NationStates Jolt Archive


African American fires whites; jury finds bias, awards damages.

Eutrusca
31-03-2005, 20:39
Jury Finds Bias in Firings of Whites (http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/31/national/31orleans.html?th&emc=th)
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Published: March 31, 2005


EW ORLEANS, March 30 (AP) - A federal jury ruled on Wednesday that New Orleans's first black district attorney discriminated against 43 whites when he fired them all at once upon taking office in 2003 and replaced them with blacks.

The fired employees were awarded hundreds of thousands of dollars in back pay and damages.

The jury of eight whites and two blacks returned the unanimous verdict in the third day of deliberations in the racial discrimination case against the district attorney, Eddie Jordan.

Eight days after taking office, Mr. Jordan fired 53 of 77 white nonlawyers in his office - investigators, clerks, child-support enforcement workers and the like - and replaced them with blacks.

Months later, most of the whites sued him, and the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission later made a preliminary finding that Mr. Jordan had been racially biased.

Mr. Jordan has acknowledged that he wanted to make the office more reflective of the city's racial makeup, but he denied that he had fired whites just because of their race. In fact, he said, he had not known the race of the people fired.

Judge Stanwood Duval of Federal District Court instructed the jurors to find Mr. Jordan liable if they concluded that the firings had been racially motivated. The law bars the mass firing of a specific group, even if the intent is to create diversity.

Mr. Jordan said he would appeal.
Pepe Dominguez
31-03-2005, 20:42
Haha, what a douche. :D
Kusarii
31-03-2005, 20:42
Well I'll be damned.

Good for New Orleans.

Racism is racism, no matter what the colour of the person is who's being a racist.
Pepe Dominguez
31-03-2005, 20:44
Well I'll be damned.

Good for New Orleans.

Racism is racism, no matter what the colour of the person is who's being a racist.

Yeah, but it's almost impossible for a black guy to be ruled discriminatory by the courts, and especially by the EEOC. You've got to be REALLY obvious about it. The guy's a total sap.
Evil Woody Thoughts
31-03-2005, 20:46
Yay for affirmative action gone horribly wrong! :D :rolleyes:
Ice Hockey Players
31-03-2005, 20:46
Just waiting for the white supremacists to show up and comment...I honestly don't know what they will say.

In any case, it is still likely wrongful termination even if it wasn't racially motivated; just showing up and firing everyone in sight is insanity.
The Cat-Tribe
31-03-2005, 20:48
This is a very good example of why all the white male whining about being discriminated against is hogwash.

It is illegal to discriminate on the basis of race. Whites can and do bring legal challenges to discrimination all the time.

Of course, discrimination against whites or males is neglible compared to discrimination against minorities. But you don't really care about that ....