NationStates Jolt Archive


Saddam's m offer to WMD inspector

Hitlerreich
12-03-2005, 23:38
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/03/12/wsaddam12.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/03/12/ixworld.html

Saddam Hussein's regime offered a $2 million (£1.4 million) bribe to the United Nations' chief weapons inspector to doctor his reports on the search for weapons of mass destruction.



Rolf Ekeus, the Swede who led the UN's efforts to track down the weapons from 1991 to 1997, said that the offer came from Tariq Aziz, Saddam's foreign minister and deputy.

Mr Ekeus told Reuters news agency that he had passed the information to the Volcker Commission. "I told the Volcker people that Tariq [Aziz] said a couple of million was there if we report right. My answer was, 'That is not the way we do business in Sweden.' "

A clean report from Mr Ekeus's inspectors would have been vital in lifting sanctions against Saddam's regime. But the inspectors never established what had happened to the regime's illicit weapons and never gave Iraq a clean bill of health.

The news that Iraq attempted to bribe a top UN official is a key piece of evidence for investigators into the scandal surrounding the oil-for-food programme. It proves that Iraq was offering huge sums of cash to influential foreigners in return for political favours.

Nile Gardiner, of the Heritage Foundation in Washington, who has followed the inquiries, said: "It's the tip of the iceberg of what the Iraqis were offering. For every official like Ekeus who turned down a bribe, there are many more who will have been tempted by it."

Saddam and his henchmen siphoned off an estimated £885 million from the humanitarian scheme, allegedly paying some of that to 270 foreign politicians, officials and journalists.

Most of those alleged to have been involved in the scandal, including the former head of the programme, Benon Sevan, have denied that they did anything wrong.

A United States Senate report said that Mr Sevan had committed criminal acts by soliciting oil contracts, while the Volcker commission said that he had failed to explain $160,000 (£83,000) paid into personal bank accounts while he was the head of the programme.



gee what a surprise, why would Saddam try to bribe UN inspectors to say there are no WMD's if there really were no WMD's? :rolleyes:

The truth is, that Saddam wanted the sanctions overturned so he could begin immediately with building WMD's, everything was set and ready to go, except he didn't count on George W Bush calling his bluff.

And furthermore, this is just the tip of the iceberg, the UN is fundamentally corrupt and needs an iron broom badly, thank God that the president has wisely nominated mr Bolton to do it. The days of tinpot dictatorships spitting in our face in the UN whilst spongeing off our money will soon be over.
Potaria
12-03-2005, 23:40
This is the first and only post I'll make in this shit-pile of a topic.

Think about what's going to happen, troll. Think about it.
Hitlerreich
12-03-2005, 23:41
This is the first and only post I'll make in this shit-pile of a topic.

Think about what's going to happen, troll. Think about it.

who are you calling a troll, commie?
Silly Sharks
12-03-2005, 23:42
It's just too easy...
Hitlerreich
12-03-2005, 23:44
FYI, the Telegraph is not some British tabloid/gutter press rag.

What's printed = TRUE!
Silly Sharks
12-03-2005, 23:46
FYI, the Telegraph is not some British tabloid/gutter press rag.

Who said it was?
Soviet Narco State
12-03-2005, 23:46
[url]
gee what a surprise, why would Saddam try to bribe UN inspectors to say there are no WMD's if there really were no WMD's? :rolleyes:

I'm sure those WMDs will show up any day now.
Bolol
12-03-2005, 23:52
Well...you don't have to go worrying your little sensationalist head...because Saddam's on the inside now.
Nellisland
12-03-2005, 23:59
I am only going to say this:

Why did you feel the need to call him a commie. He didn't make a statement that would imply that he was a commie. Now he shouldn't have called you a troll but he didn't act like a commie.
Potaria
13-03-2005, 00:01
Okay, so I'm posting again, but whatever.

I did need to call him a troll, because that's exactly what he is. However, I'm not a Communist. There's quite a big difference between Socialism and Communism.
Glinde Nessroe
13-03-2005, 00:03
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/03/12/wsaddam12.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/03/12/ixworld.html



gee what a surprise, why would Saddam try to bribe UN inspectors to say there are no WMD's if there really were no WMD's? :rolleyes:

The truth is, that Saddam wanted the sanctions overturned so he could begin immediately with building WMD's, everything was set and ready to go, except he didn't count on George W Bush calling his bluff.

And furthermore, this is just the tip of the iceberg, the UN is fundamentally corrupt and needs an iron broom badly, thank God that the president has wisely nominated mr Bolton to do it. The days of tinpot dictatorships spitting in our face in the UN whilst spongeing off our money will soon be over.

God, well, just wow, thank goodness we have you here to explain to us the truth.
The Atomic Alliance
13-03-2005, 00:46
It doesn't mean WMD's never existed in Iraq. It's a bit hard to search every square centimetre of the country (and potentially underground places/buildings also), in such a short space of time

Nothing prevented them being moved around either, to different locations within Iraq, or indeed to neighbouring countries (if they did indeed exist, that is)
BastardSword
13-03-2005, 00:54
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/03/12/wsaddam12.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/03/12/ixworld.html



gee what a surprise, why would Saddam try to bribe UN inspectors to say there are no WMD's if there really were no WMD's? :rolleyes:

The truth is, that Saddam wanted the sanctions overturned so he could begin immediately with building WMD's, everything was set and ready to go, except he didn't count on George W Bush calling his bluff.

And furthermore, this is just the tip of the iceberg, the UN is fundamentally corrupt and needs an iron broom badly, thank God that the president has wisely nominated mr Bolton to do it. The days of tinpot dictatorships spitting in our face in the UN whilst spongeing off our money will soon be over.

You see to begin building them to have them means there were no WMDs.

Your truth is statement makes no sense.
Mr. Bolton is not the kind of guy you want if tyou want Diplomacy.

He bribed them because even though he had none US kept saying he did. He thought maybe money will help them see the truth in reality.
Nekone
13-03-2005, 01:06
what happened is that Saddam ordered the building of WMD's... his scientists refunnled the funds to other projects and fed false reports to Saddam about the state of his WMD's. so Saddam lead the Inspectors around trying to hide the WMD's that he thought he had but actually didn't. the US found the reports that were being handed to Saddam and also believed them.

A couple of days before the deadline, Saddam found out that he didn't have the WMD's and panicked... which is why he sounded so desparate days before the US attack...

However, he still broke the sanctions by persuing the developement of WMD's (by ordering their development.) weather or not he had them, he still broke the sanctions.

Saddam played around with the rules and it bit him in the ass...

He bribed them because even though he had none US kept saying he did. He thought maybe money will help them see the truth in reality. That doesn't make sense... if he spoke the truth, why offer money... Unless he wanted them to see 'his truth'