Marrakech II
18-03-2005, 00:20
I have read the reasoning behind the mods banning of some trolls. Now something isn't right. How can someone be labled a troll? I mean there are certain things. One was a topic on how to kill themselves. That kind of crap should immediately be locked. Which it was deleted right away. Isn't the definition of trolling different for everybody?
Now if something you find personally offense be considered a troll. When to others its really just an odd opinion. How many people does the said topic need to inflame to be considered a troll? Does a personal attack on someones intelligence considered a troll? Would it be the same if someone pointed out that they were completely wrong because of the facts they used?
Where does the definition stand? I don't think there is a real definitive answer. It is all a matter of perception. I don't know. What is it you guys think is trolling. This should be interesting because I think we are going to get a hundred different answers.
Now if something you find personally offense be considered a troll. When to others its really just an odd opinion. How many people does the said topic need to inflame to be considered a troll? Does a personal attack on someones intelligence considered a troll? Would it be the same if someone pointed out that they were completely wrong because of the facts they used?
Where does the definition stand? I don't think there is a real definitive answer. It is all a matter of perception. I don't know. What is it you guys think is trolling. This should be interesting because I think we are going to get a hundred different answers.