Ugarit
28-03-2005, 12:54
This is a question which has been bothering me for a while.
It's widely acknowledged that the "Protocols" are nothing but a malicious forgery to spur anti-Semitism and 19th century pogroms in Russia, with no truth attached to them. I find this point of view undisputable.
However, in my travels I have seen a vast resurge in poular belief that the "Protocols" are real, expecially in Arab countries where it has been republished and serialised on television, and that this can be proven because "the worldwide Jewish Super-Villain conspriacy" has actually happened.
So, what is your gut reaction?
Do you believe that the "Protocols" are a pile of stinking rubbish?
Are they absolutely true and should be heeded as a warning?
Or are you not sure what the real deal is?
It's widely acknowledged that the "Protocols" are nothing but a malicious forgery to spur anti-Semitism and 19th century pogroms in Russia, with no truth attached to them. I find this point of view undisputable.
However, in my travels I have seen a vast resurge in poular belief that the "Protocols" are real, expecially in Arab countries where it has been republished and serialised on television, and that this can be proven because "the worldwide Jewish Super-Villain conspriacy" has actually happened.
So, what is your gut reaction?
Do you believe that the "Protocols" are a pile of stinking rubbish?
Are they absolutely true and should be heeded as a warning?
Or are you not sure what the real deal is?