NationStates Jolt Archive


The aftermath of Hurricane Katrina

Myotisinia
14-09-2005, 18:39
I hear far too much about the "poor disadvantaged folks" in New Orleans that remained behind, looting, raping, and pillaging the businesses of New Orleans in the wake of this admittedly terrible disaster that was Hurricane Katrina. Things like, that they were justified in the acts they committed in the aftermath of that event. Nothing justifies it. Nothing.

But this may explain it. Think about it.

Unnatural Disaster: A Hurricane Exposes the Man-Made Disaster of the Welfare State
An Objectivist Review

by Robert Tracinski | The Intellectual Activist

September 2, 2005It has taken four long days for state and federal officials to figure out how to deal with the disaster in New Orleans. I can't blame them, because it has also taken me four long days to figure out what is going on there. The reason is that the events there make no sense if you think that we are confronting a natural disaster.

If this is just a natural disaster, the response for public officials is obvious: you bring in food, water, and doctors; you send transportation to evacuate refugees to temporary shelters; you send engineers to stop the flooding and rebuild the city's infrastructure. For journalists, natural disasters also have a familiar pattern: the heroism of ordinary people pulling together to survive; the hard work and dedication of doctors, nurses, and rescue workers; the steps being taken to clean up and rebuild.

Public officials did not expect that the first thing they would have to do is to send thousands of armed troops in armored vehicle, as if they are suppressing an enemy insurgency. And journalists--myself included--did not expect that the story would not be about rain, wind, and flooding, but about rape, murder, and looting.

But this is not a natural disaster. It is a man-made disaster.

The man-made disaster is not an inadequate or incompetent response by federal relief agencies, and it was not directly caused by Hurricane Katrina. This is where just about every newspaper and television channel has gotten the story wrong.

The man-made disaster we are now witnessing in New Orleans did not happen over the past four days. It happened over the past four decades. Hurricane Katrina merely exposed it to public view.

The man-made disaster is the welfare state.

For the past few days, I have found the news from New Orleans to be confusing. People were not behaving as you would expect them to behave in an emergency--indeed, they were not behaving as they have behaved in other emergencies. That is what has shocked so many people: they have been saying that this is not what we expect from America. In fact, it is not even what we expect from a Third World country.

When confronted with a disaster, people usually rise to the occasion. They work together to rescue people in danger, and they spontaneously organize to keep order and solve problems. This is especially true in America. We are an enterprising people, used to relying on our own initiative rather than waiting around for the government to take care of us. I have seen this a hundred times, in small examples (a small town whose main traffic light had gone out, causing ordinary citizens to get out of their cars and serve as impromptu traffic cops, directing cars through the intersection) and large ones (the spontaneous response of New Yorkers to September 11).

So what explains the chaos in New Orleans?

To give you an idea of the magnitude of what is going on, here is a description from a Washington Times story:

"Storm victims are raped and beaten; fights erupt with flying fists, knives and guns; fires are breaking out; corpses litter the streets; and police and rescue helicopters are repeatedly fired on.

"The plea from Mayor C. Ray Nagin came even as National Guardsmen poured in to restore order and stop the looting, carjackings and gunfire....

"Last night, Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco said 300 Iraq-hardened Arkansas National Guard members were inside New Orleans with shoot-to-kill orders.

"'These troops are...under my orders to restore order in the streets,' she said. 'They have M-16s, and they are locked and loaded. These troops know how to shoot and kill and they are more than willing to do so if necessary and I expect they will.' "

The reference to Iraq is eerie. The photo that accompanies this article shows National Guard troops, with rifles and armored vests, riding on an armored vehicle through trash-strewn streets lined by a rabble of squalid, listless people, one of whom appears to be yelling at them. It looks exactly like a scene from Sadr City in Baghdad.

What explains bands of thugs using a natural disaster as an excuse for an orgy of looting, armed robbery, and rape? What causes unruly mobs to storm the very buses that have arrived to evacuate them, causing the drivers to drive away, frightened for their lives? What causes people to attack the doctors trying to treat patients at the Super Dome?

Why are people responding to natural destruction by causing further destruction? Why are they attacking the people who are trying to help them?

My wife, Sherri, figured it out first, and she figured it out on a sense-of-life level. While watching the coverage last night on Fox News Channel, she told me that she was getting a familiar feeling. She studied architecture at the Illinois Institute of Chicago, which is located in the South Side of Chicago just blocks away from the Robert Taylor Homes, one of the largest high-rise public housing projects in America. "The projects," as they were known, were infamous for uncontrollable crime and irremediable squalor. (They have since, mercifully, been demolished.)

What Sherri was getting from last night's television coverage was a whiff of the sense of life of "the projects." Then the "crawl"--the informational phrases flashed at the bottom of the screen on most news channels--gave some vital statistics to confirm this sense: 75% of the residents of New Orleans had already evacuated before the hurricane, and of the 300,000 or so who remained, a large number were from the city's public housing projects. Jack Wakeland then gave me an additional, crucial fact: early reports from CNN and Fox indicated that the city had no plan for evacuating all of the prisoners in the city's jails--so they just let many of them loose. There is no doubt a significant overlap between these two populations--that is, a large number of people in the jails used to live in the housing projects, and vice versa.

There were many decent, innocent people trapped in New Orleans when the deluge hit--but they were trapped alongside large numbers of people from two groups: criminals--and wards of the welfare state, people selected, over decades, for their lack of initiative and self-induced helplessness. The welfare wards were a mass of sheep--on whom the incompetent administration of New Orleans unleashed a pack of wolves.

All of this is related, incidentally, to the apparent incompetence of the city government, which failed to plan for a total evacuation of the city, despite the knowledge that this might be necessary. But in a city corrupted by the welfare state, the job of city officials is to ensure the flow of handouts to welfare recipients and patronage to political supporters--not to ensure a lawful, orderly evacuation in case of emergency.

No one has really reported this story, as far as I can tell. In fact, some are already actively distorting it, blaming President Bush, for example, for failing to personally ensure that the Mayor of New Orleans had drafted an adequate evacuation plan. The worst example is an execrable piece from the Toronto Globe and Mail, by a supercilious Canadian who blames the chaos on American "individualism." But the truth is precisely the opposite: the chaos was caused by a system that was the exact opposite of individualism.

What Hurricane Katrina exposed was the psychological consequences of the welfare state. What we consider "normal" behavior in an emergency is behavior that is normal for people who have values and take the responsibility to pursue and protect them. People with values respond to a disaster by fighting against it and doing whatever it takes to overcome the difficulties they face. They don't sit around and complain that the government hasn't taken care of them. They don't use the chaos of a disaster as an opportunity to prey on their fellow men.

But what about criminals and welfare parasites? Do they worry about saving their houses and property? They don't, because they don't own anything. Do they worry about what is going to happen to their businesses or how they are going to make a living? They never worried about those things before. Do they worry about crime and looting? But living off of stolen wealth is a way of life for them.

The welfare state--and the brutish, uncivilized mentality it sustains and encourages--is the man-made disaster that explains the moral ugliness that has swamped New Orleans. And that is the story that no one is reporting.

Source: TIA Daily -- September 2, 2005Copyright© 2002 The Intellectual Activist
SARAKIRASPENOWLAND
14-09-2005, 18:47
It is one thing to righteously proclaim the problem, its like looking in a mirror. suggest viable solution & pass through the looking glass. typing in front of my mirror.
Syniks
14-09-2005, 19:11
50 years ago none of this would have happened. Oh, sure, the levies might have broken and the city would have flooded, but none of the rest of it would have happened... and the cleanup would have begun immediately, spearheaded by tens of thousands of New Orleans Residents (not Red Cross Volunteers), with little to no whining about how much (or little) lucre was wending its way from Washington.

Why? IMO for the very reasons the author of the article cites. Think about it. It is the single factor that makes the population of New Orleans different today than it was 50 years ago.

Look in the Bayous: There are people living there in tin shacks - have been for decades. They want nothing from Government. Yet, I imagine that if one were to get on an airboat and dive into the Bayous, you would find that life today, a mere 2 weeks from Katrina, is probably back to near normal. Bubba helped Jaques rebuild his shack and Jaques helped bubba recover his sunken airboat & gator hides - and neither took anything from anybody... that would be accepting Charity, and the able bodied don't do that sort of thing.

The mindset that you are "owed" somthing is soul destroying and pernicious. It turns Free beings into Pets. (Stop feeding your pets sometime and see how long it takes for them to turn on you.)

When anyone begins to rely on the handout more than the instinct to strive survive, they have lost an essential part of their being.

My question is, why would anyone support a system/ideology that does that to people - one that makes people simple Pets of the Government that turn wild and dangerous when their dish is taken away?
SARAKIRASPENOWLAND
14-09-2005, 21:38
50 years ago none of this would have happened. Oh, sure, the levies might have broken and the city would have flooded, but none of the rest of it would have happened... and the cleanup would have begun immediately, spearheaded by tens of thousands of New Orleans Residents (not Red Cross Volunteers), with little to no whining about how much (or little) lucre was wending its way from Washington.

Why? IMO for the very reasons the author of the article cites. Think about it. It is the single factor that makes the population of New Orleans different today than it was 50 years ago.

Look in the Bayous: There are people living there in tin shacks - have been for decades. They want nothing from Government. Yet, I imagine that if one were to get on an airboat and dive into the Bayous, you would find that life today, a mere 2 weeks from Katrina, is probably back to near normal. Bubba helped Jaques rebuild his shack and Jaques helped bubba recover his sunken airboat & gator hides - and neither took anything from anybody... that would be accepting Charity, and the able bodied don't do that sort of thing.

The mindset that you are "owed" somthing is soul destroying and pernicious. It turns Free beings into Pets. (Stop feeding your pets sometime and see how long it takes for them to turn on you.)

When anyone begins to rely on the handout more than the instinct to strive survive, they have lost an essential part of their being.

My question is, why would anyone support a system/ideology that does that to people - one that makes people simple Pets of the Government that turn wild and dangerous when their dish is taken away?

so how do you suppose we stop this system? again stating the problem without postulating solutions is only looking in the mirror & the proverbal "pot Callin The Kettle Black! again typing while looking in my mirror.
Syniks
14-09-2005, 21:48
so how do you suppose we stop this system? again stating the problem without postulating solutions is only looking in the mirror & the proverbal "pot Callin The Kettle Black! again typing while looking in my mirror.Well, since the system/ideology of unearned handouts is variously called communitarianisim, statisim, liberalisim, socialisim, communisim and/or the Democrat Party (+ the Republican Party if you include Corporate Welfare), the solution would be Rational Libertarianisim.

But you knew that.
SARAKIRASPENOWLAND
14-09-2005, 21:54
Well, since the system/ideology of unearned handouts is variously called communitarianisim, statisim, liberalisim, socialisim, communisim and/or the Democrat Party (+ the Republican Party if you include Corporate Welfare), the solution would be Rational Libertarianisim.

But you knew that.

unfortunately there is nothing Rational in our present parties, we don't have a party for the middle of the road americans, we only have extremes, You can't be a democrat if you like guns, no & you can't be a republican if you want to see Nafta shutdown...etc. etc..
Syniks
14-09-2005, 22:03
unfortunately there is nothing Rational in our present parties, we don't have a party for the middle of the road americans, we only have extremes, You can't be a democrat if you like guns, no & you can't be a republican if you want to see Nafta shutdown...etc. etc..
The only reason the current Libertarian Party is not seen as Rational is that it is largly populated by the Drug Policy Uber Alles types.

Those of us who hold to Libertarian Principles (i.e. a Classical Liberal view) are seen as holding the worst traits of the "Dominant Parties" - which means we're probably onto somthing. :D
Syniks
14-09-2005, 22:44
What differentiates Libertarians from the other guys is that we believe in self sufficency - whether it is for Persons, Corporations or Governments. A self sufficient Federal Government "works" for its revenue by showing that it has a viable and efficient product - i.e. the few services that it and only it can provide, things like National Defense, International Treaties, and interstate commerce. Ditto for a State Government. There is no product value to a redistribution of wealth - a long term welfare handout - I (society) get(s) nothing in return for someone who eats solely out of the Government Supper Dish then gets snappy when it is late.

A majority of New Orleans' black (as well as white and Latino) residents made it out of the city before the storm hit, despite the breakdown in government communication and assistance. They did so because they didn't depend on government in the first place. Those left behind were disproportionately dependent on government because of age, infirmity or poverty -- in many instances, all three factors played a role.

New Orleans has one of the highest poverty rates in the nation. Nearly one-third of its citizens live below the poverty line. But as Michael Tanner, director of health and welfare studies at the Cato Institute, points out, the federal government has given billions of dollars to New Orleans' poor since George W. Bush took office. Tanner estimates that the Bush administration has spent some $10 billion in welfare assistance in Louisiana, including $1.2 billion in cash assistance and $3 billion in food stamps, as well as public housing, Medicaid and more than 60 other federal anti-poverty programs. But all that money did not buy self-sufficiency, the commodity that largely differentiated those who escaped the deluge from those who got stuck at the Superdome and Convention Center.

So where was government when its wards most needed it? Local and state government were nowhere to be seen, and not because, as some now claim, state and local officials, too, were victims of Hurricane Katrina. Gov. Kathleen Blanco, safely in Baton Rouge during the storm, admitted in an interview with CNN that aired this past weekend that she waited until Aug. 31 -- two days after Katrina made landfall -- to ask for federal troops in New Orleans.

I listened to one person who complained that he and his wife didn't have the money to evacuate because he only made $20,000/yr and never has more than $400 available to at one time - and that goes to rent. WTF? I make $3000 LESS per yer than he does and I have saved over $3,000 in the bank for emergencies - plus 2 (very high interest) credit cards in a lock box for extreme emergencies.

People "couldn't leave" because the city/state government didn't come pick them up. That may be a viable excuse for the old, infirm or encumbered, but not for anyone else.
Willamena
14-09-2005, 22:53
Thanks, that was an interesting article.