Bush-For or against?
Heiligkeit
13-04-2005, 03:24
Are you for or against Bush? reasons?
HannibalBarca
13-04-2005, 03:28
Hasn't this been done to death?
Against. Issues already stated.....
Great Beer and Food
13-04-2005, 03:29
Are you for or against Bush? reasons?
Your President:
http://www.mykeru.com/graphics_galleries/Videos/video_files/bush_finger.html
CthulhuFhtagn
13-04-2005, 03:31
I'm all for...
Oh. The President.
Evil Arch Conservative
13-04-2005, 03:32
I'm all for...
Oh. The President.
I'm going to assume that he was referring to the first thought that popped into your head.
Yes, I'm for bush. Heh heh.
New Sancrosanctia
13-04-2005, 03:34
it's nice if she trims it a little.
Kervoskia
13-04-2005, 03:39
Oh yeah this guy
http://www.softvote.com/blog/poll_2004/http:/www.softvote.com/blog_images/sad_bush2.jpg/sad_bush2.jpg
I am against. Not just because of his conservative policies, but because he is a proven idiot.
Kervoskia
13-04-2005, 03:44
I am against. Not just because of his conservative policies, but because he is a proven idiot.
Thats not nice!
*implodes*
Megh!
It would be nice if this discussion were a little more nuanced.
Monkeypimp
13-04-2005, 04:07
Wait, so this isn't a bikini waxing thread?
American Ex-States
13-04-2005, 04:13
Against.
I can tell that he lies - his lips move.
Steffurabi
13-04-2005, 04:22
I dont particularly care for the mans policies..
but they sure do make plenty of hot magazines of beautiful women in them with his name on it.
I also liked his magazine alot before he changed his name from alfred e. neuman
CanuckHeaven
13-04-2005, 04:26
Totally against Bush for the war in Iraq:
American power did indeed promote effective multilateral action on Iraq. But to maintain international support, the Bush administration should have then shown a willingness to adjust its military timetable to diplomatic realities. A synchronized policy would have had the diplomatic and military tracks converge sometime this fall. All of the key players in Europe now say that they would have been prepared to support or at least sanction force against Iraq if it had not fully disarmed by then. And waiting that long would have demonstrated to all that Washington was prepared to go the extra mile to secure international backing. But the Bush administration showed no such willingness.
Bush gambled and he lost. The fact that there were no WMD, intensifies that loss. There is little trust for Bush outside of the US, and any future foreign endeavours will be viewed with skepticism.
Bush has even lost a lot of support from within the US on this war:
56 Percent in Survey Say Iraq War Was a Mistake (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14266-2004Dec20.html)
That is quite a turn around and even comes after the elections in Iraq.
[NS]Goddessness
13-04-2005, 04:32
*yawn*
CanuckHeaven
13-04-2005, 04:37
Goddessness']*yawn*
We look forward to your more in depth second post. :D