Dempublicents1
12-08-2005, 15:42
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/08/12/drunkendriving.virginia.ap/index.html
Apparently DUI laws are unconstitutional because assuming someone is guilty when you have proven that guilt beyond any reasonable doubt is unconstitutional. Oh, wait, that's supposed to be exactly when you can make that assumption!
This is my favorite part:
Magee said Virginia's law presumes the blood-alcohol level at the time the test is taken is equal to the level at the time of the offense, even if the test occurs hours after police make a stop.
Hey genius, unless the cops were feeding the perp alcohol since the guy was stopped, that BAC reading hours after the stop is going to be lower than that at the time. That means that they were, beyond any shadow of a reasonable doubt, over the limit at the time of the stop!
*shakes head*
Apparently DUI laws are unconstitutional because assuming someone is guilty when you have proven that guilt beyond any reasonable doubt is unconstitutional. Oh, wait, that's supposed to be exactly when you can make that assumption!
This is my favorite part:
Magee said Virginia's law presumes the blood-alcohol level at the time the test is taken is equal to the level at the time of the offense, even if the test occurs hours after police make a stop.
Hey genius, unless the cops were feeding the perp alcohol since the guy was stopped, that BAC reading hours after the stop is going to be lower than that at the time. That means that they were, beyond any shadow of a reasonable doubt, over the limit at the time of the stop!
*shakes head*