NationStates Jolt Archive

Generator :D

dunno if u have seen it before but it new to me :P
i can see how it will make debates more"intresting"
http://www.pakin.org/complaint/ (http://)


Teh Cameron Clan has recently made a number of people very angry, including me. However, as anger serves no function in a successful rebuttal, I will simply state objectively that Teh Cameron Clan's demands are way off base. But first, I'm going to jump ahead a bit and talk in general terms about how the common denominator of all of Teh Cameron Clan's recommendations is that they seek to do away with intellectual honesty. Then, I'll back up and fill in some of the details. Okay, so to start with the general stuff, Teh Cameron Clan's disquisitions all stem from one, simple, faulty premise -- that cold-blooded insurrectionists are more deserving of honor than our nation's war heroes. To get even the simplest message into the consciousness of the worst sorts of besotted, rabid factionalism enthusiasts there are, it has to be repeated at least 50 times. Now, I don't want to insult your intelligence by telling you the following 50 times, but he should think about how his assertions lead high-handed apostates to pooh-pooh the concerns of others. If Teh Cameron Clan doesn't want to think that hard, perhaps he should just keep quiet. Since he claims to know more than the rest of us, I'm sure he is aware that I recently heard him tell a bunch of people that obnoxious, laughable nincompoops are easily housebroken. I can't adequately describe my first reaction to this notion; I simply don't know how to represent uncontrollable laughter in text. Let us now dole out acerbic criticism of Teh Cameron Clan and his phalanx of insincere proxies, because in that is our only hope for the future.

This letter has three main sections. In the first, I argue that Mr. Jesus H Christ loves everybody so much, he wants to rip out the guts of everybody who doesn't love everybody as much as he does. In the second, I make it clear that Jesus's apple-polishers are a subspecies of those feral blackguards whose shallow mottos and pudibund commentaries have become the stuff of legend. And in the third and final section, I conclude that Jesus's personal attacks will cause more harm than good. Let me preface my discussion by quickly reasserting a familiar theme of my previous letters: Those of us who are too lazy or disinterested to take off the kid gloves and vent some real anger at Jesus have no right to complain when he and his foot soldiers crush any semblance of opposition to his uncivilized opinions.

Trumpeted so many times, his remarks have begun to feed on themselves, to generate their own publicity, to cow their opponents not by argument but by sheer repetition, and to provoke terrible, total, universal, and merciless destruction. I, for one, have had enough of his brutal bait-and-switch tactics. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, challenge him to move from his broad derogatory generalizations to specific instances to prove otherwise. You've never heard Jesus announce that he plans to destabilize the already volatile social fabric that he purportedly aims to save? Well, Jesus has repeatedly enunciated such a plan, but in his typically convoluted way. He has never tried to stop piteous, headstrong pikers who use mass organization as a system of integration and control. In fact, quite the opposite is true: Jesus encourages that sort of behavior. I'd like to finish with a quote from a private e-mail message sent to me by a close friend of mine: "Mr. Jesus H Christ's hariolations are attributable to an ignorance born of fear".

.


Even as I sit here, I can't believe I'm writing this. I've never been one to voice my opinions in such a public manner. But after learning that Lord Ravea Q. Muffin, Esq. wants to devastate vast acres of precious farmland, I felt I at least had to set a few things straight. The points I plan to make in this letter will sound tediously familiar to everyone who wants to suggest the kind of politics and policies that are needed to restore good sense to this important debate. Nevertheless, he might construct the spectre of a terrible armed threat by next weekend. What are we to do then? Place blinders over our eyes and hope we don't see the horrible outcome? Does he really know anything about the wheelings and dealings he claims to support? No, he doesn't.


He says that sexism brings one closer to nirvana. Should we care that large numbers of self-satisfied storytellers actually believe such obstreperous things? Should we try to convince them otherwise? I don't think so. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that I have to wonder where he got the idea that it is my view that his vices are the only true virtues. This sits hard with me, because it is simply not true, and I've never written anything to imply that it is.


Lord Muffin claims to be fighting for equality. What he's really fighting for, however, is equality in degradation, by which I mean that Lord Muffin has announced his intentions to pour a few drops of wormwood into our general enthusiasm. While doing so may earn Lord Muffin a gold star from the mush-for-brains antipluralism crowd, he keeps telling us that what I call gormless skinflints should be fêted at wine-and-cheese fund-raisers. Are we also supposed to believe that he has been robbed of all he does not possess? I didn't think so. So let me make it clear that it looks like Lord Muffin's actions are complete drivel. His legates probably don't realize that, because it's not mentioned in the funny papers or in the movies. Nevertheless, I have a dream that my children will be able to live in a world filled with open spaces and beautiful wilderness -- not in a dark, disorderly world run by belligerent humanity-haters. I can indisputably suggest how Lord Muffin ought to behave. Ultimately, however, the burden of acting with moral rectitude lies with Lord Muffin himself. In short, I lost all respect for Lord Ravea Q. Muffin, Esq. when I heard he plans to defend elitism, stoicism, and notions of racial superiority.

Generator :D

dunno if u have seen it before but it new to me :P
i can see how it will make debates more"intresting"
http://www.pakin.org/complaint/ (http://)


That site is pure gold.

To those superficial, quixotic wankers who think that the laws of nature don't apply to Chicken pi, know this: Chicken pi has been deluding people into believing that he is omnipotent. Don't let him delude you, too.

YAY another thingy !!

thingy!! (http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?Teh%20Cameron%20Clan)

YAY another thingy !!

thingy!! (http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?Teh%20Cameron%20Clan)

IT'S A TRAP! IT'S A TRAP!

IT'S A TRAP! IT'S A TRAP!
LIES!

>.>
<.<

Teh Cameron Clan tried to eat your brain, but you are already a zombie.

You stare blankly at one another for a few moments, then lurch off in separate directions.

ha HA!

ha HA!


what? that means you already fell for it :D

Graaaagh!
Teh Cameron Clan has tricked you, and has eaten your brains - you have now joined the shambling, grey-skinned legions of the undead, along with everyone else who has ever visited this page.

Teh Cameron Clan the zombie has eaten 5 brains. Yours was the best yet

Damn right it was.

(btw, I had one of these and the mods stopped me from showing it, so...)

In this letter, I plan to discuss Tribes of Longton's soporific publications quite extensively. Note that the details aren't pleasant. In fact, they're shocking. But I insist that people who don't know what Tribes is up to doubtlessly need to be shocked. What follows is a call to action for those of us who care -- a large enough number to view the realms of escapism and boosterism not as two opposing poles, but as two continua.

He says that obscurity, evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, and ambiguity are marks of depth and brilliance. Yet he also wants to divert attention from his unprovoked aggression. Am I the only one who sees the irony there? I ask because he is inherently directionless, self-satisfied, and stuck-up. Oh, and he also has a hopeless mode of existence. It may be obvious but should nonetheless be acknowledged that Tribes wants to consign most of us to the role of his servants or slaves. Personally, I don't want that. Personally, I prefer freedom. If you also prefer freedom, then you should be working with me to make some changes here. Please remember that we've all heard him yammer and whine about how he's being scapegoated again, the poor dear.

Tribes is the embodiment of everything petty in our lives. Every grievance, every envy, every dotty ideology finds expression in Tribes of Longton. I, not being one of the many foul duffers of this world, have begged his operatives to step forth and help you reflect and reexamine your views on Tribes. To date, not a single soul has agreed to help in this fashion. Are they worried about how Tribes might retaliate? Well, while you're deliberating over that, let me ask you another question: Is it possible for those who defend slovenly opportunism to make their defense look more pertinacious than it currently is? Now, not to bombard you with too many questions, but if I may be so bold, if this letter did nothing else but serve as a beacon of truth, it would be worthy of reading by all right-thinking people. However, this letter's role is much greater than just to carry out the famous French admonition, écrasez l'infâme!, against Tribes's ploys. This is far from all I have to say on the topic, but it's certainly enough for now. Just remember one thing: Tribes of Longton's vaporings epitomize all that is unambitious in the world.

*weeps*

It knows me so well!

YAY another thingy !!

thingy!! (http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?Teh%20Cameron%20Clan)
Aren't those... Illegal?

My complaint about Runshaw College
In my last letter, I claimed that Runshaw College has lost what little credibility it once had, and that claim is even more true now. Let us note first of all that Runshaw College's sycophants always show a streak of cruelty that enables them to find pleasure in their destructiveness. Of course, this sounds simple, but in reality, the real issue is simple: It feels obligated to erect a screen of flatulent verbiage to hide the real world from its victims. Runshaw College's reason is not true reason. It does not seek the truth, but only eccentric answers, bloodthirsty resolutions to conflicts. There's a time to keep silent and a time to speak. There's a time to love and a time to hate. There's a time for war and a time for peace. And, I maintain, there's a time to build a world overflowing with compassion and tolerance. Or, to put it less poetically, Runshaw College has made a big mistake. But what, you may ask, does any of that have to do with the theme of this letter, viz., that the Runshaw College-ization of our political and spiritual lives will abandon the idea of universal principles and focus illegitimately on the particular by the next full moon? The answer is not obvious, because there is something grievously wrong with those feeble-minded oafs who call for ritualistic invocations of needlessly formal rules. Shame on the lot of them!

Runshaw College has failed to provide us with a context in which its conjectures could be discussed and understood. People have commented that there may be a gap in my logic there. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, don't think there is, and I've gone to great pains to explain why. Sure, some of Runshaw College's imprecations are valid, but that's not the point. Viewed from all angles, Runshaw College is frightened that we might offer a framework for discussion so that we can more quickly reach a consensus. That's why it's trying so hard to prevent whistleblowers from reporting that it seeks scapegoats for its own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target it can find, that is, the most scornful hooligans you'll ever see. Two quick comments: 1) Runshaw College's propaganda machine grinds on and on, and 2) it is the picture of the insane person on the street, babbling to a tree, a wall, or a cloud, which cannot and does not respond to its personal attacks.

I don't care what others say about Runshaw College. It's still dishonest, supercilious, and it intends to biologically or psychologically engineer uncompromising palookas to make them even more cantankerous than they already are. I would be grateful if Runshaw College would take a little time from its rigorous schedule to find the inner strength to indicate in a rough and approximate way the two batty tendencies that I believe are the main driving force of modern cronyism. Of course, pigs will grow wings and fly before that ever happens. I overheard one of Runshaw College's subordinates say, "Advertising is the most veridical form of human communication." This quotation demonstrates the power of language, as it epitomizes the "us/them" dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. As for me, I prefer to use language to punish Runshaw College for its counter-productive demands. Runshaw College should learn to appreciate what it has instead of feeling so oppressed because it can't do everything it wants, every time it wants to. While this letter hasn't provided anything in the way of a concrete plan of action, it may help us focus our thinking a little better when we do work out a plan. For now, we must make some changes here. I will sincerely be happy to have your help in this endeavor.

Aren't those... Illegal?

are thay? :(
i made this post then asy another thread with about the brain eating so tossed that in

The site doesn't work for me :(

are thay? :(
i made this post then asy another thread with about the brain eating so tossed that in
Illegaleror! Illegaleror! I am going to go auto generate you an angry letter! :)

The site doesn't work for me :(

The link doesnt work quite right, trying copying and pasting it into your address bar.

I don't know how to tell you this, but Sinuhue's platitudes are contrary to international human rights and humanitarian standards. Let me preface my discussion by quickly reasserting a familiar theme of my previous letters: If you read between the lines of Sinuhue's bromides, you'll undeniably find that in order to renew those institutions of civil society -- like families, schools, churches, and civic groups -- that improve the living conditions of the most vulnerable in our society -- the sick, the old, the disabled, the unemployed, and our youth -- all of whose lives are made miserable by Sinuhue, we must combat the disreputable ideology of sesquipedalianism that has infected the minds of so many abominable, flighty lumpenproletariats. And that's just the first step. Remember, I, not being one of the many domineering grizzlers of this world, have one itsy-bitsy problem with Sinuhue's ethics. Videlicet, they propitiate brassbound wishy-washy-types for later eventualities. And that's saying nothing about how she is absolutely determined to believe that anti-intellectualism is a viable and vital objective for our nation's educational institutions, and she's not about to let facts or reason get in her way. My mother always told me, "If you don't have something intelligent to say, just keep quiet." Apparently, Sinuhue's mother never told her that. As amazing as it seems, I receive a great deal of correspondence from people all over the world. And one of the things that impresses me about it is the massive number of people who realize that contrary to my personal preferences, I'm thinking about what's best for all of us. My conclusion is that what's best for all of us is for me to push a consistent vision that responds to most people's growing fears about the most intolerant usurers you'll ever see. So, sorry for being so long-winded in this letter, but Sinuhue's cohorts pit the haves against the have-nots simply because they think it's fun.

Wow. This is where our politicians get their speeches...

The link doesnt work quite right, trying copying and pasting it into your address bar.

Thank you.

That's brilliant.

King General of General's protests are totally disgusting -- so much so, that if there are any children or sensitive people reading this letter, I suggest that they stop now and not read what I am about to describe. First things first: I certainly hope that the truth will prevail and that justice will be served before King General does any real damage. Or is it already too late? One might as well ask, "Why does King General want to contaminate clear thinking with his impudent, hideous tirades?" Before you answer, let me point out that not only does he carve out space in the mainstream for beer-guzzling politics, but he then commands his forces, who are legion, "Go, and do thou likewise." Given his current mind-set, several things he has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how we should be grateful for the precious freedom to be robbed and kicked in the face by such a noble creature as him. It is becoming increasingly obvious to many people that it's only rational to think, "Contentious, dishonest clowns are sincerely the lowest form of human life". To top that off, if King General believes that all literature which opposes diabolism was forged by bumptious, rotten chuckleheads, then it's obvious why he thinks that governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments. Contrary to the impression that the most uninformed prigs you'll ever see offer "new," "innovative," and "advanced" ideas, there is little new in their fibs. Let's face it: King General intends to create a new social class. Dodgy storytellers, parasitic, fatuitous weirdos, and illiberal big-labor bosses will be given aristocratic status. The rest of us will be forced into serving as their flunkies. This has been a long letter, but I feel that its length is in direct proportion to its importance. Why? Because "parasympathomimetic" is sometimes narrowly defined by blathering boeotians.