NationStates Jolt Archive

i was watching anne "nazi :sniper: " coulter on c-span a while ago and i got to wondering how a woman could be so cold as to be "colder than a witches teet".

she seems like the type of woman that would eat her babies.

vote on whether you think her political hostility is an affront for emotional trauma, daddy didnt love me, or if she's a butch.

....also, the unamusing version of "anne coulter is okay."

If I wasn't too lazy, I would make a photo edit with Ann Coulter having a demonic shadow, or no reflection in a mirror

i love my fellow internet liberals.

ehh, I think she is just angry at what she sees as liberal's treason. if you shared her views you'd probably be just as mad

ehh, I think she is just angry at what she sees as liberal's treason. if you shared her views you'd probably be just as mad
If I shared her views, I would lay off the absinthe

she seems like the type of woman that would eat her babies.
No, no, no. You've got it all wrong. Liberals eat babies, not self-righteous conservative nutjobs like Coulter.

I almost wrote "Comrade Coulter" but I can honestly say she isn't deserving of living amongst anybody else.

your funny soviet. you had me laughing for a minute plus!

(sincere post)

Well I would have put it more coherently, with less smilies and less use of the return key...

I agree that Ann Coulter is just... not right. There are very few people I would bludgeon with a large fish, but she makes that list. She is usually beyond reason, and delights in being a bitch to people she disagrees with. No civil debator/politician/human being would act the way she does. And her novels are all various degrees of horrible.

According to Bill Maher, she's a much different person when she's coming.


Where's the pukey smiley?

She's neither butch nor nazi, she's cool. She just doesn't take liberal subversion too lightly, nor should she :D

Favorite Coulter moment: Alan Colmes telling her the fuck off. Even better than the pieing because it was (a) Colmes actually doing something and (b) Coulter actually getting told off

My personal opinion is that she got hit in the head with something large and heavy and that's why the way she is. Her arguments make little to no sence.

Failing that, I say go with the green knight's advice.

last eletion year she was at a debate in ameherst it was televised on c-span and she said this guy to tell his kids that she's sorry they have two dads.

the guy almost cried. lol, she's undeniably entertaining.

http://photos1.blogger.com/img/239/911/640/Coulter.jpg

this picture.... :D

I think she's quite possibly insane and most certaintly obsessed and fanatical, but I wasn't aware that hostility or aggressiveness in a woman was a good indicator they were lesbian.

She's neither butch nor nazi, she's cool. She just doesn't take liberal subversion too lightly, nor should she :D

Subversion?

Go on, just get it over with. Tell the whole world that you want to be back in the kitchen with no voting rights. You know you want to...

She's neither butch nor nazi, she's cool. She just doesn't take liberal subversion too lightly, nor should she :D

BECAUSE LIBERALS ARE DESTROYING AMERICA BY REMOVING PRAYER IN SCHOOLS, ALLOWING BABIES THAT WOULD OTHERWISE GROW UP IN BROKEN HOMES AND MISERABLE LIVES TO BE ABORTED, AND THINKING THAT INTELLIGENT DESIGN ISN'T A SCIENTIFIC THEORY. Yes. That's it.

:rolleyes:

And her novels are all various degrees of horrible.

Yeah, people who just attack their opponents but don't bother defending their ideas can't be taken too seriously.

Subversion?

Go on, just get it over with. Tell the whole world that you want to be back in the kitchen with no voting rights. You know you want to...



So, because liberals did a good thing in the past, we can assume that their extremist policies are a good thing in the present? I do not follow that logic.

BECAUSE LIBERALS ARE DESTROYING AMERICA BY REMOVING PRAYER IN SCHOOLS, ALLOWING BABIES THAT WOULD OTHERWISE GROW UP IN BROKEN HOMES AND MISERABLE LIVES TO BE ABORTED, AND THINKING THAT INTELLIGENT DESIGN ISN'T A SCIENTIFIC THEORY. Yes. That's it.

:rolleyes:

She wants to live in a theocracy, yet she calls The Handmaiden's Tale liberal propaganda. Don't waste your breath.

So, because liberals did a good thing in the past, we can assume that their extremist policies are a good thing in the present? I do not follow that logic.

liberal, liberalis, f., freedom. "Liberal" isn't a slur. Nor is being progressive a bad thing.

I don't expect a Christian to understand logic, so don't hold your breath.

She wants to live in a theocracy, yet she calls The Handmaiden's Tale liberal propaganda. Don't waste your breath.



That book is liberal propaganda, which in no way reflects the reality of any of the many observed Christian theocracies that have existed. I suppose I could write a book about the horrors of an atheist regime, and it would be taken as fact by people who don't want to see the truth, just like you liberals have done with this trash :rolleyes:

not all chrisitans are ranting loons.

i'm a catholic.

liberal, liberalis, f., freedom. "Liberal" isn't a slur. Nor is being progressive a bad thing.

I don't expect a Christian to understand logic, so don't hold your breath.



Wouldn't you radicals have a field-day if we slapped the term "Progressive" onto the Republican party ;) Claiming to be progressive does not make one progressive, it just makes one sound enlightened and full of lofty ideals. The contemporary "progressives" are, if anything, regressive! Of course, I don't expect an atheist to understand logic, so I'm not holding my breath :rolleyes:

I think she's quite possibly insane and most certaintly obsessed and fanatical, but I wasn't aware that hostility or aggressiveness in a woman was a good indicator they were lesbian.
Apart from adding 'that or she really just likes money and attention and doesnt care how much she has to look like a nutter to get them' to the possible options, I concur entirely.

That book is liberal propaganda, which in no way reflects the reality of any of the many observed Christian theocracies that have existed. I suppose I could write a book about the horrors of an atheist regime, and it would be taken as fact by people who don't want to see the truth, just like you liberals have done with this trash :rolleyes:
My dear Watson, I do believe I have solved this case. Neo Regolia is none other than Ann Coulter her(its)self

So, because liberals did a good thing in the past, we can assume that their extremist policies are a good thing in the present? I do not follow that logic.

Name 5 "extremist" liberal policies in the US right now. Do it.

Then explain this -

http://www.digitalronin.f2s.com/politicalcompass/images/USelection2004.gif

Explain how that in a nation where John Freaking Kerry is the far left bank of politics, "liberals" could be screwing up America. As far as I'm concerned, there isn't a Liberal(Libertarian or Socialist) party with any clout in the US at all.

So if "liberals" are pushing "extremist policies," name the policies and explain where these Liberals came from.

My dear Watson, I do believe I have solved this case. Neo Regolia is none other than Ann Coulter her(its)self



No, I just hate emotion-inducing lies, like that book.

No, I just hate emotion-inducing lies, like that book.
*insert tailored cheap-shot that induces knee-jerk reaction*

Neo Regolia is none other than Ann Coulter her(its)self

the second time you've had me rofl.

not all chrisitans are ranting loons.

i'm a catholic.

That's fine. Just be responsible and have at most 2 children (that goes for everyone, but I have to make that clear to Catholics), it shows great disregard for the well being of others when people have too many kids.

I didn't mean it to be taken in the wrong way, I'm just stating it how it is. If you're willing to take a leap of faith on various subjects, you can't be expected to use logic or objectivism when dealing with subjects such as morality et al.

No, I just hate emotion-inducing lies, like that book.
You must really hate chick flicks.

i think the one thing that everyone can agree on is that babies are delicious. like veal.

ann coulter's problem is that no one has killed her yet.

My dear Watson, I do believe I have solved this case. Neo Regolia is none other than Ann Coulter her(its)self

That would explain why she can't keep her age straight. Two months ago her profile said she was 17.

No, I just hate emotion-inducing lies, like that book.
So... got any other fiction stories that you hate and would like to see banned?

Green Knight's advice

i think the one thing that everyone can agree on is that babies are delicious. like veal.

i wish i had come to this forum before. so funny.

So... got any other fiction stories that you hate and would like to see banned?

Green Knight's advice

OMFG HARRY POTTER IS TEH DVIL!!!11ONE

Name 5 "extremist" liberal policies in the US right now. Do it.

Then explain this -

http://www.digitalronin.f2s.com/politicalcompass/images/USelection2004.gif

Explain how that in a nation where John Freaking Kerry is the far left bank of politics, "liberals" could be screwing up America. As far as I'm concerned, there isn't a Liberal(Libertarian or Socialist) party with any clout in the US at all.

So if "liberals" are pushing "extremist policies," name the policies and explain where these Liberals came from.



1. Legalization of drugs

2. Advocacy of gay marriage

3. Abortion-on-demand (including, but not limited to: partial birth abortions)

4. Strict gun-control

5. Affirmative action


Perhaps not all of you libs endorse these, but I can assure you that many, if not the majority, do.

That would explain why she can't keep her age straight. Two months ago her profile said she was 17.



I never put my age in my profile, care to try again?

i wish i had come to this forum before. so funny.
yes. yes you do. WISH HARDER. it will never come true.

1. Legalization of drugs

2. Advocacy of gay marriage

3. Abortion-on-demand (including, but not limited to: partial birth abortions)

4. Strict gun-control

5. Affirmative action


Perhaps not all of you libs endorse these, but I can assure you that many, if not the majority, do.

Oh... this is TOO easy.

Try again, now, which policies are actually in effect, nation wide?

1. Legalization of drugs
I know very few liberals who support this, if you're talking about marijuana. And even less who support anything harder.

2. Advocacy of gay marriage
Yeah, I hear hardcore fundie conservatives are big on equal rights as stated under the Constitution too.*

*Except when it offends them.

3. Abortion-on-demand (including, but not limited to: partial birth abortions)
Is that sort of like Comcast On Demand? Oh, and since when does anyone support partial birth abortions except when the mother's life is in danger?

Except people who REALLY hate babies.

4. Strict gun-control
I don't like people having guns because I think people are stupid. It's not that radical.

5. Affirmative action.
I STILL don't agree with it, and I'm a liberal. I can't speak for everyone.

Perhaps not all of you libs endorse these, but I can assure you that many, if not the majority, do.

I can throw the same sort of 'emotion-inducing lies' about your party too, babe. ;)

Oh... this is TOO easy.

Try again, now, which policies are actually in effect, nation wide?



None, thank goodness (partial birth abortion used to be legal, sadly, but undeniable murder has been banned, thankfully). It's nice having a conservative party in power, to prevent it from occurring.

Except people who REALLY hate babies.
ehem.

None, thank goodness (partial birth abortion used to be legal, sadly, but undeniable murder has been banned, thankfully). It's nice having a conservative party in power, to prevent it from occurring.

Yeah, instead we get power towards the federal government at the expense of state government and individual rights!

Wooooooooooooooo!

None, thank goodness (partial birth abortion used to be legal, sadly, but undeniable murder has been banned, thankfully). It's nice having a conservative party in power, to prevent it from occurring.
hahaha! praise the lord! three out of three of our three major sections of federal government represent maybe, MAYBE, a third of the population. thank the LORD GOD ALMIGHTY!

by conservative, you mean regressive?

(recent energy bill, transportation bill, et al that was pushed through by republicans)

the above mentioned do nothing for the long term, and the energy bill is a ridiculous hand out to US big oil

hahaha! praise the lord! three out of three of our three major sections of federal government represent maybe, MAYBE, a third of the population. thank the LORD GOD ALMIGHTY!

In fact, that's so thrilling about the LORD GOD ALMIGHTY that we should go back TO PRAISING HIM IN SCHOOLS!

*cough*

Yeah, instead we get power towards the federal government at the expense of state government and individual rights!

Wooooooooooooooo!



The people losing rights are the ones who really didn't deserve them anyway, since they tend to abuse those rights by blowing us up. Also, despite the Patriot Act's infringement on civil liberties, we have yet to see a case affecting a decent, law-abiding American citizen.

The people losing rights are the ones who really didn't deserve them anyway, since they tend to abuse those rights by blowing us up. Also, despite the Patriot Act's infringement on civil liberties, we have yet to see a case affecting a decent, law-abiding American citizen.
man, my head hurts. i think my brain is trying to throttle this guy. ;)

by conservative, you mean regressive?

(recent energy bill, transportation bill, et al that was pushed through by republicans)

the above mentioned do nothing for the long term, and the energy bill is a ridiculous hand out to US big oil



The energy bill was a bi-partisan thing, you can't really attribute its failings to the Republicans, more Democrats supported it because of the provisions it gave for ethanol, which would benefit the corn farmers.

anyone remember micheal moore's flick? you know, the one where that peace group up north, the one that ate the cookies got sent a cease and desist order from the good old "beauracracy-choked morass" of homeland security?

None, thank goodness (partial birth abortion used to be legal, sadly, but undeniable murder has been banned, thankfully). It's nice having a conservative party in power, to prevent it from occurring.
Thank you for defeating yourself.

All too easy.

anyone remember micheal moore's flick? you know, the one where that peace group up north, the one that ate the cookies got sent a cease and desist order from the good old "beauracracy-choked morass" of homeland security?



Now, there is someone who is truly deserving of an insulting thread!

The people losing rights are the ones who really didn't deserve them anyway, since they tend to abuse those rights by blowing us up. Also, despite the Patriot Act's infringement on civil liberties, we have yet to see a case affecting a decent, law-abiding American citizen.

I guess the states don't deserve rights and we should cease to be a federal republic?

'Cause, you know, things like No Child Left Behind certainly don't affect the states' ability to decide on their own education standards, since deciding education is not a right given to the federal government in the Constitution.

The energy bill was a bi-partisan thing, you can't really attribute its failings to the Republicans, more Democrats supported it because of the provisions it gave for ethanol, which would benefit the corn farmers.

the dems had no choice, if they voted for it they represented their constituency by submitting to a lost cause. all reform was blocked by the reps and even if the dems voted for it, it still would have passed b/c the lobbyists.

1. Legalization of drugs
Not arresting people who are not forcing harm onto anyone actually doesnt appear all that extreme to me...

2. Advocacy of gay marriage
Again I fail to see what is extreme about this.

3. Abortion-on-demand (including, but not limited to: partial birth abortions)
I would be surprised if a majority of so called 'liberals' supported this, although again it's not exactly as extreme as for instance bombing abortion clinics. Frankly I expect people desiring on-demand partical birth abortions are probably no more representive of 'liberals' than people bombing abortion clinics are representive of christians.

4. Strict gun-control
And what exactly do you mean by strict, I dont think supporting some restriction and regulation of guns is extreme, perhaps you disagree, if so who only knows what you make of the regulation of cars.

5. Affirmative action
Well I could imagine that some affirmative action is extreme, but I would hardly label affirmitive action as being extreme in and of itself.

Perhaps not all of you libs endorse these, but I can assure you that many, if not the majority, do.
I find your assertion dubious, it also fails to recognise that many non-liberals hold the views you refer to.

Thank you for defeating yourself.

All too easy.


Name 5 "extremist" liberal policies in the US right now. Do it.


Actually, I forgot to mention that Affirmative Action is in effect. Thanks a lot, you guys :rolleyes:

anyway, back to eating babies.

micheal moore is a great man.


everything he said is true and he speaks for the middle-class americans the ones who make this country what it is. not the tom delays or the bill o'riellys

I guess the states don't deserve rights and we should cease to be a federal republic?

Ya, and who cares about those EVIL!!!11 gays, who those backwards freedom-loving liberal scum want to give equal rights.

anyway, back to eating babies.

First, do we pull them out of wombs and crush their skulls needlessly? That's what all liberals do. And we condemn God. When we acknowledge his existance.

Now, if you don't mind, I'm going to go pass some laws protecting my black bisexual transgendered handicapped friend, or something.

Ya, and who cares about those EVIL!!!11 gays, who those backwards freedom-loving liberal scum want to give equal rights.
Yeah, they might reproduce and FLOOD THE WORLD WITH HOMO-ISM IF WE LET THEM MARRY!

Oh... wait...

I guess the states don't deserve rights and we should cease to be a federal republic?

'Cause, you know, things like No Child Left Behind certainly don't affect the states' ability to decide on their own education standards, since deciding education is not a right given to the federal government in the Constitution.



Trust me, the state of education in Alabama is abysmal. I'd rather the Feds interfere before the state legislature again decides to divert education funding to public works, e.g. sports stadiums.

You know, I'd really feel bad about everyone picking on Rogolia if she didn't bring it upon herself.

First, do we pull them out of wombs and crush their skulls needlessly? That's what all liberals do. And we condemn God. When we acknowledge his existance.

Now, if you don't mind, I'm going to go pass some laws protecting my black bisexual transgendered handicapped friend, or something.
if i'm barbequeing my mulatto fetuses (feti? whatever) i like to use pages of the bible to help get the flame going. then i rape some godfearing, blue blooded true americans. then i commit senseless acts of terrorism, burning flags the whole while. speaking of which, all of my treason has really wiped me out. i'm going to go find a sodomite, and make them live up to their name, then sleep.

Trust me, the state of education in Alabama is abysmal.

You've proven that quite nicely. ;)

Yeah, they might reproduce and FLOOD THE WORLD WITH HOMO-ISM IF WE LET THEM MARRY!

the deludge shall surely destroy us!

rofl.

Trust me, the state of education in Alabama is abysmal.

EDIT: Nono. That'd be too easy.

Actually, I forgot to mention that Affirmative Action is in effect. Thanks a lot, you guys :rolleyes:

I'll grant you that a form of it is, still, four out of five? You are not a Jedi yet. Come back when you actually have something to complain about.

I'll grant you that a form of it is, still, four out of five? You are not a Jedi yet. Come back when you actually have something to complain about.
dude, you don't even live here and you know the score better than this female burmingham-ite. speaking of which, where the devil is male burmingham?\

edit: saipea, you just crossed a line.

I'll grant you that a form of it is, still, four out of five? You are not a Jedi yet. Come back when you actually have something to complain about.

Affirmative action is based on socio-economic background (I hope), so it's still a no go.

You've proven that quite nicely. ;)



Subtle flaming? I take it you concede your point then?

it looks liek she's a basket case so far. daddy not loving her is coming in second.

Not arresting people who are not forcing harm onto anyone actually doesnt appear all that extreme to me...


Again I fail to see what is extreme about this.


I would be surprised if a majority of so called 'liberals' supported this, although again it's not exactly as extreme as for instance bombing abortion clinics. Frankly I expect people desiring on-demand partical birth abortions are probably no more representive of 'liberals' than people bombing abortion clinics are representive of christians.


And what exactly do you mean by strict, I dont think supporting some restriction and regulation of guns is extreme, perhaps you disagree, if so who only knows what you make of the regulation of cars.


Well I could imagine that some affirmative action is extreme, but I would hardly label affirmitive action as being extreme in and of itself.


I find your assertion dubious, it also fails to recognise that many non-liberals hold the views you refer to.

My thoughts pretty much.

Subtle flaming? I take it you concede your point then?

If you consider that subtle, how are we supposed to take you seriously when you try and espouse your obnoxious views about something as complicated as politics?

You know, I'd really feel bad about everyone picking on Rogolia if she wasn't such an ignorant and prejudice tw@.

That was unneccisary.

That was unneccisary.
word.

by gumphrey, where's my "stern look" emoticon! how can i possibly express feelings with mere text?

word.

by gumphrey, where's my "stern look" emoticon! how can i possibly express feelings with mere text?

Try :sternlook:

It's not a real smilie, but it get's the idea accross in a semi-smilie form.

Affirmative action is based on socio-economic background (I hope), so it's still a no go.
There are still considerations given in college admission to race and socio-economic status, of course it's nothing like a quota system that lowers the standards like conservative scream about when they yell Affirmative Action, but in all fairness I do have to concide the point that with SCOTUS decisions, a national policy of a form of AF is in place.

Everything else though...

That was unneccisary.

I'll admit, that was a very poor way of trying to remind people that the topic is about the famous conservative bitch and to ease off of Rogolia.

I'll admit, that was a very poor way of trying to remind people that the topic is about the famous conservative bitch and to ease off of Rogolia.

Um... you're digging yourself in deeper and Neo R already has a thread up in Moderation.

Try :sternlook:

It's not a real smilie, but it get's the idea accross in a semi-smilie form.
:sternlook:

hey, that did feel good. good call buddy. :happydance:

My head is still spinning, trying to comprehend someone actually saying Gay Marriage is an extremist policy.

Anyway, back on topic. Ann Coulter is a basket case...I almost think that she's putting on an act to MAKE people pissed off at her just for the kicks, which would make her even MORE insane.

I'll admit, that was a very poor way of trying to remind people that the topic is about the famous conservative bitch and to ease off of Rogolia.

Actually I'd venture to say that it wasn't just poor, but it didn't really do that at all, per se.

But getting back on topic is a good sentiment. Of course it's probably impossible, but still a good sentiment. :)

Um... you're digging yourself in deeper and Neo R already has a thread up in Moderation.

Well then, I guess I'm as fried as all those EVIL!!!111 gay people will be in the eternal fires of hell. I can't very well go deleting all my posts now, because that won't change anything, and to besides apologizing for my choice of words, there's not much I can do.I can't edit them, because they're already quoted, so I guess I have to face the consequences and let this pointless topic sink to the bottom of the thread.

One warning in the several years I've been here isn't all that bad anyways.

well, i've been trying to diffuse a hostile situation with levity, but given that it's 2 in the morning, i can't really. so, i shall hold my breath until everyone shuts up about this crap, and gets back to the topic at hand. if i die, it's on all y'all bitches.

thump.

As long as we're off topic: Ninjas are better!

well, i've been trying to diffuse a hostile situation with levity, but given that it's 2 in the morning, i can't really. so, i shall hold my breath until everyone shuts up about this crap, and gets back to the topic at hand. if i die, it's on all y'all bitches.

He was a good man. He died, attempting to bring peace to an online forum. A noble death? Certainly. A wise death? Probably not. Some say pointless... but let's just go with noble shall we?

May he rest in peace.

--snip--
I don't like people having guns because I think people are stupid. It's not that radical.--snip--

You know, you've just summed up in one sentence what I've spent a lifetime feeling and casually arguing.

He was a good man. He died, attempting to bring peace to an online forum. A noble death? Certainly. A wise death? Probably not. Some say pointless... but let's just go with noble shall we?

May he rest in peace.
nah, i just passed out for a bit. it's pretty much impossible to kill yourself by holding your breath. but before the darkness settled in, i typed that onomonopiea.

Its Anne's job to be a total bitch, shes funny.

if you shared her views you'd probably be just as mad

minor correction:

if you shared her views you'd have to be just as stark raving mad.

Its Anne's job to be a total bitch, shes funny.
That is what she makes a living being, whether or not that is her job is another matter

Actually, I forgot to mention that Affirmative Action is in effect.

The primary benefactors of affirmative action are women. So what are you complaining about??

I can proudly say that even with the 'generosity' of Affirmative Action more black males are in prison than in college. Wow we've really benefitted :rolleyes:

i love my fellow internet liberals.


Heh? In no way am I a Social Liberal but I hate her. She's a close minded racist fecker.

Well, well, well. Neo Rogolia, we gotta stop meetig like this, people are starting to talk.

Anyway, on topic, you can get my thoughts on Coulter on my "Ann Coulter sucks" thread.

The primary benefactors of affirmative action are women. So what are you complaining about??

I can proudly say that even with the 'generosity' of Affirmative Action more black males are in prison than in college. Wow we've really benefitted :rolleyes:

Affirative action is the left-wing equivalent of discussing people being "morally bankrupt", in that it's all about FEELING moral rather than actually BEING moral.

Subtle flaming? I take it you concede your point then?

You're funny, girlie. That's why I'm gonna kill you last. :D

*Loads Colt 45*

Bump!

Bump again.

The people losing rights are the ones who really didn't deserve them anyway, since they tend to abuse those rights by blowing us up. Also, despite the Patriot Act's infringement on civil liberties, we have yet to see a case affecting a decent, law-abiding American citizen.

I seem to recall a 70-something nun who at one point in her life was an activist, and she got flagged for the no-fly list....

There is absolutely no reason why that Patriot Act should exist--all it does is allow the controlling faction of a police state the authority to run all over our freedoms.

"If you haven't done anything, you've got nothing to hide". Is that it?

Bull-fucking-shit. The government is here for US to run, not for them to run US.

The amendments of the constitution cannot be legally run over, without an amendment retracting the amendment.

The Patriot Act is illegal--period.

http://photos1.blogger.com/img/239/911/640/Coulter.jpg

this picture.... :D


Some how, Hillary Clinton fit better in this pic-better than Ann Coulter OR Ilsa, for that matter..

micheal moore is a great man.

No he's not...he's a hack with too much time on his hands to eat and make movies that aren't actual documentaries.

No he's not...he's a hack with too much time on his hands to eat and make movies that aren't actual documentaries.
Michael Moore and Ann Coulter are cut from the same cloth.

Both are rather humorous
Both lie, distort facts and misquote to make a living
Both are extremely ugly
Both don’t know the difference between attacking your opponent and defending your position
Both are often incoherent
Both are men

You're funny, girlie. That's why I'm gonna kill you last. :D

*Loads Colt 45*

It doesn't matter of you are joking or not with this post, but threats are NOT allowed on this site.

Zexaland: Official Warning for Flaming

Bumping the topic every 10 minutes is spam, do not let me catch you doing it again.

I wouldn't call Ann Coulter physically ugly. The only good thing about her is her looks.

You know, I'd really feel bad about everyone picking on Rogolia if she wasn't such an ignorant and prejudice tw@.
Saipea, you can knock it off with the insults. We do know when you've edited your own post, so doing so won't save you from what you said.

As long as we're off topic: Ninjas are better!
You can quit hi-jacking the thread too.

Are we even sure Anne Coulter is really a Genetic Girl? I'm not sure she really believes in the venom she spouts.
I don't think she's really a Conservative, I think she found a way to make a buck using her worst personal traits. (*thus, she probably is a true dyed-in-silk bitch.) Kind of like the "Insult Comic" standup that was popular when I was in High School... (whatsisname... oh yeah, "Dice".)
People will always pay to see a freak.

Coulter, like every political pundit, is paid to be a piece of shit. The job of people like Ann Coulter is basically to exaggerate, tell half-truths, and sometimes even outright lie in order to spread the political ideology that pays them and slam the political opposition. They're part of the big money corruption of US politics which is largely, but not exclusively affiliated with the Republicans. Michael Moore is one example of the destroyers of democracy on the left. These people destroy civil debate and keep people shrieking past each other instead of communicating and compromising. Fuck 'em all.

Michael Moore and Ann Coulter are cut from the same cloth.

Both are rather humorous
Both lie, distort facts and misquote to make a living
Both are extremely ugly
Both don’t know the difference between attacking your opponent and defending your position
Both are often incoherent
Both are men

HA! That's excellent!

I agree--I'm no Coulter supporter either.

The primary benefactors of affirmative action are women. So what are you complaining about??

I can proudly say that even with the 'generosity' of Affirmative Action more black males are in prison than in college. Wow we've really benefitted :rolleyes:



1. Maybe it's because I'm not a self-centered jerk, but I don't believe that I should have an unfair advantage merely because of my gender.

2. I think that's more of an insult to them than a statement about the effects of affirmative action >.>

Anne Coulter is a Foxy lady, enough said.

Name 5 "extremist" liberal policies in the US right now. Do it.

Then explain this -

http://www.digitalronin.f2s.com/politicalcompass/images/USelection2004.gif

Explain how that in a nation where John Freaking Kerry is the far left bank of politics, "liberals" could be screwing up America. As far as I'm concerned, there isn't a Liberal(Libertarian or Socialist) party with any clout in the US at all.

So if "liberals" are pushing "extremist policies," name the policies and explain where these Liberals came from.


I don't know about 5 of them, but here one big one for ya. How about the newest and most ridiculous ruling from our own supreme court? The new eminant domain bullshit they handed us last month.

I know very few liberals who support this, if you're talking about marijuana. And even less who support anything harder.


Yeah, I hear hardcore fundie conservatives are big on equal rights as stated under the Constitution too.*

*Except when it offends them.


Is that sort of like Comcast On Demand? Oh, and since when does anyone support partial birth abortions except when the mother's life is in danger?

Except people who REALLY hate babies.


I don't like people having guns because I think people are stupid. It's not that radical.


I STILL don't agree with it, and I'm a liberal. I can't speak for everyone.



I can throw the same sort of 'emotion-inducing lies' about your party too, babe. ;)

evidently you fall into the group that doesn't endorse all of these policies. She covered you already. None of what she said was a lie.

the above mentioned do nothing for the long term, and the energy bill is a ridiculous hand out to US big oil

How do you figure that? I don't see tax credits to hybrid purchasers and diesel users as handing just a whole lot to big oil. Agreed that it does nothing, alone, to solve the problem in the long term but its a start. Much better start I might add than that ridiculous Kyoto crap...which did nothing long term OR short term.

anyone remember micheal moore's flick? you know, the one where that peace group up north, the one that ate the cookies got sent a cease and desist order from the good old "beauracracy-choked morass" of homeland security?

I remember, I love a good comedy. Where does that guy get that stuff? What an imaginatioin!

She's neither butch nor nazi, she's cool. She just doesn't take liberal subversion too lightly, nor should she :D

My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building.
Ann Coulter

this is cool?

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/a/ann_coulter.html

the dems had no choice, if they voted for it they represented their constituency by submitting to a lost cause. all reform was blocked by the reps and even if the dems voted for it, it still would have passed b/c the lobbyists.

so their excuse is they voted for it anyway? good one :rolleyes:

We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war. Ann Coulter


yes, this will get all the world on our side.

My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building.
Ann Coulter

this is cool?

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/a/ann_coulter.html



She's certainly said some...blunt....things, but the good outweighs the bad. I'm not a big fan of the largest liberal paper in the country myself :D

micheal moore is a great man.


everything he said is true and he speaks for the middle-class americans the ones who make this country what it is. not the tom delays or the bill o'riellys

Why? because he's got a big gut and wears flannel shirts? He's no more middle class than the Queen of England. He's a rich putrid chunk of shit liar who needs pineapples shoved backwards up his ass. :gundge:

Ya, and who cares about those EVIL!!!11 gays, who those backwards freedom-loving liberal scum want to give equal rights.

They have equal rights. They have the exact same rights as the rest of us. To marry anyone of the opposite sex whom they choose. What you really want for them, isn't EQUAL rights, but EXTRA rights.

Why? because he's got a big gut and wears flannel shirts? He's no more middle class than the Queen of England. He's a rich putrid chunk of shit liar who needs pineapples shoved backwards up his ass. :gundge:

i agree, plus everything michael moore says isn't true. it's twisted propaganda, just like coulter twists hers.

here's another quote from coulter i find disturbing:

When contemplating college liberals, you really regret once again that John Walker is not getting the death penalty. We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed, too. Otherwise, they will turn out to be outright traitors.

Ann Coulter

i agree, plus everything michael moore says isn't true. it's twisted propaganda, just like coulter twists hers.

here's another quote from coulter i find disturbing:

When contemplating college liberals, you really regret once again that John Walker is not getting the death penalty. We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed, too. Otherwise, they will turn out to be outright traitors.

Ann Coulter


I don't find punishing treason disturbing, especially if it discourages further treason, and, from what I've seen, many of the rabid liberals could be considered traitors. What with the whole "assassinate Bush" and "spit on soldiers" rubbish...

anyone who holds someone like ann coulter or rush limbaugh, or michael moore on a pedistal needs to rethink their outlook on life. As all persons listed above are a detriment to society.

here's another quote from coulter i find disturbing:

When contemplating college liberals, you really regret once again that John Walker is not getting the death penalty. We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed, too. Otherwise, they will turn out to be outright traitors.


Replace the word "liberals" with "Jews".

I don't find punishing treason disturbing, especially if it discourages further treason, and, from what I've seen, many of the rabid liberals could be considered traitors. What with the whole "assassinate Bush" and "spit on soldiers" rubbish...

I haven't heard/seen anything about spitting on soldiers since vietnam. as far as assassinating bush... well, i'm sure those ppl will be getting a visit from secret service soon :P

there is nothing wrong w/ discouraging treason. however, to connect college "liberals" with treason is what i find disturbing.

*edit*

that and the threatening of life... "making them realize that they can be killed, too" is just deplorable.

Anne Coulter is a Foxy lady, enough said.

Harummph!

Replace the word "liberals" with "Jews".



Great, now you've turned me into a Nazi :mad:

anyone who holds someone like ann coulter or rush limbaugh, or michael moore on a pedistal needs to rethink their outlook on life. As all persons listed above are a detriment to society.



Hey! Take Limbaugh out of that list! He's my favorite talk show host!

Great, now you've turned me into a Nazi :mad:

her views may not be of the nazi type, but it's just as hard as the nazi views were.

Hey! Take Limbaugh out of that list! He's my favorite talk show host!

hehe, he's just as crazy as michael moore :P just different opinions.

She's certainly said some...blunt....things, but the good outweighs the bad.

the good being her advocvacy of torture and murder?

the good being her advocvacy of torture and murder?

no, her good looks. yummy!

the good being her advocvacy of torture and murder?

what murder? i don't mind some forms of torture myself :P

Great, now you've turned me into a Nazi :mad:
Owned

1. Maybe it's because I'm not a self-centered jerk, but I don't believe that I should have an unfair advantage merely because of my gender.

I'm guessing you haven't gotten a taste of the real world yet. The truth is, everybody has already had unfair advantages before AA. That's why schools who don't have it now are 99% white. The question is not whether Affirmative Action is a feel-good social program, but whether it's necessary. And I think you'd agree that if our goal is to live in an integrated society, we need it, because without it we're as segregated as we were in 1960.

2. I think that's more of an insult to them than a statement about the effects of affirmative action >.>

Right. So you think it's a statement about how bad black people are, and not a statement about the justice system. Did you feel the same way about the gulags? All those evil Russian peasants always getting in trouble. :rolleyes:

You can get life for stealing a TV in North Carolina if you're black and can't buy a lawyer. Is that not vaguely reminiscent of people getting sent to the gulags for stealing things in the USSR?

Replace the word "liberals" with "Jews".


You know, that's not debating, nor is it an accurate test of portrayal of someone else's opinion either. You can't simply replace any word (s) you want from a person's quote with another word and try to rationalize that it's the same thing (or the same as)..


Example: "Break the eggs into a pan, and beat thoroughly with the fork."


Replace the word "eggs" with "liberals."

One is a cook book, the other is hate speech, but it does not prove that it was wrong to say the words of the recipe simply by suggesting that the reader analyze the words when the words have been replaced...

You can get life for stealing a TV in North Carolina if you're black and can't buy a lawyer.


i somehow doubt that.

i somehow doubt that.
I don't

Man released after 35 years for TV theft (http://www.prisonpotpourri.com/PAROLED/CNN_com%20-%20Man%20released%20after%2035%20years%20for%20TV%20theft%20-%20May%2028,%202005.html)


HILLSBOROUGH, North Carolina (AP) -- After 35 years in prison for stealing a black-and-white television set, Junior Allen is a free man.
....
He was sentenced in 1970 to life in prison for second-degree burglary. The penalty for the offense has since been changed to a maximum of three years in prison.

The state Parole Commission decided last year to release Allen if he behaved and completed a transitional work-release program. He worked at a restaurant washing dishes and floors and had no prison infractions during the past three years.

He did so well he was released several months early -- on his 26th try at parole.

His parole could last up to five years, meaning he could gain complete freedom by age 70.

Rich Rosen, a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill law professor who took up Allen's case three years ago, said it was a shame that Allen had not been released decades ago. "At least he's got some years left," Rosen said.



You'd better believe it. If you can't afford a good lawyer in NC you're screwed. Yup it's a crazy world.

I don't

ok. then show me where a black man has been incacerated for life for just "stealing a tv"

*edit*
Originally Posted by CNN
HILLSBOROUGH, North Carolina (AP) -- After 35 years in prison for stealing a black-and-white television set, Junior Allen is a free man.
....
He was sentenced in 1970 to life in prison for second-degree burglary. The penalty for the offense has since been changed to a maximum of three years in prison.

The state Parole Commission decided last year to release Allen if he behaved and completed a transitional work-release program. He worked at a restaurant washing dishes and floors and had no prison infractions during the past three years.

He did so well he was released several months early -- on his 26th try at parole.

His parole could last up to five years, meaning he could gain complete freedom by age 70.

Rich Rosen, a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill law professor who took up Allen's case three years ago, said it was a shame that Allen had not been released decades ago. "At least he's got some years left," Rosen said.

that isn't life is it? :P (rereads the entire article and sees that he was sentenced to life.)

however, i do agree that the justice system was abused. BUT, did Junior Allen have a past criminal history? AND you have to look at the time it happened, 1970, just shortly after all the civil rights stuff happened, definite abuses back then.

You know, that's not debating, nor is it an accurate test of portrayal of someone else's opinion either. You can't simply replace any word (s) you want from a person's quote with another word and try to rationalize that it's the same thing (or the same as)..


Example: "Break the eggs into a pan, and beat thoroughly with the fork."


Replace the word "eggs" with "liberals."

One is a cook book, the other is hate speech, but it does not prove that it was wrong to say the words of the recipe simply by suggesting that the reader analyze the words when the words have been replaced...
He was not trying to say she hated Jews but that her exetreme hatred of "liberals" is as extreme as the hatred the Nazis had of Jews

no, her good looks. yummy!

http://www.straponvets.com/

ok. then show me where a black man has been incacerated for life for just "stealing a tv"

*edit*


that isn't life is it? :P (rereads the entire article and sees that he was sentenced to life.)

however, i do agree that the justice system was abused. BUT, did Junior Allen have a past criminal history? AND you have to look at the time it happened, 1970, just shortly after all the civil rights stuff happened, definite abuses back then.
But instead of being released for time served, he was released on parole for good behavior

I don't find punishing treason disturbing, especially if it discourages further treason, and, from what I've seen, many of the rabid liberals could be considered traitors. What with the whole "assassinate Bush" and "spit on soldiers" rubbish...

I don't know of people who have SERIOUSLY said "assassinate Bush". There are people who might make comments about it, but at LEAST 999 times out of 1000 they are NOT serious.

And the same thing happened during the Clinton administration. Would that make those people treasonous?

And anyone who's spitting on the soldiers THEMSELVES is an asshole. I don't agree with the cause they're fighting for at all -- I think it's total bullshit. But that's no reason to hit the soldiers with disrespect.

Word.

But instead of being released for time served, he was released on parole for good behavior

funny part was, he was denied parole 25 times, then in 2003, when he was in his 60's, denied again in dec of 2003. Something was said about him failing to follow rules, and all but 8 of his infractions were considered moderate. on paper, it probably looked bad for him, but the guards who were guarding him had no serious probs w/ him.

the reason he was sentenced to life was because there was a story he "roughed up" the old lady he stole the tv from. back in 70, in the carolinas, i can see that adding to his setence even though it didn't officially come up.

On that note, i still don't think something like that would happen today.

He was not trying to say she hated Jews but that her exetreme hatred of "liberals" is as extreme as the hatred the Nazis had of Jews



? I don't hate liberals, although I do detest their policies, disrespect, and mendacity. In fact, I don't hate anyone :fluffle:

however, i do agree that the justice system was abused. BUT, did Junior Allen have a past criminal history? AND you have to look at the time it happened, 1970, just shortly after all the civil rights stuff happened, definite abuses back then.

But the parol comission regularly reviewed his sentence and regularly denied him parol. They knew what he was in there for and still kept him in. They were still keeping him in prison in 2004. When reached for comment they refused to explain why they had kept him in all those years.

And the only way he got out was when a UNC-CH lawyer decided to take up his case. Imagine if people like that weren't around, like say in a part of the country where university law professors don't frequent. You'd be screwed.

A lot of people absolutely loathe the SPLC, but don't realize that without it a lot of people would essentially have no rights. When you have rights only on paper, and the fact that you're a human being gets lost in the paperwork, somebody needs to be there to reconnect with the foundations of justice. Otherwise the things that are supposed to make our nation great cease to exist.

? I don't hate liberals, although I do detest their policies, disrespect, and mendacity. In fact, I don't hate anyone :fluffle:

you say that like republicans don't disrespect anyone. i've already proved coulter does that.

? I don't hate liberals, although I do detest their policies, disrespect, and mendacity. In fact, I don't hate anyone :fluffle:
not you. You hippy! :D

But the parol comission regularly reviewed his sentence and regularly denied him parol. They knew what he was in there for and still kept him in. They were still keeping him in prison in 2004.
right, because all but 8 of his 60 some odd infractions were deemed moderate. on paper, w/o knowing the person, they may have felt that those were good reasons to keep him in. (tho in hindsight it was stupid)
When reached for comment they refused to explain why they had kept him in all those years.
how many ppl like to show their stupidity? :P especially when they know something they did was stupid.

And the only way he got out was when a UNC-CH lawyer decided to take up his case. Imagine if people like that weren't around, like say in a part of the country where university law professors don't frequent. You'd be screwed.
you'd be screwed if you were black and prosecuted in the 70s in the south, but otherwise, i don't think so. Today i don't think so either, well not screwed this much.
A lot of people absolutely loathe the SPLC, but don't realize that without it a lot of people would essentially have no rights. When you have rights only on paper, and the fact that you're a human being gets lost in the paperwork, somebody needs to be there to reconnect with the foundations of justice. Otherwise the things that are supposed to make our nation great cease to exist.
i don't even know who the SPLC is :P but i agree that there should be groups that monitor shit like this so it doesn't happen.

And anyone who's spitting on the soldiers THEMSELVES is an asshole. I don't agree with the cause they're fighting for at all -- I think it's total bullshit. But that's no reason to hit the soldiers with disrespect.

Word.

If someone anywhere spat on a vet it would be on Fox News in a heartbeat, and you can bet people would hear about it. That's why I doubt it's happened recently.

If someone anywhere spat on a vet it would be on Fox News in a heartbeat, and you can bet people would hear about it. That's why I doubt it's happened recently.



I was referring to the "Do you support our troops?" thread, which had some suprisingly (even for NS) inhumane comments directed towards our vets.

I was referring to the "Do you support our troops?" thread, which had some suprisingly (even for NS) inhumane comments directed towards our vets.
As opposed to this thread and comments made towards people deemed "liberals"

I was referring to the "Do you support our troops?" thread, which had some suprisingly (even for NS) inhumane comments directed towards our vets.

We don't all hate the military. :D

you say that like republicans don't disrespect anyone. i've already proved coulter does that.



Well, she, like all people, certainly does have her bad side...and I don't think she's a man either, that Adam's Apple was probably her swallowing a piece of turkey or something! (yes, eating turkey while giving an interview!)

i don't even know who the SPLC is :P but i agree that there should be groups that monitor shit like this so it doesn't happen.

It's the Southern Poverty Law Center, and they get nailed by antagonists every day claiming that they have a social agenda, are opportunists, etc. Yet no mention of what the world would probably be like without them around.

anyone who holds someone like ann coulter or rush limbaugh, or michael moore on a pedistal needs to rethink their outlook on life. As all persons listed above are a detriment to society.

I couldn't agree more. Anyone that replaces rational arguments with hyperbole sensationalism are doing far more harm than good.

Anne Coulter I think deserves a special mention because she's one of the first people I've come across on the news that is so consistently ridiculous that I can't believe she actually believes the BS she spouts off.

Edit: and her daddy didn't love her. :p

ehh, I think she is just angry at what she sees as liberal's treason. if you shared her views you'd probably be just as mad
Fortunately, most people are not of the view that disagreeing with the US President is treacherous.

So, because liberals did a good thing in the past, we can assume that their extremist policies are a good thing in the present? I do not follow that logic.
I don't think you're in any position to call anyone else's views "extremist".

That book is liberal propaganda, which in no way reflects the reality of any of the many observed Christian theocracies that have existed.

I suppose I could write a book about the horrors of an atheist regime, and it would be taken as fact by people who don't want to see the truth, just like you liberals have done with this trash :rolleyes:
What admirable Christian theocracies are you thinking of NR? 15th century Spain? Savonarola's Florence? John Calvin's Geneva? Or perhaps the good town of Salem, Massachusetts c. 1692.

Atheist regime? Well, atheism is a religion like bald is a hair colour, so it has no rules that could be put into law.

It's nice having a conservative party in power, to prevent it from occurring.
ahaha, as if the Republican party is conservative! That's rich! I agree that partial birth abortion is probably murder but it was only ever done where the mother's life was in danger, namely 0.17% of abortion cases.

The energy bill was a bi-partisan thing, you can't really attribute its failings to the Republicans, more Democrats supported it because of the provisions it gave for ethanol, which would benefit the corn farmers.
He said that liberals opposed the Patriot act. Most Democrats aren't liberals.

Well, she, like all people, certainly does have her bad side...

her 'bad side' leads her to advocate fucking torture and murder

Man released after 35 years for TV theft (http://www.prisonpotpourri.com/PAROLED/CNN_com%20-%20Man%20released%20after%2035%20years%20for%20TV%20theft%20-%20May%2028,%202005.html)




You'd better believe it. If you can't afford a good lawyer in NC you're screwed. Yup it's a crazy world.

dude, that was 35 years ago.

http://www.straponvets.com/


:eek: :D :D :D LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

dude, that was 35 years ago.

As was mentioned before, he was denied parole more than twenty times over the past 35 years, most recently in 2004 - indicating that officials in north carolina's justice department just one year ago had no problem keeping a man in jail for more than 30 years for knicking a TV. :eek:

Doesn't that seem a little ridiculous to you?

so far, our collective wisdom has ruled that it is most likely emotional trauma or that her daddy didnt love her.

This woman is an Absolut Whackjob. I don't even know where to start.

There's always: "When we were fighting communism, OK, they had mass murderers and gulags, but they were white men and they were sane. Now we're up against absolutely insane savages."

Or maybe: "It would be a much better country if women did not vote. That is simply a fact. In fact, in every presidential election since 1950 - except Goldwater in '64 - the Republican would have won, if only the men had voted."

And then there was that thing on The Fifth Estate about right vs. left in the American media when she was telling the Canadian interviewer how she doesn't understand why we didn't go Iraq since we followed the US into Vietnam.

Does this woman even listen to herself? It's one thing to be completely nuts, but at least get your facts right. Augh. :headbang:

I listened to Anne Coulter once and that was enough for me.

She well deserves the epithets thrown her way, describing her as a Nazi.

One could say she positively seeks them.

People like her polarize everything, which to me is the definition of a fascist.

As was mentioned before, he was denied parole more than twenty times over the past 35 years, most recently in 2004 - indicating that officials in north carolina's justice department just one year ago had no problem keeping a man in jail for more than 30 years for knicking a TV. :eek:

Doesn't that seem a little ridiculous to you?

as was also mentioned before, there was talk of assault on an old woman involved so it was more than just stealing a TV. Something else that was mentioned was that all but 8 out of 60 infractions were deemed moderate. Would 60 moderate infractions and 8 major infractions play a part in deciding whether to let someone out on parole or not? I mean I don't really know the story, I don't know the man, and I find it appauling that a man spent that much of his life in prison for something like this. But without knowing the details involved, and only reading a headline, there's insufficient information to be judging the situation.

Wait. What if we think her daddy didn't love her because she was a lesbian?

I almost wrote "Comrade Coulter" but I can honestly say she isn't deserving of living amongst anybody else.
I hope it's not too late to say I had a helluva good chuckle reading this, TSA.

Wait. What if we think her daddy didn't love her because she was a lesbian?
She’s not a lesbian. She’s a man. :D
http://www.rawilson.com/images/coulter.jpg