The Death Party Manifesto
Death Party Leadership
02-06-2005, 18:14
Note: The Death Party will not be running for this, or probably any other NS General Election.
THE DEATH PARTY
-- Law and Order --
Anyone committing a crime will be killed.
-- Military --
Anyone who attacks the nation will be killed.
-- Abortion --
People who want abortion to be controlled by the government will be killed.
-- Gay Marriage --
People who want marriage to be controlled by the government will be killed.
-- Environment --
People who refuse the chance to avoid harming the environment will be killed.
-- Education --
Any teacher who teaches badly will be killed. Any student who is taught well but does not learn will be killed.
-- Healthcare --
To prevent the spread of diseases, anyone with an infectious disease will be killed.
-- Unemployment --
If the number of workers exceeds the number of jobs, workers will be killed.
-- Death Penalty --
Guess.
If you support the death penalty, you will be killed?
If you support the death penalty, you will be killed?
LOL
Makes sense... ;)
Death Party Leadership
02-06-2005, 18:22
If you support the death penalty, you will be killed?
No.
No.
Then you're sellouts. A true death party would kill someone for that. :mad:
Death Party Leadership
02-06-2005, 18:25
Then you're sellouts. A true death party would kill someone for that. :mad:
The Death Party kills people for not supporting the death penalty, since it's the only penalty the party uses.
The Death Party kills people for not supporting the death penalty, since it's the only penalty the party uses.
But that sucks. Logically, to maximise the death-rate, you would apply the death penalty to supporters too. Your policies are inefficient, soft and not morbid enough.
Death Party Leadership
02-06-2005, 18:35
But that sucks. Logically, to maximise the death-rate, you would apply the death penalty to supporters too. Your policies are inefficient, soft and not morbid enough.
The aim is not to kill as many as possible, but to attempt to disprove the claim that "death does not solve everything".
The aim is not to kill as many as possible, but to attempt to disprove the claim that "death does not solve everything".
Well, if you killed everyone, then all the problems we have would be fixed, wouldn't they?
Leaving some people alive is just daft. It's like "hey look, this is how we fix the problems, but we're not going to go all the way, because we're pussies."
:p
Death Party Leadership
02-06-2005, 18:40
Well, if you killed everyone, then all the problems we have would be fixed, wouldn't they?
Leaving some people alive is just daft. It's like "hey look, this is how we fix the problems, but we're not going to go all the way, because we're pussies."
:p
Killing everyone would be bad for the economy.
Killing everyone would be bad for the economy.
But leaving everyone alive is bad for the economy. People screw things up. They can't be trusted with something as fragile as an economy.
We could replace them with robots, but code all of the robots to kill eachother.
Death Party Leadership
02-06-2005, 19:02
But leaving everyone alive is bad for the economy. People screw things up. They can't be trusted with something as fragile as an economy.
We're not leaving everyone alive. Besides, people are responsible for the economy according to all other parties' policies too. As for the robots - they could do manual labour, but AI is not advanced enough to control the economy itself.