NationStates Jolt Archive


That Chinese Government! Peasants Fight Back!

Kryozerkia
13-06-2005, 17:58
For Chinese, Peasant Revolt Is Rare Victory (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/12/AR2005061201531.html?nav=hcmodule)

Farmers Beat Back Police In Battle Over Pollution

By Edward Cody
Washington Post Foreign Service
Monday, June 13, 2005

HUAXI, China -- A hard rain had fallen most of the night. Xu Juxian, a wiry farmer's wife with straggly black hair, said the downpour leaked copiously into the ragged tents where elderly protesters had been camping for more than two weeks. As a result, recalled Xu, they were all damp, uncomfortable and wide awake in the still hour just before dawn.

So Xu, 79, and the others immediately heard the commotion when dozens of government cars and buses wound into Huaxi beginning at 4:30 a.m. on April 10, carrying an estimated 3,000 policemen and civilians assigned to destroy the tents. To alert people in this gritty farm town that police were pouring in, watchful residents set off fireworks by the hundreds.


Angry residents overturned several police cars April 10 during a peasant revolt in which police officers carrying out a raid were beaten and driven away by 20,000 residents protesting an industrial park that was eventually shut down.
Angry residents overturned several police cars April 10 during a peasant revolt in which police officers carrying out a raid were beaten and driven away by 20,000 residents protesting an industrial park that was eventually shut down.

By the time dawn broke, up to 20,000 peasants from the half-dozen villages that make up Huaxi township had responded to the alarm, participants recounted, and they were in no mood to bow to authority. For four years, they had been complaining that industrial pollution was poisoning the land, stunting the crops and fouling the water in their fertile valley surrounded by forested hills 120 miles south of Hangzhou. And now their protest -- blocking the entrance to an industrial park -- was being put down by force.

A pitched battle erupted that soggy morning between enraged farmers and badly outnumbered police. By the end of the day, high-ranking officials had fled in their black sedans and hundreds of policemen had scattered in panic while farmers destroyed their vehicles. It was a rare triumph for the peasants, rising up against the all-powerful Communist Party government.

The confrontation was also a glimpse of a gathering force that could help shape the future of China: the power of spontaneous mass protest. Peasants and workers left behind by China's economic boom increasingly have resorted to the kind of unrest that ignited in Huaxi. Their explosions of anger have become a potential source of instability and a threat to the party's monopoly on power that has leaders in Beijing worried. By some accounts, there have been thousands of such protests a year, often met with force.

The workers and peasants appear to have nowhere else to turn but the street. Their representatives in parliament do what the government says; independent organizations are banned in China's communist system; and party officials, focused on economic growth, have become partners of eager entrepreneurs rather than defenders of those abandoned by the boom. Most of the violent grass-roots eruptions have been put down, hard and fast. This report examines the origin and unfolding of one revolt that went the other way. "We won a big victory," declared a farmer who described the protest on condition that his name be withheld, lest police arrest him as a ringleader. "We protected our land. And anyway, the government should not have sent so many people to suppress us."

A Deaf Ear

From the beginning, the villagers said, they had opposed Zhuxi Industrial Park, which spreads over 82.3 acres at the edge of town. Some feared pollution. Others thought giving up even a little farmland betrayed their long agricultural heritage.

The villagers described the origins of their protests in a series of recent interviews. They expressed anxiety that undercover police were now seeking ringleaders of the protest, filtering through Huaxi's walled barnyards and brick homes. They said arrests were likely to come soon. But they portrayed the protest as a victory over officialdom that was long overdue. Most of the villagers spoke on condition of anonymity out of fear of arrest and imprisonment.

When the industrial park was begun, the municipal government of nearby Dongyang City, which has authority over Huaxi, already owned 49.4 acres of the needed land. Villagers whose fields overlapped into the site had to slice off swaths for the other 32.9. In return, villagers said, each affected family got $14.60 a year for four years, an amount that villagers consider woefully inadequate.

Despite the opposition, Zhuxi Industrial Park opened in 2001. Elected village councils in Huaxi and the Huaxi Communist Party secretary were powerless to stop a decision imposed by municipal authorities, residents said. The Dongyang City government and the Communist Party committee, which also administered the park, leased sites to 13 private and joint state-private factories. Eight of them produced chemical products, villagers said, and others worked with plastic.

Gas emissions soon seethed through the village, residents said, irritating eyes and forcing families to close their windows to sleep. Factory effluents seeped into the stream that farmers depended on for irrigation, they complained, causing crops and trees to wither. A particular offender, they added, was a pesticide factory that had moved in after being forced out of Dongyang City because of foul odors.

But no one, the villagers lamented, would listen to their pleas to have the factories closed...

This is just the first page of the article. This is 4 pages long, but very well written and it gives a very good account.

I find that this is just amazing. I mean, it took place in Communist China. These villagers actually drove back police! It's mind boggling what a seemingly powerless group of people can do when they truly feel passionate about something.
Zouloukistan
13-06-2005, 18:11
I thought the police would have imprisonned them all for being against them, but no...

Good reading.
Niccolo Medici
13-06-2005, 18:49
Throughout history Chinese peasants have revolted, time and again they rise up and are put down (or simply settle down on their own). Be it issue specific complaints or a general dissatisfaction with the government, all the way back into antiquity these uprisings have occured.

I wouldn't put too much stock into this being a sign of the Central government's imminent downfall. A brief study into history shows that this kind of thing happens all the time over there.
Domici
13-06-2005, 18:56
I thought the police would have imprisonned them all for being against them, but no...

Good reading.

Well that's the thing about tyranny. Sooner or later you either have to do something to make the people happy with you, or you have to hire half of them to police the other half. In China that would mean hiring 500,000,000 people. And with one half of the population in jail and the other half keeping them there, well, there's no one left to make you any money. A big part of making a democracy is the realization that it's cheaper than autocracy.
Franz Hat
13-06-2005, 19:00
I agree fully, I mean look at Teadamen(spelling) Square. It appeared that the Chiness(Spelling) goverment was following then, but they are a Machivellen (spell lol) state. They don't give a damn if your old, young or poor if you stand in the way of the government (and even if you receive a minor victory) you are going to DIE.
Do not get argressive on me I just choose to live in reality, i do not choose what reality I live in.
:rolleyes: :sniper:
Spyr
13-06-2005, 19:07
If you go through China today, you can see the evidence of developmental dissonance... its not as if the peasants have never recieved anything from the Party, its just that while skyscrapers shoot up daily in the cities, the old rural projects remain unupgraded from their origins under Mao, where there was a bit of an ideological bias to favour the rural peasantry over the urban world in several areas. As has been said above, in China the peasants are a powerful force for change: the CCP wouldnt have come to power without them. When the peasants become overly difficult to control, the Party will invoke the spirit of the Chairman and try to find a way to satisfy them, but at this juncture its not yet critical.
Kryozerkia
13-06-2005, 21:25
I agree fully, I mean look at Teadamen(spelling) Square. It appeared that the Chiness(Spelling) goverment was following then, but they are a Machivellen (spell lol) state. They don't give a damn if your old, young or poor if you stand in the way of the government (and even if you receive a minor victory) you are going to DIE.
Do not get argressive on me I just choose to live in reality, i do not choose what reality I live in.
:rolleyes: :sniper:
Bad spelling, bad choice in smileys...

Verdict - ignore!
Phylum Chordata
14-06-2005, 01:58
Fingers crossed that the transition to a more democratic form of government comes peacefully.
Neo Rogolia
14-06-2005, 02:09
I think this is wonderful! It's about time they revolted against their communist oppressors! Too bad they're all going to be mowed down by government weapons :(
Dragons Bay
14-06-2005, 02:10
It's not the first time in recent years that the mass public have protested against government policies that obstructed development. Often a time local officials are too corrupt to listen to public demands, and it is up to the public to revolt against that. China still has a strong public power.