NationStates Jolt Archive


2004 home computer

Demented Hamsters
20-08-2005, 17:26
Thought some of you might like this old photo:
Scientists in 1954 predict what home computers will look like 50 years in the future:
http://www.funfry.com/data//873/medium/Scientists_Predict_Computers_in_2004_Funny_Picture_FunFry.jpg
For the more myopic of you, here's what it says below the photo:
Scientists from the RAND Corporation have created this model to illustrate how a "home computer" could look like in the year 2004. However the needed technology will not be economically feasible for the average home. Also the scientists admit that the computer will require not yet invented technology to actually work, but 50 years from now scientific progress is expected to solve these problems. With teletype interface and the Fortran languae, the computer will be easy to use.
I'd like to know what the hell the huge dial thingy is behind the boffin. It'd look more in place on an old sailing ship. Imagine trying to download porn on that thing.
Maybe the sailing ships wheel is how one logs onto the internet.
New Foxxinnia
20-08-2005, 17:27
It's fake just so you know.

And old.
Dragons Bay
20-08-2005, 17:36
And a steering wheel for WHAT????
Kedalfax
20-08-2005, 17:42
You've got it all wrong! that's just a steering wheel for the latest video game! "Sub Commander 2004"
Arcas
20-08-2005, 17:49
...with steam powered force feedback.
Homieville
20-08-2005, 18:11
How is it fake?
Homieville
20-08-2005, 18:14
http://tonova.typepad.com/thesuddencurve/images/1954_computer_oops_1.jpg

This has to be real
Colodia
20-08-2005, 18:41
Yep they've got the right idea. There's the steering wheel for all the racing games. And there's the giant printer where we print out posters of porn. And the giant T.V. where we rip off T.V. shows, burn them to our computer, and redestribute them all over the world!
Swilatia
20-08-2005, 18:44
I can't imagine playing NS on that thing-a-majig :p
Grampus
20-08-2005, 18:50
How is it fake?

The really bad photoshopping of the teletyper isn't clue enough?