NationStates Jolt Archive


Bush is more intelligent than Kerry. I can PROVE IT.

Robert E Lee II
29-06-2005, 05:11
Kerry's record was recently released, and to my great disapointment, he did actually serve his time in the military, hence the purple hearts for the cuts. (Can you believe one of them needed a BIG band-aid to be healed? :eek: )
However, other things were also released.

As you may or may not know, both Bush and Kerry went to the prestigious Yale University in New Haven Connecticut. Durring the election, Kerry's staff constantly pointed out the fact that Bush made "C"s and "B"s there. The liberal media also tried very hard to fool Americans into thinking George Bush was just that, a fool.

WELL GUESS WHAT:
John Kerry, as we now know, FAILED EVERY CLASS FRESHMAN YEAR, with the exception of French (C) WHICH HE SPOKE. He a did little better later on, an managed to pull out a C Average.

GUESS WHAT ELSE:
John Kerry is also now shown to have taken an IQ test. Now that it has been released we know that it is 10 POINTS LOWER THAN Bush's.
While that is still far above average, vilifying Bush as a moron is now laughable.
The Kerry staff's only excuse was that Kerry's IQ is probably much higher, for Kerry was MOST LIKELY DRUNK during that month.
Robert E Lee II
29-06-2005, 05:11
So what do you make of that?
[NS]Ihatevacations
29-06-2005, 05:12
Don't you got something else to do? Like eat goats?
Haloman
29-06-2005, 05:12
Kerry's record was recently released, and to my great disapointment, he did actually serve his time in the military, hence the purple hearts for the cuts. (Can you believe one of them needed a BIG band-aid to be healed? :eek: )
However, other things were also released.

As you may or may not know, both Bush and Kerry went to the prestigious Yale University in New Haven Connecticut. Durring the election, Kerry's staff constantly pointed out the fact that Bush made "C"s and "B"s there. The liberal media also tried very hard to fool Americans into thinking George Bush was just that, a fool.

WELL GUESS WHAT:
John Kerry, as we now know, FAILED EVERY CLASS FRESHMAN YEAR, with the exception of French (C) WHICH HE SPOKE. He a did little better later on, an managed to pull out a C Average.

GUESS WHAT ELSE:
John Kerry is also now shown to have taken an IQ test. Now that it has been released we know that it is 10 POINTS LOWER THAN Bush's.
While that is still far above average, vilifying Bush as a moron is now laughable.
The Kerry staff's only excuse was that Kerry's IQ is probably much higher, for Kerry was MOST LIKELY DRUNK during that month.

Does anyone care?

The election is over, Bush won, Kerry lost.
Robert E Lee II
29-06-2005, 05:13
Mmmmmm Goats.......
Achtung 45
29-06-2005, 05:14
this was already discussed and dismissed as being retarded.
Deleuze
29-06-2005, 05:14
I really couldn't care less.
Cannot think of a name
29-06-2005, 05:15
http://users.myexcel.com/metromonte/wayback.jpg
"Where are we going today Mr. Peabody?"
"Well Sherman, we're headed to Fall 2004 when this might of mattered."
"Ah, screw you Mr. Peabody. We keep going back there for nothin'. Come back to me when we're headed to something worth it."
Robert E Lee II
29-06-2005, 05:15
The point was Bush is smart and the Dems are liars. I am, strangely enough, aware that the election is over.
Robert E Lee II
29-06-2005, 05:17
this was already discussed and dismissed as being retarded.
Very good reply. You think it's retarted. PROFOUND REASONING, GENIUS!
[NS]Ihatevacations
29-06-2005, 05:17
The point was Bush is smart and the Dems are liars. I am, strangely enough, aware that the election is over.
Yet its June and you post shit. You might want to call Captain Kirk to come beam your ass outta that time warp.
Robert E Lee II
29-06-2005, 05:17
I really couldn't care less.
Then why are you telling us?
BLARGistania
29-06-2005, 05:18
First off, old news. Second off, Bush got a higher average than Kerry his Freshman year alone. Kerry graduated with a higher GPA and was the class speaker at the farewell address. Neither of which Bush can claim.

Third, you may want to actually read what you think is a source before you go ranting off about it.
Clarinet Geeks
29-06-2005, 05:19
sorry, but tests and grades dont prove intelligence

a frickin pig is smarter than bush
Achtung 45
29-06-2005, 05:20
Very good reply. You think it's retarted. PROFOUND REASONING, GENIUS!
wow, in case you weren't aware, a thread like this was created a few weeks ago quickly died because it has no relevence whatsoever, whoopdeedoo, you made your point. Good for you, you get a raisin.
Cannot think of a name
29-06-2005, 05:32
This has been done once (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=424312&highlight=kerry) not twice (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=424412&highlight=kerry), but three (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=424255&highlight=kerry) times.

And now makes four. You're on the long end of the trough, it seems.
Deleuze
29-06-2005, 05:34
wow, in case you weren't aware, a thread like this was created a few weeks ago quickly died because it has no relevence whatsoever, whoopdeedoo, you made your point. Good for you, you get a raisin.
For starting this thread, a raisin is too good.
Rogues and Minstrels
29-06-2005, 05:36
in case you weren't aware, none of you with the raisin comments are funny in the least, also your democrats which makes it readily apparent that you do not think for yourselves so whatever you have to say really is totally irrelevant, in case you weren't aware that is
Cannot think of a name
29-06-2005, 05:39
in case you weren't aware, none of you with the raisin comments are funny in the least, also your democrats which makes it readily apparent that you do not think for yourselves so whatever you have to say really is totally irrelevant, in case you weren't aware that is
The same relatively trivial at best morsel gets posted four times and we're the ones not thinking for ourselves? Are you sure about that?
Deleuze
29-06-2005, 05:40
in case you weren't aware, none of you with the raisin comments are funny in the least, also your democrats which makes it readily apparent that you do not think for yourselves so whatever you have to say really is totally irrelevant, in case you weren't aware that is
Grammatical errors in bold/underlined when necessary.

The point was not to be funny, but to point out that the thread was idiotic. As was the logic in the above post. But I don't feel the need to go into it.
Crack Worshipers
29-06-2005, 05:42
Going by the fact that you consider Bush smart I'd hav to say that
A: Your just stupid
B: Your standard deep-south conservitive
C: Your young and influence in politics by your parents

Now before you say the same to me... I'm a 13 year-old Texas Democrat and both my parents re BIG conservitives, I'm in all the honors courses and the Gifted and Talented. I sometimes feel like shooting my oarents at the dinner tble when e talk politics... talking about social security refom.. they'll be fine with it... until it's their turn and see that all the money's in iraq or north korea or iran or wherever we invade without looking t evidence next.
Achtung 45
29-06-2005, 05:42
in case you weren't aware, none of you with the raisin comments are funny in the least, also your democrats which makes it readily apparent that you do not think for yourselves so whatever you have to say really is totally irrelevant, in case you weren't aware that is
Nice convoluted run-on. Give me a sec to translate it into English. Oh wait, it has no real substance other than trying to be flamebaiting. So what you're saying is that because our views aren't like yours, what we say is false and/or irrelevant? damn, I hate to bump this thread.
Deleuze
29-06-2005, 05:45
Going by the fact that you consider Bush smart I'd hav to say that
A: Your just stupid
B: Your standard deep-south conservitive
C: Your young and influence in politics by your parents

Now before you say the same to me... I'm a 13 year-old Texas Democrat and both my parents re BIG conservitives, I'm in all the honors courses and the Gifted and Talented. I sometimes feel like shooting my oarents at the dinner tble when e talk politics... talking about social security refom.. they'll be fine with it... until it's their turn and see that all the money's in iraq or north korea or iran or wherever we invade without looking t evidence next.
Now you're making the rest of us liberals look bad.

damn, I hate to bump this thread.Couldn't agree with you more, but I can't help it.
Sarkasis
29-06-2005, 05:45
While my first year of college was a huge disaster (too much beer), I ended up with a Master's degree and the highest possible grades (not to mention the international publications).

You evolve a lot during these years.

So freshman year means *nothing*. Except that some kids are more well prepared to perform in college than others... but after a while it doesn't matter.
Sdaeriji
29-06-2005, 05:46
Going by the fact that you consider Bush smart I'd hav to say that
A: Your just stupid
B: Your standard deep-south conservitive
C: Your young and influence in politics by your parents

Now before you say the same to me... I'm a 13 year-old Texas Democrat and both my parents re BIG conservitives, I'm in all the honors courses and the Gifted and Talented. I sometimes feel like shooting my oarents at the dinner tble when e talk politics... talking about social security refom.. they'll be fine with it... until it's their turn and see that all the money's in iraq or north korea or iran or wherever we invade without looking t evidence next.

One who is thirteen years old should not offer "you're young" as criticism of another's opinions.
Grays Hill
29-06-2005, 05:48
Just because the election is over doesnt mean that these issues shouldn't be raised. In 2008, just incase Kerry decides to run again, this proof can be used against him as a liar and false campaigner.
Sdaeriji
29-06-2005, 05:50
Just because the election is over doesnt mean that these issues shouldn't be raised. In 2008, just incase Kerry decides to run again, this proof can be used against him as a liar and false campaigner.

Then bring it up in 2008. It's 2005 right now. It just makes you look like a poor winner.

On second thought, comparing Kerry to Bush won't be relevant even in 2008. And I doubt Kerry ever personally claimed to be smarter than Bush, so calling him a liar and false campaigner is really accurate.
Cannot think of a name
29-06-2005, 05:51
Just because the election is over doesnt mean that these issues shouldn't be raised. In 2008, just incase Kerry decides to run again, this proof can be used against him as a liar and false campaigner.
Hmmm. Interesting. Of course, in order for this to prove he is a liar and a false campaigner you'd have to also show Kerry claiming to have had a better Freshman year than Bush. I can't say that grades where a big reason I was voting for or against any candidate, personally, but hey-it's your claim. Lets see it.
BlackKnight_Poet
29-06-2005, 05:55
wow, in case you weren't aware, a thread like this was created a few weeks ago quickly died because it has no relevence whatsoever, whoopdeedoo, you made your point. Good for you, you get a raisin.

A Raisin? That's being really generous on your part. I'd have given a rock.
:D
Achtung 45
29-06-2005, 05:56
A Raisin? That's being really generous on your part
:D
I'm nice, even to Republicans :) .......sometimes
Sdaeriji
29-06-2005, 05:59
While my first year of college was a huge disaster (too much beer), I ended up with a Master's degree and the highest possible grades (not to mention the international publications).

You evolve a lot during these years.

So freshman year means *nothing*. Except that some kids are more well prepared to perform in college than others... but after a while it doesn't matter.

Which would be evidenced by the fact that Kerry did eventually surpass Bush in terms of GPA.
BlackKnight_Poet
29-06-2005, 06:02
I'm nice, even to Republicans :) .......sometimes


:D Then may I have a quarter for the parking meter?
Azanunya
29-06-2005, 06:09
The point was Bush is smart and the Dems are liars. I am, strangely enough, aware that the election is over.Well, I'm a conservative, and I think Bush is an idiot, a shill for megaoil, a puppet of big money, a liar, and too stupid to know any of this.
What does it say of your intellect, that you think he's smart?
Probibly as much as the moniker you've chosen.
L
Achtung 45
29-06-2005, 06:10
:D Then may I have a quarter for the parking meter?
If you promise to return it. [/HIJACK] :)
Non Aligned States
29-06-2005, 06:39
Looking at post records, I think this thread was ninja trolled.
Desperate Measures
29-06-2005, 07:00
Jesus - I wonder what Robert is going to do with that new one that has been torn for him.
Dodgetopia
29-06-2005, 13:26
just thought i'd add a british view

in america you have to vote for one of two idiots and liars, in britain we have three main idiots to choose from, plus a whole bunch of no-hopers as well.

after the election a qulity broadsheet newspaper (times i think) published a report on the american people. a poll was done on the average iq of each state by an american company. it found WITHOUT EXCEPTION that ALLthe states with the highest iq voted for kerry, and ALL the states with the lowest iq voted for bush

so what does that say about america?
Corneliu
29-06-2005, 13:33
First off, old news. Second off, Bush got a higher average than Kerry his Freshman year alone. Kerry graduated with a higher GPA and was the class speaker at the farewell address. Neither of which Bush can claim.

Bush: 76%
Kerry: 75%

Bush had a higher one! :rolleyes:
Corneliu
29-06-2005, 13:39
Going by the fact that you consider Bush smart I'd hav to say that
A: Your just stupid
B: Your standard deep-south conservitive
C: Your young and influence in politics by your parents

A: Your just as stupid
B: *yawns* Stereotyping gets you nowhere
C: Talk about young (sees age in next paragraph)

Now before you say the same to me... I'm a 13 year-old Texas Democrat and both my parents re BIG conservitives, I'm in all the honors courses and the Gifted and Talented.

Impressive. To bad most of that is book smarts. Live alittle more.

I sometimes feel like shooting my parents at the dinner table when [b]we talk politics... talking about social security refom.. they'll be fine with it... until it's their turn and see that all the money's in iraq or north korea or iran or wherever we invade without looking t evidence next.[/QUOTE]

Here's a fact: 70% of the College students (Of which I am one) want social security reform. 40% of those people are *gasp* self-proclaimed liberals! I suggest you take a bigger look at the world as a whole instead of running off at the mouth. Your only 13 yo whereas I am about 9 years older than you and able to vote.

*sighs* another brainwashed kid to deal with.
Corneliu
29-06-2005, 13:40
Which would be evidenced by the fact that Kerry did eventually surpass Bush in terms of GPA.

Proof of this please?
Super-power
29-06-2005, 13:42
Meh, who cares?
Badnarik > Kerry
Badnarik > Bush
Take that, two-party monstrosity!
Di Venuto
29-06-2005, 14:04
Even if Bush's IQ (did he really take the test)is higher then Kerry's you must bear two points in mind; Firstly an IQ test does not measure ignorance nor does it count if somebody else is actually filling in the test(change to making the decisions when considering his current job). Secondly, the bigger question should be how stupid are the American people for voting for him again?
Corneliu
29-06-2005, 14:12
Secondly, the bigger question should be how stupid are the American people for voting for him again?

He was better than the likes of John Kerry who really did have shoddy leadership. Also, Kerry didn't have a platform. Third, he says one thing to one group, says something totally different to another group.

I have to wonder how stupid are the American People for voting for Kerry.
Gataway_Driver
29-06-2005, 14:15
As they are going for a political position this might have to be taken into consideration:

"The transcript shows that Kerry's freshman-year average was 71. He scored a 61 in geology, a 63 and 68 in two history classes, and a 69 in political science. His top score was a 79, in another political science course. Another of his strongest efforts, a 77, came in French class."

"Bush went to Yale from 1964 to 1968; his highest grades were 88s in anthropology, history, and philosophy, according to The New Yorker article. He received one D in his four years, a 69 in astronomy. Bush has said he was a C student."

I'm sorry but what has anthropology and astronomy got to do with running the USA? Just proof this is completely pointless. Different subjects, different years. Not a lot to do with being President of the USA


http://www.madeevent.com/bbs/archive/index.php/t-4836

Couldn't find the origional article but its been copy & pasted here
[NS]Ihatevacations
29-06-2005, 14:17
Bush: 76%
Kerry: 75%

Bush had a higher one! :rolleyes:
Why did no one tell me we started calculating GPAs with percents?

He was better than the likes of John Kerry who really did have shoddy leadership. Also, Kerry didn't have a platform. Third, he says one thing to one group, says something totally different to another group.
The only part of your general liberal bashing bullshit I will agree with is Kerry had no platform. Not enough of one. The rest is conservative propagandist bullshit which one could EASILY apply to Bush.

I have to wonder how stupid are the American People for voting for Kerry.
Maybe they wanted some one who could say nuclear to be in charge of the launching of them
Yupaenu
29-06-2005, 14:21
Kerry's record was recently released, and to my great disapointment, he did actually serve his time in the military, hence the purple hearts for the cuts. (Can you believe one of them needed a BIG band-aid to be healed? :eek: )
However, other things were also released.

As you may or may not know, both Bush and Kerry went to the prestigious Yale University in New Haven Connecticut. Durring the election, Kerry's staff constantly pointed out the fact that Bush made "C"s and "B"s there. The liberal media also tried very hard to fool Americans into thinking George Bush was just that, a fool.

WELL GUESS WHAT:
John Kerry, as we now know, FAILED EVERY CLASS FRESHMAN YEAR, with the exception of French (C) WHICH HE SPOKE. He a did little better later on, an managed to pull out a C Average.

GUESS WHAT ELSE:
John Kerry is also now shown to have taken an IQ test. Now that it has been released we know that it is 10 POINTS LOWER THAN Bush's.
While that is still far above average, vilifying Bush as a moron is now laughable.
The Kerry staff's only excuse was that Kerry's IQ is probably much higher, for Kerry was MOST LIKELY DRUNK during that month.

and'ya know what? neither of them would have made anywhere close of an effective government if put into power, so why does it matter?
Alinania
29-06-2005, 14:24
Meh, the IQ is overrated. It would be pretty interesting to see the results of Emotional Intelligence tests of both of them though :D
Deleuze
29-06-2005, 14:25
Meh, the IQ is overrated. It would be pretty interesting to see the results of Emotional Intelligence tests of both of them though :D
Coming from a Kerry supporter, Bush would have PUNKED him.
Corneliu
29-06-2005, 16:39
Ihatevacations']Why did no one tell me we started calculating GPAs with percents?

To be honest, according to my grades, I"m smarter than both of them :D

The only part of your general liberal bashing bullshit I will agree with is Kerry had no platform. Not enough of one. The rest is conservative propagandist bullshit which one could EASILY apply to Bush.

Propagandist that he says one thing then says another and goes back to his original statement? :rolleyes:

Maybe they wanted some one who could say nuclear to be in charge of the launching of them

Oh brother. I'm not going to vote against someone that can't say nuclear. That has got to be the dumbest reason to vote against someone. Well that and strict party line voting.
The Sunset Jackals
29-06-2005, 16:54
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crack Worshipers
Going by the fact that you consider Bush smart I'd hav to say that
A: Your just stupid
B: Your standard deep-south conservitive
C: Your young and influence in politics by your parents


A: Your just as stupid
B: *yawns* Stereotyping gets you nowhere
C: Talk about young (sees age in next paragraph)


Quote:
Now before you say the same to me... I'm a 13 year-old Texas Democrat and both my parents re BIG conservitives, I'm in all the honors courses and the Gifted and Talented.


Impressive. To bad most of that is book smarts. Live alittle more.

Quote:
I sometimes feel like shooting my parents at the dinner table when [b]we
talk politics... talking about social security refom.. they'll be fine with it... until it's their turn and see that all the money's in iraq or north korea or iran or wherever we invade without looking t evidence next.

Here's a fact: 70% of the College students (Of which I am one) want social security reform. 40% of those people are *gasp* self-proclaimed liberals! I suggest you take a bigger look at the world as a whole instead of running off at the mouth. Your only 13 yo whereas I am about 9 years older than you and able to vote.

*sighs* another brainwashed kid to deal with.[/QUOTE]



*sighs* Another prissy college girl to deal with. Sorry for that, didn't mean to insult you, it's just that your message is chock-full of contradictions and messages that you don't quite finish or explain. If you REALLY wanted to deal with this "brainwashed kid" -rather than make yourself feel superior- then you would explain some things which is what I have done for you.

A(Again): Good one. Let's go back and forth on THAT one forever, just for laughs, shall we? Um...how's it go? Oh yeah. You are! :P lol jk

B: And you don't? Simply because this guy is in the G&T, you assume he mostly has book smarts and doesn't live much. Also, EVERYONE stereotypes something to some extent. Personally, I stereotype a lot of my own gender, cuz they're asses. See? Stereotyping gets you to being human, like everyone else.

C(finally): Age is not an insult, and I don't think the Crack Worshippers -which REALLY could use a better name so that I don't laugh when I type it- meant it in the way you are thinking. Look at the facts (And no you DON'T need to look up a report, use common sense): Most kids are influenced by their parents on a LOT of levels. Those who choose to become political are most likely to be whatever side BECAUSE of their parents. Whether they've been raised to follow their parents or whether they are rebelling against their parents, their views are still influenced by them. The comment about age -I think- merely refers to the likely supposition that this person is still being influenced by their parents.

Finally, your last paragraph has some merit, but not a lot. 70 percent. So that's 70 out of 100. Ok, keep that in mind and move on. 40 percent of 70. So that would be 28. 28 out of 100 college students are self-proclaimed liberals who WANT social reform. That's just barely squeaking past the 1/4 marker.

Still, I don't doubt this information. I'm liberal, but liberal is more of an idea, not a belief or strict code. Not all liberals act or think alike, but overall their goals are (generally) the same. The unfortunate thing here is that Democrats have allowed the word liberal to become a dirty one, so to speak. Not many want to be liberal, and there are plenty of religious and non-religious conservatives ready to call us childish and ignorant of the truth.

And lastly, as I said, age is not REALLY a factor. I know plenty of 14-17 year old students who sometimes shock me into a stupor because of their knowledge. I also know plenty of 20-40 year olds who also shock me, simply because of their profound stupidity. Not to say YOU are stupid, I'm just trying to say age has not proven a factor in my own experiences. As Albert Einstein once said, "Only two things are infinite: The universe and human stupidity, and I'm not so sure about the universe."
Corneliu
29-06-2005, 17:09
*sighs* Another prissy college girl to deal with.

Actually, I"m a guy not a girl.

Sorry for that, didn't mean to insult you, it's just that your message is chock-full of contradictions and messages that you don't quite finish or explain. If you REALLY wanted to deal with this "brainwashed kid" -rather than make yourself feel superior- then you would explain some things which is what I have done for you.

Oh brother.

*snip*

Very nice but for 2 things.

1: Don't explain what I ment to say. I know full well what I said and I mean what I say. You understand that?

2: 70% of college students do want social security reform. 40% of those 70%, which is 57% (I love calculators) want social security reform.
The Sunset Jackals
29-06-2005, 17:29
Sorry, didn't realize you were a guy. It DOES say UberSpamgirl you know. Anyways, you're right, I shouldn't have phrased my message the way I did, it makes it seem like I know what you mean. I merely meant that you DON'T explain anything, so I was continuing what you wrote from my own perspective. So the "Oh brother." comment is justified. Now, since you tell me not to say what you're thinking and I've now explained that wasn't what I intended, don't "*snip*" my message please.

1. Yes, I understand, and I'm sorry I wasn't clearer.
2. Are you SURE you did this math right? Maybe I AM wrong but again, we have 70 out of 100, and then 40 percent OF that 70...so how could that possibly be 57? 35 is 50 percent of 70...so how could the answer possibly be any higher than that if it's 40 percent of 70?
Jocabia
29-06-2005, 17:53
Going by the fact that you consider Bush smart I'd hav to say that
A: Your just stupid
B: Your standard deep-south conservitive
C: Your young and influence in politics by your parents

Now before you say the same to me... I'm a 13 year-old Texas Democrat and both my parents re BIG conservitives, I'm in all the honors courses and the Gifted and Talented. I sometimes feel like shooting my oarents at the dinner tble when e talk politics... talking about social security refom.. they'll be fine with it... until it's their turn and see that all the money's in iraq or north korea or iran or wherever we invade without looking t evidence next.

And yet you don't knew the difference between you're and your and the difference between a reasoned post and flaming.
Jocabia
29-06-2005, 18:05
Sorry, didn't realize you were a guy. It DOES say UberSpamgirl you know. Anyways, you're right, I shouldn't have phrased my message the way I did, it makes it seem like I know what you mean. I merely meant that you DON'T explain anything, so I was continuing what you wrote from my own perspective. So the "Oh brother." comment is justified. Now, since you tell me not to say what you're thinking and I've now explained that wasn't what I intended, don't "*snip*" my message please.

1. Yes, I understand, and I'm sorry I wasn't clearer.
2. Are you SURE you did this math right? Maybe I AM wrong but again, we have 70 out of 100, and then 40 percent OF that 70...so how could that possibly be 57? 35 is 50 percent of 70...so how could the answer possibly be any higher than that if it's 40 percent of 70?

He did it backwords. 57% of 70% is 40% (or 39.9% to be exact). You did it right. 40% of 70% is 28%. Both of your messages are full of assumptions about the each other and Crack worshippers. It really isn't appropriate for either of you to judge the other given the circumstances.
Jocabia
29-06-2005, 18:12
Does anyone care?

The election is over, Bush won, Kerry lost.

You did. Isn't that why you entered the thread and replied?
Parduna
29-06-2005, 19:00
Someone with an IQ ten points lower than GWB would strangle himself when binding his shoes. So, this is very unlikely.
Swimmingpool
29-06-2005, 19:03
The point was Bush is smart and the Dems are liars. I am, strangely enough, aware that the election is over.
When did the Democratic Party claim the Bush was stupid? There are many individuals who think so, but it was never an official line.
Aldranin
29-06-2005, 19:17
Going by the fact that you consider Bush smart I'd hav to say that
A: Your just stupid
B: Your standard deep-south conservitive
C: Your young and influence in politics by your parents

Now before you say the same to me... I'm a 13 year-old Texas Democrat and both my parents re BIG conservitives, I'm in all the honors courses and the Gifted and Talented. I sometimes feel like shooting my oarents at the dinner tble when e talk politics... talking about social security refom.. they'll be fine with it... until it's their turn and see that all the money's in iraq or north korea or iran or wherever we invade without looking t evidence next.

Yay public schools. Does anyone else find it incredibly ironic that he wrote, "Your just stupid," and says he is in all honors classes?
Gauthier
29-06-2005, 19:18
I declare this thread a Straw Man Argument made to distract people from Bush's incompentence in general.

:D
Kasaru
29-06-2005, 19:19
Impressive. To bad most of that is book smarts. Live alittle more.

If book smarts don't matter, then this topic's point is moot. Of course, even if they do matter, the point is still moot.


It doesn't matter how much information you retain in your head, it's how you use it. Bush doesn't seem to use much of whatever knowledge he has. You could know everything there is to know, but if you acted like a moron who can't even pronouce "nuclear" correctly, NOBODY would care how much you knew since, in their view, you would still be an idiot.
Cruso
29-06-2005, 19:22
this was already discussed and dismissed as being retarded.

Ya, not kidding. If KErry was seriously 10 points lower than Bush, he would be, by terms of the American Psychiatric Association, "Borderline Intellectual Functioning".
Warta Endor
29-06-2005, 19:27
I don't judge people by their IQ, but by their actions. In both cases Bush comes pretty bad outta the test in my eyes. :D
Aldranin
29-06-2005, 19:27
Anyway, this thread, just like the last three times it was posted, proves not that Bush is smart, but that, if Bush is stupid, Kerry is also stupid. He just speaks more articulately than Bush does. Either way, neither of them are stupid. Getting through Yale with a C average is quite an accomplishment in itself.
Frangland
29-06-2005, 19:28
sorry, but tests and grades dont prove intelligence

a frickin pig is smarter than bush

that last statement shows your lack of intelligence.

IQ testing allows someone to demonstrate his ability to remember, to reason, to solve problems... all three of these are incredibly huge variables of intelligence.

if Bush out-IQ'd Kerry, then one can make the claim, based on the scores, that Bush is smarter than Kerry.

Also, some have ripped on the poster for even bringing this up so long after the election... I think he's doing it for the benefit of those who continue to unreasonably rip on the president... with name-calling directed to comment on his level of intelligence. It's a rather apropos response to such attacks on GWB.
New Exeter
29-06-2005, 19:29
Going by the fact that you consider Bush smart I'd hav to say that
A: Your just stupid
B: Your standard deep-south conservitive
C: Your young and influence in politics by your parents

Now before you say the same to me... I'm a 13 year-old Texas Democrat and both my parents re BIG conservitives, I'm in all the honors courses and the Gifted and Talented. I sometimes feel like shooting my oarents at the dinner tble when e talk politics... talking about social security refom.. they'll be fine with it... until it's their turn and see that all the money's in iraq or north korea or iran or wherever we invade without looking t evidence next.

Considering you lack proper grammar, I'd have to say that these 'honors' and 'gifted and talented' courses would have to be on the very low end of the educational quality spectrum.
Frangland
29-06-2005, 19:31
yes, public service announcement:

your = possessive
Your dog just bit me.

you're = you are
You're a bunghole.

If the 13-year-old is "gifted and talented"... my opinion of the Texas educational system just went down a few notches.
Xanaz
29-06-2005, 19:33
Kerry's record was recently released, and to my great disapointment, he did actually serve his time in the military, hence the purple hearts for the cuts. (Can you believe one of them needed a BIG band-aid to be healed? :eek: )
However, other things were also released.

As you may or may not know, both Bush and Kerry went to the prestigious Yale University in New Haven Connecticut. Durring the election, Kerry's staff constantly pointed out the fact that Bush made "C"s and "B"s there. The liberal media also tried very hard to fool Americans into thinking George Bush was just that, a fool.

WELL GUESS WHAT:
John Kerry, as we now know, FAILED EVERY CLASS FRESHMAN YEAR, with the exception of French (C) WHICH HE SPOKE. He a did little better later on, an managed to pull out a C Average.

GUESS WHAT ELSE:
John Kerry is also now shown to have taken an IQ test. Now that it has been released we know that it is 10 POINTS LOWER THAN Bush's.
While that is still far above average, vilifying Bush as a moron is now laughable.
The Kerry staff's only excuse was that Kerry's IQ is probably much higher, for Kerry was MOST LIKELY DRUNK during that month.

Does that include when Kerry went on to Harvard Law School and finished in the top 5 of his class and went on to be one of the most successful D.A's in Massachusetts history? No? I didn't think so!

As for the IQ test, it's mostly been discredited in the last ten years. As it's been proven to be not an effective way to test intelligence because some of the smartest people in the world simply don't test well. However, that is neither here nor there.

And prey tell how did Bush get where he is today? Oh that's right, bankrupting companies and using his daddy's money. I almost forgot. And lets not even talk about Kerry drinking for a month, he couldn't of held a candle to Bush's alcoholism and drug abuse.
Deleuze
29-06-2005, 19:33
yes, public service announcement:

your = possessive
Your dog just bit me.

you're = you are
You're a bunghole.
Shh, don't tell them. I have fun correcting people on that one!
Frangland
29-06-2005, 19:53
Shh, don't tell them. I have fun correcting people on that one!

fine

do you also handle there/their/they're and to/too?

hehe
Faradawn
29-06-2005, 19:55
If the 13-year-old is "gifted and talented"... my opinion of the Texas educational system just went down a few notches.

*Somewhere in the distance, a thin ribbon of wind carries this voice to your ears*

A village in Texas is missing its Idiot. In 2008 they're holding a welcome home party.
Chellis
29-06-2005, 20:09
Kerry's record was recently released, and to my great disapointment, he did actually serve his time in the military...

Am I the only one who stopped reading after this biased PoS?
New Courds
29-06-2005, 20:17
All of this talk of Bush being smarter than Kerry is pure speculation. One may be smarter than the other (yay), but Bush won the election and it's over. Bush can't be elected again, so be happy for that, Liberals. It's unlikely that Kerry can be elected, so be happy for that, Conservatives.

And Conservatives, don't be too discouraged by the Liberals. It's when you use their own arguments against them that their feathers begin to become ruffled, i.e. Bush is stupid. Bush isn't stupid, we know this. So just ignore their ignorant claims.

Liberals...calm down, please.
East Monstio
29-06-2005, 20:29
do you think the parties could of pick better people to run hell yes there are both mildly stupied and who cares
Deleuze
29-06-2005, 20:31
fine

do you also handle there/their/they're and to/too?

hehe
Yup.
East Monstio
29-06-2005, 20:34
Liberals shut not calm down 2 in a row lol lol lol lol when it come down to it here is JOHN KERRY :fluffle: Here is GWB and here is:sniper: lee harvey
East Monstio
29-06-2005, 20:35
Liberals shut not calm down 2 in a row lol lol lol lol when it come down to it here is JOHN KERRY :fluffle: Here is GWB and here is :sniper: lee harvey
East Monstio
29-06-2005, 20:36
Liberals shut not calm down 2 in a row lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lollol lol lol lol when it come down to it here is JOHN KERRY :fluffle: Here is GWB and here is :sniper: lee harvey
Tensaiji
29-06-2005, 20:55
ok...I'll admit. Kerry wasn't the Democrat's best choice as presidential candidate. However, a lot people that voted for him probably weren't Democrat either, they just didn't want Bush in office again. I'm a democrat, but I didn't vote at all because I didn't like Kerry, and on the other hand, I don't like Bush even more. Frickin John McKain would've done a much better job. Whatever. This is so pointless. The election's been over for over half a year now. People need to get over it. That's all I'm saying. Screw it all.
Frangland
29-06-2005, 21:12
*Somewhere in the distance, a thin ribbon of wind carries this voice to your ears*

A village in Texas is missing its Idiot. In 2008 they're holding a welcome home party.

...an idiot who's smarter than kerry, nonetheless.

LET IT DIE! LET IT DIEEEEEE!

hehe
Chellis
30-06-2005, 00:42
...an idiot who's smarter than kerry, nonetheless.

LET IT DIE! LET IT DIEEEEEE!

hehe

aka Give me the last word!