Australian cricket team
Jeruselem
19-06-2005, 12:36
God, what's happened?
We lost two games to local English teams - then lose to Bangladesh?
http://aus.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2005/OD_TOURNEYS/NWS/SCORECARDS/AUS_BDESH_NWS_ODI2_18JUN2005.html
We're playing England now and the Poms are playing well against us.
http://www.cricinfo.com/db/NEW/LIVE/frames/AUS_ENG_NWS_ODI3_19JUN2005.html
Harlesburg
19-06-2005, 12:37
You finally realised your victories over New Zealand wernt that impressive and got scared.
Jeruselem
19-06-2005, 12:40
You finally realised your victories over New Zealand wernt that impressive and got scared.
We were also lucky with that 1-0 win in Soccer too.
World wide allies
19-06-2005, 12:44
My dad has gone to bristol for todays match ^_^.
Harlesburg
19-06-2005, 12:46
We were also lucky with that 1-0 win in Soccer too.
Yeah but what was up with your strikers its as if they thought the idea of a header was to miss the ball.
We were missing at least 4 players(Nielson would have been great in the back) that we would have prefered to play and the team is a far cry from what we had in 99 its kind of wierd to see Jackson Ngata Zorichch Bouganuihe(sp)not there.
From what ive seen off the cricket it looks like Aussie are bowling too short and not waiting for the ball to come on to the bat.
Chocolate is Yummier
19-06-2005, 12:48
it's depressing, :( the english guy in our class is going to be unbearable.
Jeruselem
19-06-2005, 12:50
We'd better beat the Poms, but this English teams is good.
And Aussie cricketters getting drunk .... it was normal in the past
Boonytopia
19-06-2005, 13:16
The poms have improved, maybe we've been a bit complacent. I think if the poms play well, they can definitely beat us, but if we play as we can, they'll be in trouble.
Monkeypimp
19-06-2005, 13:30
Haha.
Result: Bangladesh won by 5 wickets
Points: Bangladesh 5, Australia 1
Toss: Australia
Umpires: BF Bowden (NZ) and DR Shepherd
TV Umpire: MR Benson
Match Referee: JJ Crowe (NZ)
Man of the Match: Mohammad Ashraful
Australia innings (50 overs maximum) R M B 4 6
+AC Gilchrist lbw b Mashrafe Mortaza 0 1 2 0 0
ML Hayden b Nazmul Hossain 37 71 50 4 1
*RT Ponting lbw b Tapash Baisya 1 21 16 0 0
DR Martyn c Nafees Iqbal b Tapash Baisya 77 138 112 2 0
MJ Clarke c Mashrafe Mortaza b Tapash Baisya 54 100 84 4 0
MEK Hussey not out 31 38 21 5 0
SM Katich not out 36 27 23 4 0
Extras (lb 3, w 2, nb 8) 13
Total (5 wickets, 50 overs) 249
DNB: GB Hogg, JN Gillespie, MS Kasprowicz, GD McGrath.
FoW: 1-0 (Gilchrist, 0.2 ov), 2-9 (Ponting, 5.2 ov),
3-57 (Hayden, 15.4 ov), 4-165 (Martyn, 41.4 ov),
5-183 (Clarke, 43.3 ov).
Bowling O M R W
Mashrafe Mortaza 10 2 33 1 (1w)
Tapash Baisya 10 1 69 3 (8nb)
Nazmul Hossain 10 2 65 1
Mohammad Rafique 10 0 31 0 (1w)
Aftab Ahmed 10 0 48 0
Bangladesh innings (target: 250 runs from 50 overs) R M B 4 6
Javed Omar c Hayden b Kasprowicz 19 84 51 3 0
Nafees Iqbal c Gilchrist b Gillespie 8 27 21 1 0
Tushar Imran c Katich b Hogg 24 35 35 4 0
Mohammad Ashraful c Hogg b Gillespie 100 118 101 11 0
*Habibul Bashar run out (Gillespie) 47 82 72 3 0
Aftab Ahmed not out 21 28 13 2 1
Mohammad Rafique not out 9 11 7 2 0
Extras (b 1, lb 11, w 6, nb 4) 22
Total (5 wickets, 49.2 overs) 250
DNB: +Khaled Mashud, Mashrafe Mortaza, Tapash Baisya,
Nazmul Hossain.
FoW: 1-17 (Nafees Iqbal, 7.1 ov), 2-51 (Tushar Imran, 15.4 ov),
3-72 (Javed Omar, 20.5 ov), 4-202 (Habibul Bashar, 43.5 ov),
5-227 (Mohammad Ashraful, 47.1 ov).
Bowling O M R W
McGrath 10 1 43 0 (2nb)
Gillespie 9.2 1 41 2 (2w)
Kasprowicz 10 0 40 1 (2nb)
Hogg 9 0 52 1 (1w)
Clarke 6 0 38 0 (1w)
Hussey 5 0 24 0
But hey, at least they got a bonus point.
Jeruselem
19-06-2005, 13:35
Well, two NZ and Pommie umpire! No wonder.
Australia has always being extremley arrogant when it comes to sports, constantly going on about how superior they are. That is what makes it all the sweeter when a team they look down on such as Bangladesh utterly humiliate them.
Cockbill Street
19-06-2005, 13:43
Well, two NZ and Pommie umpire! No wonder.
:lol:
Gentlemanly in defeat, as always.
Can see the Aussies winning this one, though, England selectors really stuffed it up by picking the extra batsman Solanki over the bowler Tremlett.
Jeruselem
19-06-2005, 13:46
:lol:
Gentlemanly in defeat, as always.
Can see the Aussies winning this one, though, England selectors really stuffed it up by picking the extra batsman Solanki over the bowler Tremlett.
Well, the batting is fine. It's our bowling ... if you can't bowl out Bangladesh, there's an issue.
Boonytopia
19-06-2005, 13:57
At some point the wheel has to turn. Maybe we have reached that point.
Gataway_Driver
19-06-2005, 14:01
Aus 223 - 7 after, 46 overs
England, especially Steve Harmissan 5 wickets for 33
english bowling is beautiful at the moment...just came into college to do some work but will be going back to the match in a minute....steve harmison is doing great today as well as freddy...
Jeruselem
19-06-2005, 14:07
At some point the wheel has to turn. Maybe we have reached that point.
Who will replace Australia was Uber-cricket team?
Pakistan - Inconsistent but talented.
India - Just not performing.
England - Getting better and better
Zimbarwe - That's a cricket team?
Bangladesh - No - yes they beat Australia once but the Poms trashed them earlier
West Indies - Having management problems
Sri Lanka - Good team, youngster coming through
New Zealand - Needs more superstars like Vetori
Jeruselem
19-06-2005, 14:30
Australia 9/252. No much better than the score against Bangladesh.
Who will replace Australia was Uber-cricket team?
Pakistan - Inconsistent but talented.
India - Just not performing.
England - Getting better and better
Zimbarwe - That's a cricket team?
Bangladesh - No - yes they beat Australia once but the Poms trashed them earlier
West Indies - Having management problems
Sri Lanka - Good team, youngster coming through
New Zealand - Needs more superstars like Vetori
Why do we need an uber cricket team? It would be better for the game if 3-4 nations scrapped out for the top spot over the next ten years or so. Though If their had to be an Uber team, being English, I'd naturally choose England ;) .
But isnt it a bit premature for this kind of talk. Yes, the Aussies have lost to Bangladesh but this is still the same team dubbed "Invincible" by some after some of the recent thrashings they have given out (N.Z in N.Z, Pak in Aus). Though I hope they keep up this form for the Ashes.
Note: You forgot South Africa - Not as good as they were a few years ago.
England 253 for 7 (Pietersen 91*, Vaughan 57) defeated Australia 252 for 9 (Hussey 84, Clarke 45, Harmison 5-33) by three wickets
Sorry reading for Aussies. As an Englishman have you got some sort of secret plan to lull us into a false sense of security before the Ashes then strike when we let down are guard? As if you are you are doing it pretty well, even losing to Bangladesh into the bargin, you must be the true masters of deception.
Bah! Australians. So arrogant. May I extend my congratulations to our bangladeshi friends. Well done! Perhaps this is the beginning of a collapse of all australian sporting triumphs. We can always hope. Perhaps you convicts will never win again. I hope you dont.
Harlesburg
20-06-2005, 06:41
Why do we need an uber cricket team? It would be better for the game if 3-4 nations scrapped out for the top spot over the next ten years or so. Though If their had to be an Uber team, being English, I'd naturally choose England ;) .
But isnt it a bit premature for this kind of talk. Yes, the Aussies have lost to Bangladesh but this is still the same team dubbed "Invincible" by some after some of the recent thrashings they have given out (N.Z in N.Z, Pak in Aus). Though I hope they keep up this form for the Ashes.
Note: You forgot South Africa - Not as good as they were a few years ago.
Bah theyve lost at least 4 in a row now.
In New Zealand we gave them the games!
Sventria
20-06-2005, 07:21
Either the Aussie cricket team will start winning again, or they'll keep losing to the point where Warnie's latest indiscretions no longer make the news.
I'm happy either way.
Avarhierrim
20-06-2005, 08:39
did u no that Australia's main import to Israel is biscuits?
Murflonia
20-06-2005, 08:59
I know it's only one game in a long summer, but WOO-HOO!
Pietersen has to be in the test side now.
Bah theyve lost at least 4 in a row now.
In New Zealand we gave them the games!
lol was it day 3 syndrome again?
Monkeypimp
20-06-2005, 12:03
lol was it day 3 syndrome again?
It's day 4.
Jeruselem
20-06-2005, 13:47
did u no that Australia's main import to Israel is biscuits?
Nope - not to Jeruselem anyway :D
Jeruselem
20-06-2005, 13:51
Good news, Warne is back to his old habits!
Lenin grad
20-06-2005, 14:14
what can i say ... come on you mighty bangladesh, and somerset oh i forgot cmon england too
victory is sweet
Findecano Calaelen
20-06-2005, 15:20
Bring back Steve Waugh
Don't know anything about cricket but go Pakistan! :D
AlanBstard
20-06-2005, 19:05
What rhymes with austrialia..... failure
what rhymes with England...... er well er, Inca's Sands? oh well we won somthing at last, even if some of our players sound suspiciously South African, and you can't take that victory away from me.
AlanBstard
20-06-2005, 19:06
Although that victory was lessened by being beaten by Bangladesh soon after...
Pietersen has to be in the test side now.
not to mention that he's gorgeous! cricketers have definitely got better looking in the last ten years...so now i can drool over great cricketers that have a sense of style as well :)
Jeruselem
24-06-2005, 14:56
Australia beat England by 57 runs in latest one day match.
:)
Alien Born
24-06-2005, 15:24
In a day - night onedayer when the captain that wins the toss opts to field rather than bat, you know something strange is going on. Who in their right mind would choose to bat under floodlights?
Zombie Lagoon
24-06-2005, 16:05
Ha, Warne! theres a guy I'd like to punch!
Harlesburg
25-06-2005, 07:04
Bring back Steve WaughHEAR HEAR