanco Took Necessary Steps (http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Nonpartisan_congressional_research_report_finds_Louisiana_governor_took_nece_0913.html)

The Orders that Never Came, Part 1 (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4839666)

The Orders that Never Came, Part 2 (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4839669)
Sumamba Buwhan
17-09-2005, 00:52
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4849706


FEMA Official Says Agency Heads Ignored Warnings
by Laura Sullivan


Morning Edition, September 16, 2005 ยท In the days before Hurricane Katrina hit land, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, FEMA Director Michael Brown and other top Homeland Security officials received e-mails on their blackberries warning that Katrina posed a dire threat to New Orleans and other areas. Yet one FEMA official tells NPR little was done.

Leo Bosner, an emergency management specialist at FEMA headquarters in Washington, D.C., is in charge of the unit that alerts officials of impending crises and manages the response. As early as Friday, Aug. 26, Bosner knew that Katrina could turn into a major emergency.

In daily e-mails -- known as National Situation Updates -- sent to Chertoff, Brown and others in the days before Katrina made landfall in the Gulf Coast, Bosner warned of its growing strength -- and of the particular danger the hurricane posed to New Orleans, much of which lies below sea level.

But Bosner says FEMA failed to organize the massive mobilization of National Guard troops and evacuation buses needed for a quick and effective relief response when Katrina struck. He says he and his colleagues at FEMA's D.C. headquarters were shocked by the lack of response.

"We could see all this going downhill," Bosner said, "but there was nothing we could do."

...

National Situation Updates
Read the daily briefings that Leo Bosner and his team sent to Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, FEMA Director Michael Brown and other top officials in the days before Hurricane Katrina made landfall:


Friday, Aug. 26 E-mail (http://www.fema.gov/emanagers/2005/nat082605.shtm)
Saturday, Aug. 27 E-mail (http://www.fema.gov/emanagers/2005/nat082705.shtm)
Sunday, Aug. 28 E-mail (http://www.fema.gov/emanagers/2005/nat082805.shtm)
Monday, Aug. 29 E-mail (http://www.fema.gov/emanagers/2005/nat082905.shtm)
Eutrusca
17-09-2005, 00:57
... The state and local governments, although not perfect, responded before the disaster, issuing an evacuation order, giving instructions to those who could not evacuate, and asking for federal assistance, for the local governments knew they would not have sufficient resources to deal with the aftermath by themselves....
"Not perfect???" I don't know what news services or programs you watch, but the ones I read/watch pretty generally ascribe culpability up and down the line, and especially to the New Orleans mayor for not mobilizing the buses to evacuate those who had no other way out of the city.
Ravenshrike
17-09-2005, 01:01
@ Woody

In reference to article 1, the feds weren't set up to move in until after the hurricane anyway, especially as evac. is a city and state responsibility. The Feds are there for clean-up and rebuilding only. If you think that it is than you're living in a pipe-dream. An organism as big as the federal government just can't move fast enough to do so.

In reference to article 2, see above.


In reference to article 3, you obviously don't know much about the Nat. Guard organization do you? The units in question were not designated active. If they are not active the president has NO CONTROL over them. All they needed was authorization from governor Blanco in order to cross the state border. Article 4, same thing. Those Nat guard troops were not under federal control. They were under state control. The majority of the Nat Guard currently in the state is still under Blanco's control. I want to know what happened to the city and state's evac plans. Those weren't followed at all.
Eutrusca
17-09-2005, 01:03
Well, considering Bush wanted Blanco to submit to Option A before receiving federal help, no wonder Governor Blanco was so hesitant!

Oh, and you might want to take a look at this: the government could have started its response a hell of a lot earlier than it did.
Chertoff (Homeland Security chief) delayed federal response (http://www.timesleader.com/mld/timesleader/news/politics/12637130.htm)

Nonpartisan Report finds Blanco Took Necessary Steps (http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Nonpartisan_congressional_research_report_finds_Louisiana_governor_took_nece_0913.html)

The Orders that Never Came, Part 1 (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4839666)

The Orders that Never Came, Part 2 (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4839669)
"The Raw Story?" Hmmm. When this becomes a topic on reputable news sources, then I will give it a bit more credence. Sorry.
The Cat-Tribe
17-09-2005, 01:21
Perhaps he is. I don't really know. But is what he says true?

Some random points here and there are good points, but most of this is bullshit.

What does the ACLU have to do with the issue? (Not to mention that he makes up lawsuits the ACLU hasn't filed.)

Whether or not the response to Katrina has any tinge of racism or overcomes racism, he simply assumes therefore that there is no racism in America. Funny. I've posted statistics and studies to the contrary many times.

The essay is a cheap attempt to exploit Katrina for ideological purposes. Shame on the author.
Sumamba Buwhan
17-09-2005, 02:28
Quote From My T-Shirt Hell 'Mid september Thing" -

Kanye West said that President Bush doesn't care about black people. I
think this was an incredibly insensitive statement. It was especially
hurtful to the hundreds of millions of other people the President
doesn't care about.


hehe :p
Sumamba Buwhan
17-09-2005, 02:31
It's probably more due to classism and partisanship than it is to racism.
Shingogogol
17-09-2005, 03:08
I just want to comment on the title.

Before we white folk start patting ourselves on our backs...

as we seem to do any time we bomb other people,
we also seem to look out at the rest of the world and
see a world that is full of disease, povery, and war
and use this to think of how great we are, how superior? we are.

totally ignoring
any historical or any other context.


so, with that in mind,
if we're talking NO and try to say "no racism",
you must talk about N.O. BEFORE the hurricane.
How & why did it get to be the way it is.
That is where we begin to see where racism
comes in.
And not just 2 weeks before the flood...
Evil Woody Thoughts
17-09-2005, 08:20
"The Raw Story?" Hmmm. When this becomes a topic on reputable news sources, then I will give it a bit more credence. Sorry.

So, because one of my news sources is...controversial...that's grounds to ignore the other two? :rolleyes:
Evil Woody Thoughts
17-09-2005, 08:23
"Not perfect???" I don't know what news services or programs you watch, but the ones I read/watch pretty generally ascribe culpability up and down the line, and especially to the New Orleans mayor for not mobilizing the buses to evacuate those who had no other way out of the city.

The buses WERE used to transport indigent people to the Superdome, because it was thought that they could make more trips to the Superdome than they could to Baton Rouge, as I recall...

Although I'm not sure whether they used school buses or not. They might have only used public transit buses.

Oh, and many of the drivers for those buses probably evacuated the city.
Evil Woody Thoughts
17-09-2005, 08:43
@ Woody

In reference to article 1, the feds weren't set up to move in until after the hurricane anyway, especially as evac. is a city and state responsibility. The Feds are there for clean-up and rebuilding only. If you think that it is than you're living in a pipe-dream. An organism as big as the federal government just can't move fast enough to do so.

In reference to article 2, see above.


In reference to article 3, you obviously don't know much about the Nat. Guard organization do you? The units in question were not designated active. If they are not active the president has NO CONTROL over them. All they needed was authorization from governor Blanco in order to cross the state border. Article 4, same thing. Those Nat guard troops were not under federal control. They were under state control. The majority of the Nat Guard currently in the state is still under Blanco's control. I want to know what happened to the city and state's evac plans. Those weren't followed at all.

New Orleans evacuation plan in a nutshell:

1. Mandatory evacuation for those who can leave the city on their own.
2. Those who cannot leave the city on their own are evacuated to "shelters of last resort" expected to withstand the hurricane, such as the Superdome.

This plan was largely followed, though I know they did have lots of problems evacuating hospitals.

The largest problem was that the mass shelters were vastly undersupplied and ill-equipped to handle that many people without running water and electricity. This is what I see as the local government's largest deficiency.

Although it would have been nice if the federal government would have utilized its available resources to assist in the evacuation, there is little or no precedent to do so. However, FEMA does generally attempt to get supplies into disaster areas after the fact, and as such, precedent for federal involvement in this case exists.

The problem was that the supplies didn't come for about three days, only after public pressure became great enough to force FEMA to act. For this, I hold FEMA responsible, and Bush responsible for appointing an incompetent political crony to head FEMA with almost no relevant experience.

Regarding the National Guard, much of it is deployed in Iraq. In Louisiana's case, I believe a third of it is deployed there. I thought that a state's NG had to be federalized before it could enter another state, though this assumption could be mistaken.

I recognize that in this case, no politician's hands are clean. What upsets me is the federal government's attempts to spin its way out of any accountability.

Even though Bush admitted some degree of imperfection within FEMA the other day, it was a weak, heavily qualified statement. I want accountability, dammit.