NationStates Jolt Archive


Men Going Extinct

Desperate Measures
08-09-2005, 03:08
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFriendly/0,,2-525-781631,00.html

To my fellow man: Avoid the tar pits!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/1431489.stm

ACK!!



we're useless....
Neo Kervoskia
08-09-2005, 03:10
Well, shit...
Colodia
08-09-2005, 03:13
WHAT'LL BECOME OF THE PORN INDUSTRY?

And who's going to fix the car?
Or fix the sink?
Or buy that expensive necklace?

Huh? HUH?

*is whispered into ear* DAMN THEY CAN LEARN?!!?!?!?
H N Fiddlebottoms VIII
08-09-2005, 03:18
WHAT'LL BECOME OF THE PORN INDUSTRY?
They've been working on a top secret plan to deal with this eventuality for years. I understand it has something to do with a top secret "Project: Lesbian" of some sort, but so far it is very secret and so hardly anyone knows about these "Lesbians" that they have been creating through a combination of genetic modification and drug testing.

Anyways, I quit reading the first story when it went into the cliched "men are tyrants, women are teh good" bit, Women are at least as malevolant as men, they just had better PR and fewer oppurtunities, and the second article is old as crap (provided that said crap was created at exactly 12:25 GMT on July 10, 2001).
So, yeah, whatever. I didn't intend to reproduce, and my spiritual successor and heir to the Throne of the World will probably be a female anyway.
Foxstenikopolis
08-09-2005, 03:19
Oh, this is bull. I don't believe this crap. :fluffle:
The Abomination
08-09-2005, 03:21
I can't help thinking, when reading the first article, that the tone it sets is one of supremely bitter and malicious expectation.

Everyone knows that men are going to go extinct. The Matriarchy has been cheerfully abusing us for 4000 years, breeding us for greater strength and often stupid dedication to the status quo. Now that manual labour is no longer as necessary as it once was and the whole breeding thing can be overcome, we were bound to fall prey to something. This is a lucky break for the gender oppressors, far easier than a highly specific plague conveniently released by some mad MALE terrorist.

It is a weary lament to lay most acts of violence and aggression squarely at the feet of men. Yet the association is strong and undeniable. Women only rarely commit violent crimes, become tyrants or start wars.

Balls, quite simply.

I would point to Catherine the Great, Mary Tudor, Boadicea, Queen Victoria and... er... Condoleeza Rice.

Of course, the Matriarchs will need men around a little bit longer. First of all, we can be blamed for environmental disaster. Secondly, we will either die by the thousands clearing up the toxic environment or die by the thousands building off world colonies. Meantime we will die by the thousands scrabbling for the few remaining natural resources trying to keep women in the style to which they've become accustomed, i.e. all those oil based cosmetics and stylish cars. Whoop de frickin doo for the dying Y chromosome.
Desperate Measures
08-09-2005, 03:24
Laughs at all the feminist plot theories. You're all weird.
Straughn
08-09-2005, 03:25
I've already posted on another thread that they resolved this "little issue" .... no need to :eek:
Maybe i'll repost but i don't think it'll be today.
It was on the chimpanzee DNA similarity (96%), methinks.
Kroisistan
08-09-2005, 03:26
Men won't go extinct. We have an astounding 125,000 years to figure this out. For crying out loud, we went from caves to computers in 1/8 that time, and tech growth has been practically exponential for some 100 years. Guys, we're fine.

And the first article is EXTREMELY sexist. I take great exception to most of the depections of men in it.
Desperate Measures
08-09-2005, 03:27
Men won't go extinct. We have an astounding 125,000 years to figure this out. For crying out loud, we went from caves to computers in 1/8 that time, and tech growth has been practically exponential for some 100 years. Guys, we're fine.

And the first article is EXTREMELY sexist. I take great exception to most of the depections of men in it.
It, uh, was written by a man.
JuNii
08-09-2005, 03:27
Laughs at all the feminist plot theories. You're all weird.
But you're not denying it... :)
Desperate Measures
08-09-2005, 03:29
But you're not denying it... :)
I would never deny it!


At least not with my girlfriend around....
The Abomination
08-09-2005, 03:31
Laughs at all the feminist plot theories. You're all weird.

Weird LIKE A FOX!!!

Btw, don't diss my dissertation. Couple thousand words more and that BA is mine! HA!
Santa Barbara
08-09-2005, 03:32
Ha. I dislike ultra-feminism but men going extinct is about as likely as eliminating terrorism by dropping bombs.
Kroisistan
08-09-2005, 03:32
It, uh, was written by a man.

Don't care. You don't have to be describing the other sex when you are sexist. Just as you can be a self-hating Jew or Black, you can be a self-hating man. I think he proves that point exquisitely.
Jiren
08-09-2005, 03:33
By the time this stuff *might* happen we'll all either be dead or have found a way to convert our bodies to pure energy methinks.
Desperate Measures
08-09-2005, 03:35
Don't care. You don't have to be describing the other sex when you are sexist. Just as you can be a self-hating Jew or Black, you can be a self-hating man. I think he proves that point exquisitely.
I think he is talking more about the y chromosone being all FUCKED UP. And you can try to say that women are more violent than men but I will punch you.
Thekalu
08-09-2005, 03:45
I can't help thinking, when reading the first article, that the tone it sets is one of supremely bitter and malicious expectation.

Everyone knows that men are going to go extinct. The Matriarchy has been cheerfully abusing us for 4000 years, breeding us for greater strength and often stupid dedication to the status quo. Now that manual labour is no longer as necessary as it once was and the whole breeding thing can be overcome, we were bound to fall prey to something. This is a lucky break for the gender oppressors, far easier than a highly specific plague conveniently released by some mad MALE terrorist.



Balls, quite simply.

I would point to Catherine the Great, Mary Tudor, Boadicea, Queen Victoria and... er... Condoleeza Rice.

Of course, the Matriarchs will need men around a little bit longer. First of all, we can be blamed for environmental disaster. Secondly, we will either die by the thousands clearing up the toxic environment or die by the thousands building off world colonies. Meantime we will die by the thousands scrabbling for the few remaining natural resources trying to keep women in the style to which they've become accustomed, i.e. all those oil based cosmetics and stylish cars. Whoop de frickin doo for the dying Y chromosome.

don't forget about elizabeth bathory
The Abomination
08-09-2005, 03:48
don't forget about elizabeth bathory

Ya know what? I think I may have.

Who the hell is Elizabeth Bathory?
H N Fiddlebottoms VIII
08-09-2005, 03:53
don't forget about elizabeth bathory
She was the one who bathed in the blood of virgins to stay young wasn't she? A real bitch, as I recall, secret torture chambers, mass executions, general nastiness. I'd say that she pretty much disproves the first articles claims about men being the more violent sex.
Pacific Northwesteria
08-09-2005, 03:54
Ha. I dislike ultra-feminism but men going extinct is about as likely as eliminating terrorism by dropping bombs.
No, they're not about as likely, because the Y chromosome is going to go away and dropping bombs is almost certainly not going to eliminate terrorism.

odds of first thing: almost 100%
odds of second thing: barely above 0%
Definitely the same chance :rolleyes:
Thekalu
08-09-2005, 03:56
Ya know what? I think I may have.

Who the hell is Elizabeth Bathory?

see h n fiddlebottoms VIII's post
Ogalalla
08-09-2005, 03:58
here is another link on the same topic, im surprised someone else didnt put it down first, go on the bar on the left to the bottom of the green section, click on xy conflict
http://www.exitmundi.nl/exitmundi.htm
its really interesting, but humorous also
Pacific Northwesteria
08-09-2005, 03:58
She was the one who bathed in the blood of virgins to stay young wasn't she? A real bitch, as I recall, secret torture chambers, mass executions, general nastiness. I'd say that she pretty much disproves the first articles claims about men being the more violent sex.
No. She proves that women can be violent. They can be very violent. They can be extremely extremely horribly violent. But most men are more violent than most women. A few examples of what I mean:

Most men are taller than most women. But some women are tall, and some men are short. Just ask a girl who has trouble finding a guy taller than her to dance with. However, it is generally accepted as a rule of thumb that "men are taller than women".

Same goes for strength. One of the secondary sex characteristics for men is a more developed musculature. And yet there are some extremely buff women, and some flabby-assed men. However, it is still a rule of thumb that "men are stronger than women".

Similarly, "men are more violent than women". See what I mean? They're not meant to be true in every possible comparison, but, rather, they're meant to be true on average.
Santa Barbara
08-09-2005, 04:00
No, they're not about as likely, because the Y chromosome is going to go away and dropping bombs is almost certainly not going to eliminate terrorism.

odds of first thing: almost 100%
odds of second thing: barely above 0%
Definitely the same chance :rolleyes:

Oh, it is going to go away. Nice to know you're so very certain! Does God talk directly to you, too? There's so much of that on online forums, I noticed. I guess if Jesus was born today, he wouldn't be a carpenter, he'd be posting smileys on a forum online.
Desperate Measures
08-09-2005, 04:00
She was the one who bathed in the blood of virgins to stay young wasn't she? A real bitch, as I recall, secret torture chambers, mass executions, general nastiness. I'd say that she pretty much disproves the first articles claims about men being the more violent sex.
At the Easter celebration in 1456, the year Vlad first achieved the throne of Wallachia, he invited the Boyar to dine with him at the palace in Tîrgoviste. These were the long-established noble families of his country, and after serving them a sumptuous meal his guards swarmed into the courtyard, the old and infirm were impaled beyond the city walls for all to see and the remainder were made to march, still in their Easter finery. The journey was some fifty miles in length, up the Arges valley to the village of Arefu, and at the end of it they found pre-prepared brick ovens, lime kilns and building materials. The boyar and their families were put to work rebuilding an extensively damaged fortress some 1200 feet above the village, creating the Castle Dracula (where, indeed, Dracula's wife would one day throw herself from the battlements in response to a Turkish invasion). At the end of the arduous task those that were still alive were impaled in front of their creation.


No, you're right. Women are more violent.
DELGRAD
08-09-2005, 04:08
Oh, this is bull. I don't believe this crap. :fluffle:

Believe it my friend.



We will eventually find a way to fix this. Hell we have 125.000 years to fix it, if we do not destroy ourselves first.
Phylum Chordata
08-09-2005, 04:16
The Y chromosome is getting smaller and it is only logical to assume that it will continue to get smaller and disappear in 125,000 years time. But I'm afraid that we'll all be dead long before that. You see, my kitten has doubled in size over the past three months and it's only logical to assume that this will continue. So in seven years time my cat will be as big as the sun and will have crushed all life on earth. One year after that it will collapse under it's own gravitational pull and become a black hole.
H N Fiddlebottoms VIII
08-09-2005, 04:21
At the Easter . . . creation.
In her 40s Elizabeth Bathory, concerned with the thought that she might some day grow older and die, started becoming more cruel and bitter than usual. At one point, however, she thought that she had hatched upon a scheme to cheat death when she struck a female servantgirl and got a spot of virgin blood on her hand. When she cleaned the blood off, she believed that she saw younger skin underneath, and then she (and several other women) started sneaking out at night to capture young girls in order to bleed them to death (a process that involved hanging them to the ceiling by their ankles and slitting their throats). She would then drink or bathe in the blood, sometimes while the still living victim looked on. In the end she was caught and killed by her own peasants, but not before killing several hundred young girls in a desperate attempt to maintain her youthful appearance.

No, you're right. Women are more violent.
Not what I said, I said that they are just as violent. Bathory was twice the monster Vlad was, after all, Vlad's actions were generally in the name of power. Bathory killed because of enjoyment and a paranoid dream of holding on to her good looks.
GMC Military Arms
08-09-2005, 04:24
The Y chromosome is getting smaller and it is only logical to assume that it will continue to get smaller and disappear in 125,000 years time. But I'm afraid that we'll all be dead long before that. You see, my kitten has doubled in size over the past three months and it's only logical to assume that this will continue. So in seven years time my cat will be as big as the sun and will have crushed all life on earth. One year after that it will collapse under it's own gravitational pull and become a black hole.

Phylum Chordata wins two [2] internets for this post.
Avertide
08-09-2005, 04:32
It, uh, was written by a man.

That doesn't negate the sexism.
Avertide
08-09-2005, 04:34
By the time this stuff *might* happen we'll all either be dead or have found a way to convert our bodies to pure energy methinks.

What is the incentive for becoming pure energy anyway?

After all energy bleeds. And disperses. And consciousness is... fragile.
Avertide
08-09-2005, 04:36
No. She proves that women can be violent. They can be very violent. They can be extremely extremely horribly violent. But most men are more violent than most women. A few examples of what I mean:

Most men are taller than most women. But some women are tall, and some men are short. Just ask a girl who has trouble finding a guy taller than her to dance with. However, it is generally accepted as a rule of thumb that "men are taller than women".

Same goes for strength. One of the secondary sex characteristics for men is a more developed musculature. And yet there are some extremely buff women, and some flabby-assed men. However, it is still a rule of thumb that "men are stronger than women".

Similarly, "men are more violent than women". See what I mean? They're not meant to be true in every possible comparison, but, rather, they're meant to be true on average.

Merely physically violent.
Avertide
08-09-2005, 04:40
Phylum Chordata wins two [2] internets for this post.

I concur.
Sdaeriji
08-09-2005, 04:41
The Y chromosome is getting smaller and it is only logical to assume that it will continue to get smaller and disappear in 125,000 years time. But I'm afraid that we'll all be dead long before that. You see, my kitten has doubled in size over the past three months and it's only logical to assume that this will continue. So in seven years time my cat will be as big as the sun and will have crushed all life on earth. One year after that it will collapse under it's own gravitational pull and become a black hole.

You win this thread. Congratulations!

(I should really make a trophy picture for all these presentations.)
Oxwana
08-09-2005, 04:46
And who's going to fix the car?I will.

Or fix the sink?I can do that too.

Or buy that expensive necklace?Hopefully we'll be done with capitalism by then.

WHAT'LL BECOME OF THE PORN INDUSTRY?Holograms. :D
Kelleda
08-09-2005, 04:54
Only they're, you know, not.

http://www.livescience.com/humanbiology/050901_ap_y_chromosome.html
Desperate Measures
08-09-2005, 05:35
In her 40s Elizabeth Bathory, concerned with the thought that she might some day grow older and die, started becoming more cruel and bitter than usual. At one point, however, she thought that she had hatched upon a scheme to cheat death when she struck a female servantgirl and got a spot of virgin blood on her hand. When she cleaned the blood off, she believed that she saw younger skin underneath, and then she (and several other women) started sneaking out at night to capture young girls in order to bleed them to death (a process that involved hanging them to the ceiling by their ankles and slitting their throats). She would then drink or bathe in the blood, sometimes while the still living victim looked on. In the end she was caught and killed by her own peasants, but not before killing several hundred young girls in a desperate attempt to maintain her youthful appearance.


Not what I said, I said that they are just as violent. Bathory was twice the monster Vlad was, after all, Vlad's actions were generally in the name of power. Bathory killed because of enjoyment and a paranoid dream of holding on to her good looks.
She's a nasty woman. Probably had too much testosterone.
Desperate Measures
08-09-2005, 05:39
Only they're, you know, not.

http://www.livescience.com/humanbiology/050901_ap_y_chromosome.html
Actually, it takes a bit more than that to fully disprove a theory. Scientists are constantly arguing. That is what makes it all good. If it's true though, I am very happy for my Great Great x 5000 Grandson.
Desperate Measures
08-09-2005, 05:47
That doesn't negate the sexism.
I don't see it.
Santa Barbara
08-09-2005, 05:48
Come to think of it, men ARE going extinct. The ones that don't die off are mutating into metrosexual girly-men! :D
Phalanix
08-09-2005, 05:54
WE'RE SCREWED!!! We ahve to ether fix this or start using cryogenic storage to store us guys and unleash us in an all woman future... I'll enevy that lucky bastard that does
Desperate Measures
08-09-2005, 06:25
Come to think of it, men ARE going extinct. The ones that don't die off are mutating into metrosexual girly-men! :D
Are you looking at my Khakied bubble butt?
Maniacal Me
08-09-2005, 10:14
The Y chromosome is getting smaller and it is only logical to assume that it will continue to get smaller and disappear in 125,000 years time. But I'm afraid that we'll all be dead long before that. You see, my kitten has doubled in size over the past three months and it's only logical to assume that this will continue. So in seven years time my cat will be as big as the sun and will have crushed all life on earth. One year after that it will collapse under it's own gravitational pull and become a black hole.
ROTFL!
:D
Irinistan
08-09-2005, 10:24
This may sound sexist, but I think the only reason women have rarely become tyrants or started wars is because men have opressed them for 4000 years. Keeping them away from positions of power, and conditioning societies to shun them, though not necessarilly in any formal way. Sooner or later, we'll get a woman tyrant. (But I doubt it'll be in the middle east.)
Laerod
08-09-2005, 10:25
Holograms. :DNot in your lifetime! :p
Archipellia
08-09-2005, 10:43
Meh. The author claims the Y chromosome has been around for at least 100 million years, and we're still at only 1-2 % infertility? At that rate, men will still be going strong by the time the sun does its Red Giant impression.

Besides, women are as evil as men, they're just more subtle.
The great nude
08-09-2005, 10:56
I've been waiting for this day for a long time. :p
St Heliers
08-09-2005, 11:16
Here's a thought, to all the other guys out there- if it was discovered that we were no longer required would we just keel over and only produce females just because men were no longer required? surely we want some variation in our species.
Laerod
08-09-2005, 11:18
Hm... has anyone bothered to point out that men aren't a "species" as the article starts out with?
Tanthan
08-09-2005, 11:30
Hm... has anyone bothered to point out that men aren't a "species" as the article starts out with?

Ya this is total bull....One if men..and predessors have been alive since before the chimp-days why is it ONLY 7%! That's over millions of years, the rate is simply NOT possible.

The true answer lies in the human elimination of the Darwin constant in the rest of nature. People survive when they clearly weren't supposed to, death is so much harder for a human then any animal, badly damaged genes and other 'genetic waste' has been artifically enhanced through our survival and reproduction of BAD genes that aren't superior to the others, thus weakening future males.

Now denying mutation or repairs (which had to have occured), has anyone ever thought of the time-line in which males need to 'fuck themselves out of existance'? Evolution-wise it is ample time to fix a weak cell or replace or evolve to a better way. Hell maybe the Y-chromosome will fix iself with natural course. If theat doesn't work....breeding or DNA changing.

By the way...it makes use of this line:

"This probably happened in the early ancestors of the mammals, perhaps 100m years ago when they were small, insignificant creatures doing their best to avoid the ruling dynasty of the time — the dinosaurs. A mutation on one of those ancestral chromosomes suddenly, and quite by chance, enabled it to switch on the pathway to male development."

That is the most RETARDED thing in the world. Its not like male and female is totally different, dinosaurs were mail and female! 100m ago is a LONG time and I doubt that to. Like some feminist bastard wrote it under a pen name.
Randomlittleisland
08-09-2005, 11:36
The loss of the Y chromosone wouldn't wipe out the male sex.

Many creatures don't have a Y chromosone, some have several, I think the duck-billed platypus has 12 (nobody's quite sure why). There are lizards who determine the sex of their eggs by burying them on different sides of a sand dune: the temperature affects the gender.

So in conclusion, we won't disappear, they'll just bury us in sand dunes.
Maniacal Me
08-09-2005, 11:39
<snip>
The true answer lies in the human elimination of the Darwin constant in the rest of nature. People survive when they clearly weren't supposed to, death is so much harder for a human then any animal, badly damaged genes and other 'genetic waste' has been artifically enhanced through our survival and reproduction of BAD genes that aren't superior to the others, thus weakening future males.
<snip>
Also recall that the military traditionally only took the most (externally) healthy men. Thus, we have actually been selecting against the healthy male. WW1 and WW2 must have had a huge impact.

I wonder if these tests have been carried out in other cultures.
Maniacal Me
08-09-2005, 11:41
The loss of the Y chromosone wouldn't wipe out the male sex.

Many creatures don't have a Y chromosone, some have several, I think the duck-billed platypus has 12 (nobody's quite sure why). There are lizards who determine the sex of their eggs by burying them on different sides of a sand dune: the temperature affects the gender.

So in conclusion, we won't disappear, they'll just bury us in sand dunes.
Or, given that we can already eliminate certain genetically inheritable conditions by selecting the egg & sperm, maybe in the next 125,000 years we'll come up with something a little bit more workable?
Runs House
08-09-2005, 11:45
Isn’t everyone forgetting that if your heterosexual you actually enjoy being with people of the opposite sex. Why would women want to get rid of men or vice versa? :confused:
The Unending Winter
08-09-2005, 11:58
Sooner or later, we'll get a woman tyrant. (But I doubt it'll be in the middle east.)

Are you forgetting Margaret Thatcher?

I like her. She has nice taste in jewellery. I just thought the time to right to mention Thatcher in this...as the ultimate blending of men and women.

Or perhaps a warning for what women will eventually turn into.
Phylum Chordata
08-09-2005, 12:00
Say what you will, I still think my cat is going to crush the planet.
Maniacal Me
08-09-2005, 12:01
Isn’t everyone forgetting that if you're heterosexual you actually enjoy being with people of the opposite sex. Why would women want to get rid of men or vice versa? :confused:
Shhh!!!!!!
Logic and reason have no place here!
Maniacal Me
08-09-2005, 12:02
Say what you will, I still think my cat is going to crush the planet.
Well, your evidence is indisputable.
Avertide
08-09-2005, 12:09
WE'RE SCREWED!!! We ahve to ether fix this or start using cryogenic storage to store us guys and unleash us in an all woman future... I'll enevy that lucky bastard that does

I'd pity the man who was shoved through space and time into such an eventuality....
Noshu
08-09-2005, 12:19
The Y chromosome is getting smaller and it is only logical to assume that it will continue to get smaller and disappear in 125,000 years time. But I'm afraid that we'll all be dead long before that. You see, my kitten has doubled in size over the past three months and it's only logical to assume that this will continue. So in seven years time my cat will be as big as the sun and will have crushed all life on earth. One year after that it will collapse under it's own gravitational pull and become a black hole.
Beautiful.
Sane Outcasts
08-09-2005, 12:38
I seriously doubt that men will let themselves dissappear, assuming that article was correct. Remember, this is a scientific community that invented a pill to cure erectile disfunction before a cure for, say, cancer or the common cold. If it's possible to use genetic science to preserve the Y chromosome, you can bet that we'll find a way to do it.
Glamorgane
08-09-2005, 13:34
Merely physically violent.

How true. How very, very true.
Randomlittleisland
08-09-2005, 14:04
I'd pity the man who was shoved through space and time into such an eventuality....

I'll take your cryochamber if you don't want it. :p
H N Fiddlebottoms VIII
08-09-2005, 14:05
Isn’t everyone forgetting that if your heterosexual you actually enjoy being with people of the opposite sex. Why would women want to get rid of men or vice versa? :confused:
But, as every man and porn exec secretly knows, all women are secretly lesbians who bust out the playthings if men haven't been around for more than 23 consecutive minutes.
Sheesh, some people are so ignorant of the facts.
Not that it matters, because Phylum Chordata's cat has got us all fucked in the long and short term anyway.
Randomlittleisland
08-09-2005, 14:05
Or, given that we can already eliminate certain genetically inheritable conditions by selecting the egg & sperm, maybe in the next 125,000 years we'll come up with something a little bit more workable?

Artificial sand dunes?
New Independents
08-09-2005, 14:27
It is a weary lament to lay most acts of violence and aggression squarely at the feet of men. Yet the association is strong and undeniable. Women only rarely commit violent crimes, become tyrants or start wars.

Whereas men do it all the time. I started 3 wars last week, and I've been a tyrant of various nations since 1993.

What?
New Independents
08-09-2005, 14:30
As I can't be arsed to read the acres of twaddle that I assume those articles are, could someone tell me about the Y chromosome getting smaller? Do they claim it is getting fewer and fewer genes in it? And the X chromosome? Is that getting bigger? Do people have fewer genes? What?
Balipo
08-09-2005, 14:36
Why are we to become extinct? Why not both men and women and have an XXY society of androgenous people?

Like Jamie Lee Curtis.
The Abomination
08-09-2005, 15:56
As I can't be arsed to read the acres of twaddle that I assume those articles are, could someone tell me about the Y chromosome getting smaller? Do they claim it is getting fewer and fewer genes in it? And the X chromosome? Is that getting bigger? Do people have fewer genes? What?

Well, something about the fact that since there is only one Y chromosome, it can't swap genes to repair damage in the manner of two X chromosomes. So it gets progressively more damaged.

The author cleverly links this in with evidence that all men are bastards. So thats alright then.

BTW - Thanks to all for the info on Elizabeth Bathory. I had heard the legend but not the name.

BTW BTW - Did I really write that post? Ye gods, remind me never to smoke sociology books again....
Muntoo
08-09-2005, 17:45
Phylum Chordata, you are my new favorite poster. ;)
Dergamoor
08-09-2005, 18:09
the first report is utter rubish. the world wont just lets man, a totally viable, and massive species go down to pan. Research will be done, the Y chromosone will be fixed. My great great etc gran children will look at girls asses and kick eachother in the face
Liskeinland
08-09-2005, 18:12
the first report is utter rubish. the world wont just lets man, a totally viable, and massive species go down to pan. Research will be done, the Y chromosone will be fixed. My great great etc gran children will look at girls asses and kick eachother in the face *takes deep breath* MAN IS NOT A SEPARATE SPECIES! Otherwise men and women wouldn't be able to breed!
H N Fiddlebottoms VIII
08-09-2005, 18:21
*takes deep breath* MAN IS NOT A SEPARATE SPECIES! Otherwise men and women wouldn't be able to breed!
Of course man is a seperate species, and he is going extinct, the Intarweb tolds me so!
Also, bigfoot is a kind of alien that can go invisible and suck the brains out of people and replace their brains with parasites that allow them to control the world, with the aid of the Jews of course.
Kjata Major
08-09-2005, 20:31
Men...won't go 'extinct' besides women need them. Genetics change to....it won't be the end of humanity or (males).
QuentinTarantino
08-09-2005, 20:34
Without men, women would live in constant fear and be ruled by small insects and spiders.
Desperate Measures
08-09-2005, 21:52
I keep reading posts that somehow link the theory of the Y chromosome to feminism theory. What the hell? The article was supposed to be of interest and/or humorous debate. If men were wiped out in this way, it would be so far into the future that dinosaurs will probably have made a come back. Please get some sense of time. And yeah. Men are more violent. OK, more physically violent. Great distinction, there. I forgot about all those massive feminine mental wars. Chances are by the time men are even in the remotest danger of being wiped out we'll be able to isolate the y chromosomes and raise them as pets.
Oxwana
08-09-2005, 22:59
*takes deep breath* MAN IS NOT A SEPARATE SPECIES! Otherwise men and women wouldn't be able to breed!Liger.
Somewhere
08-09-2005, 23:13
I don't think it will matter before long. You see so many young boys acting like complete eunuch sissies these days. Usually it comes with boys with no strong male role model in their lives, those who's minds have been poisoned by some bitter lesbian teacher or those special cases who act naturally sissified but haven't been beaten sufficiently. Either way, as society crumbles further, real men will become a dying breed.
Andaluciae
08-09-2005, 23:37
Where'd that goddamn cryo tank get off to...
Muntoo
08-09-2005, 23:44
Without men, women would live in constant fear and be ruled by small insects and spiders.

ROFLMAO!

Well, that's true for me, but only for about a week. :) Then I learn to smash them with a shoe.
Vaitupu
09-09-2005, 01:02
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050831/ap_on_sc/y_chromosome

also, even if the y does disappear, a different gene will take over sex determination. Actually, humans are one of the few that use an XY set to determine sex. In some animals, it is XY. in others, it is the number of X's, and in many birds, it is Z and W