God exists!
Neo-Anarchists
06-03-2005, 00:30
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com/
In 1994 a U.S. physicist named George Hammond published discovery of the long sought for STRUCTURAL MODEL of Psychology. 3 years later, as a result of that discovery, he accidentally discovered the World's first scientific proof of God.
Published in the peer reviewed literature, readers can find out about this discovery by reading the next 4 pages. Readers desiring a more detailed treatment of the discovery are invited to read The Scientific proof of God which is a published 20 page paper (split into 2 webpages). You MUST however, read the following 4 pages before attempting to read that professional level paper.
This 4-page introduction will also orient the reader to the other scientific documents on this website which are contained in a TABLE OF CONTENTS. Please visit this table of contents after finishing these 4-Introductory pages.
Finally, in a dramatic development, the author has recently discovered that this scientific proof of God confirms the entire theory of the Christian Science Religion founded by Mary Baker Eddy in 1879. In fact, the author claims the entire history of Christian Science as a major piece of experimental evidence confirming the truth of this discovery. A full report of the concordance between the scientific proof of God and the Christian Science Religion is given in an article entitled Scientific Proof of God confirms the Christian Science Religion. Christian Scientists may wish to go directly to this site after reading these introductory 4 pages. Incidentally, the author is not a Christian Science church member.
Well, there goes atheism and agnosticism! You heard it, folks, this guy has proved God exists!
Or not.
McEacherntopia
06-03-2005, 00:38
if you have to assume that christian science is valud in order for this proof to work, you cannot claim that the proof itself validates christian science. that's called circular logic. good try, though.
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com/
Well, there goes atheism and agnosticism! You heard it, folks, this guy has proved God exists!
Or not.
Hahaha, I'm always up for a good laugh. Thanks!
Affenfelsen
06-03-2005, 00:41
all these "proofs" have the same flaw
they assume one thing without proving it, and then later prove god exists!
however they got quite good at it....the usual reader wont notice the fishy line 84 on page 9 in a 20 page work... :rolleyes:
Neo-Anarchists
06-03-2005, 00:42
if you have to assume that christian science is valud in order for this proof to work, you cannot claim that the proof itself validates christian science. that's called circular logic. good try, though.
Oh, but you didn't read the proof, did you? It's very in-depth!
And also completely incoherent, but that's a different matter.
Lunatic Goofballs
06-03-2005, 00:43
He forgot to carry the 1. It's not god... :eek: OMG!!! I'ts Joe Pesci! :eek:
Neo-Anarchists
06-03-2005, 00:43
however they got quite good at it....the usual reader wont notice the fishy line 84 on page 9 in a 20 page work... :rolleyes:
Hey, if you actually read this one, almost every line is fishy. It's absolutely hilarious. This one has more flaws per paragraph than the rest of the Proof of God studies combined!
Bleezdale
06-03-2005, 00:47
yeah... I'm pretty sure a "real", "scientific" paper wouldn't read like a 6th grade essay.
Atheistic Might
06-03-2005, 00:47
The reason a modern man won't fit into a suit of armor is because most remaining ones are scale models. I could go on, but after reading such drivel, I must pause, else I lose the ability to think rationally...
But does this mean we are all saved?
I mean now that we know God exist we believe in Her
and salvation is ours :fluffle:
:confused:
You didn't actually BELIEVE that, did you?
Oh no...
Neo-Anarchists
06-03-2005, 00:53
You didn't actually BELIEVE that, did you?
Have you been reading my invisible messages?
If you had, you'd know that the hell I don't believe it. Or at least have had some clues...
EDIT:
Hey, one of them was even a spoiler message, not even invisible.
PopularFreedom
06-03-2005, 00:54
Greetings,
December 18, 1995 Time magazine has an excellent article on things which have been proved that are in the bible. Not stating that God exists, not stating he doesn't, just adding some factual data to help the discussion :)
Sincerely, Eagle Scream
The reason a modern man won't fit into a suit of armor is because most remaining ones are scale models. I could go on, but after reading such drivel, I must pause, else I lose the ability to think rationally...
The reason modern soldiers won't fit into suit of armor is
'cause we have grown as a species (spelling?) But that has nothing to do with the subject at hand :)
Mythopia
06-03-2005, 00:57
No.
Tocrowkia
06-03-2005, 00:58
I need no proof that God exists. I believe in him anyway.
Boonytopia
06-03-2005, 00:59
Yes, yes, I have seen the light. Or, in fact no, it sounds like a big, warm, steaming pile of sh.....
Maledictum
06-03-2005, 01:00
Lol, ridiculous. Absolutely ridiculous. How lame of a common sense function would you have to have to beleive this drivel? You're so desperate for proof that your sheepherder exists that you would cling to any crap that is slung at you, and furthermore, try shoving it down the throats of others when you yourself cant possibly beleive it fully. Stop lying to yourself and wake up, the rest of the world has stood up and begun walking foward, while you are still on your knees.
Yes, yes, I have seen the light. Or, in fact no, it sounds like a big, warm, steaming pile of sh.....
You're right my friend :)
So right!
Enlightened Humanity
06-03-2005, 01:04
Bugger. There goes my years of careful Atheist thought. Oh well, off to church tomorrow I guess.
Vegas-Rex
06-03-2005, 01:04
Whatever this guy was taking, I want some!
Seriously, this makes no sense. It sounds scientific, though, so it works the same way dihydrogen monoxide petitions work.
Neo-Anarchists
06-03-2005, 01:05
Lol, ridiculous. Absolutely ridiculous. How lame of a common sense function would you have to have to beleive this drivel? You're so desperate for proof that your sheepherder exists that you would cling to any crap that is slung at you, and furthermore, try shoving it down the throats of others when you yourself cant possibly beleive it fully. Stop lying to yourself and wake up, the rest of the world has stood up and begun walking foward, while you are still on your knees.
Calm down. Hadn't you guessed by now that I had posted this as a joke?
Neo-Anarchists
06-03-2005, 01:05
Whatever this guy was taking, I want some!
I know!
I've been trying to get that incoherent for years!
:D
Mythopia
06-03-2005, 01:06
Oh, my GOD! You're absolutely right! God does really exist! All of my life I have been sinning, I deserve to go to hell.
No. There is no such thing as heaven or hell. This is ridiculous. How did you find that? It's all nonsense, there's no such thing as a god.
:D
all these "proofs" have the same flaw
they assume one thing without proving it, and then later prove god exists!
however they got quite good at it....the usual reader wont notice the fishy line 84 on page 9 in a 20 page work... :rolleyes:
Post the line, please, if possible. I didn't read the enire thing, just enough to say "yea, right".
Post the line, please, if possible. I didn't read the enire thing, just enough to say "yea, right".
yes post the line! For all the lazy sons of B*** here :fluffle:
yes post the line! For all the lazy sons of B*** here :fluffle:
Lazy is easier!
P.S. :fluffle:
Neo-Anarchists
06-03-2005, 01:10
Post the line, please, if possible. I didn't read the enire thing, just enough to say "yea, right".
S/he isn't talking about this thing, it was a general statement about people fooling others with pseudoscientific bunk.
The White Hats
06-03-2005, 01:12
I've just reached this passage:
"The discovery that Psychology is caused by Relativity begins with the discovery of the STRUCTURAL MODEL of psychology. Although this model has been searched for since the time of Aristotle, it was not until the invention of Psychometry and modern high speed computers that the model was actually found."
Never mind prooving God, I want to know more about psychology being caused by relativity. No, on second thoughts, I want some of what this guy's smoking, then I want to know more about psychology being caused by relativity.
This is good stuff. :)
Lazy is easier!
P.S. :fluffle:
I Agree.
P.P.S :fluffle:
Neo-Anarchists
06-03-2005, 01:13
This is good stuff. :)
I know, I was kept amused for a few days by that site. It's comedy gold.
S/he isn't talking about this thing, it was a general statement about people fooling others with pseudoscientific bunk.
Oh, ok.
Boonytopia
06-03-2005, 01:14
You're right my friend :)
So right!
Bugger, I stepped in it too. Now I have to clean it off my boot.
The White Hats
06-03-2005, 01:17
I know, I was kept amused for a few days by that site. It's comedy gold.
It's like a PS platform game for the brain. You gotta stay on the assertions while travelling at speed and dodging those pesky fact bombs.
Man, they should get an actor to read that stuff in a studio. You could set it to music.
Bugger, I stepped in it too. Now I have to clean it off my boot.
I just wonder who has the time... :p
There's now 4 people voted yes...
Are you those who already believed in Almighty or joking??
Is there anybody who was convinced by that...???
The time to do all that... Anybody hanging on NS...
Makes you wonder ;)
Neo-Anarchists
06-03-2005, 01:23
Man, they should get an actor to read that stuff in a studio. You could set it to music.
If you want to hear crazy ranting backed with music:
http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=399967
Cornelystan
06-03-2005, 01:27
It might be similar to this small book (ISBN: 3-89397-441-5), i found in a exchange student's room that i rentet for a month.
They say there would be 'proof not taken from the bible' but scientific proof.
They somehow abuse the thermodynamic's rules (but just the first and the second one) ... saying if you cannot convert some forms of energy (totally) into another one - there is a ranking for these energies. ...blabla...
The conclusion of all this is: They say science proofs things are becoming more simple with time, instead of becoming more complex.
So, men cannont descend from lower lifeforms and someone must have had plan in constructing complex beings like us...
Or something like it.
The flaw is: Science proofs (you can see it by looking at the history of science itself) things generally go from simple to complex.
Jordaxia
06-03-2005, 01:28
If you want to hear crazy ranting backed with music:
http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=399967
As soon as I seen that, I knew you'd post that link. My psychic powers are at work. I was going to do it, but I realised that you'd only be disappointed.
Oh, and I didn't notice your invisible posts til you pointed them out, but I had an inkling, anyway. Damned sneaky of you.
That's some funny stuff. But it was just too much for me to read all the way through. I chuckled, then wandered off.
I wonder if the only reason I'm posting this is for the autosubscribe that making a post does? Perhaps.
The White Hats
06-03-2005, 01:30
If you want to hear crazy ranting backed with music:
http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=399967
The site looks good, but my sound card is unfunctioning. :(
Have you come across this guy (http://www.tcfn.org/timecapsule/html/james_l._acord.html) ? He sculpts nuclear waste (and is also a really cool guy).
fuckin hell Neo, where do you find all this crazy shit?
:p