NationStates Jolt Archive


The "Under God" In the Pledge part 2!

Colyell
09-08-2005, 02:08
Whoa. I stepped on a lot of people's toes, didn't I?
But seriously, there are some errors in your arguement:

1) The Constitution is a god-less document, it isn't based on the Ten Commandments, otherwise it might've mentioned God AT LEAST ONCE (IT DOESN'T).

2) The "In God We Trust" thing appeared in the 50's to spite the godless commies, not because of the Freemasons.

3) The founders of your country were not Freemasons, but Diests or something like that.

4) There are other moral codes then the Ten Commandments, and a few of them are more similar to the words and basic ideals of the Constituion then the Ten Commandments. The COnstituion could've been based on those.

Little History Lesson, ok? Why did our founding father come to America????? They Didn't agree how the King was Running his CHRISTIAN Church. Case Closed... My God be with you... For our Savior will return... and you WILL be left behind.
Kroisistan
09-08-2005, 02:16
Little History lesson, eh? The Founding Fathers didn't come to America to escape Religious persecution. The Massachussetts Bay colonists did that(aka Pilgrims), and they set up Theocracies that make Iran look soft. The colonists in the southern, middle and some of the northern colonies came for profit, land, glory and/or at the behest of the English sovreign.

But I have something for you that should put the religiousness of the Founding Fathers in proper perspective. I don't know who wrote it, but it came from NS -

Our founding fathers were devout Christians who based this nation on the Bible? Oh my. Well, lets get some opinions from the Founding Fathers themselves, eh? Arranging in alphabetical order. Why? Because I like it.

Lets start with John Adams, one of my favorites.
John Adams (1735-1826)
Second President of the United States (1797-1801)

As I understand the Christian religion, it was, and is, a revelation. But how has it happened that millions of fables, tales, legends, have been blended with both Jewish and Christian revelation that have made them the most bloody religion that ever existed?
-- John Adams, letter to F.A. Van der Kamp, December 27, 1816

I shall have liberty to think for myself without molesting others or being molested myself.
-- John Adams, letter to his brother-in-law, Richard Cranch, August 29, 1756, explaining how his independent opinions would create much difficulty in the ministry, in Edwin S. Gaustad, Faith of Our Fathers: Religion and the New Nation (1987) p. 88, quoted from Ed and Michael Buckner, "Quotations that Support the Separation of State and Church"

Let the human mind loose. It must be loose. It will be loose. Superstition and dogmatism cannot confine it.
-- John Adams, letter to his son, John Quincy Adams, November 13, 1816, from James A. Haught, ed., 2000 Years of Disbelief

Can a free government possibly exist with the Roman Catholic religion?
-- John Adams, letter to Thomas Jefferson, May 19, 1821, from James A. Haught, ed., 2000 Years of Disbelief

I almost shudder at the thought of alluding to the most fatal example of the abuses of grief which the history of mankind has preserved -- the Cross. Consider what calamities that engine of grief has produced!
-- John Adams, letter to Thomas Jefferson, from George Seldes, The Great Quotations, also from James A. Haught, ed., 2000 Years of Disbelief

God is an essence that we know nothing of. Until this awful blasphemy is got rid of, there never will be any liberal science in the world.
-- John Adams, "this awful blashpemy" that he refers to is the myth of the Incarnation of Christ, from Ira D. Cardiff, What Great Men Think of Religion, quoted from James A. Haught, ed., 2000 Years of Disbelief

The Treaty of Tripoli
Signed by John Adams

"As the government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen [Muslims] ... it is declared ... that no pretext arising from religious opinion shall ever product an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries....
"The United States is not a Christian nation any more than it is a Jewish or a Mohammedan nation."
-- Treaty of Tripoli (1797), carried unanimously by the Senate and signed into law by John Adams (the original language is by Joel Barlow, U.S. Consul)


Alright, so Jonny is a bit hard-core. I'm sure friendly Mr. Franklin will be the very opitime of a good Christian!

Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
American public official, writer, scientist, and printer who played a major part in the American Revolution

The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason: The Morning Daylight appears plainer when you put out your Candle.
-- Benjamin Franklin, the incompatibility of faith and reason, Poor Richard's Almanack (1758)

I have found Christian dogma unintelligible. Early in life I absented myself from Christian assemblies.
-- Benjamin Franklin, quoted from Victor J. Stenger, Has Science Found God? (2001)

Lighthouses are more helpful than churches.
-- Benjamin Franklin (attributed: source unknown)

Um...alright. Thomas Jefferson will prove the US is a Christian nation!

Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
The third President of the United States (1801-1809)

The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.
-- Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia, 1781-82 (capitalization of the word god is retained per original; see Positive Atheism's Historical Section)

Millions of innocent men, women, and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined, and imprisoned; yet we have not advanced one inch toward uniformity. What has been the effect of coercion? To make one-half the world fools and the other half hypocrites. To support roguery and error all over the earth.
-- Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia, 1781-82

[N]o man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer, on account of his religious opinions or belief; but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion, and that the same shall in no wise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities.
-- Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom (1779), quoted from Merrill D. Peterson, ed., Thomas Jefferson: Writings (1984), p. 347

I am for freedom of religion, & against all maneuvres to bring about a legal ascendancy of one sect over another.
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to Elbridge Gerry, 1799 (see Positive Atheism's Historical section)

I never will, by any word or act, bow to the shrine of intolerance, or admit a right of inquiry into the religious opinions of others.
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to Edward Dowse, April 19, 1803

Because religious belief, or non-belief, is such an important part of every person's life, freedom of religion affects every individual. State churches that use government power to support themselves and force their views on persons of other faiths undermine all our civil rights. Moreover, state support of the church tends to make the clergy unresponsive to the people and leads to corruption within religion. Erecting the "wall of separation between church and state," therefore, is absolutely essential in a free society.
We have solved ... the great and interesting question whether freedom of religion is compatible with order in government and obedience to the laws. And we have experienced the quiet as well as the comfort which results from leaving every one to profess freely and openly those principles of religion which are the inductions of his own reason and the serious convictions of his own inquiries.
-- Thomas Jefferson, to the Virginia Baptists (1808). This is his second use of the term "wall of separation," here quoting his own use in the Danbury Baptist letter. This wording was several times upheld by the Supreme Court as an accurate description of the Establishment Clause: Reynolds (98 U.S. at 164, 1879); Everson (330 U.S. at 59, 1947); McCollum (333 U.S. at 232, 1948)

Religion is a subject on which I have ever been most scrupulously reserved. I have considered it as a matter between every man and his Maker in which no other, and far less the public, had a right to intermeddle.
-- Thomas Jefferson, to Richard Rush, 1813

Christianity neither is, nor ever was, a part of the common law.
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper, February 10, 1814, responding to the claim that Chritianity was part of the Common Law of England, as the United States Constitution defaults to the Common Law regarding matters that it does not address. This argument is still used today by "Christian Nation" revisionists who do not admit to having read Thomas Jefferson's thorough research of this matter.

The clergy, by getting themselves established by law and ingrafted into the machine of government, have been a very formidable engine against the civil and religious rights of man.
-- Thomas Jefferson, to Jeremiah Moor, 1800

I am for freedom of religion, and against all maneuvers to bring about a legal ascendency of one sect over another.
-- Thomas Jefferson, to Elbridge Gerry, 1799. ME 10:78

To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical.
-- Thomas Jefferson, Statute for Religious Freedom, 1779. Papers, 1:545

History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes.
-- Thomas Jefferson, to Alexander von Humboldt, December 6, 1813 (see Positive Atheism's Historical section)

In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own. It is easier to acquire wealth and power by this combination than by deserving them, and to effect this, they have perverted the purest religion ever preached to man into mystery and jargon, unintelligible to all mankind, and therefore the safer engine for their purposes.
-- Thomas Jefferson, to Horatio G. Spafford, March 17, 1814

Damn it Tommy, shut up! You're not helping me prove to these nice people that Christianity was built into our nation by the Founding Fathers! In fact, you're being down-right hostile towards religion in general, and Christianity in particular!

I can only hope that James Madison, Father of our Constitution, can save us!
After all, it is that document that is the supreme law!

The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe in blood for centuries.
-- James Madison, letter objecting to the use of government land for churches, 1803, quoted from James A. Haught, ed., 2000 Years of Disbelief

Thats not a good start, James....

I have ever regarded the freedom of religious opinions and worship as equally belonging to every sect.
-- James Madison, letter to Mordecai Noah, May 15, 1818, from Albert J. Menendez and Edd Doerr, The Great Quotations on Religious Freedom

The general government is proscribed from the interfering, in any manner whatsoever, in matters respecting religion; and it may be thought to do this, in ascertaining who, and who are not, ministers of the gospel.
-- James Madison, 1790, Papers, 13:16

What influence, in fact, have ecclesiastical establishments had on society? In some instances they have been seen to erect a spiritual tyranny on the ruins of the civil authority; in many instances they have been seen upholding the thrones of political tyranny; in no instance have they been the guardians of the liberties of the people. Rulers who wish to subvert the public liberty may have found an established clergy convenient allies.
-- James Madison, A Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments, addressed to the Virginia General Assemby, June 20, 1785

Ecclesiastical establishments tend to great ignorance and corruption, all of which facilitate the execution of mischievous projects.
-- James Madison, letter to Bradford, January 1774, from Albert J. Menendez and Edd Doerr, The Great Quotations on Religious Freedom

Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprize, every expanded prospect.
-- James Madison, letter to William Bradford, Jr., April 1, 1774, quoted from Edwin S. Gaustad, Faith of Our Fathers: Religion and the New Nation (1987) p. 37, quoted from Ed and Michael Buckner, "Quotations that Support the Separation of State and Church"

Rulers who wished to subvert the public liberty, may have found an established Clergy convenient auxiliaries. A just Government instituted to secure & perpetuate it needs them not.
-- James Madison, A Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments, addressed to the Virginia General Assemby, June 20, 1785

Among the features peculiar to the political system of the United States, is the perfect equality of rights which it secures to every religious sect ... Equal laws, protecting equal rights, are found, as they ought to be presumed, the best guarantee of loyalty and love of country; as well as best calculated to cherish that mutual respect and good will among citizens of every religious denomination which are necessary to social harmony, and most favorable to the advancement of truth.
-- James Madison, letter to Dr. De La Motta, August 1820 (Madison, 1865, III, pages 178-179), quoted from James A. Haught, ed., 2000 Years of Disbelief

Because the bill vests in the said incorporated church an authority to provide for the support of the poor and the education of poor children of the same, an authority which, being altogether superfluous if the provision is to be the result of pious charity, would be a precedent for giving to religious societies as such a legal agency in carrying into effect a public and civil duty.
-- James Madison, veto message, February 21, 1811. Madison vetoed a bill to fund "pious charity" organized by the Episcopal Church in Alexandria, Virginia, and the District of Columbia, saying that a project comparable to the modern "Charitible Choice" scheme of the George W. Bush administration gives religious societies legal agency in performing a public and civil duty

And smacking down a faith-based initiative! How dare you!


Because the bill in reserving a certain parcel of land in the United States for the use of said Baptist Church comprises a principle and a precedent for the appropriation of funds of the United States for the use and support of religious societies, contrary to the article of the Constitution which declares that "Congress shall make no law respecting a religious establishment."
-- James Madison, veto message, February 28, 1811. Madison vetoed a bill granting public lands to a Baptist Church in Mississippi Territory. Quoted from Albert J. Menendez and Edd Doerr, The Great Quotations on Religious Freedom. Also in Gaillard Hunt, The Writings of James Madison, Vol. 8, (1908), p. 133.

Freedom arises from the multiplicity of sects, which pervades America and which is the best and only security for religious liberty in any society. For where there is such a variety of sects, there can ot be a majority of any one sect to oppress and persecute the rest.
-- James Madison, spoken at the Virginia convention on ratification of the Constitution, June, 1778, quoted from James A. Haught, ed., 2000 Years of Disbelief


AAAAAHHHH!!! Washington, you are my only hope!

George Washington (1732-1799)
The first President of the United States (1789-1797)

Every man, conducting himself as a good citizen, and being accountable to God alone for his religious opinions, ought to be protected in worshipping the Deity according to the dictates of his own conscience.
-- George Washington, letter to the United Baptist Chamber of Virginia, May 1789, in Anson Phelps Stokes, Church and State in the United States, Vol 1. p. 495, quoted from Albert J. Menendez and Edd Doerr, The Great Quotations on Religious Freedom

Among many other weighty objections to the Measure, it has been suggested, that it has a tendency to introduce religious disputes into the Army, which above all things should be avoided, and in many instances would compel men to a mode of Worship which they do not profess.
-- George Washington, to John Hancock, then president of Congress, expressing opposition to a congressional plan to appoint brigade chaplains in the Continental Army (1777), quoted from a letter to Cliff Walker from Doug Harper (2002) ††

Well. Screw me. I guess the Founding Fathers weren't religious nuts. How about that.

Oh, and a technical note, you shouldn't respond to someone in a new thread, you should do it in the original thread that person posted the post in.
Ginnoria
09-08-2005, 04:27
lol ... good for them. But seriously, why does it matter what the 'founding fathers' thought or wanted, especially today? They're dead and gone, their religious or political views are irrelevent. You can make a case either way for their intentions, but what's the point?

What should matter to us today, right now, is the issue and how to resolve it. I've seen the constitution, and I haven't seen any mention of God. Or any god. Or any relgion, except to forbid the government's role legislating its establishment or persecution. Who cares what Thomas Jefferson or whoever thought about it? He was a slaveowner, too ... you going to follow by example? What we have to think about is what the government should do based on what's right, not what Thomas Jefferson thought was right, whatever that was.

Writing a Pledge that invokes the name of a specific god of a specific religion, printing a religious message on currency, and other such things aren't right. Those actions discriminate unfairly against every other religion out there, or lack thereof. If the Pledge says "under God", it had better say "under Krishna", "under Allah", "under Ahura Mazda", etc. as well. Since that would take hours to recite, and would undoubtably leave a few out, it's a far better solution to just leave all of them out. The government doesn't say that it is under God, and it doesn't say it is under Ares. It doesn't even say whether or now God or Ares exist. And it definitely doesn't cater to any crackpot who dreams up his own divine entitiy.
Kroisistan
09-08-2005, 04:44
And it definitely doesn't cater to any crackpot who dreams up his own divine entitiy.

http://www.venganza.org/shirtiwtb.jpg

http://www.venganza.org/shirt4.jpg

'Nuff Said.
Ginnoria
09-08-2005, 04:51
http://www.venganza.org/shirt4.jpg

'Nuff Said.

Hahaha ... almost makes me want to buy it just for kicks ...
CSW
09-08-2005, 04:52
Hahaha ... almost makes me want to buy it just for kicks ...
The original page is better...
Kroisistan
09-08-2005, 04:53
Hahaha ... almost makes me want to buy it just for kicks ...

I've been waiting several days for a perfect opportunity to post something about the Flying Spaghetti Monster. :D

"I was touched by his noodly appendage."
Kroisistan
09-08-2005, 04:54
The original page is better...

What original page? This one?

http://www.venganza.org/
CSW
09-08-2005, 04:54
What original page? This one?

http://www.venganza.org/
That one.


You know there's been a thread about ID kicking around somewhere, the FSM is perfect for that...
Rotovia-
09-08-2005, 05:00
The Consititution exists as the supreme law of the land and if in this document of such weighted importance there is no mention of God, then it can be presumed that the issue of the Christian diety is to play no role in the legislation of the nation.
Kroisistan
09-08-2005, 05:01
That one.


You know there's been a thread about ID kicking around somewhere, the FSM is perfect for that...

That *might* have actually been where I got this from. I know I came across it *somewhere* on the Internet within the past couple of days, and an ID thread might have been it...
Rysonia
09-08-2005, 05:04
Nice quotes Kroisistan.

And the 'Under God' in the pledge was added in the 60's (?), might have been the 50's but I'm thinking it was the 60's. Suffice it to say it is a farirly new addition to the Pledge and truly doesn't need to be there in my opinion. Though it's not a big deal to me.
Ginnoria
09-08-2005, 05:08
Nice to see that we all agree here ... no luck with getting anyone to defect from the other under God thread ... oh well. Bump.
Kroisistan
09-08-2005, 05:11
Nice quotes Kroisistan.

And the 'Under God' in the pledge was added in the 60's (?), might have been the 50's but I'm thinking it was the 60's. Suffice it to say it is a farirly new addition to the Pledge and truly doesn't need to be there in my opinion. Though it's not a big deal to me.

Yes the phrase wasn't even in there originally. I mean it doesn't really bother me, but it is perhaps inappropriate in a society with many, many religions.....

including Flying Spaghetti Monsterism. :D

But I should reiterate for honestly and integrity purposes that I didn't get those quotes. Some guy a while back, who's name I don't know, posted that somewhere in NS, and I figured it might come in handy in future debates.
Rysonia
09-08-2005, 06:47
Well they are still nice quotes.

And yeah it really isn't appropriate. And truthfully just causes promblems and arguements amongst people that are trully unnecissary. Let's leave religion in home and churches (temples, etc...). I can't see any need for it in school or government buildings. Bad enough I have to filter my daughter's cartoons so strongly so that I'm teaching her religion, not the television set. Just when you think it's safe to let them watch something you here them teaching about 'Uncle Noah' oie.....
Evinsia
09-08-2005, 07:04
What's the big deal? It's two words! You can say the pledge without saying 'Under God'. You don't even have to say the pledge. It's understandable (in my opinion) why it would be in there, since a solid 78% of the nation is of some Christian belief. You can look it up on the CIA World Factbook if you want.
And any attempt to remove it from the pledge would be a fascist move. And you don't want to live in a fascist nation, do you?
Rysonia
09-08-2005, 07:08
It's a recent addition to the pldege, so removing it would be returning to the traidtions of our country.

Our country may be 78% Christian but that doesn't mean that we're a Christian Country. We are a Country founded on the belief of freedom to worship or not worship as we choose. The Pledge is taught in schools and as such should not give an indication of religious biastry on the part of the government.

No it doesn't bother me those two words. On the other hand I can see where it would trouble others, and I'm not certain I would want it taught to my child as it stands.
Evinsia
09-08-2005, 07:21
It's a recent addition to the pldege, so removing it would be returning to the traidtions of our country.

Our country may be 78% Christian but that doesn't mean that we're a Christian Country. We are a Country founded on the belief of freedom to worship or not worship as we choose. The Pledge is taught in schools and as such should not give an indication of religious biastry on the part of the government.

No it doesn't bother me those two words. On the other hand I can see where it would trouble others, and I'm not certain I would want it taught to my child as it stands.

Good point, especially with the second paragraph. If anything, it should just be a sign of 'religious biastry' in the schools.
The Black Forrest
09-08-2005, 07:27
Meh.

The pledge is an outdated artifact for one simple reason. The knowledge of history. Most kids today barely know our history and just go through the motions of parroting the words.

I doubt few could give a decent synopsis of what it took to get us where we are.

Do many even know what they are pledging to anymore? Exlcuding the catchall phrases......
Burlia
09-08-2005, 07:30
...any attempt to remove it from the pledge would be a fascist move. And you don't want to live in a fascist nation, do you?

How is that?

EDIT: Godwin's Law.
Phenixica
09-08-2005, 07:44
Ameica only says it christian when it wants people to think there doing what the christian world wants christians dont support america but the america government also know that alot of it's population is christian so people like G.bush pretend to be christian to get votes a smart christian know that the dumb ones are so easy to manlipulate that any leader of government even in my beloved country of australia can say "I AM CHRISTIAN" then pretty much ignore everything that it takes to be christian
Keruvalia
09-08-2005, 08:43
Little History Lesson, ok? Why did our founding father come to America?????

Umm ... because they were born here.

Ok, so Alexander Hamilton was born in the West Indies, but you get the point.
The boldly courageous
09-08-2005, 08:49
A variety of quotes by John Adams.


My recommendation is that everyone realize the amount of quotes on this thread are not adequate to give a full picture of John Adams paradigm. Including this post. Many times people pick out only the quotes that support their view. This post is to show that John Addams had many different views. Including favorable ones about the bible and negative about certain religious/secular systems. I reiterate this is a miniscule sample and should not be considered as authoritative.



In what light soever we regard the Bible, whether with reference to revelation, to history, or to morality, it is an invaluable and inexhaustible mine of knowledge and virtue.

So great is my veneration for the Bible, that the earlier my children begin to read it the more confident will be my hopes that they will prove useful citizens to their country and respectable members of society.

The question before the human race is, whether the God of nature shall govern the world by his own laws, or whether priests and kings shall rule it by fictitious miracles.

Set before us the conduct of our own British ancestors, who defended for us the inherent rights of mankind against foreign and domestic tyrants and usurpers, against arbitrary kings and cruel priests; in short against the gates of earth and hell.

By the former of these (canon law), the most refined, sublime, extensive, and astonishing constitution of policy that ever was conceived by the mind of man was framed by the Romish clergy for the aggrandizement of their own order.

The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God...anarchy and tyranny commence.

Source: http://www.quotableonline.com/quotedisplay.php?lastName=Adams&firstName=John&page=1
THE LOST PLANET
09-08-2005, 10:03
The words "under god" were added to the pledge in '53 after a concerted lobbying effort by (big suprise!) a religious organization, the Knights of Columbus. They weren't part of Francis Bellamy's original concept (although "equality" was supposed to there with liberty and justice and was left out only because it was too controversial for the day, some thirty odd years after the civil war).

The puritans who left England for religious reason's weren't our founding fathers as others have pointed out. Our founding fathers were descendants of them and of many others from many places who came to this land for a variety of reasons. Over a hundred years seperate the two groups you treat as one entity in your little rant.

A basic knowledge of history is somewhat helpfull when you try to use it to argue a point.
BackwoodsSquatches
09-08-2005, 10:06
LP, your alive!

Where have you been young man?
Your mother and I have been SO worried about you!

You are SO grounded MR!
THE LOST PLANET
09-08-2005, 10:11
LP, your alive!

Where have you been young man?
Your mother and I have been SO worried about you!

You are SO grounded MR!Hey Squatch, how you been.

My seperation and Divorce has kind of kept me too occupied for NS. I'm lucky I can log on enough to keep from being deleted.
BackwoodsSquatches
09-08-2005, 10:13
Hey Squatch, how you been.

My seperation and Divorce has kind of kept me too occupied for NS. I'm lucky I can log on enough to keep from being deleted.


Aw man....tough break with divorce thing.

Wemmins is crazy I tells ya.
THE LOST PLANET
09-08-2005, 10:18
Aw man....tough break with divorce thing.

Wemmins is crazy I tells ya.I still like women...I've met a few since the split that have restored my faith in the fairer sex.

But the divorce is rough. I know most are but mine is especially nasty. Some days I swear that if you were to google "ugly divorce" you'd find our picture...
BackwoodsSquatches
09-08-2005, 10:23
Makes ya wonder some cultures would want more than one wife.


Gluttons for punishment, Im thinking.
THE LOST PLANET
09-08-2005, 10:30
Makes ya wonder some cultures would want more than one wife.


Gluttons for punishment, Im thinking.One of those "carefull what you wish for scenarios".....Most men in those cultures are wise enough to pass on the opportunity...those who don't are punished for their greed.




This brings back memories....it's been so long since I hyjacked a thread...
RIGHTWINGCONSERVANIA
09-08-2005, 10:37
I'm back.

You can't legislate morality. You can only teach it to your children and hope it sticks.

You can't strongarm true religious faith. Burning at the stake and public humiliation are not in the Bible. Those are inventions of human beings with the wrong idea about how God wants to get the Word out.

You can't tell me that this country would not be better off if more people at least held to the principles of the Christian faith, if not the actual beliefs.

The concepts of treating your fellow man with dignity, respect and brotherly love are not sedition against the constitutional separation of church and state.

AS I should have said in thread #1 last night, we should probably go ahead and remove the "under God" since it's really against the principle of the first ammendment. It doesn't really do for people to speak falsely in pledging their allegance anyway. If you don't believe in God, then you shouldn't have to say you do.

It does me no good as a Christian to expect anyone to fall in line behind me as I march to the beat of the drum of my beliefs. Go ahead and explore, see what there is out there with your own eyes, listen with your own ears. That's all God expects you to do anyway. He never forces Himself on anyone, especially not via a human persecution. That is the way of heathens and apostates.

Have a nice day. ;)
Americai
09-08-2005, 10:41
Little History Lesson, ok? Why did our founding father come to America????? They Didn't agree how the King was Running his CHRISTIAN Church. Case Closed... My God be with you... For our Savior will return... and you WILL be left behind.

Dude, what? Have you had ANY education regarding the causes of the American Revolution?
Americai
09-08-2005, 10:51
lol ... good for them. But seriously, why does it matter what the 'founding fathers' thought or wanted, especially today? They're dead and gone, their religious or political views are irrelevent. You can make a case either way for their intentions, but what's the point?

What should matter to us today, right now, is the issue and how to resolve it. I've seen the constitution, and I haven't seen any mention of God. Or any god. Or any relgion, except to forbid the government's role legislating its establishment or persecution. Who cares what Thomas Jefferson or whoever thought about it? He was a slaveowner, too ... you going to follow by example? What we have to think about is what the government should do based on what's right, not what Thomas Jefferson thought was right, whatever that was.

Because THEY as a founding body understood how a representative republic works more than ANY person today. You'll never find such an educated body of men going what they went through, then doing what they did. There are a LOT of legitimate reasons why we, the inheriters of THEIR nation, continue to look to them for guidence. But untill you get off your ass and learn more about the purposes of this nation's government, most of what people tell you falls on deaf ears.

So I'll tell you what, prick. How about YOU found a representative repubilc that lasts for 200 plus years, that has citizens that are still trying to figure out what you would have done in their sitaution and are committed to trying to keep the nation's purpose as it was initially created for, before you go on and slander our founding fathers?

Maybe you'll understand what type of people your badmouthing.
THE LOST PLANET
09-08-2005, 11:10
Because THEY as a founding body understood how a representative republic works more than ANY person today. You'll never find such an educated body of men going what they went through, then doing what they did. There are a LOT of legitimate reasons why we, the inheriters of THEIR nation, continue to look to them for guidence. But untill you get off your ass and learn more about the purposes of this nation's government, most of what people tell you falls on deaf ears.

So I'll tell you what, prick. How about YOU found a representative repubilc that lasts for 200 plus years, that has citizens that are still trying to figure out what you would have done in their sitaution and are committed to trying to keep the nation's purpose as it was initially created for, before you go on and slander our founding fathers?

Maybe you'll understand what type of people your badmouthing.Maybe you don't really understand the constitution or the founders wisdom in creating it. Your reply seemed to venomous for one who does. It's OK to look to the founders for inspiration but even they foresaw that they could not cover every concievable issue in that document and left room for adaption and evolution. Our nation and it's people change and the constitution was designed to keep pace, that's why it has endured for over 200 years. The politics of the founders is immaterial, what they might think about any issue is meaningless. These men of vision surely would have adapted to the times, it's foolish to think of their vision as static.