NationStates Jolt Archive


serial killer hijack thread

Catushkoti
02-06-2005, 00:16
hah! why am I not surprised? :p

not similarly, I was putting the swastika on all my school papers next to my name in the 4th grade because I saw the symbol and thought it was awesome (I had no idea what it represented). that got me a long lecture.

Did that include any other permutations of the swastika (Bhuddist symbol for instance), or just the Nazi element?
Sumamba Buwhan
02-06-2005, 02:48
Did that include any other permutations of the swastika (Bhuddist symbol for instance), or just the Nazi element?

of course not
Sino
02-06-2005, 03:15
hah! why am I not surprised? :p

not similarly, I was putting the swastika on all my school papers next to my name in the 4th grade because I saw the symbol and thought it was awesome (I had no idea what it represented). that got me a long lecture.

If you saw marching Nazis and thought they were awesome, then you got interested in the symbol. I ain't surprised.

I myself admire the Nazi image, but not their beliefs. Nazis uniforms are still large unsurpassed by today's styles.
Gartref
02-06-2005, 06:36
That dog is a slut.
Chewbaccula
02-06-2005, 07:49
That dog is a slut.

What choice did it have?
Gartref
02-06-2005, 07:52
What choice did it have?

One bark, yes. Two barks, no.
Gartref
02-06-2005, 08:16
Look, alls I'm saying is, if that's the dog I think it is - then the bitch was begging for it.
Gartref
02-06-2005, 08:22
That dog certainly did not give consent, and neither did the girls he raped.

The dog raped some girls???
Sino
02-06-2005, 08:34
I understand why you love aesthic. The whole Nazi look is very sharp and designed to imapart a sense of importance and power But if you'd just ignore the enitre swastika, SS logos and other offensive symbols and maybe make your own, people won't be so offended, and you'd have done some thing original and creative? Eh? Non?

But the look is really appealing. Thats what the whole point behind all Nazi imagery.

The besides the uniforms of the Nazis, only the modern day Chinese have managed to trail behind them in terms of appeal and portraying power.

http://www.tridentmilitary.com/photo-gallery/Chinese-photo-4.jpg
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/images/04.jpg
http://www.sinodefence.com/navy/sub/yuan_2lg.jpg
Sino
02-06-2005, 08:36
The dog raped some girls???

No! Didn't ya read the article? The criminal raped two girls and now he raped the dog.
Gartref
02-06-2005, 08:39
No! Didn't ya read the article? The criminal raped two girls and now he raped the dog.

There was a reading assignment?!
Gartref
02-06-2005, 09:03
Actually, it was "criminal sexual conduct", which doesn't purtain only to rape.

So... he might have been having consensual sex with a dog in front of two girls?
Bismarck II
02-06-2005, 10:11
Lol. Serial killers are less potent.
Try someone like Hitler and war mongers. They kill milllions... some get away with it.
Sino
02-06-2005, 10:40
Try someone like Hitler and war mongers. They kill milllions... some get away with it.

Hey, Old Hitler didn't start out screwin' girls and dogs. In fact, he was sexless (having limited interest in sex) and was later rumoured (by Albert speer) to be impotent. Hitler's closest experience to sexual satisfaction was power, simple as that.
1248B
02-06-2005, 10:48
Hey, Old Hitler didn't start out screwin' girls and dogs. In fact, he was sexless (having limited interest in sex) and was later rumoured (by Albert speer) to be impotent. Hitler's closest experience to sexual satisfaction was power, simple as that.

Actually, word is he was a flaming homosexual. Then again, he did have sexual relationships with two of his nieces, who commited suicide to escape any further sexual escapades with Herr Hitler. It may have been because they didn't share their uncle's sexual fixation for urine and shit.
Gartref
02-06-2005, 11:28
...there are *lots* of arguments in favour, and if you can keep the "screw greenies! " people out it makes quite an interesting debate.

Is screwing greenies morally acceptable?
The Alma Mater
02-06-2005, 11:34
Is screwing greenies morally acceptable?

Depends on wheter you think greenies have rights, and if so if they (can) consent to it or not :p
Chewbaccula
02-06-2005, 12:14
Actually, word is he was a flaming homosexual. Then again, he did have sexual relationships with two of his nieces, who commited suicide to escape any further sexual escapades with Herr Hitler. It may have been because they didn't share their uncle's sexual fixation for urine and shit.

PROOF????????
Mythotic Kelkia
02-06-2005, 13:15
PROOF????????


He was pure evil (FACT!) That obviously means he was a sexual deviant.


/sarcasm :rolleyes:
Sumamba Buwhan
02-06-2005, 20:23
If you saw marching Nazis and thought they were awesome, then you got interested in the symbol. I ain't surprised.

I myself admire the Nazi image, but not their beliefs. Nazis uniforms are still large unsurpassed by today's styles.

No I just saw the symbol. But you are right their uniforms are swell. Gee whiz gosh and golly. Nazis themselves suck major ass though.
Carnivorous Lickers
03-06-2005, 03:04
Hey, Old Hitler didn't start out screwin' girls and dogs. In fact, he was sexless (having limited interest in sex) and was later rumoured (by Albert speer) to be impotent. Hitler's closest experience to sexual satisfaction was power, simple as that.


I heard something different about hitler- one testicle? Also, something involving his niece or another underage girl urinating on him? maybe I'm wrong..I remember somthing about this...
Sino
03-06-2005, 03:10
Actually, word is he was a flaming homosexual. Then again, he did have sexual relationships with two of his nieces, who commited suicide to escape any further sexual escapades with Herr Hitler. It may have been because they didn't share their uncle's sexual fixation for urine and shit.

The homosexuality claims are the work of modern homosexual groups in order to further their cause, by framing that staunch anti-homosexual men in history were in fact fags. There's no significant evidence to argue that Hitler was gay and every piece of evidence cited in a recent book of the topic was neither backed up in records nor unable to be refuted.

Hitler may have had an incestuous relationship with his niece, the exact nature of the relationship will forever remain unknown, due to her suicide. It was a fact that Hitler cared for politics more than women. He was able to seek a greater pleasure than an aspect of bondage assigned by nature, which is very admirable. There's no greater lust than the lust for power.
Carnivorous Lickers
03-06-2005, 03:16
The homosexuality claims are the work of modern homosexual groups in order to further their cause, by framing that staunch anti-homosexual men in history were in fact fags. There's no significant evidence to argue that Hitler was gay and every piece of evidence cited in a recent book of the topic was neither backed up in records nor unable to be refuted.

Hitler may have had an incestuous relationship with his niece, the exact nature of the relationship will forever remain unknown, due to her suicide. It was a fact that Hitler cared for politics more than women. He was able to seek a greater pleasure than an aspect of bondage assigned by nature, which is very admirable. There's no greater lust than the lust for power.


I just read something that claims Hitler sexually abused Richard Wagner's-the composer-son.
Sino
03-06-2005, 03:23
No I just saw the symbol. But you are right their uniforms are swell. Gee whiz gosh and golly. Nazis themselves suck major ass though.

The Germans only lost faith with them when the war went badly. Don't forget that what Hitler could achieve with Germany in five years, the Chinese would never pull off in fifty years. Their political ideas made little sense, but it certainly revitalized the economy and pathed the way for state of the arts rearmament.
Sino
03-06-2005, 03:27
I heard something different about hitler- one testicle? Also, something involving his niece or another underage girl urinating on him? maybe I'm wrong..I remember somthing about this...

I have yet to hear of any hard evidence that Hitler was a masochist who fancied bodily wastes, but the Russian proved it in their autopsy of his charred remains that he had only one testicle. It was rumoured that in the subsequent years after the war and prior to Stalin's death, a piece of his skull (which now rests in the Moscow archives), was used as an ashtray by Stalin in the ultimate portrayal of victory. The Red Army's 79th rifle division (which discovered Hitler's remains) was known to have kept it in a cigar box.
Sino
03-06-2005, 03:29
He was pure evil (FACT!) That obviously means he was a sexual deviant.


/sarcasm :rolleyes:

Where's the proof in that?
Chewbaccula
03-06-2005, 03:56
He was pure evil (FACT!) That obviously means he was a sexual deviant.


/sarcasm :rolleyes:

thanks for all the useless info :rolleyes: seriously but anyone else, was there any substance to the before mentioned posts about Hitler being this deviant?
I think its all horseshit to be honest.
Reason aman doing stuff like this would have lost all respect from his comrades and not made it as far as he did, even if what he did become was incredibly flawed in other ways.
Gartref
03-06-2005, 07:26
This kid's a prime candidate for chemical castration. Locking him up for about ninety years sounds like a fantastic idea.


Nah... I think it will have a happy ending just like the Mary Kay Letourneau fairytale. This guy will get out of prison in a few years and marry the pooch. It will be so romantic. *sniff*
Sino
03-06-2005, 08:21
Nah... I think it will have a happy ending just like the Mary Kay Letourneau fairytale. This guy will get out of prison in a few years and marry the pooch. It will be so romantic. *sniff*

Are you out off your mind? You can't marry a pooch let along f*ck one!