NationStates Jolt Archive

Said title was stolen from Texan Hotrodder's sig. And I do believe that to a girl, a bourgeoisite oppressing meager proles looks sexy to a chick. ;)
So, agree, disagree, w/e.

They wont love you so much after WE take power

you mean like how we all want donald trump?


*shudder*

No, chicks love stereotypically geeky guys. :rolleyes:

Oppressor. No. Unless chicks don't know he's an oppressor.

But power and money are chick magnets guys could have. :)

Myrth.

No, damn it! Chicks dig communist revolutionaries!

No, damn it! Chicks dig communist revolutionaries!

What about more Socialist-leaning men? How do we rank?

Chicks dig power, in most of its forms (physical, intellectual, charismatic etc.), but so do guys (in most of its forms).
Chicks like to have disposable assets to spare, but so do guys.
Capitalist oppressor = Person with power and disposable assets. Chicks will dig them generally, but so will guys.

Or were you being sexist here and assuming that all capitalist oppressors are men. Or even if you were, you are then assuming that no gays exist.

Be more inclusive. People dig capitalist oppressors.

Myrth, RAWR!!!

Myrth. Whatever that means.

you know it used to be that a woman's only route to power was through a man. so the most ambitious woman latched onto a powerful man, or a man she judged could become powerful with her guidance. then she became the "power behind the throne"

nowadays women work on their own success and their own power. no need to pretend to be weak and pretty as she engineers someone else's success (esp since those men tend to divorce that wife and pick up a nice trophy wife instead). now only a lazy woman wants to leech off a man's power and money. dont envy a powerful man for having a woman like that.

today's women are more eclectic in their choices since the can afford to carry a pretty boy or an undiscovered artist. if they prefer a powerful man they want an equal not a sugar daddy. she can marry for love or for fun.

I remember reading somewhere, some studies, say that the higher the IQ of the women, the less chance she would find a partner. :(

I wonder why men are intimidated. For me, I'm an opportunist. I like smart ladies. If something bad would happen to me *feeling lazy Cough cough* that I would be unable to do anything, at least I have someone in charge that i can trust that can take care of me for life. Yay.

I'll go with the Myrth option, on this one...

Step aside plebeians; I'm late for the national Capializm Now meeting!

Why do threads like this get the "Myrth" option? What is the point?

I remember reading somewhere, some studies, say that the higher the IQ of the women, the less chance she would find a partner. :(

I wonder why men are intimidated. For me, I'm an opportunist. I like smart ladies. If something bad would happen to me *feeling lazy Cough cough* that I would be unable to do anything, at least I have someone in charge that i can trust that can take care of me for life. Yay.

i think its changing. dont young men today realize the advantage of having a wife who can move up in her profession and make the big bucks?

the stupid men might be intimidated but why would the above average guys want less?

Chicks dig Myrth! ;)

No, damn it! Chicks dig communist revolutionaries!

Most of the chicks I know are virulently anticommunist.