NationStates Jolt Archive


A good case for a bigger military and more nuclear weapons for the USA

Drunk commies deleted
23-08-2005, 20:05
Pakistan, our ally in the war on terror, is teaching it's students that Jews are tight-fisted moneylenders and that Christians are vengefull conquerors and that the children should strive to be martyrs for Islam. No, this crap isn't being taught in madrassas, it's in the public schools.

With allies like this we'd better be ready to defend ourselves.

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/la-fg-schools18aug18,1,6017013,full.story?ctrack=1&cset=true
Tactical Grace
23-08-2005, 20:07
I don't trust the source...

First, because I need a subscription log-in ID to view the article, secondly because the LA Times is a bastion of the homosexual lobby.
Lagrange Wei
23-08-2005, 20:08
actually what they are teaching is the truth... :rolleyes:

your thread title prove it :D
Jordaxia
23-08-2005, 20:10
I hardly think it's a fair example.... it's not like that's the rule after all. But I have a question. What could the USA possibly do with MORE nuclear weapons? it already has enough to sterilise the world several times over... surely more are just pointless wastes of money that could be better served say.... oh, bettering the standards of living for the average person?

Besides.... it's highly likely that unless the USA escalates things, no nation will declare war on them.
Seosavists
23-08-2005, 20:14
oh, bettering the standards of living for the average person?

You un-American commie! ;)

If they want better standards thay can join the military!

your thread title prove it :D nuke them! It's what Jesus would do! :D :D
Drunk commies deleted
23-08-2005, 20:15
actually what they are teaching is the truth... :rolleyes:

your thread title prove it :D
The US is not a Christian Country! Our conquests and desire for vengance should have nothing to do with Christianity.
Daniel Metallo
23-08-2005, 20:25
The US is not a Christian Country! Our conquests and desire for vengance should have nothing to do with Christianity.

Tell that to Jerry Falwell...
Tactical Grace
23-08-2005, 20:26
Tell that to Jerry Falwell...
Oh yeah, and that Anne Coulter woman.
Frangland
23-08-2005, 20:31
The US is not a Christian Country! Our conquests and desire for vengance should have nothing to do with Christianity.

you're right. Our aim should instead be to turn the soil of the earth red, or burgundy (maybe what you get when red mixes with brown.. the color of the Washington Redskins' pants.)

hehe
Republic of Texas
23-08-2005, 20:34
If Anne Coulter was a man I'd punch her in the mouth.
Seosavists
23-08-2005, 20:45
If Anne Coulter was a man I'd punch her in the mouth.
that's kind of random?
Republic of Texas
23-08-2005, 20:47
Someone else brought her up, I merely expressed my opinion of the woman.
Frangland
23-08-2005, 20:49
If Anne Coulter was a man I'd punch her in the mouth.

she's probably a black belt in jujitsu
Sdaeriji
23-08-2005, 20:52
she's probably a black belt in jujitsu

She's probably a man.
Swimmingpool
23-08-2005, 21:03
With allies like this we'd better be ready to defend ourselves.

I agree, but you need no more nuclear warheads. Just use the ones you already have. I mean, are you really going to run out of them when you have 25,000?
Republic of Texas
23-08-2005, 21:04
It's possible, I mean, what if we wanted to blow up the moon?
Drunk commies deleted
23-08-2005, 21:05
I agree, but you need no more nuclear warheads. Just use the ones you already have. I mean, are you really going to run out of them when you have 25,000?
We need more little tactical ones that we're more likely to use.
Kragmeer
23-08-2005, 21:09
If America has more nukes, it just shows hostility. Then all other nuclear nations will build their nuclear bastion, and you have a much bigger fuckin problem, it's just stupid.
Drunk commies deleted
23-08-2005, 23:27
Bumping this thread once
Swimmingpool
23-08-2005, 23:30
We need more little tactical ones that we're more likely to use.
Why use "small" nuclear weapons when you can just use conventional explosives.
Drunk commies deleted
23-08-2005, 23:33
Why use "small" nuclear weapons when you can just use conventional explosives.
A tactical warhead worth just 10 kilotons makes a nice big boom that takes alot of conventional explosive to mimic, plus the fact that you're willing to nuke your enemies makes them think twice about being your enemies.

Or maybe I'm just a little angry.
Upitatanium
24-08-2005, 00:05
Now, now people...

It isn't "more" nukes. It's "different" nukes. :D