Super-power
03-06-2005, 20:03
I've just noticed some peculiar poll results from my thread on leaders (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=423374). The majority of people believe that the further a ruler geopolitically is from the citizens he/she is governing, the less likely that the ruler really cares about those people, or the issues affecting them.
Drawing from this poll alone, with no previous knowledge of NS, one would think the posters here are opposed to organizations like world government (since in a world government, rulers are geopolitically the furthest away from the governed).
However, a few months ago there was a thread on if NS players support the idea of world government (here (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=409081)). Going back to this poll, the results showed that 70% of NSers would either support a world government, or support the idea of one
Obviously these poll results seem to contrast one another. So I ask the people of NS: What good is supporting the idea of a world government if you also share the belief that those in the world government would care less for the people the govern?
Drawing from this poll alone, with no previous knowledge of NS, one would think the posters here are opposed to organizations like world government (since in a world government, rulers are geopolitically the furthest away from the governed).
However, a few months ago there was a thread on if NS players support the idea of world government (here (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=409081)). Going back to this poll, the results showed that 70% of NSers would either support a world government, or support the idea of one
Obviously these poll results seem to contrast one another. So I ask the people of NS: What good is supporting the idea of a world government if you also share the belief that those in the world government would care less for the people the govern?