I don't believe that for a month...
Super-power
10-08-2005, 01:36
I've overlooked This (http://www.freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty2.html)!
Though y'all have probably read it, I just heard abut this (been away). Serves Souter right, that bastard
I'd get a chain going and chase the bastard wherever he goes.
Neo Rogolia
10-08-2005, 01:38
Lol, it would be hilarious if they actually managed to pull it off :D
Neo Kervoskia
10-08-2005, 02:06
I'd get a chain going and chase the bastard wherever he goes.
Oo!Oo, may I come? Post 825
Gymoor II The Return
10-08-2005, 02:06
That's just beautiful.
Sumamba Buwhan
10-08-2005, 02:53
Now theres a nefarious action I can get behind
I pray this really does happen.
Rotovia-
10-08-2005, 03:03
Looks like Souter will be eating a hearty helpful at the Just Desserts Cafe.
Would this be one of those "OWN3D!" moments?
"Old".
That and possibly violating a number of laws, including ones that prevent people from threatening a judge's property and life because of what they do.
Lol, it would be hilarious if they actually managed to pull it off :D
what if he actually accepts it and moves?
Sumamba Buwhan
10-08-2005, 04:10
what if he actually accepts it and moves?
That would be a good classic bitch slap right back at them, but I would still like to see a museum like that.
Non Aligned States
10-08-2005, 04:14
"Old".
That and possibly violating a number of laws, including ones that prevent people from threatening a judge's property and life because of what they do.
Nope. According to this, its not a threat. Threats are normally illegal with malicious intent. This one is a legitimate business move approved by the same precedent he set. If he loses his home as a result, what can we say but "Oh, too bad"
Nope. According to this, its not a threat. Threats are normally illegal with malicious intent. This one is a legitimate business move approved by the same precedent he set. If he loses his home as a result, what can we say but "Oh, too bad"
Please. We all know that this is a threat against his property for a decision that he made, and acting all "oh, too bad" isn't exactly the most honest thing to be doing.
Dempublicents1
10-08-2005, 04:31
By the Kelo decision, this would not be allowed - as has been explained in previous threads.
One of the reasons that the Kelo case was found to be constitutional was the fact that no particular third party was specified. The developers who will eventually take the land were not yet decided.