Two nations you want to see go all out in war.
No U.N. interference.
No alliances interfearing.
No nuclear attacks.
No terrorism.
Straight nation on nation action. Wait, wouldn't that make it homo? Eh, never mind.
So, two nations you'd like to see go all out in war? For laughs? For revenge? For that sick little man in your shoulder going "Kill them! Kill them all! MWAHAHAHAHAH!!!!11"
Personally, I'd like to see Switzerland to stand up to the U.S. and go "Fuck this, we're not taking this shit anymore. War on America!" :D
BLARGistania
05-04-2005, 06:30
China/US
largest land army vs. better technology.
Oh, and they'd fight in Switzerland because tis neutral turf.
New Granada
05-04-2005, 06:31
Israel and China in a conventional war.
Salvondia
05-04-2005, 06:32
China/US
largest land army vs. better technology.
Oh, and they'd fight in Switzerland because tis neutral turf.
That'd be damn boring. China would be decimated on the Ocean and America would never gain a hold on the land.
Me, I want to See Germany vs France. Germany deserves to grind those damn people in the ground without interference for once.
American Civil War Part II: Red States Vs. Blue States
Findecano Calaelen
05-04-2005, 06:33
Australia vs New Zealand :)
Sdaeriji
05-04-2005, 06:33
The old USSR versus the current China. I have a feeling that would be a hell of a war.
New Granada
05-04-2005, 06:35
American Civil War Part II: Red States Vs. Blue States
We'd kill three times as many of them in half the time :)
Angry Fruit Salad
05-04-2005, 06:35
Canada versus....well, Canada!
come on, a little comic relief can't kill anyone....oh, wait....damn.
Silver Skies
05-04-2005, 06:35
France and US
US: "We're not taking this from a country who's butt me saved twice and who's revolution we help start."
*Hundreds of US bombers and fighters bomb France back to the stone age* "Oh wait they're already there"
--------------------------
This is not meant to be offensive.
Findecano Calaelen
05-04-2005, 06:36
The old USSR versus the current China. I have a feeling that would be a hell of a war.
now that is just down right scary
Trilateral Commission
05-04-2005, 06:36
China vs. India rematch.
Dempublicents1
05-04-2005, 06:37
My boyfriend jokes that we should just put a dome over the middle east, let 'em duke it out, then take the dome off in a hundred years or so. Whoever's left ought to be sick of it.
Silver Skies
05-04-2005, 06:38
That'd be damn boring. China would be decimated on the Ocean and America would never gain a hold on the land.
Me, I want to See Germany vs France. Germany deserves to grind those damn people in the ground without interference for once.
"Yeah I can see it now"
"Today germany invaded france for the third time in less then a hundred years, Paris has already fallen and the world continues to cheer on Germany" :D
------------
sorry I just don't like France
Findecano Calaelen
05-04-2005, 06:39
My boyfriend jokes that we should just put a dome over the middle east, let 'em duke it out, then take the dome off in a hundred years or so. Whoever's left ought to be sick of it.
not really a good idea, we would end up with one all powerful state, likely the most dangerous and corrupt
"Yeah I can see it now"
"Today germany invaded france for the third time in less then a hundred years, Paris has already fallen and the world continues to cheer on Germany" :D
"And it's barely noon!"
New Granada
05-04-2005, 06:43
Good to see the third reichers are out tonight.
Lemuriania
05-04-2005, 06:44
Hah! I want to see corporate war! McDonald's vs. Walmart! Burgers Bombs vs Smiley Schrapnel! C'mon!
If I had to pick a Nation vs. Nation war... I'd love to those Aussie just pwn New Zealand. Because Aus has never really been in a war hardcore. Except maybe WWII.
New Illyria
05-04-2005, 06:44
Yeah I would definitely like to see a new Franco-German war.
Trilateral Commission
05-04-2005, 06:45
Needs more Second Reich
Monkeypimp
05-04-2005, 06:47
US - China would be interesting, but I think 2 countries that have a decent land border would be better.
Sdaeriji
05-04-2005, 06:48
US - China would be interesting, but I think 2 countries that have a decent land border would be better.
Italy vs. San Marino? Austria vs. Leichtenstien? Spain vs. Andorra? France vs. Monaco?
Nation of Fortune
05-04-2005, 06:48
-snip-
Well I see you rdoing laundry again
anyway, I'd like to see America and Britain. Just because.
Monkeypimp
05-04-2005, 06:49
If I had to pick a Nation vs. Nation war... I'd love to those Aussie just pwn New Zealand. Because Aus has never really been in a war hardcore. Except maybe WWII.
And WWI...
Lacadaemon
05-04-2005, 06:49
India v. China.
(Oh, wait, well they can do it again for my viewing pleasure.)
Well, I would like to see Mexico and Brazil go all out...with the prize being dominance over all of Latin America...
...well, except for the U.S. of course.
Silver Skies
05-04-2005, 06:51
"And it's barely noon!"
It's is wow I thought is justed turned 8am, my clock must be screwed up.
*Turns on TV*
Newscaster: "Breaking news France has just surrendered their entire armed forces, the total causalties come out to
Germany: 10 men who all laughed themselves to death watching French soldiers fire one shot and then throw down their weapons and pee themselves.
France: 1,000 men who took a wrong turn wandered into the line of sight of a German tank division, and 1000 pilots who attempted to shoot down German Pilots. Along with 100,000 men how during seperate firefights attempted to surrender by standing straight up, not a smart move!"
Salvondia
05-04-2005, 06:51
Needs more Second Reich
Nein, Nein; Leben lang das Vierte Reich von Deutschland.
Tötung Frankreich
Tötung Frankreich
Tötung Frankreich
Tötung Frankreich
Lemuriania
05-04-2005, 06:53
And WWI...
Eh, I don't know enough Aus history to make any drastic claims.
Silver Skies
05-04-2005, 06:54
Sorry I'm not for the Third Reich I just want to see France get pwned, even if it were by Switzerland(sp?) (There's an Idea!)
Trilateral Commission
05-04-2005, 06:54
Needs more Pussian imperialistic control and pre-1918 borders
von der Maas bis an die Memel,
von der Etsch bis an den Belt
Thal_Ixu
05-04-2005, 06:55
it would be vierte Reich my friend. ;) and i think we germans had enough centrist, war hungry and totalitarian governments in the last two centurys, it's somebody elses turn. ;) but considering france...well of course that's a different thing. screw versailles, we're going back in :D
It's is wow I thought is justed turned 8am, my clock must be screwed up.
*Turns on TV*
Newscaster: "Breaking news France has just surrendered their entire armed forces, the total causalties come out to
Germany: 10 men who all laughed themselves to death watching French soldiers fire one shot and then throw down their weapons and pee themselves.
France: 1,000 men who took a wrong turn wandered into the line of sight of a German tank division, and 1000 pilots who attempted to shoot down German Pilots. Along with 100,000 men how during seperate firefights attempted to surrender by standing straight up, not a smart move!"
"In American Education news, teachers are now automatically passing students in French once they can understand and clearly pronounce the words "We surrender!" in German."
Monkeypimp
05-04-2005, 06:57
Italy vs. San Marino? Austria vs. Leichtenstien? Spain vs. Andorra? France vs. Monaco?
All of the above, with a few more thrown in.
There's an idea, a Europe war knockout battle. 1 on 1. Winner progresses to the next round.
Thal_Ixu
05-04-2005, 06:58
Monaco vs. The Vatican
yeah right. monaco throws with hundred dollar bills while the vatican sends his pikemen :D
PS: you wouldn't wanna Europe get into an all-out war ;)
New Granada
05-04-2005, 06:58
Monaco vs. The Vatican
The Pope's Army numbers a billion people, they'd burn the prince at the stake.
Silver Skies
05-04-2005, 06:58
"In American Education news, teachers are now automatically passing students in French once they can understand and clearly pronounce the words "We surrender!" in German."
roflmfao!
That was great my friend
But I think they already do that
Salvondia
05-04-2005, 06:59
Sorry I'm not for the Third Reich I just want to see France get pwned, even if it were by Switzerland(sp?) (There's an Idea!)
Eins, Zwei, Drei, Vier
Thal_Ixu
05-04-2005, 07:00
you have to think of the grammar. believe a german ;)
roflmfao!
That was great my friend
But I think they already do that
What makes it better is that I didn't steal this particular joke, but ACTUALLY thought it up myself! :)
New Granada
05-04-2005, 07:00
roflmfao!
That was great my friend
But I think they already do that
HUK HUK HEE HAW I TELL YOU WHAT YOU WANT SOME FREEDOM FRIES WITH THAT YEEEHAW
Salvondia
05-04-2005, 07:01
it would be vierte Reich my friend. ;) and i think we germans had enough centrist, war hungry and totalitarian governments in the last two centurys, it's somebody elses turn. ;) but considering france...well of course that's a different thing. screw versailles, we're going back in :D
Danke
Salvondia
05-04-2005, 07:03
you have to think of the grammar. believe a german ;)
I hate German Grammar.
"I Porsche Hear, I Autobahn Think" is just plain wrong :p
Two nations in all-out war, eh? Well, that's simple.
Cuba and Haiti!
[NS]Ein Deutscher
05-04-2005, 07:03
Seriously, if you have no clue how to speak/write German, don't even try. It looks so pathetic. :p
Silver Skies
05-04-2005, 07:05
HUK HUK HEE HAW I TELL YOU WHAT YOU WANT SOME FREEDOM FRIES WITH THAT YEEEHAW
Nope i'll stick with French fires. :D
--------------------------------
I just don't really like france as the country (the people are ok, it's just the leaders)
Salvondia
05-04-2005, 07:08
Ein Deutscher']Seriously, if you have no clue how to speak/write German, don't even try. It looks so pathetic. :p
Bah. With that attitude no one would ever attempt to learn another lanaguage :p
Fools flute
05-04-2005, 07:14
Ireland versus England in a straight up, winner takes all, direct grudge match. Screw this drawn out shite. Ireland can have scotland for back up if they think it's worth the risk and they can draw straws for who gets stuck with wales.
A little war between Liechenstein and Andorra versus Vatican and San Marino.
Nation of Fortune
05-04-2005, 07:27
Ireland versus England in a straight up, winner takes all, direct grudge match. Screw this drawn out shite. Ireland can have scotland for back up if they think it's worth the risk and they can draw straws for who gets stuck with wales.
that was one of my thoughts but I don't think Ireland woud stand a chance. And I wouldn't want them to be decimated.
Tarlachia
05-04-2005, 07:31
Ireland versus England in a straight up, winner takes all, direct grudge match. Screw this drawn out shite. Ireland can have scotland for back up if they think it's worth the risk and they can draw straws for who gets stuck with wales.
Actually if you think about it... I'm from an Irish family...my grandmother recently remarried to a Scot...by the name of Wallace...
When they got married, I said "Great! Now we've got an army against the Crown of England!"
New Granada
05-04-2005, 07:41
I still maintain that Israel v China would resolve once and for all this whole banter about "god's chosen people."
Callisdrun
05-04-2005, 07:53
Canada vs. Mexico
Greenland fighting Denmark for independence, with Iceland supporting
China vs. India and Russia
France vs. Spain
Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Finland vs. UK
Canada vs. UK
Greedy Pig
05-04-2005, 08:02
Battle of the Isles!
Singapore Vs Taiwan
South Korea vs Taiwan
Japan vs Taiwan
Heheh France vs Germany would always be one to watch.
Silver Skies
05-04-2005, 08:08
Battle of the Isles!
Singapore Vs Taiwan
South Korea vs Taiwan
Japan vs Taiwan
Heheh France vs Germany would always be one to watch.
Those would be very cool to watch, actually every battle here would be fun to watch. :D
Andaras Prime
05-04-2005, 08:09
Yeah I would definitely like to see a new Franco-German war.
You don't want another treaty of Versailles, do you?
Kellarly
05-04-2005, 08:27
Ein Deutscher']Seriously, if you have no clue how to speak/write German, don't even try. It looks so pathetic. :p
Oi! I can speak german reasonably well, although my attempts at grammar, well, lets say it gives my grammar nut of a professor nightmares :D
Kellarly - Proffesional Decimator of the German Grammar System ;)
that said enough of the native speakers can't write it well enough anyways :p at least I make the effort :D
Oh and as for a battle, another grudge match:
Russia vs All ex-USSR states
In the words of the legend that is Unreal Tournament
MMMMMMMMMMM MONSTER KILLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.clicksmilies.com/s0105/waffen/violent-smiley-066.gif
USA vs. the entire EU. Much fun to be had!
Gum Tree
05-04-2005, 08:33
American Civil War Part II: Red States Vs. Blue States
Hell yes! Blue would win, the cities would give the logistical advantage to them, plus all the shipping channels would bring weapons in and starve out the Red states.
Militant Feministia
05-04-2005, 09:09
Putting my personal feelings about war aside (are you all nuts? war is never fun! Violence is never the solution!!!)
I think it would be kinda funny to pit two militarily puny countries halfway around the world against each other. Like, Ecuador vs. Nepal. No idea what they're doin'. None.
Imagine them trying to get to each other! A bunch of Ecuadorian troops marching through India, "No offense intended. Only be here six weeks, just on our way to Nepal."
I’d like to see New Zealand and China go head to head. The war would like last less than a day... then we'd all be eating rice with chop sticks!
Findecano Calaelen
05-04-2005, 09:21
I’d like to see New Zealand and China go head to head. The war would like last less than a day... then we'd all be eating rice with chop sticks!
Australia would come to the rescue and get wiped out too in the ANZAC spirit
Lucky Seaville
05-04-2005, 09:24
Belgium vs Luxemburg. As I don't think anyones voted for them yet
Australia would come to the rescue and get wiped out too in the ANZAC spirit
Clark would kiss Howard's ass! She has a crush on him, you know?
Australia vs New Zealand :)
or a 3 way:
Australia Vs New Zealand Vs Tasmania
Findecano Calaelen
05-04-2005, 09:26
Clark would kiss Howard's ass! She has a crush on him, you know?
:D :D
or a 3 way:
Australia Vs New Zealand Vs Tasmania
Ouch, Tasmania has it won.
...two heads are better than one, after all. :D
I can't believe nobody has suggested this yet, but it seems perfectly obvious to me.
Poland Vs. Spain: The Final battle!
Come on, you know you're all just aching for one of these guys to just up and vanish, let's make it happen!
Portu Cale MK3
05-04-2005, 11:01
Portugal Vs Spain. We miss butchering them.
Or, the EU vs the USA.
Grand Thuringia
05-04-2005, 11:21
This Germany vs. France thing is just lol. Not there is enough resentment left to actually have enough people fighting it out, it would resemble a barfight at its zenith.
Monkeypimp
05-04-2005, 11:36
The only problem with declaring war on New Zealand is that it takes a week for boats to get here. You have to mission all your men and supplies all the way down here, and the only routes in and out of the capital city can be blocked with 2 small acts of sabotage.
Haken Rider
05-04-2005, 11:37
Belgium vs Luxemburg. As I don't think anyones voted for them yet
Are you mad, Luxembourg has freaking humvees!
and: France über alles!
Kiwicrog
05-04-2005, 11:52
The only problem with declaring war on New Zealand is that it takes a week for boats to get here. You have to mission all your men and supplies all the way down here, and the only routes in and out of the capital city can be blocked with 2 small acts of sabotage. Or earthquakes, landslides or heavy fog :D
A war against NZ would be even funnier since we pissed off the yanks a while back. One or two of those nuclear-powered carriers would look mighty nice if we had an invasion on our hands! Delicious irony.
Glinde Nessroe
05-04-2005, 12:00
I'd love to see another American Civil War.
LazyHippies
05-04-2005, 12:05
US vs UK
That would be a grand conflict. Unfortunately it could only end one of two ways 1. an inconclusive outcome
2. nuclear winter
Neo Cannen
05-04-2005, 12:05
IRA vs AlQuieda
Now we will see who the "real" terrorists are.
[NS]Ein Deutscher
05-04-2005, 12:34
We'd so steamroll over France. But nowdays, we simply don't need to. We got them in the EU, that's all we need to dominate them :P
Velkomen
05-04-2005, 13:11
Hell yes! Blue would win, the cities would give the logistical advantage to them, plus all the shipping channels would bring weapons in and starve out the Red states.
First off almost everyone with a gun in America would side with the Red States, second the Red States own the executive branch (plus 70% of the military support Bush), and it wouldn't be between the states, more likely red people v. blue people.
In fact there is no way the blue states could win.
Thal_Ixu
05-04-2005, 13:19
Ein Deutscher']We'd so steamroll over France. But nowdays, we simply don't need to. We got them in the EU, that's all we need to dominate them :P
roflmao :D :D :D
Jali land
05-04-2005, 13:25
We should place 2 huge armys in a area, and dress them up like in the 1400's, imagine that, Barbarian Germans Vs. The french, only with swords ;)
Kwazulu-Natal
05-04-2005, 13:32
China vs. India rematch.
China and India have never been in war with eachother. Atleast not in the last 100 years. ;)
I am actualy wonderig. Why in the name of god do you want nations to declare war at eatchother. Do you think it is entertaning to watch people die? You should be be ashamed!
Wherramaharasinghastan
05-04-2005, 13:44
Australia vs. Tasmania. :D
China and India have never been in war with eachother. Atleast not in the last 100 years. ;)
I am actualy wonderig. Why in the name of god do you want nations to declare war at eatchother. Do you think it is entertaning to watch people die? You should be be ashamed!
I should, but I won't. :D
Teh Cameron Clan
05-04-2005, 17:56
not really a good idea, we would end up with one all powerful state, likely the most dangerous and corrupt
then u just inject poison gas into the dome >=D
Australia vs. Tasmania. Hmm, us versus inbred mutants eh? I'd prefer war with New Zealand, it would be short and easy and we could thereafter take the credit for Lord of the Rings.
First off almost everyone with a gun in America would side with the Red States, second the Red States own the executive branch (plus 70% of the military support Bush), and it wouldn't be between the states, more likely red people v. blue people.
In fact there is no way the blue states could win.
Actually you forget that the Nation's manufacturing base is almost completely dominated by blue states. Which is why they are blue, you hicks don't know what it's like to work in a factory eighteen hours a day for six days a week or else you'd be a little bit more considerate for the working man.
That being said, the blue states would obviously win, we'd be able to service, maintain and produce our weapons systems. Which is what wins the war for America, our technological supperiority.
If the war dragged on, we'd continue to dominate technological, because I've been to Southern Universities, they are a big joke compared to the Blue States. Without the Blue States, you hicks wouldn't even be able to keep an Abrams running for more then a week.
I live in Lansing, Michigan, half the city is nothing but manufacturing plants pumping our automobiles, tanks and aircraft. And again, we'd starve you of any foreign supply. You may have guns, but we have the ability to feed, clothe and arm armies. You simply, do not. Please choose a Southern Capital though, so we can burn it down... again.
Hahaha. ;)
Not to mention with all the southern racism, degenerated education and complete social intolerance. Who'd actually fight for the south?
Sanctaphrax
05-04-2005, 18:01
I think there should be a nice war between Syria, Jordan, Egypt and Lebanon, with maybe Iran in there for a laugh.
See u Jimmy
05-04-2005, 18:03
Tazmania v French Virgin Islands.
They would take so long to get their, avoiding flights over Australia and other nations, neither have any WMD's Diplomacy could actually get a chance to work before they blew the s**t out each other.
Diplomacy could actually get a chance to work before they blew the s**t out each other With what, sheep?
Although I'm amused by the thought of Tasmania somehow managing to declare war whilst not actually being a sovereign nation then begging for Australian Mainland help, and us just happening to "forget" to send any support.
Nimzonia
05-04-2005, 18:06
Panama vs Costa Rica would be kinda funny.
Like baiting the two wussiest kids in the playground to fight each other, and then laughing at their little girly punches.
Cognative Superios
05-04-2005, 18:06
"In American Education news, teachers are now automatically passing students in French once they can understand and clearly pronounce the words "We surrender!" in German."
As a member of the french education community i find that... Quite apropriate :)
GUINESS AND TULLAMORE
05-04-2005, 18:08
How about Mongolia V. France? and or Italy?
Oh, and I'd like to see an army of rednecks ACTUALLY hold Los Angeles for more than 10 minutes. If the gangs don't get ya, the endless amount of hobos and skyscrapers will.
"Ho shit! This place is scarier than Houston!"
"Run! RUN AWAY!"
"Git R Done!"
Germachinia
05-04-2005, 18:10
Germany vs. France. Germany would pwn France; German tanks are amazing, with a top speed of around 75 mph. Plus, once a cannon locks on to a target, if you ballance a wine glass on top, you can go up and town trenches and ditches, and the wine glass will not fall off, the cannon is held so steady.
And I'm not a Neo-Nazi. Just my opinion.
GUINESS AND TULLAMORE
05-04-2005, 18:10
First off almost everyone with a gun in America would side with the Red States, second the Red States own the executive branch (plus 70% of the military support Bush), and it wouldn't be between the states, more likely red people v. blue people.
In fact there is no way the blue states could win.
Not true, many Americans own illeagal firearms. Do you think all the gangbangers and drug dealers would side w/ the Red states/people. Also many folks in those red states are freaky anti-government gun-nuts.
Cognative Superios
05-04-2005, 18:10
This Germany vs. France thing is just lol. Not there is enough resentment left to actually have enough people fighting it out, it would resemble a barfight at its zenith.
Interesting that WWI is commonly called 'The Great Barfight' by most of the professors ive worked with.
Schleegalandia
05-04-2005, 18:15
.... Because Aus has never really been in a war hardcore. Except maybe WWII.
This may surprise you but Aus was in Vietnam
Is no one going to defend the South against the accusations I made on page 6? :/
Steel Fish
05-04-2005, 18:42
Syria and Iran. It would save the US a LOT of trouble.
Cognative Superios
05-04-2005, 18:44
Is no one going to defend the South against the accusations I made on page 6? :/
nope, some things are even beneath us, whats the point to it if you are too dense to be persuaded?
Paradiesonearth
05-04-2005, 18:48
Belgium vs Luxemburg. As I don't think anyones voted for them yet
It's not necessary. We share the army... If Luxembourg had to fight alone, it were over before it started.. Our own army has about 300 soldiers... The Germans ran us over in one day in WW I+II
And plese: No war between Germany and France! We're just in between them.. Already had this situation before... :(
Velkomen
05-04-2005, 18:50
Actually you forget that the Nation's manufacturing base is almost completely dominated by blue states. Which is why they are blue, you hicks don't know what it's like to work in a factory eighteen hours a day for six days a week or else you'd be a little bit more considerate for the working man.
That being said, the blue states would obviously win, we'd be able to service, maintain and produce our weapons systems. Which is what wins the war for America, our technological supperiority.
If the war dragged on, we'd continue to dominate technological, because I've been to Southern Universities, they are a big joke compared to the Blue States. Without the Blue States, you hicks wouldn't even be able to keep an Abrams running for more then a week.
I live in Lansing, Michigan, half the city is nothing but manufacturing plants pumping our automobiles, tanks and aircraft. And again, we'd starve you of any foreign supply. You may have guns, but we have the ability to feed, clothe and arm armies. You simply, do not. Please choose a Southern Capital though, so we can burn it down... again.
Hahaha. ;)
Not to mention with all the southern racism, degenerated education and complete social intolerance. Who'd actually fight for the south?
You are right, if we were still back in the 1800s. The Blue States do not own the majority of the factories. Michigan and Illinois are your best bets. Over the last 100 years companies have been moving down to the south because of the weather and the cheap labor. I hate to break it to you, but Michigan is part of the rust belt in America, the new sunbelt is Arizona and New Mexico, two red states.
Also this is not North v. South, we are talking about red v. blue. Or red people v. blue people. These people are spread all over the country not just red in the south and blue in the north. Take another look who works in a factory and who they would vote for, odds are it's for Bush.
Planners
05-04-2005, 18:52
Panama vs Costa Rica would be kinda funny.
Like baiting the two wussiest kids in the playground to fight each other, and then laughing at their little girly punches.
Costa Rica doesn't even have an army.
Bush only one by a few percent of the popular vote. I don't think that justifies an 'odds are' response.
How many illegal immigrants that work in those factories do you suppose would have voted for Bush if they were allowed to?
Velkomen
05-04-2005, 18:56
Probably alot of illegals would have. Bush is very soft on imigration
Steel Fish
05-04-2005, 18:58
That being said, the blue states would obviously win, we'd be able to service, maintain and produce our weapons systems. Which is what wins the war for America, our technological supperiority. What weapons systems?
SheexLand
05-04-2005, 18:58
i say iceland and greenland VS canada. you know that is all our country can take.
Audio Assault
05-04-2005, 19:06
Ahh, the partisan hatred boils on.
Instead of the "dome over the middle east" idea as was mentioned in an earlier post, why don't we put that said dome over the US, and let the reds vs. the blues have at it until one side convinces the other is right.
Carnagada
05-04-2005, 19:13
China VS North Korea
Russia VS Germany (VENGEANCE!!!)
FARC (colombian rebel army) VS Al Qaeda
China VS Taiwan
North Korea VS South Korea
Canada VS United States (LOL we wouldn't last 3 seconds!!!!)
China VS Japan
Israel VS Egypt
India VS Pakistan (The final Battle!!!)
Turkey VS Greece
Those are just some of what I can think of.
Canada vs. Iran. Lets beat the crap out of them, I dont know why we havent started already since they killed that lady.
We could easily do it.
The Silver Sky
05-04-2005, 19:34
Argentina vs. UK- Round 2
Upper Cet Kola Ytovia
05-04-2005, 19:37
Hmmmm...how 'bout...Singapore vs. Liechtenstein.
The Silver Sky
05-04-2005, 19:40
Afganistan (before US invaded) vs. USSR - round 2 (USSR used chemical and bio weapons against Afganistan)
-------------------------------
WOW! My post count went up by 10 in this thread :D
Wazanathri
05-04-2005, 20:02
Palestine and Lebanon VS Israel
I would like to see how things would end up without USA helping Israel...
The Silver Sky
05-04-2005, 20:12
It would be two easy, remember Israel defeated 5 country during the 3 day war (or was it 7 :confused: )
Monaco (sp?) vs. Russia
C'mon...you know it'd be fun to watch 3 Russians enter the city, take out the guards, and declare victory.
Scouserlande
05-04-2005, 20:23
The E.u vs the U.S.A
That would be f*cking awsome
The E.U would win mind if we held the atlantic islands, and we have a much better navy so...
Haken Rider
05-04-2005, 20:44
It's not necessary. We share the army... If Luxembourg had to fight alone, it were over before it started.. Our own army has about 300 soldiers... The Germans ran us over in one day in WW I+II
And plese: No war between Germany and France! We're just in between them.. Already had this situation before... :(
Awesome, a real luxembourgian!
Matchopolis
05-04-2005, 21:06
Like baiting the two wussiest kids in the playground to fight each other, and then laughing at their little girly punches.
that is a new classic line...I congratulate your wit!
In a digital kind of world where we could just unplug the computer and everything go back to normal...I would like to see Southwest American Indians HALO jump into Vatican City. Tell them it's payback for Coronado.
I've seen a few bada** Indians in my day. That dude from Predator was scary looking but I've never seen a priest I was scared of...at least while I was an adult. (rimshot) That guy from Predator would be the General...first out of the plane. Would he yell "Geronimo"?
American Civil War Part II: Red States Vs. Blue States
And...that would be pointless because the Red States would have a overwhelming amount of partisan groups due to gun owners. Blue states wan to ban private ownership of guns...
No endorse
05-04-2005, 21:10
The old USSR versus the current China. I have a feeling that would be a hell of a war.
Add in the US, India, and Pakistan, and we've got WW3
The E.u vs the U.S.A
That would be f*cking awsome
The E.U would win mind if we held the atlantic islands, and we have a much better navy so...
More numbers, but less organized. It would be a logistical mess also. I would say it would be pretty even until the US could get a foothold and start using it's stealth/airpower.
Battlestar Christiania
05-04-2005, 21:15
My boyfriend jokes that we should just put a dome over the middle east, let 'em duke it out, then take the dome off in a hundred years or so. Whoever's left ought to be sick of it.
Yet one more person who has made the grave error of assuming all the Mid-Eastern governments are moral equals.
Bastard-Squad
05-04-2005, 21:16
Israel v. the rest of Arabia/Mid. East round two. I'd like to see those Israelis recieve some justice for once.
Or maybe Luxembourg or the Vatican versus.......the US! Those Vatican err people would so kick the US's ass! What with those deadly pikes and all. Deadly!
Luxembourg would then be open to invade Italy and then Europe!! MWUAHAHA.
Battlestar Christiania
05-04-2005, 21:24
Israel VS Egypt
Israel has already defeated Egypt. Four times (five if you count the Exodus :p ).
Israel v. the rest of Arabia/Mid. East round two. I'd like to see those Israelis recieve some justice for once.
*sigh* You really are pathetic.
What with those deadly pikes and all. Deadly!
They're halberds.
The E.U would win mind if we held the atlantic islands, and we have a much better navy so...
No you don't.
It would be too easy, remember Israel defeated 5 country during the 3 day war (or was it 7 :confused: )
Six.
Iceland, Andorra, Monaco, Costa Rica
None of these countries have militaries.
GUINESS AND TULLAMORE
05-04-2005, 21:27
How about Mongolia V. Hungry?
No endorse
05-04-2005, 21:33
Monaco vs. The Vatican
The Soverign Military Order of Malta vs the Vatican
"Causalties are light, consisting of two Swiss Guards who fell over laughing and got cuts, and one Maltan with an Airsoft Rifle who was thrown out of the second story window."
New British Glory
05-04-2005, 21:35
Wales v Ireland
which equates to
Sheep vs Leprachauns
Marrakech II
05-04-2005, 23:46
European Cage match. Everyone against everyone. No outside help or interference. Last country standing gets a cookie.
Marrakech II
05-04-2005, 23:48
The E.u vs the U.S.A
That would be f*cking awsome
The E.U would win mind if we held the atlantic islands, and we have a much better navy so...
You guys would get pwned. In fact I would spot you Canada just for fun. Of course we would give 24hrs notice of any land invasion to make it fun.
A war between Andorra, San Marino, and Liechtenstein. Only then would the fate of their 131,804 combined population be decided. We could hold it in a stadium.
Bastard-Squad
05-04-2005, 23:56
*sigh* You really are pathetic.
:(
Why? The Israeli thieves persecute Palestinians, bulldoze their homes, demonize their leaders as terrorists? How could anyone not wish for justice?
The Soverign Military Order of Malta vs the Vatican
"Causalties are light, consisting of two Swiss Guards who fell over laughing and got cuts, and one Maltan with an Airsoft Rifle who was thrown out of the second story window."
Lmao. Now that would be fun to watch.
OceanDrive
05-04-2005, 23:56
France and US
*Hundreds of US bombers and fighters bomb France back to the stone age* And what would france do?
OceanDrive
05-04-2005, 23:59
... I'd like to see America and Britain. Just because.the UK has a decent strike force.
Mathiopia
06-04-2005, 00:18
"In American Education news, teachers are now automatically passing students in French once they can understand and clearly pronounce the words "We surrender!" in German."
Is J'abandonne good enough? (I abandon in French)
Mathiopia
06-04-2005, 00:42
Actually you forget that the Nation's manufacturing base is almost completely dominated by blue states. Which is why they are blue, you hicks don't know what it's like to work in a factory eighteen hours a day for six days a week or else you'd be a little bit more considerate for the working man.
That being said, the blue states would obviously win, we'd be able to service, maintain and produce our weapons systems. Which is what wins the war for America, our technological supperiority.
If the war dragged on, we'd continue to dominate technological, because I've been to Southern Universities, they are a big joke compared to the Blue States. Without the Blue States, you hicks wouldn't even be able to keep an Abrams running for more then a week.
I live in Lansing, Michigan, half the city is nothing but manufacturing plants pumping our automobiles, tanks and aircraft. And again, we'd starve you of any foreign supply. You may have guns, but we have the ability to feed, clothe and arm armies. You simply, do not. Please choose a Southern Capital though, so we can burn it down... again.
Hahaha. ;)
Not to mention with all the southern racism, degenerated education and complete social intolerance. Who'd actually fight for the south?
Sounds awkwardly familiar to the "first" Civil War? Oh sorry Red States, War Between the States.. ;)
Bitchkitten
06-04-2005, 00:46
How bout switzerland and the vatican?
Battlestar Christiania
06-04-2005, 01:21
Why? The Israeli thieves
:rolleyes:
persecute Palestinians, bulldoze their homes,
1. Yes, they demolished the bases of operation of terrorists, however;
2. The IDF no longer does so.
demonize their leaders as terrorists?
Their "leaders" ARE terrorists, proving themselves to be by their actions.
How could anyone not wish for justice?
Israel is a pluralistic, modern liberal democracy. Their enemies are terrorist thugs and murderous tyrants. How could you possibly deny the right of the State of Israel to exist and of her government to defend her people from terrorists?
Albiotine
06-04-2005, 01:30
Gotta be England vs Scotland.
Mister Moose
06-04-2005, 01:31
I would love to see canada invade finland. That would be cool! :D
I fail to see how the current generation of Palenstinian leaders are terrorists considering both sides have established a somewhat lasting agreement.
Seriously, you two just go kill each other, because I think Isreal and Palestine have both had enough of the killing and would rather you not speak on their behalf.
Battlestar Christiania
06-04-2005, 02:53
I fail to see how the current generation of Palenstinian leaders are terrorists considering both sides have established a somewhat lasting agreement.
Alright, the jury's still out on Abbas -- but Arafat was unquestionably a terrorist, never mind Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, etc.
Seriously, you two just go kill each other, because I think Isreal and Palestine have both had enough of the killing and would rather you not speak on their behalf.
Then why are Palestinian children raised to be suicide bombers? Why does Palestinian television programming consist almost exclusively of vile anti-Semetic propoganda and the encouraging of children to murder Jews?
Nimzonia
06-04-2005, 03:08
Costa Rica doesn't even have an army.
Neither does Panama. That's kind of the point.
Xenazwolia
06-04-2005, 03:25
Columbia against a Scandanavian nation of some sort. ;)
Alright, the jury's still out on Abbas -- but Arafat was unquestionably a terrorist, never mind Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, etc.
Then why are Palestinian children raised to be suicide bombers? Why does Palestinian television programming consist almost exclusively of vile anti-Semetic propoganda and the encouraging of children to murder Jews?
Sir, please quote your sources.
Paradiesonearth
07-04-2005, 15:00
Awesome, a real luxembourgian!
Yes, a real luxembourgian (or luxembourger? or luxembourgish??? :confused: )
;)
Whispering Legs
07-04-2005, 15:05
Ecuador and Peru. Two piss poor nations with low tech armies.
It would be war the old fashioned way, with nothing high tech, miraculous, or quick.
Gurdenvazk
07-04-2005, 15:36
I would like to see Ireland and Scotland or a Cuban Civil War
Matchopolis
07-04-2005, 17:07
Nikoko...
If the gauntlet were thrown down in front of me in 1861, as a strict Constitutionalist I would do my part to ensure the reunification of the Union and emancipation of slaves.
Did you know that the North bought grain from the South during the Civil War? Major metropolitan cities have an average of 3 days food in them. Even with modern shipping, logistical nightmares would cause great harm among the populus. An extremely quick victory over the Red States would be necesssary for the survival of the Blue State government. With no recourse against government except free speech, citizens goaded by "how many days until we all starve to death, and why can't they win the war faster" stories turn peaceful demonstrations into riots. For the safety of the populus, martial law is declared and troublemakers are sought out. Civil rights become a thing of the past.
It is a conflict with no winners. Kinda like...my dad can beat up your dad
It's an interesting topic but when someone resorts to calling me a hick, all it does is make me thing that guy is a smuck. Nikoko, about me being a hick. Find a better enemy than me. Your an American, I'm on your side. If it was 1861 and I supported slavery, call me names I would deserve it. Red States Blue States would be no better than Mexico without each other. Quit the backstabbing.
Yaga-Shura-Field
07-04-2005, 17:44
Canada vs. Iran. Lets beat the crap out of them, I dont know why we havent started already since they killed that lady.
We could easily do it.
I take it you're Iranian :p
And The UK could easily beat the US. Theyd all just get lost on their way over the ocean, or show up two years late like in the other wars
Belgium vs. The Netherlands... the last time was in 1830-1839 - nowadays I think the Dutch are organized better, but the Belgians have better weapons :p Both the armies ARE kinda crap though...
U.S.A. vs. The EU would be classic - Allied and Axis united :P
Or two European regions who you wouldn't expect to fight eachother...
Benelux vs. Scandinavia: progressives vs. progressives :mp5: ;)
Baltic vs. Balkan: total randomness... though they kinda sound like eachother