Invisiblity cloak now a reality!
Marrakech II
02-03-2005, 04:32
This is from Feb 28. Very cool uses im sure. Check out this link.www.ananova.com/news/story/sn_747591.html (http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sn_747591.html)
I apologize I made my links backwards. See the post down a few for the real story I wanted to post first. Im tired and its late....
Frisbeeteria
02-03-2005, 04:36
Nah. I just don't see it.
Evil Arch Conservative
02-03-2005, 04:36
So it's only transparent on a screen? Or, in this case, a picture of what's on the screen? That's not quite what i was hoping for.
Marrakech II
02-03-2005, 04:37
Apparently there is a race to this tech. Here is another link from the same day.www.nature.com/news/2005/050228/full/050228-1.html (http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050228/full/050228-1.html)
New Foxxinnia
02-03-2005, 04:42
Where's Colodia? I need to scold him for not inventing this first.
Marrakech II
02-03-2005, 04:45
Nah. I just don't see it.
Quick witted, nice one..
Neo-Anarchists
02-03-2005, 04:55
Where's Colodia?
Right over here. (http://artpad.art.com/?icphgs166fqg)
Mwahaha.
Well...It's obviously far from perfect. But by God it's a good first step!
Neo-Anarchists
02-03-2005, 05:36
Well...It's obviously far from perfect. But by God it's a good first step!
It's a pretty big step too, or so it seems to me. I can't imagine how much trouble it was to get it to work right.
The pic I saw in that news post is old news. I saw it (and a video!) last summer.
Dunno why it's only surfacing now.
Unless you mean Feb. 28, 2004.
Marrakech II
02-03-2005, 05:55
The pic I saw in that news post is old news. I saw it (and a video!) last summer.
Dunno why it's only surfacing now.
Unless you mean Feb. 28, 2004.
Well who knows, maybe slow news day. Both are date for this year anyway
Not quite up to Romulan or Section 9 standards, but a damn fine start.
This is from Feb 28. Very cool uses im sure. Check out this link.www.ananova.com/news/story/sn_747591.html (http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sn_747591.html)
Saw something similar but a lot more sophisticated in a Scientific American article on modern warfare several months, maybe a year ago. U.S. army gear,of course. Perverse ...
Saw something similar but a lot more sophisticated in a Scientific American article on modern warfare several months, maybe a year ago. U.S. army gear,of course. Perverse ...
Got it:
02/01/2002 issue: Fighting Future Wars by Gary Stix
http://www.sciamdigital.com/browse.cfm?sequencenameCHAR=item2&methodnameCHAR=resource_getitembrowse&interfacenameCHAR=browse.cfm&ISSUEID_CHAR=F3512189-9123-4A3A-B755-3602FE08C78&ARTICLEID_CHAR=027AE48D-34A5-4959-BF7E-58A8D4FE259&sc=I100322
Jester III
02-03-2005, 12:27
Right over here. (http://artpad.art.com/?icphgs166fqg)
Mwahaha.
You are soo mean! (http://artpad.art.com/?icq2cx1axthk)
The Mindset
02-03-2005, 13:01
http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050228/full/050228-1.html <- better version.
The odd one
02-03-2005, 14:30
a lot of those kinds of experiments have involved fibre-optics.
Pure Metal
02-03-2005, 15:21
Right over here. (http://artpad.art.com/?icphgs166fqg)
Mwahaha.
you are so evil :(
to the rescue! (http://artpad.art.com/gallery/?icqajk1f2c3c) :D
R00fletrain
02-03-2005, 15:29
Right over here. (http://artpad.art.com/?icphgs166fqg)
Mwahaha.
Wow, I think we should always communicate like this :)
Pure Metal
02-03-2005, 15:31
Wow, I think we should always communicate like this :)
http://artpad.art.com/gallery/?icqazt1bwlhs