NationStates Jolt Archive


If You Wondered How Good Charlotte Remained On the Radio:

Mister Pink
27-07-2005, 22:25
Sony Busted for Payola!

Rob Kleckner reports:
Just in from Pitchfork's Crimewatch: New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer has forced Sony BMG Music Entertainment to stop paying radio stations for airplay. In case you didn't know, this practice known as payola, is illegal. "Our investigation shows that, contrary to listener expectations that songs are selected for airplay based on artistic merit and popularity, air time is often determined by undisclosed payoffs to radio stations and their employees," Spitzer said.

According to a press release from Spitzer's office, the payola occurred in several forms, including the following: "Outright bribes to radio programmers, including expensive vacation packages, electronics, and other valuable items; contest giveaways for stations' listening audiences; and payments for 'spin programs', airplay under the guise of advertising."

An email found during the investigation, from one executive at Epic to another, read: "At the end of the day, [David] Universal added Good Charlotte and Gretchen Wilson and hit Alex up for another grand and they settled for $750."

Another, from an Epic employee to a Clear Channel programmer looked like this: "WHAT DO I HAVE TO DO TO GET AUDIOSLAVE ON WKSS THIS WEEK?!!? Whatever you can dream up, I can make it happen."

You can't make this shit up, folks. To pay for their crimes, Sony has agreed to donate $10 million to non-profit charities and music education programs. Don Henley, of Eagles fame, commended Spitzer for "successfully addressing the pay-for-play problem. There is no question that payola hurts recording artists. The Recording Artists' Coalition is grateful to him and his staff for exposing the magnitude of the payola problem and for getting a major label to agree to change the way it does business."

In a statement, the label said: "Despite federal and state laws prohibiting unacknowledged payment by record labels to radio stations for airing of music, such direct and indirect forms of what has been described generically as 'payola' for spins has continued to be an unfortunately prevalent aspect of radio promotion. Sony BMG acknowledges that various employees pursed some radio promotion practices on behalf of the company that were wrong and improper and apologizes for such conduct. Sony BMG looks forward to defining a new, higher standard in radio promotion."

What does this mean for you, the music listener? Hopefully it's a sign we'll be hearing a lot less Good Charlotte on the radio. Fans of good music everywhere thank you, Mr. Spitzer. He can likely count on the New York hipster vote when he runs for Governor in 2006.

* Eliot Spitzer 2006: http://www.spitzer2006.com/

While I am glad to see that the bands that actually deserve to be on the radio are getting some help, I have to wonder if "payola" should be illegal.

What do you think?
Fischerspooner
27-07-2005, 22:27
While I am glad to see that the bands that actually deserve to be on the radio are getting some help, I have to wonder if "payola" should be illegal.

What do you think?

Yes. Otherwise we'll just get wall to wall "what Corporate America thinks we should be listening to this year" on all our radio stat...

oh, bugger, too late ;)
Danemix
27-07-2005, 22:29
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=434366

Made a thread about this already. :)
Mister Pink
27-07-2005, 22:32
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=434366

Made a thread about this already. :)

Sorry, I missed it.
Mister Pink
27-07-2005, 22:33
Yes. Otherwise we'll just get wall to wall "what Corporate America thinks we should be listening to this year" on all our radio stat...

oh, bugger, too late ;)

But radio stations are private businesses, shouldn't they be able to determine what goes on the playlist, regardless of their influences?
Undelia
27-07-2005, 22:36
But radio stations are private businesses, shouldn't they be able to determine what goes on the playlist, regardless of their influences?
Yes, they should.
Dimiscant
27-07-2005, 23:21
The radio stations in question are probably getting some sort of govt support, and that would be why they are in trouble for this act.

Otherwise I'd say let the radio stations play whatever the hell they want. They usually only play garbage or commercials anyway.
Mister Pink
27-07-2005, 23:28
The radio stations in question are probably getting some sort of govt support, and that would be why they are in trouble for this act.

Otherwise I'd say let the radio stations play whatever the hell they want. They usually only play garbage or commercials anyway.

That could be true, or they could be explicitly saying that their playlists are based on listener requests.
[NS]Ihatevacations
28-07-2005, 00:11
But radio stations are private businesses, shouldn't they be able to determine what goes on the playlist, regardless of their influences?
No, they shouldn't, why? because they are using licensed public airwaves. The FCC strictly controls who has the right to broadcast on the various airwaves therefore controlling said airwaves throguh bribery is illegal
Fass
28-07-2005, 00:18
Ihatevacations']No, they shouldn't, why? because they are using licensed public airwaves.

People often tend to forget that little tidbit.
Mister Pink
28-07-2005, 04:07
Ihatevacations']No, they shouldn't, why? because they are using licensed public airwaves. The FCC strictly controls who has the right to broadcast on the various airwaves therefore controlling said airwaves throguh bribery is illegal

I did forget about that. Excellent point.
Cannot think of a name
28-07-2005, 04:20
I didn't know anyone enforced this anymore. Clear Channel are bastards, anyway...