NationStates Jolt Archive

With all the abortion threads flying around, I was beginning to wonder what exactly people are up against in their mini heated stubborn debates.

Take your arguments somewhere else, please.

So:

Hello, I'm Callipygousness, and I'm pro-Choice and agnostic.

hello. Im refusing to tell you my name or my political stance. so there. Youll just have to work it out somehow....

I respect that you had the wisdom to differentiate pro-choice and pro-abortion. I’m pro-choice and religious, by the way.

See above

yeah, i could understand being pro-choice, but what kind of nazi is pro abortion???

yeah, i could understand being pro-choice, but what kind of nazi is pro abortion???
Well, not me, even though I can think of more than a few people whose mothers I wish had had one.

yeah, i could understand being pro-choice, but what kind of nazi is pro abortion???

Zero population growth terrorists. I'm PC/NR

Well, not me, even though I can think of more than a few people whose mothers I wish had had one.

LOL! I agree with you to no end.

yeah, i could understand being pro-choice, but what kind of nazi is pro abortion???
Pro-abortion isn't forcing people to get abortions. It's simply supporting the use of them. Pro-choice is supporting the women's right to choose. Pro-abortion goes above and beyond that.

Pro-abortion isn't forcing people to get abortions. It's simply supporting the use of them. Pro-choice is supporting the women's right to choose. Pro-abortion goes above and beyond that.

hey retard shut up and let the big boys talk, its so freakin obvious you're a terrorist it's insane

Pro-Abortion means you're in favour of aborting any and all life past the womb as well?

Pro-Abortion means you're in favour of aborting any and all life past the womb as well?
No. Pro-abortion is simply when you support the use of abortions. You can't abort what has already been born.

fark, so it's just synonymous with pro-choice as noone's fool enough to advocate abortion in the face of the woman.

I was hoping there'd be someone who'd cash in on that idea....

fark, so it's just synonymous with pro-choice as noone's fool enough to advocate abortion in the face of the woman.

It's not synonomous. There's a subtle difference. You can be pro-choice but anti-abortion. Most pro-choicers are.

yeah, i could understand being pro-choice, but what kind of nazi is pro abortion???

Some people are legitimately pro-choice, others see every abortion as the furtherence of their political agenda

im a catholic atheist who is pro-choice. i support the right of a woman to choose. that includes the right of a young teen girl to carry her pregnancy to term over the objections of her parents.

How is one a catholic athiest?

im a catholic atheist who is pro-choice. i support the right of a woman to choose. that includes the right of a young teen girl to carry her pregnancy to term over the objections of her parents.


YOU ARE RETARDED

Catholic athiest thats pro choice. well thats just one huge contradiction. First of all, Catholic and athiest kinda, just kinda conflict, and if you are a catholic, how do you justify abortion? I hope to god youre kidding otherwise that was the single most stupid statement ive ever heard other that "im a democratic jewish nazi" or a "sane liberal"

Or kind conservative, Tyrannical Facists? Whatever happened to tact? YOU ARE RETARDED
Fauz pas?
Jeez... :rolleyes:

you forgot brave frenchman or Patriotic democrat

What did the French ever to do you? Were you hit over the head by a baguette as a child? I am so sick of insinuations that French people are wimps and only conservatives are true Americans. We left England to escape people like you.

tact died with the innocent babies liberals murder every year.

the word is doctors, not liberals. I'm afraid you may be confused.

how many conservative abortion clinics ya see out there? you call them doctors, ill call them murderers, or liberals if you prefer.

At least it's murder and not homicide. I think it should stay that way.

Well, I definently think there are certain circumstances where abortion is a neccessary evil, such as pregnancy by rape. However, I believe that if somebody is having sex, they are accepting the odds of getting pregnant, whether they use birth control or condoms, and in that case I am against it. I hate to put conditions on my beliefs, but I believe women shouldhave the choice in all situations except promiscuity. Granted you can't really find a 100% non-faulty way of judging how they got pregnant, so I believe the woman should have the choice, and in some cases the man also. No woman should be forced to keep a baby, but I don't think it should be something for stupid teenager who sleep around to fall back on. And I am religious. I was raised Catholic, but follow Christian beliefs.

How is one a catholic athiest?

Born a Catholic then converted?

Personally, I would never get an abortion unless the reason was incest, maybe rape, I'm not too sure.

But I still fully support the womans RIGHT TO CHOOSE. that's what CHOICE is all about. Just like how a woman can chose to keep a baby, against all odds, I think a woman has a right to chose not to have the baby.

Pro-choice, and not religious.

I think a woman has a right to chose not to have the baby.

But the pro-life sector also offers choice. Choose not to have sex.

If you were catholic and converted to being an athiest, stop saying your catholic, YOUR NOT! youre just trying to create confusion, and a bunch of useless posts

I didn't notice any useless posts. They appeared to be tag-ons to otherwise productive posts.

Have I killed the thread?

im still here but im focusing on a similar thread with more participants

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?p=9396689&posted=1#post9396689

if youde like to join us

its an abortion one as well

For the record, I'm a pro-abortion athiest female. :)

pro-abortion or pro-choice, theres a difference.

Agnostic pro-choicer. I view a previous comment as "the right to choose not to have sex" as foolish. Sex is a so very human urge, and even though the poster did not say it or imply it, it is foolish to burden a person if they chose to pursue their urge. The thought once crossed my mind concerning punishing a person by not allowing them to abort for their urge...I compared it to a person acting on an urge for very fatty but very, very good food. I thought...would we ever consider not allowing them surgery for a heart attack were it the result of high cholesterol tacked onto fatty foods, because they knew better and chose to anyway? We wouldn't. Sure, that's a life-and-death situation, and not many pregnant women in the "western world" die during childbirth. But perhaps if I were to change it around a bit, to say "consider not allowing them supplements to lower their cholesterol", would not it be along the same logic? Yet there are conservatives out there who would give the burden to pregnant mothers whose contraception failed, or didn't use contraception, merely because they could have chosen not to have sex and did so anyway? That's a rather cruel thing to believe in. To top this off, it is to preserve the sanctity of a parasitic embryo which has not been yet carried to full term, which has not been birthed, and which will only continue to become "more of a parasite" for months to come. Claiming it's murder to abort a bundle of cells. 'Course, this is going towards the route of what's "human", per se. We don't think twice about killing house flies, but so much debate goes over something that should be a very personal, difficult choice. </BlahBlah>