NationStates Jolt Archive


Response to "Concerned Citizen."

Eutrusca
28-02-2005, 17:34
A "Concerned Citizen" wrote a letter to the White House complaining about the treatment of a captive taken during the Afghanistan war. Below is a copy of the response.


The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C.


Dear Concerned Citizen:

Thank you for your recent letter criticizing our treatment of the Taliban and Al Qaeda detainees currently held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The administration takes these matters seriously, and your opinion was heard loud and clear here in Washington You'll be pleased to learn that, thanks to the concerns of citizens like you, we are creating the Terrorist Retraining Program, to be called the "Liberals Accept Responsibility for Killers" program, or LARK for short.

In accordance with the guidelines of this new program, we have decided to place one terrorist under your personal care. Your detainee has been selected and scheduled for transportation to your residence next Monday. Ali Mohammed Ahmed bin Mahmud is to be cared for pursuant to the standards you personally demanded in your letter of admonishment. We will conduct weekly inspections to ensure that your standards of care for Ahmed are commensurate with those you so strongly recommended in your letter.

Although Ahmed is a sociopath and extremely violent, we hope that your sensitivity to what you described as his "attitudinal problem" will help him overcome this character flaw. Perhaps you are correct in describing these problems as mere cultural differences.

Your adopted terrorist is extremely proficient in hand-to-hand combat and can extinguish human life with such simple items as a pencil or nail clippers. He is also expert at making a wide variety of explosive devices from common household products, so you may wish to keep those items locked up, unless you feel that this might offend him.

Ahmed will not wish to interact with your wife or daughters since he views females as a subhuman form of property. This is a particularly sensitive subject for him. He has been known to show violent tendencies around women who fail to comply with the dress code that he considers appropriate, but I'm sure that over time they will come to enjoy the anonymity offered by the bhurka. Just remind them that it is all part of respecting his culture and his religious beliefs.

Thanks again for your letter. We truly appreciate it when folks like you inform us of the proper way to do our job. Take good care of Ahmed and good luck!

Cordially,

Don Rumsfeld
MuhOre
28-02-2005, 17:42
LOL, that would be so entertaining if true....
Mt-Tau
28-02-2005, 17:47
Hahaha!
Eutrusca
28-02-2005, 17:49
LOL, that would be so entertaining if true....
I know! :D
Drunk commies
28-02-2005, 17:54
Actually it might be doable. Get some of those US citizens who hate the USA and sympathize with the taliban to volunteer as social workers in Guantanamo. Let them see up close who they're sticking up for.
Marrakech II
28-02-2005, 17:55
LOL, Damn that is a good one. Nice post!
Eutrusca
28-02-2005, 17:56
Actually it might be doable. Get some of those US citizens who hate the USA and sympathize with the taliban to volunteer as social workers in Guantanamo. Let them see up close who they're sticking up for.
But, but ... that would be cruel ( not to the detainees, but to the social workers )! ;)
Exelby
28-02-2005, 18:00
I sympathize the US for having such a fruitcake of a President.
Marrakech II
28-02-2005, 18:24
I sympathize the US for having such a fruitcake of a President.

Over half of us voted for him. So that makes one hell of a fruitcake.
MuhOre
28-02-2005, 18:28
Weren't all the elections pretty much lose, like nearly 50/50? This one shouldn't be that different...
Zeppistan
28-02-2005, 18:32
Oh look, it's an apologist letter wrapped up in a lame attempt at humour that seems to indicate that there is no other option except denial of rights and torturing inmates, and if some citizen's don't like those things they should do the government's job for them!



Wow....that is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo funny.




:rolleyes:
Zooke
28-02-2005, 18:34
I sympathize the US for having such a fruitcake of a President.

No...you are misinformed. Kerry did not win. Did you know that after the election, his wife dropped the name of "Kerry" and now goes only by "Heinz"? If she had done this before the election and then kept quiet he might have won. Nah....
RhynoD
28-02-2005, 18:39
No...you are misinformed. Kerry did not win. Did you know that after the election, his wife dropped the name of "Kerry" and now goes only by "Heinz"? If she had done this before the election and then kept quiet he might have won. Nah....
Really? HAHAHAHA! What a loser.

btw, *applause* for the letter. Truely excellent.
Chinkopodia
28-02-2005, 18:39
Over half of us voted for him. So that makes one hell of a fruitcake.

WRONG! About half of you didn't vote AT ALL, quite possibly because that half deemed neither candidate suitable, so really only about 1/4 of the American population voted for Bush.
Zeppistan
28-02-2005, 18:43
Hey, you know what would be even funnier? If when asked about a proposed Bill to ban the current US policy of shipping suspects off to other countries for incarceration and torture the spokesperson for the House Speaker stated that this bill was a bad idea "Because, U.S. taxpayers should not necessarily be on the hook for their judicial and incarceration costs."


Oh wait - he DID say that... (http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/28/opinion/28herbert.html?)


My bad.


Right. Why should American's deal with terrorists when they have places like Syria to do it for them. They're trustworthy right?

I mean, it's not like there is a War on Terror going on....

:rolleyes:
Gadolinia
28-02-2005, 18:48
Weren't all the elections pretty much close, like nearly 50/50? This one shouldn't be that different...

actually it is the first election since 1988 where the winner took more than 50% of the popular vote.
Nasopotomia
28-02-2005, 18:50
Over half of us voted for him. So that makes one hell of a fruitcake.

Certainly means the mix has far too many nuts for my liking...
Alien Born
28-02-2005, 18:51
What really worries me here is Don Rumsfeld writing from the Whitehouse not the Pentagon! There has been a silent coup, and no-one noticed?
Swimmingpool
28-02-2005, 18:53
That's funny Eutrusca.

But yeah it's clearly a humourous torture-apologist letter. As if regular citizens could reasonably look after terrorist prisoners. ;)
MuhOre
28-02-2005, 18:54
actually it is the first election since 1988 where the winner took more than 50% of the popular vote.


You mean normally the winning president doesn't get both the popular and state vote? O_O wow...
Nasopotomia
28-02-2005, 18:54
WRONG! About half of you didn't vote AT ALL, quite possibly because that half deemed neither candidate suitable, so really only about 1/4 of the American population voted for Bush.

Actually it was more like 1/6. However, since 1/3 of the US population are under the age of 16, and about 1/6 are smart enough not to bother voting when both candidates are rubbish, and Kerry was a totally awful idea as a candidate, it seems about fair to say half of all voters went for Bush. This still doesn't make it better, and is the kind of thing most countries would try to keep quiet about.
Nasopotomia
28-02-2005, 18:56
What really worries me here is Don Rumsfeld writing from the Whitehouse not the Pentagon! There has been a silent coup, and no-one noticed?

Well, George used to do it until his crayons broke. The first draft of the reply was a picture of a tree, with George and mummy and daddy stood on the lawn outside a little cottage, and "by Gorg" written at the bottom. Karl decided it might be bad PR.
Gadolinia
28-02-2005, 19:04
You mean normally the winning president doesn't get both the popular and state vote? O_O wow...

no, i mean it is the first election that the winner got 50% of the total vote:

2000:
George W. Bush 50,456,002 47.87%
Al Gore 50,999,897 48.38%
Ralph Nader 2,882,955 2.74%

1996:
William Jefferson Clinton 47,402,357 49.24%
Robert Joseph Dole 39,198,755 40.71%
Henry Ross Perot 8,085,402 8.40%


1992:
William Jefferson Clinton 44,908,254 42.93%
George Herbert Walker 39,102,343 37.38%
Henry Ross Perot 19,741,065 18.87%

1988:
George H. W. Bush 48,882,808 53.4%
Michael S. Dukakis 41,807,430 45.6%
MuhOre
28-02-2005, 19:07
Can you show me the site where you got the figures from? I want to see all the results. :)
Teh Cameron Clan
28-02-2005, 19:08
I sympathize the US for having such a fruitcake of a President.
ahhahahahah *wipes tear*
Gadolinia
28-02-2005, 19:08
Can you show me the site where you got the figures from? I want to see all the results. :)

wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presidential_election%2C_1996

scroll down they have results from all elections dating back to 1700's
Chinkopodia
28-02-2005, 20:50
Actually it was more like 1/6. However, since 1/3 of the US population are under the age of 16, and about 1/6 are smart enough not to bother voting when both candidates are rubbish, and Kerry was a totally awful idea as a candidate, it seems about fair to say half of all voters went for Bush. This still doesn't make it better, and is the kind of thing most countries would try to keep quiet about.

I meant out of voting age Americans. I subtracted the American pop below voting age.