NationStates Jolt Archive

*the bottomfeeding slimeball of dirty tricks AKA the sleaziest man in America karl Rove planted the forged documents that told the truth about Bushs war cowardice at CBS in order to setup Dan Rather whom the Right has been out to get for years. CBS has added insult to injury by persecuting the reporters victimized by the filthy tactics of the snake

Democratic Congressmember Maurice Hinchey of New York said he believes that President Bush's senior advisor Karl Rove was behind the fake documents that brought down several top executives at CBS. Hinchey said "I have my own beliefs about how that happened: It originated with Karl Rove, in my belief, in the White House ... . Once they did that, then it undermined everything else about Bush's draft dodging. ... That had the effect of taking the whole issue away." The documents in question addressed Bush's military service in Alabama in 1972 while on leave from the Texas National Guard. Ultimately, CBS could not prove that the memos were authentic.
democracynow.org

So Bush and Crew are now extremely intelligent conspirators who managed to successfully take down a major media outlet?

I thought the democracynow.org always ranted about them being a bunch of stupid idiots? hmmm.

Anyway, all that little quote up there is some personal statements by but one person. Hey, You know, I've got this theory about how the Pink Panther orchestrated the invasion of Iraq by secretly slipping subliminal messages onto President Bush's favorite coffee mug. If I make a slick shiny webpage about it are you going to run around shouting it out as if it was from God's own tongue?

Lol :D

Yeah, I posted about this yesterday or the day before to make fun of him. You're a bit late.

So Bush and Crew are now extremely intelligent conspirators who managed to successfully take down a major media outlet?


Just because Rove is smart does not make the shrub smart.....

So Bush and Crew are now extremely intelligent conspirators who managed to successfully take down a major media outlet?

I thought the democracynow.org always ranted about them being a bunch of stupid idiots? hmmm.

Anyway, all that little quote up there is some personal statements by but one person. Hey, You know, I've got this theory about how the Pink Panther orchestrated the invasion of Iraq by secretly slipping subliminal messages onto President Bush's favorite coffee mug. If I make a slick shiny webpage about it are you going to run around shouting it out as if it was from God's own tongue?
Bush is the idiot puppet of evil genuises who control him. We saw the same pattern under the senile Reagan.

the Pink Panther didnt make billions from invading the helpless Iraq whereas the Bush crime syndicate did

This is a stupid move by the Congressman. No proof = he's dumb.

This is a stupid move by the Congressman. No proof = he's dumb.
Karl Roves scumbaggery is common knowledge

"Bushs ancestors...shift earths axis....ray thru crystal....to center of earth"
-Skapedroe

You get the pic :D

Karl Roves scumbaggery is common knowledge

Perhaps. But the proof that Rove and the Bush Administration orchestrated Rathergate is not forthcoming. The Congressman refers to his "own beliefs." For a politician on the national stage, he's not too clever.

Alright Skap, you should know I got nothin' but love for ya, but you are at an impass.

Everything you've got comes from Democracynow.org and while I don't think using a place that has a like mind is all bad as a starting point or rallying point, here you are stuck. Regardless of what you think of Democracynow.org or even the reality of Democracynow.org, at this point as far as your intended audience, the good folks here, you might as well post from Freshfrommyass.org.

Now I'm not saying (though plenty will) that Democracynow.org is all grade A fresh bullplop, but that is what you are faced with.

You will get little more than gainsay responses unless you start adjusting the argument. You either have to establish the chain of information or find correlating(sp) stories and historical patterns that underline what you say.

The yellow journalism, attention grabbing exageration isn't helping either. All political threads get picked up here. You don't need it.

And keep in mind, nothin' but love. I'm not giving this advice to Panhandlia. That guy fling his own poop all he wants.

Maybe ween yourself off that particular teet, maybe Democracynow.org with some Salon, or Guardian. Mix it up a little.

I've said this before, so I suspect I'll be ignored. It's too bad, you seem like a nice guy underneath it all.

ya but no one gave a damn about bush's ng record. he went into the guard to serve but avoid vietnam. he's not the only one who did it.

no one cares anymore than they cared about his cocaine use or drunk driving conviction.

it all happened before he was "born again" so its irrelevant to his being a very moral man.

This is a stupid move by the Congressman. No proof = he's dumb.

Didn't the "No Proof" method work for Iraq? ;)

Ahh! Karl Rove! Satan is upon us! Run!

Psh. I want a t-shirt with Karl Rove's face and the words "I will kill you with my devil powers! Rahr!" I think that would be really sweet.

...yellow journalism...
Is of the same color, and same trustability as urine - as a journalist myself, I hate the damn stuff

Didn't I hear Terry McCauliffe float this concept back in october?

Didn't I hear Terry McCauliffe float this concept back in october?Possibly. And the thing is no one is saying that Rove is ethically above doing such a thing. It's totally consistent with his reputation to engineer such a scam.

Unfortunately, accusations without proof simply serve to inure the bastard from his karma. It's really sad, but what I think we'll see is another Atwater Deathbed Scene. At some point in the future, Rove is going to try to get right with his god by admitting he's a total scumbag.

Alright Skap, you should know I got nothin' but love for ya, but you are at an impass.

Everything you've got comes from Democracynow.org and while I don't think using a place that has a like mind is all bad as a starting point or rallying point, here you are stuck. Regardless of what you think of Democracynow.org or even the reality of Democracynow.org, at this point as far as your intended audience, the good folks here, you might as well post from Freshfrommyass.org.

Now I'm not saying (though plenty will) that Democracynow.org is all grade A fresh bullplop, but that is what you are faced with.

You will get little more than gainsay responses unless you start adjusting the argument. You either have to establish the chain of information or find correlating(sp) stories and historical patterns that underline what you say.

The yellow journalism, attention grabbing exageration isn't helping either. All political threads get picked up here. You don't need it.

And keep in mind, nothin' but love. I'm not giving this advice to Panhandlia. That guy fling his own poop all he wants.

Maybe ween yourself off that particular teet, maybe Democracynow.org with some Salon, or Guardian. Mix it up a little.

I've said this before, so I suspect I'll be ignored. It's too bad, you seem like a nice guy underneath it all.
I understand your point and I will try to mix it up a bit more in future posts--but usually people that whine about the sources are generally people who dont have open minds to begin with and theyll just look for any excuse to try to discredit what makes der fuhrer look bad

I prefer DailyKos.com for my liberal blogging. I also keep an eye on lowculture.com, because they're funny little wanks.