NationStates Jolt Archive

Lindsay Lohan too big for Disney!

This isn't an article, but more of a summary, by the way.

Lindsay Lohan is, as you may or may not know, starring in Herbie: Fully Loaded. And of course, the movie is distributed by Disney. Disney is, of course, a respectable institution with high standards. So what does Disney do?

Disney has apparently digitally reduced in size Miss Lohan's breasts on film because it's a family movie!

I'm sorry, ladies and gentlemen, but that's an absolute crock of male bovine droppings. If you feel as outraged as I do... Join the petition to save Lindsay Lohan's breasts! That came out wrong. :rolleyes:

http://www.petitiononline.com/DisLohan/petition.html <-- The link to the online petition.

EDIT: Somewhat comparison pics

Miss Lohan with Herbie (http://www.imdb.com/gallery/ss/0400497/Ss/0400497/Herbie_Garage.jpg?path=gallery&path_key=0400497) <-- Link to an IMDB image, not too clear, but it's clearly not as... Prominent.
Miss Lohan in Bikini (http://www.lindsay-lohan-sexy-pictures.com/ll31.jpg) Partial nudity (Bikini) warning!

I would sign for the sheer hilarity of it all, but I try to make a habit of not putting my email address on strange online forms. I refuse to put a fake one, that would just undermine the validity of this important issue. :rolleyes: :p

Lindsay Lohan is, as you may or may not know, starring in Herbie: Fully Loaded. And of course, the movie is distributed by Disney. Disney is, of course, a respectable institution with high standards. So what does Disney do?

Disney has apparently digitally reduced in size Miss Lohan's breasts on film because it's a family movie!

I'm sorry, ladies and gentlemen, but that's an absolute crock of male bovine droppings. If you feel as outraged as I do... Join the petition to save Lindsay Lohan's breasts! That came out wrong. :rolleyes:

I'm going to have to see an example of her breasts, so I can make a fully informed decision about this.

I'm going to have to see an example of her breasts, so I can make a fully informed decision about this.

Ah, yes. It's always best to examine the evidence before coming to a conclusion. ;)

Ah, yes. It's always best to examine the evidence before coming to a conclusion. ;)

Indeed. I'm not going to get my knickers in a twist about this until I've seen all the details.

Dammit, I'm not going to get my hackles up over this matter until I've seen Lindsay Lohan's breasts! As much as I dislike the idea of breast censorship, you aren't going to get a rise out of me until I've seen the material evidence.



*sigh* I'm all out of innuendo...

Both the whole "Save that bitch's tits" and Disney's decisions are B.S. Looks like some people really have nothing better to do.

Looks like some people really have nothing better to do.

Yep. We're here on the NS forums, aren't we? That should be proof enough that you're correct. :)

Am I the only man here who plays NS seriously (as in RP'ing)? It looks like people just come here and talk shite!

Am I the only man here who plays NS seriously (as in RP'ing)? It looks like people just come here and talk shite!

I roleplay a fair amount, though only a small percentage of it is on the Jolt boards. I prefer the regional offsite forums for RPing in most cases, but I have done a few RPs here (with a couple of different accounts). Just look at the links in my sig.

I like talking "shite" too.

I like talking "shite" too.

Shite can be of two categories: productive and unproductive. Threads like these are a waste of bandwith.

Shite can be of two categories: productive and unproductive. Threads like these are a waste of bandwith.

Careful. It could easily be argued validly that RPs are a waste of bandwidth as well. The real difference is that RPs are actually what NS is all about, and this stuff is not.

Am I the only man here who plays NS seriously (as in RP'ing)? It looks like people just come here and talk shite!


I only come here to talk shite. I nurture my NS nations (in different ways for each ofcourse) but I will never RP them on any boards. It just doesn't rock my boat.

Anyways, I thought General was the place to talk shite in all ways shapes and forms. But I might be mistaken :rolleyes:

I've updated the first post with two pics, one a blurry still from the movie, courtesy of IMDB and one of her in a bikini which demonstratably ah... I'll leave the descriptions to someone else.

And Sino, I consider myself an RPer. Not of your calibre, mind you, but this is one of the 0.0000001% of my posts that are in General. Everything else is RP or OOCly related to an RP. It's just that this thing has me amused and annoyed as all hell. http://home.iprimus.com.au/quincyw/dwhuh.gif

This is probably some bs rumor.

This is probably some bs rumor.

It would still be funny.

I've spent the last few hours carefully examining all the evidence, and I've come to the conclusion that I need a paper towel.

I've spent the last few hours carefully examining all the evidence, and I've come to the conclusion that I need a paper towel.
Two messy for a sock?....

"Save that bitch's tits"
Oh my God that is the greatest comment. Siggy!

They appear to be size C or the large side of B on the Herbie picture and both of the bikini pictures, so what's the problem here?

In all likelihood the magazine pictures you see where she has a massive chest are edited to make her more well-endowed, and obviously in children's movies they're going to edit to downplay her chest, so in reality we're never really seeing the true size of her breasts.

That being said, how in the world is this a big deal? I've seen enough pictures of her tits; who cares if they've been reduced for a movie most of the people complaining would never even go see. The internet is full of porn.

I signed the damn petition. I find digital breast reduction offensive. The media should encourage the view that all human forms are beautiful, not suddenly decide that large breasts are "non-family friendly".

It really is a matter of principle for me. I mean, aren't these worth saving?

http://www.mediasharx.net/images/stories/lindsey_lohan/lindseylohan1.jpg

The problem is how the media filters the information. NS General has been ranting for years about how apparently Bush lied (and I do not want a rehash of that debate in this thread, please!) and all that.

While this is a Disney film, the principle holds if they start changing the information that we get fed, how else are we meant to know the truth about the world? We often hear these stories about politicians lying, but was it really the media just misquoting out of context? The media and the information and entertainment industries should stop distorting the truth and tell the truth for once.

And once again, please do not bring up Bush and Iraq in this discussion!

Mhhh... Americans!
Somewhat... sexually immature...maybe.
But Germany was alike some decades ago. But then came 68... and now there have to be boobies in each news story (at least on private TV)... or it wont go on air...

..I'm glad they digitally made them smaller. It's not teenagers or adults who are going to see this movie, it's going to be kids. If I had a child, I wouldn't want to take them to the movies to have some chick's tits in their face the whole time.


Lindsay's Boobs= :gundge:

Haha, I read about this story at the a local newsstand.
Disney spent a million dollars to edit the movie (digital reduction and digital clothing to provide more cover) because mothers in test audiences complained about Lohan's "assets." I'm sure that million dollars could have fed a decent amount of starving children.

Disney has apparently digitally reduced in size Miss Lohan's breasts on film because it's a family movie!

Another thing: how are large breasts inappropriate for a family movie? Many kids were breastfed as babies, they've seen it all before.

Why petition when you can boycott?

Not that I care about this Lindsey Lohan thing, but I do think digitally reducing breasts is stupid. Is it supposed to be a secret that women have breasts or something? Sshh... the kids don't know breasts exist...

..I'm glad they digitally made them smaller. It's not teenagers or adults who are going to see this movie, it's going to be kids. If I had a child, I wouldn't want to take them to the movies to have some chick's tits in their face the whole time.


Lindsay's Boobs= :gundge:
Why are large breasts inappropriate for a family movie if they are unexposed?

Haha, I read about this story at the a local newsstand.
Disney spent a million dollars to edit the movie (digital reduction and digital clothing to provide more cover) because mothers in test audiences complained about Lohan's "assets." I'm sure that million dollars could have fed a decent amount of starving children.

They were probably just jealous.

Lindsay Lohan too big for Disney!

This isn't an article, but more of a summary, by the way.

Lindsay Lohan is, as you may or may not know, starring in Herbie: Fully Loaded. And of course, the movie is distributed by Disney. Disney is, of course, a respectable institution with high standards. So what does Disney do?

Disney has apparently digitally reduced in size Miss Lohan's breasts on film because it's a family movie!

I'm sorry, ladies and gentlemen, but that's an absolute crock of male bovine droppings. If you feel as outraged as I do... Join the petition to save Lindsay Lohan's breasts! That came out wrong. :rolleyes:

http://www.petitiononline.com/DisLohan/petition.html <-- The link to the online petition.

EDIT: Somewhat comparison pics

Miss Lohan with Herbie (http://www.imdb.com/gallery/ss/0400497/Ss/0400497/Herbie_Garage.jpg?path=gallery&path_key=0400497) <-- Link to an IMDB image, not too clear, but it's clearly not as... Prominent.
Miss Lohan in Bikini (http://www.lindsay-lohan-sexy-pictures.com/ll31.jpg) Partial nudity (Bikini) warning!

They should have waited until she lost all that weight to film the movie, if they were so concerned. She's pretty much completely flat now....

Another prime example of the overzealous paranoid neo-conservatism that is all over the US like a cheap suit! :D

Another prime example of the overzealous paranoid neo-conservatism that is all over the US like a cheap suit! :D

Except California. Which is why I'm moving there ASAP.

You're stupid if you believe this rumour.

This is discrimination against big-breasted women. What if they altered a black woman to make her look white? What if they altered a large child to look thin?

Fuck off.

I can't believe you all actually think this is real.

I can't believe you all actually think this is real.
are you going to keep replying the same thing over and over or are you going to contribute to SOME for of conversation - seeing as though this is a message board.

I'm pretty sure that the work it would take to digitally edit (and seemlessly, at that) Lohan's breasts throughout every frame of every scene of that movie would be logistically infeasible. The person who said it would cost a million dollars is way off base. It would likely cost more than doing the animation for an entire Pixar movie.

There's no way this is a real story.

That being said, I would love to do a comparison just to make sure. ;)

I'm pretty sure that the work it would take to digitally edit (and seemlessly, at that) Lohan's breasts throughout every frame of every scene of that movie would be logistically infeasible. The person who said it would cost a million dollars is way off base. It would likely cost more than doing the animation for an entire Pixar movie.

There's no way this is a real story.

That being said, I would love to do a comparison just to make sure. ;)
good luck getting the anorexia cokehead bitch to put on more weight. :S she was so beautiful too. Moron child.

Any way, I like the story even if its fake.

Flatearth: I'm just posting what the article said; I don't know enough about movie editing to even guess how much editing selective scenes would cost.

Lindsay's Boobs= :gundge:

That's what most men do in reaction to her boobs. :D

Oh, and did you hear that Disney deleted a scene where Lohan and a co-pilot spend time together in Herbie's back seat?*

*A cookie for anyone who sees the Mallrats reference. :D

They should have waited until she lost all that weight to film the movie, if they were so concerned. She's pretty much completely flat now....
Yeah, that pretty much killed the "she got implants" rumour.

I thought she looked great before, she was all nice and curvy and well proportioned. Perhaps she could have used a little toning up, but really, she looked great. Now she just looks scary.

you know, after about... 15 seconds of Googling, i can't find any somewhat trustworthy article to prove that it's true... :eek:

Did anyone even consider that the woman in eaither of those pictures might not have really been her? and in the bikini picture, there is a leg jutting out from behind her, kinda odd, wouldn't you say? :mp5:

You guys are talking about the size reduction of Lohan's boobs....unbelievable. This is a waste of bandwidth, I agree.

HAHAHAAHAHAHAHA.

This is obviously ridiculous. Besides, it'd make more sense to reduce her breasts for an adult film, as that would take the men's attention away from the dialogue.

I think Lindsay Lohan is a delicious little piece of pie. I'm still split on the issue of whether her boobs are, er, organic or modified, but it doesn't really matter anymore given the great boobjobs that they do nowadays.

Whether or not it's true this makes me laugh. If her breasts do appear smaller in Herbie that could be due to a number of things. How clothes fit and what kind of bra a girl is wearing can make a big difference. When she's doing magazine shoots and such she's going to want to look "hot"(or at least the magazine will want her to) and will therefore wear something to accentuate the breasts while in a children's movie she won't be trying to look overly sexy nor will the company want her to.

This is ridiculous. I signed, I don't care if it's true or not because I used my address that already gets 50 spams a day and if it isn't true it won't do anything. But seriously. That's stupid - the idea of being family friendly is not to implant sexual ideas in the kiddies' minds, right? Well guess what - by reducing boob size, you're implanting the idea that large breasts are inherently sexual, which they're not, and if you didn't, the kids would never think of it by themselves. I know because I watched Titanic when I was 9 and it's only now, six years later, that I have mentally reviewed and thought "you know, that was kinda hot."

OH YEAH and another thing, the petition really isn't going to be taken seriously at all in fact it will probably be a detriment, because so many idiotic males have signed saying "yeah I wanna stare at her tits during the movie". I suppose I am somewhat losing my faith in the male gender. In fact, I think anyone who signed that petition in that manner ought to be forced to watch a long, erotic movie with a girl who is indeed a girl, but has very small breasts that are covered at all times. Perhaps gay film starring a pre-op male transsexual...

Actually, I am rather disappointed in the entire plot of the movie anyways. Too much like another, older movie. I think it was chitty-chitty-bang-bang, or something.

Actually, I am rather disappointed in the entire plot of the movie anyways. Too much like another, older movie. I think it was chitty-chitty-bang-bang, or something.There's an old series of movies called Herbie that have the same sort-of alive racecar

Herbie is a remake of Herbie The Lovebug. Chitty-Chitty Bang-bang was a different franchise.

I must admit, I was wrong. I said this was a ridiculous rumor that couldn't possibly be true: It is though.

They ACTUALLY DID digitally edit Lohan's breast-size. But not because of concerned mothers. The reason was that the MPAA refused to give the movie a G rating if they did not.

You've got to understand why I didn't believe this: Namely because it is absolutely retarded.

Here's an article on the subject, I guess it did have something to do with concerned mothers, but Entertainment Weekly says it had more to do with MPAA:

"Teen actress Lindsay Lohan's breasts have been digitally reduced for forthcoming Disney film Herbie: Fully Loaded, to avoid offending family audiences.

Test screenings for the new movie, the fourth sequel to the 1968 film The Love Bug about a Volkswagen Beetle car with a mind of its own, indicated that some parents felt Lohan's character Maggie Peyton was too raunchy for a children's film.

Disney technicians were forced to plough through numerous scenes - especially those showing the busty actress jumping up and down at a motor racing track, reducing her breasts by two cup sizes and raising revealing necklines on her T-shirts.

Amused at her digital bosom reduction, Lohan says, "I don't know how Renee Zellweger kept swelling and shrinking for Bridget Jones. It's no fun.

"Bring on the computer guys."

Article Copyright World Entertainment News Network All Rights Reserved. "

the idea of being family friendly is not to implant sexual ideas in the kiddies' minds, right? Well guess what - by reducing boob size, you're implanting the idea that large breasts are inherently sexual, which they're not, and if you didn't, the kids would never think of it by themselves.

Actually, not really. Yes, by describing a story like this to kids you might be "implanting the idea that large breasts are inherently sexual," but not by just doing it in the movie. Why? 99.999% of the kids who watch won't even notice. They didn't know or care what size Lindsay Lohan's breasts were before, so why should they notice that they're smaller now? I don't think it makes the movie any more family-friendly, but I don't think it's teaching kids that breasts are sexual either.

~PC, PC, Politically Correct~
~PC, PC, Politically Correct~
~PC, PC, Politically Correct~
~I'm still not inoffensive but I'll get there yet~

If they shot the movie now, since she's lost all the weight (and her boobs), they wouldn't have to worry about it. She looks like a stick.

Lindsey Lohan is a watery tart!

I'm sorry to say guys but Lindsay has already destroyed her money making breasts. She got into the cocaine. If you look at the latest pictures of her you will see.....oh god I can't describe it.....THE HORROR!!!! I will say two words to describe her now.....CRACK WHORE. Rude I know, but it has to be said.

good luck getting the anorexia cokehead bitch to put on more weight. :S she was so beautiful too. Moron child.

If I said, "Thank god she lost all that weight; she looked like a fat pig before. What a ugly whale of a slut," I'd get attacked (and rightly so). So why is it okay to insult someone for being thin? Regardless of whether you think she looked better before or after her weight loss, it's her friggin' body, not anyone else's. Do you really want people to be judged and insulted based only on their physical appearance?

It's not just her specifically, really. It's more what she represents.

SPEAKING OF LOHAN

Lets play a guessing game, is she bulimic or anorexic? I am betting bulimic

http://www.imdb.com/gallery/ss/0400497/049.jpg?path=gallery&path_key=0400497&seq=40
They look pretty normal there. I think it's just a rumor, the original picture is too blurry to discern anything.