NationStates Jolt Archive

I know this isn't a particualry important trial, but it is somewhat intruging. Has anybody been following it? What do you think so far?

I think the man is clearly insane. Anyone who calls their son Prince Michael Jr & Prince Michael Jr the Second (or whatever it is exactly) has pretty serious mental issues. I think he probably was sexually involved with the boys, I also think it's being over-hyped because of who he is.

I think reasonable doubt will be established.

He's going to go to jail for contempt of court, just based off his first day.

He came in late in his pajamas. If he does that again, he's gone for a bit.

Hes freakin nuts.

Answers:

No.

I try not to.

I think the man is clearly insane. Anyone who calls their son Prince Michael Jr & Prince Michael Jr the Second (or whatever it is exactly) has pretty serious mental issues. I think he probably was sexually involved with the boys, I also think it's being over-hyped because of who he is.

Yes, he is clearly eccentric and somewhat disturbing. Though not sure whether that makes him a child molester.

One thing I find interesting is the pornography which the prosecution has presented in its case against him. So far its all of naked women and teenage girls … which seems a little strange, if he’s supposed to be into boys.

I'm not following the trial.

I hope he's found guilty, cause I think he's guilty as hell.

Knowing our judicial system, I don't think that he will be found guilty.

Regardless of the outcome, I can't wait for the whole story to just go away.


...........why'd I post here again?

I'm not following the trial.

I hope he's found guilty, cause I think he's guilty as hell.

Knowing our judicial system, I don't think that he will be found guilty.

Regardless of the outcome, I can't wait for the whole story to just go away.


...........why'd I post here again?

I don’t know, but it’s kind of SPAM. If you or Eichen don't care, then don't post...

Yes, he is clearly eccentric and somewhat disturbing. Though not sure whether that makes him a child molester.

One thing I find interesting is the pornography which the prosecution has presented in its case against him. So far its all of naked women and teenage girls … which seems a little strange, if he’s supposed to be into boys.

No it doesn't necessarily make him a child molester. It's his past actions (particularly thinking back to that BBC doco he did a couple of years ago) & his obvious lack of connection with reality. That's makes me think he is.

i don't think the trial will get to the truth - too many technicalities can be used to muddy the waters. But in the coverage to date, I am disturbed that he doesn't think there is anything wrong with sharing his bed with children, and taht his own children are being raised in very strange circumstances