NationStates Jolt Archive


English Royal Navy begins recruiting gays

Kahta
21-02-2005, 22:52
http://xtramsn.co.nz/news/0,,11965-4133689,00.html

bad idea. AIDS and HIV will be spread. BAD IDEA.
[NS]Ein Deutscher
21-02-2005, 22:57
I'm Gay. I don't have HIV or AIDS. Actually, I'd only be worried if they started recruiting black African women.
Neo-Anarchists
21-02-2005, 22:57
bad idea. AIDS and HIV will be spread. BAD IDEA.
As though gays are the source of HIV?
Greenmanbry
21-02-2005, 22:59
Ein Deutscher']I'm Gay. I don't have HIV or AIDS. Actually, I'd only be worried if they started recruiting black African women.

Was that sarcasm? Or a sincere opinion?
[NS]Ein Deutscher
21-02-2005, 23:00
Was that sarcasm? Or a sincere opinion?
Black African Women are obviously the largest risk group regarding HIV/AIDS.
Johnny Wadd
21-02-2005, 23:01
Ein Deutscher']I'm Gay. I don't have HIV or AIDS. Actually, I'd only be worried if they started recruiting black African women.

Cool, you could sign up and swab the poop decks.
Johnny Wadd
21-02-2005, 23:02
As though gays are the source of HIV?


Many gay men do have the HIV and the AIDs in them, correct?
Jordaxia
21-02-2005, 23:03
I don't believe you. I see no reason for HIV and aids to spread simply because of the place of someones employment. By that logic, gays shouldn't be allowed to work, because they'll be in the same environment. Besides, it works on the flawed assumption that homosexuals refuse to use protection.
Also, it doesn't just spread through the gay community, straight people get it too!

Unless of course... the royal navy spreads aids on its ships, and by broadening the recruitment spectrum, they spread the disease by default?
McLeod03
21-02-2005, 23:03
Cool, you could sign up and swab the poop decks.

Heh.
Kahta
21-02-2005, 23:03
Ein Deutscher']I'm Gay. I don't have HIV or AIDS. Actually, I'd only be worried if they started recruiting black African women.

Most gays are at a high risk of getting it.
L-rouge
21-02-2005, 23:03
http://xtramsn.co.nz/news/0,,11965-4133689,00.html

bad idea. AIDS and HIV will be spread. BAD IDEA.
HIV/Aids are spread through the transmission of bodily fluids eg. unprotected sex, it makes no difference whether it is a man or woman.

P.S. Its the Royal Navy or BRITISH Royal Navy, it's not just English.
Kahta
21-02-2005, 23:06
Ein Deutscher']Black African Women are obviously the largest risk group regarding HIV/AIDS.


No, blacks in general, are 15 times more likley to have it compared to any other group.
Swimmingpool
21-02-2005, 23:06
Many gay men do have the HIV and the AIDs in them, correct?
I'm getting sick and tired of your homophobic posts.
Kahta
21-02-2005, 23:07
HIV/Aids are spread through the transmission of bodily fluids eg. unprotected sex, it makes no difference whether it is a man or woman.

P.S. Its the Royal Navy or BRITISH Royal Navy, it's not just English.

Because of the nature of how gays do things with each other, it is far more likley to spread aids, because things go where they're not supposed to be.
Refused Party Program
21-02-2005, 23:07
Many gay men do have the HIV and the AIDs in them, correct?

Many heterosexual men and women have AIDS. What's your point?
[NS]Ein Deutscher
21-02-2005, 23:07
Most gays are at a high risk of getting it.
Only if they have unsafe sex... most likely anal sex. Most gays I know don't do unsafe sex due to exactly this risk. And most I know don't even like anal sex :)
Johnny Wadd
21-02-2005, 23:08
I don't believe you. I see no reason for HIV and aids to spread simply because of the place of someones employment. By that logic, gays shouldn't be allowed to work, because they'll be in the same environment. Besides, it works on the flawed assumption that homosexuals refuse to use protection.
Also, it doesn't just spread through the gay community, straight people get it too!

Unless of course... the royal navy spreads aids on its ships, and by broadening the recruitment spectrum, they spread the disease by default?

Well if you don't participate in unprotected gay, royal navy, ass sex, your changes of catching the AIDs is slim.

No, gays shouldn't be allowed to work anywhere. When I go to get my hair done or buy flowers, I don't need no gay eyeing me up and down. Certain people have lost teeth while doing this to yours' truely.
L-rouge
21-02-2005, 23:08
Because of the nature of how gays do things with each other, it is far more likley to spread aids, because things go where they're not supposed to be.
Erm, no...it can go wherever it wants to go, it doesn't make it any less likely to infect a person whether they are gay or straight.
[NS]Ein Deutscher
21-02-2005, 23:09
No, blacks in general, are 15 times more likley to have it compared to any other group.
I dunno about Blacks in general. But I know that Africa has a very serious AIDS problem and that African women are most affected by this.
Nimzonia
21-02-2005, 23:09
http://xtramsn.co.nz/news/0,,11965-4133689,00.html

bad idea. AIDS and HIV will be spread. BAD IDEA.


It's the navy, for God's sake. It's not like there weren't any homosexuals in it before.
Kahta
21-02-2005, 23:09
I don't believe you. I see no reason for HIV and aids to spread simply because of the place of someones employment. By that logic, gays shouldn't be allowed to work, because they'll be in the same environment. Besides, it works on the flawed assumption that homosexuals refuse to use protection.
Also, it doesn't just spread through the gay community, straight people get it too!

Unless of course... the royal navy spreads aids on its ships, and by broadening the recruitment spectrum, they spread the disease by default?

Gays will sign up as a way to meet other men.
[NS]Ein Deutscher
21-02-2005, 23:10
Well if you don't participate in unprotected gay, royal navy, ass sex, your changes of catching the AIDs is slim.

No, gays shouldn't be allowed to work anywhere. When I go to get my hair done or buy flowers, I don't need no gay eyeing me up and down. Certain people have lost teeth while doing this to yours' truely.
To be honest, we have taste. You do not seem to be the kind of guy *anyone* would want to eye up. Not even girls. How's Lady 5-fingers doing?
Refused Party Program
21-02-2005, 23:10
Because of the nature of how gays do things with each other, it is far more likley to spread aids, because things go where they're not supposed to be.

Congratulations. You have just posted what we in the scientific community refer to as "absolute bollocks".
Chicken pi
21-02-2005, 23:10
Gays will sign up as a way to meet other men.

Wouldn't it just be easier for them to go to a gay bar instead?
Neo-Anarchists
21-02-2005, 23:10
Because of the nature of how gays do things with each other, it is far more likley to spread aids, because things go where they're not supposed to be.
That is, assuming that one of them has AIDS, and they are stupid and don't get tested.
[NS]Ein Deutscher
21-02-2005, 23:11
Gays will sign up as a way to meet other men.
And turn them gay with a blink of their eyes. Duh...
Johnny Wadd
21-02-2005, 23:11
I'm getting sick and tired of your homophobic posts.

Don't read them. Isn't it true that the AIDs is starting to become a problem again in the gay community?

I am not homophobic. How was that post homophobic.

I'm getting tired of your bleeding heart, sissy posts. :)
Kahta
21-02-2005, 23:12
It's the navy, for God's sake. It's not like there weren't any homosexuals in it before.

This will result in even more, if gays were allowed in any military institution I was in, I would leave as soon as possible.
[NS]Ein Deutscher
21-02-2005, 23:12
Don't read them. Isn't it true that the AIDs is starting to become a problem again in the gay community?

I am not homophobic. How was that post homophobic.

I'm getting tired of your bleeding heart, sissy posts. :)
No. Not as far as I know. At least not more of a problem as anywhere else.
Jordaxia
21-02-2005, 23:12
Gays will sign up as a way to meet other men.
Instead of going to a pub, like everyone else?

How insidious.

I have serious doubts that the Royal navy will become little more than a glorified floating dating service when there are other, far more accessable ways to go about doing things.
Johnny Wadd
21-02-2005, 23:12
Ein Deutscher']To be honest, we have taste. You do not seem to be the kind of guy *anyone* would want to eye up. Not even girls. How's Lady 5-fingers doing?

I wouldn't know, as I have no arms and legs. Tell me, how are your anal fissures holding up?

BTW the correct term is Rosey Palm and her 5 friends.
[NS]Ein Deutscher
21-02-2005, 23:13
This will result in even more, if gays were allowed in any military institution I was in, I would leave as soon as possible.
Obviously you are sexually very insecure. Are you afraid of finding your inner gay feelings or are you just a victim of your indoctrinated homophobia?
[NS]Ein Deutscher
21-02-2005, 23:15
I wouldn't know, as I have no arms and legs. Tell me, how are your anal fissures holding up?

BTW the correct term is Rosey Palm and her 5 friends.
I'm not having anal sex so they're doing fine. If you don't have any arms and legs, I doubt anyone would eye you up.
Neo-Anarchists
21-02-2005, 23:15
Wait a minute...

Kahta, why would you care if AIDS was spread to more homosexuals? If they all died, wouldn't you be able to stop worrying about them?
:confused:
Aardvarkhomia
21-02-2005, 23:15
Because of the nature of how gays do things with each other, it is far more likley to spread aids, because things go where they're not supposed to be.
Like Tahiti. Them gays is a going to Tahiti, shiver me timbers, an' Tahiti is the place for diseases
FairyTInkArisen
21-02-2005, 23:17
and here was m thinking the entire ROyal Navy was gay anyway :confused:
Rarne
21-02-2005, 23:17
I have a suggestion.

Why not give everyone(including them freakss who like the opposite sex) a blood test/STD check before they are enlisted? Due to the nature of being in the armed forces (sharing showers, living in close quarters etc...), the Navy should have the right to reject some one based on their medical history.

If they're clean, then there's no issue here.

Besides, HIV attacks the immune system and makes you more open to bacteria and viruses. Therefore you are a health hazard on a Naval ship, so they do have interest in not allowing HIV positive people into the armed forces.

Keep in mind, this should only apply to the armed forces. There is absolutely no reason to deny an HIV positive patient pretty much any other job, my only concern is what is stated above.
Aardvarkhomia
21-02-2005, 23:18
Well if you don't participate in unprotected gay, royal navy, ass sex, your changes of catching the AIDs is slim.

No, gays shouldn't be allowed to work anywhere. When I go to get my hair done or buy flowers, I don't need no gay eyeing me up and down. Certain people have lost teeth while doing this to yours' truely.
Real men don't buy flowers or get their hair 'done'. You're obviously a screaming woofter, albeit latent.
Swimmingpool
21-02-2005, 23:19
Don't read them. Isn't it true that the AIDs is starting to become a problem again in the gay community?

I am not homophobic. How was that post homophobic.

I'm getting tired of your bleeding heart, sissy posts. :)
Your post in this thread was not homophobic but your posts here on this forum in general are.

My posts are not bleeding heart or sissy. Nice to assume that I am a socialist because I oppose homophobic idiocy. :rolleyes:
Aardvarkhomia
21-02-2005, 23:19
and here was m thinking the entire ROyal Navy was gay anyway :confused:
Rum buggery and the lash. Great naval traditions. Made Britain the great force for moral virtue that it is today.
Johnny Wadd
21-02-2005, 23:21
Ein Deutscher']I'm not having anal sex so they're doing fine. If you don't have any arms and legs, I doubt anyone would eye you up.


You may not be having gay, anal sex, but what about the good old fashioned tea bagging you do? How are the herpes sores holding up? Well I'm glad you stopped messing around back there as it is kind of gross! (http://www.tedsuey.com/art/puke.jpg) I'm glad those fissures are healing up nicely for you. You should still visit the Proctologist and get them fixed. Remember it's a one way street, and as with all one way streets, it's dangerous to go the "wrong way".
Sdaeriji
21-02-2005, 23:22
I have a suggestion.

Why not give everyone(including them freakss who like the opposite sex) a blood test/STD check before they are enlisted? Due to the nature of being in the armed forces (sharing showers, living in close quarters etc...), the Navy should have the right to reject some one based on their medical history.

If they're clean, then there's no issue here.

Besides, HIV attacks the immune system and makes you more open to bacteria and viruses. Therefore you are a health hazard on a Naval ship, so they do have interest in not allowing HIV positive people into the armed forces.

Keep in mind, this should only apply to the armed forces. There is absolutely no reason to deny an HIV positive patient pretty much any other job, my only concern is what is stated above.

And shockingly enough, any military branch tests all recruits up and down for all sorts of possible diseases, and reject recruits who have non-curable, potentially spreadable diseases. And they do it frequently.
Johnny Wadd
21-02-2005, 23:24
Your post in this thread was not homophobic but your posts here on this forum in general are.

My posts are not bleeding heart or sissy. Nice to assume that I am a socialist because I oppose homophobic idiocy. :rolleyes:

From my pov your posts are far to the left. Never said you were a socialist, just a bleeding heart, sissy type.

Nonsense, my posts on here are all gay friendly, I swear.
Myrth
21-02-2005, 23:24
You may not be having gay, anal sex, but what about the good old fashioned tea bagging you do? How are the herpes sores holding up? Well I'm glad you stopped messing around back there as it is kind of gross! (http://www.tedsuey.com/art/puke.jpg) I'm glad those fissures are healing up nicely for you. You should still visit the Proctologist and get them fixed. Remember it's a one way street, and as with all one way streets, it's dangerous to go the "wrong way".

Haven't you had enough nations deleted already?
Sdaeriji
21-02-2005, 23:25
Haven't you had enough nations deleted already?

Wait a second...who was he in the past? I didn't have him pegged as anyone.
[NS]Ein Deutscher
21-02-2005, 23:26
You may not be having gay, anal sex, but what about the good old fashioned tea bagging you do? How are the herpes sores holding up? Well I'm glad you stopped messing around back there as it is kind of gross! (http://www.tedsuey.com/art/puke.jpg) I'm glad those fissures are healing up nicely for you. You should still visit the Proctologist and get them fixed. Remember it's a one way street, and as with all one way streets, it's dangerous to go the "wrong way".
You're sexually insecure, as someone else already pointed out. I'll not waste any more energy replying to you...
Neo-Anarchists
21-02-2005, 23:27
Wait a second...who was he in the past? I didn't have him pegged as anyone.
I was beginning to suspect that he sounded familiar, but I can't quite put my finger on it.
Myrth
21-02-2005, 23:28
Gays will sign up as a way to meet other men.

Of course, just like how allowing women into the navy meant they all signed up looking for men, right?

:rolleyes:
Myrth
21-02-2005, 23:30
Wait a second...who was he in the past? I didn't have him pegged as anyone.

'HannibalSmith' and 'MoeHoward' to name but two.
Rarne
21-02-2005, 23:30
And shockingly enough, any military branch tests all recruits up and down for all sorts of possible diseases, and reject recruits who have non-curable, potentially spreadable diseases. And they do it frequently.

So why is this obvious case of homophobia even an issue???
The Mindset
21-02-2005, 23:31
Your logic astounds me. It's almost as good as the Creationists.
Sdaeriji
21-02-2005, 23:32
So why is this obvious case of homophobia even an issue???

Beats me. I'm certainly not the one making it an issue.
Neo-Anarchists
21-02-2005, 23:35
Beats me.
Hey, this is a thread about homosexuality, not S&M.

:D
Sthyxia
21-02-2005, 23:40
Blast! Our dastardly homosexualist plan to bring down the Royal Navy by turning them all magically gay and infecting them with AIDs (which, by the way, we created- don't let those damn monkeys take all the credit, yo' ) has been foiled! Curse you, Kahta, and your little dog too. Curse you.
Nadkor
21-02-2005, 23:41
this is the most absurd thread ive ever read...

youd think that homosexuals all had AIDS or HIV and were denied access to condoms...

jeez
12345543211
21-02-2005, 23:42
How will HIV and AIDS spread more? Its not like the gay men are going to rape everyone. And even if they have sex with each other on the boat, which is not very likely; that would have happened anyway.
Johnny Wadd
21-02-2005, 23:44
Real men don't buy flowers or get their hair 'done'. You're obviously a screaming woofter, albeit latent.

Duh, I have to purchase flowers for the wife. I use wigs as I am naturally bald, and it seems that only gays work in wig shops. That is what I call getting my "hair" done.

You are obviously a screaming pillow biter, albeit flaming.
Johnny Wadd
21-02-2005, 23:47
Haven't you had enough nations deleted already?

Nope! I find this fun.
Sthyxia
21-02-2005, 23:52
Duh, I have to purchase flowers for the wife. I use wigs as I am naturally bald, and it seems that only gays work in wig shops. That is what I call getting my "hair" done.

If you wear wigs, you probably won't have to worry about gay men looking you over.
Johnny Wadd
21-02-2005, 23:53
Ein Deutscher']You're sexually insecure, as someone else already pointed out. I'll not waste any more energy replying to you...


Thanks Freud, but the only thing I'm insecure about is not having any limbs. Why do you gays always say that about "homophobes"? Seriously, the majority of people aren't gay, neither are animals. Perhaps you are secretly straight, huh?
Johnny Wadd
21-02-2005, 23:55
If you wear wigs, you probably won't have to worry about gay men looking you over.

Well, when you have certain assets, they do seem to look at your pants. I always tell them to get their eyes out of my pants.
Davo_301
21-02-2005, 23:55
I want the 10 minuates of my life i wasted looking at this ilogical topic fulled to the brim with stupidity, thanks to this post i've lost 20 I.Q. points
Sthyxia
21-02-2005, 23:57
Why do you gays always say that about "homophobes"?

Maybe because it's actually true to some extent? It certainly seems so to me, but then where I live is thankfully quite liberal and most people don't care whether you screw men, women or cuddly toys, so I could be wrong.
Sthyxia
21-02-2005, 23:59
Well, when you have certain assets, they do seem to look at your pants. I always tell them to get their eyes out of my pants.

Don't flatter yourself.

I like women, but my eyes aren't glued to the tits of every woman I pass. Maybe you have a strange stain on the back of your trousers or something. It wouldn't surprise me.
Johnny Wadd
22-02-2005, 00:04
Maybe because it's actually true to some extent? It certainly seems so to me, but then where I live is thankfully quite liberal and most people don't care whether you screw men, women or cuddly toys, so I could be wrong.


Enjoy your own private gayville.
Johnny Wadd
22-02-2005, 00:08
Don't flatter yourself.

I like women, but my eyes aren't glued to the tits of every woman I pass. Maybe you have a strange stain on the back of your trousers or something. It wouldn't surprise me.

Sure you like 'women', that are actually men. The best of both worlds indeed!

I love tits. I don't wear trousers, I wear short pants as wearing 'trousers' wouldn't make a whole lot of sense, now would it? Besides, the only thing that goes near my exit is my wife's tongue.
Hitlerreich
22-02-2005, 00:10
http://xtramsn.co.nz/news/0,,11965-4133689,00.html

bad idea. AIDS and HIV will be spread. BAD IDEA.


I agree, what is wrong with people who make these decisions? Is nothing sacred for the agents of political correctness above all?
Neo-Anarchists
22-02-2005, 00:11
I agree, what is wrong with people who make these decisions? Is nothing sacred for the agents of political correctness above all?
Wait, so getting more people in the navy is a bad thing?
Spesh
22-02-2005, 00:12
What you don't realise is that the Royal Navy has been accepting gays since 2000. Just because they try and recruit a few more, suddenly the whole Navy is going to turn gay and become AIDS infected?? I think not.
Sumamba Buwhan
22-02-2005, 00:12
Because of the nature of how gays do things with each other, it is far more likley to spread aids, because things go where they're not supposed to be.


lol

Katha you are one of those solid gold flaimbaiters that makes the forum so entertaining.

Keep up the spread of ignorance and disinformation because it sure does make you look smart!
Nadkor
22-02-2005, 00:13
Wait, so getting more people in the navy is a bad thing?
yea

especially if theyre gay

because then were all going to die of AIDS

did nobody tell you?
Myrmidonisia
22-02-2005, 00:15
http://xtramsn.co.nz/news/0,,11965-4133689,00.html

bad idea. AIDS and HIV will be spread. BAD IDEA.
I always did refer to them as the second best Navy.
Sumamba Buwhan
22-02-2005, 00:16
I would think that katha would hope that anyone who is inclined to have gay sex should do so right away as well as often, just so they can all die of AIDS and this can be e perfect world of straight white rich people
Davo_301
22-02-2005, 00:26
yea

especially if theyre gay

because then were all going to die of AIDS

did nobody tell you?

wow we should put this person in a test tube, we could find out where loonies come from
New British Glory
22-02-2005, 00:26
Well if you don't participate in unprotected gay, royal navy, ass sex, your changes of catching the AIDs is slim.

No, gays shouldn't be allowed to work anywhere. When I go to get my hair done or buy flowers, I don't need no gay eyeing me up and down. Certain people have lost teeth while doing this to yours' truely.

What a pleasant individual you are.
Rarne
22-02-2005, 00:27
Technically,the only argument they have had so far is that gays do have a larger chance of contracting AIDS, however, not for the reason that more gays have AIDS.

It is true that anal sex is more likely to rip a condom than vaginal sex, so therefore you have a larger chance of getting AIDS by anal sex than vaginal sex. But, this has nothing to do with allowing them into the Navy.
Chicken pi
22-02-2005, 00:28
What a pleasant individual you are.

He's taking the mickey. Personally I don't find as offensive as certain other posters, as the only reason he's posting this stuff is to annoy people.
Nadkor
22-02-2005, 00:30
wow we should put this person in a test tube, we could find out where loonies come from
im not serious. im parodying some other people....
New British Glory
22-02-2005, 00:34
Did you also that women are allowed in the Royal Navy? Surely a straight man could join up to have a relationship with a woman just as a gay man could sign up to have a relationship with a man.

Anyway I heard a debate on Radio 5 this morning (BBC Radio which being British I listen to) saying that if any gay men formed a relationship onboard they would be suspended for unprofessional conduct. The same applies to anyone who forms a relationship while on duty.

I am not particularly anti gay - I dont mind what they do in their private time so long as they don't thrust it (if you will pardon the expression) into society at large.
Johnny Wadd
22-02-2005, 00:37
I would think that katha would hope that anyone who is inclined to have gay sex should do so right away as well as often, just so they can all die of AIDS and this can be e perfect world of straight white rich people

That would be nice world. One can only dream! (http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004W3MS.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg)
Neo-Anarchists
22-02-2005, 00:39
One can only dream! (http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004W3MS.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg)
Hey, that's the cover of ágætis byrjun. That's a good album.
Syawla
22-02-2005, 00:50
I loved the tolerant, liberal reporting of this with The Sun having a cartoon showing Lord Nelson's famous phrase "Kiss me Hardy" with Hardy replying "I thought you'd never ask sir" alongside a picture of Lord Kitchener saying "I want you" witha bent wrist.

Top journalism.
New British Glory
22-02-2005, 01:08
Well if you read The Sun you can't expect much better really...
Tummania
22-02-2005, 01:11
Gays will sign up as a way to meet other men.

:rolleyes:
Most people don't apply for a job so they can date... Have you?
I_Hate_Cows
22-02-2005, 01:19
http://xtramsn.co.nz/news/0,,11965-4133689,00.html

bad idea. AIDS and HIV will be spread. BAD IDEA.
Yes, because all and only gay people have HIV an AIDS, as a matter of fact, HIV is produces by becoming a homosexual male, its like testotesterone for gays

[/sarcasm]
Roach-Busters
22-02-2005, 01:33
No, blacks in general, are 15 times more likley to have it compared to any other group.

Got proof?
I_Hate_Cows
22-02-2005, 01:36
Got proof?
That depends on your definition of "proof." An intelligent, logical, verifiable proof, no he doesn't
Refused Party Program
22-02-2005, 01:39
Seeing as we're unlikely to get any more fun out of Kahta's rampant homophobia, I suggest that this abomination of a thread is locked.

In fact, I declare this thread deceased. Time of death: 00:42.
VoteEarly
22-02-2005, 01:40
Got proof?


http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5133a1.htm

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5315a1.htm

http://www.niaid.nih.gov/factsheets/aidsstat.htm
Kahta
22-02-2005, 01:41
I would think that katha would hope that anyone who is inclined to have gay sex should do so right away as well as often, just so they can all die of AIDS and this can be e perfect world of straight white rich people

The perfect America would be a white America divided by classes. Not everyone can be rich, and what people in their free time do doesn't concern me, because if they're gay, they're going to hell.
VoteEarly
22-02-2005, 01:41
That depends on your definition of "proof." An intelligent, logical, verifiable proof, no he doesn't

Does the Center for Disease Control count as intelligent, logical, verifiable proof?
Kahta
22-02-2005, 01:41
lol

Katha you are one of those solid gold flaimbaiters that makes the forum so entertaining.

Keep up the spread of ignorance and disinformation because it sure does make you look smart!


Its not ignorance, its the truth.

The reason I'm opposed to all gays, and anyone with AIDS/HIV in the military is because they are more likley to spread the disease in combat when blood starts flying.

I like how you can't debate on the facts, so you start calling names. Real mature.
Roach-Busters
22-02-2005, 01:42
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5133a1.htm

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5315a1.htm

http://www.niaid.nih.gov/factsheets/aidsstat.htm

Thanks.
Tummania
22-02-2005, 01:44
Why don't victims of Hepatitis C get the same flak as people with HIV from racist puritan yanks?
VoteEarly
22-02-2005, 01:44
The perfect America would be a white America divided by classes. Not everyone can be rich, and what people in their free time do doesn't concern me, because if they're gay, they're going to hell.

We need a caste system, but not rigid like India. If folks work hard, they ought to be allowed to advance in life.
Tummania
22-02-2005, 01:46
We need a caste system, but not rigid like India. If folks work hard, they ought to be allowed to advance in life.

:D
Please keep talking!
VoteEarly
22-02-2005, 01:46
Thanks.



http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/2004icr/11croi/docs/0301/030104_h.htm
CSW
22-02-2005, 01:52
Its not ignorance, its the truth.

The reason I'm opposed to all gays, and anyone with AIDS/HIV in the military is because they are more likley to spread the disease in combat when blood starts flying.

I like how you can't debate on the facts, so you start calling names. Real mature.
Because all gays have AIDS. Brilliant sherlock.
I_Hate_Cows
22-02-2005, 01:53
Does the Center for Disease Control count as intelligent, logical, verifiable proof?
Yeah, you want me to reference where it says the largest growing group for HIV infection is white people? (comparitive to previous years)
THE LOST PLANET
22-02-2005, 02:18
What an interesting mix of misinformation.

Kahta, keeping gays out of the military won't keep HIV out of it. More new cases of infection are in hetero's than gays. I believe the fastest growing group is hetero females, gays are actually declining in rates of new infections. Probably because they are more aware and careful. The old "it's a gay disease" hasn't applied for over a decade.

As for the number of infections in blacks, well sub-Saharan Africa is the hotbed of the world for HIV, and most people there are black. In the rest of the world I don't think they acount for a disportionate number of cases.

Especially when you factor in socio-economic status. A much more accurate indicator of likelyhood of infection is education and poverty. The uneducated and poor have more cases of infection, Blacks do make up a larger percentage of this group than the general population, which explains the slightly higher numbers. But a middle class suburban black is no more likely than a white of the same class to be infected. Poor uneducated urban people of all ethnicities have higher than average rates of infection.
Kahta
22-02-2005, 02:33
What an interesting mix of misinformation.

Kahta, keeping gays out of the military won't keep HIV out of it. More new cases of infection are in hetero's than gays. I believe the fastest growing group is hetero females, gays are actually declining in rates of new infections. Probably because they are more aware and careful. The old "it's a gay disease" hasn't applied for over a decade.

As for the number of infections in blacks, well sub-Saharan Africa is the hotbed of the world for HIV, and most people there are black. In the rest of the world I don't think they acount for a disportionate number of cases.

Especially when you factor in socio-economic status. A much more accurate indicator of likelyhood of infection is education and poverty. The uneducated and poor have more cases of infection, Blacks do make up a larger percentage of this group than the general population, which explains the slightly higher numbers. But a middle class suburban black is no more likely than a white of the same class to be infected. Poor uneducated urban people of all ethnicities have higher than average rates of infection.


They should still be kept out, because they're not conformists, homosexuality is a choice, all they need to do is think themselves straight.

They're more likley to get AIDS if they're stupid and have unprotected sex. Serves them right for fornicating anyways.

They are not uneducated, they are stupid, their IQ's are lower.

Arthur De Gobineau was a very good ethnologist, he knew what he was talking about.
CSW
22-02-2005, 02:35
They should still be kept out, because they're not conformists, homosexuality is a choice, all they need to do is think themselves straight.

They're more likley to get AIDS if they're stupid and have unprotected sex. Serves them right for fornicating anyways.

They are not uneducated, they are stupid, their IQ's are lower.

Arthur De Gobineau was a very good ethnologist, he knew what he was talking about.
Roflmao. Troll.
IDF
22-02-2005, 02:45
http://xtramsn.co.nz/news/0,,11965-4133689,00.html

bad idea. AIDS and HIV will be spread. BAD IDEA.
I don't care much here, but either way who cares? The English Navy is a joke running on 30 year old DDs with piss poor AA defenses (proven when the Argentinians successfully killed 3 of the DDs and 1 other ship.)

Their ships don't survive exocet missile hits well. Each of the four ships took only 1 hit and sank. Compare that to the USS Stark. She was a Perry class FFG that took two exocet missiles in port side. She survived taking twice the hits as the British ships. Her crew valiantly fought fires and flooding to save her and she was brought back to service and continued to do her job until her decomissioning in 2002. Sadly, 37 brave men died in the attacks.
Neo-Anarchists
22-02-2005, 02:48
They should still be kept out, because they're not conformists, homosexuality is a choice, all they need to do is think themselves straight.
Hmm, years of that never worked for me.
They are not uneducated, they are stupid, their IQ's are lower.
Ooh, thank you kindly for the personal insult!
:)
I'll have you know that my IQ is greater than 150.

EDIT:
Whoops, I misread your post, Kahta. I thought you were saying that homosexuals are stupid, not blacks.
I guess you can totally ignore the second half of this post.
Bottle
22-02-2005, 02:50
less than half of the HIV positive individuals in Britain are gay.

just thought i would remind everybody of that minor detail. carry on.
CSW
22-02-2005, 02:52
Hmm, years of that never worked for me.

Ooh, thank you kindly for the personal insult!
:)
I'll have you know that my IQ is greater than 150.
Imagine what it was before you were turned gay, you poor soul :(


(Because we all know just having a queer look at you makes one turn gay)
THE LOST PLANET
22-02-2005, 02:54
Hmm, years of that never worked for me.

Ooh, thank you kindly for the personal insult!
:)
I'll have you know that my IQ is greater than 150.I think the IQ jab was directed at blacks, the second part of my post.

Although I've never heard you discuss it now that I think about it. Your ethnicity I mean. You don't happen to be black do you Neo?
Neo-Anarchists
22-02-2005, 02:57
Imagine what it was before you were turned gay, you poor soul :(
Seeing as I'm transsexual as well as being attracted to the same sex, I must be doubly more stupid! (even though in general supposedly transsexuals have higher IQ, I'll see if I can find an article on it)

Since stupid would mean below average...
150 to 70 would be a change of -80.
Therefore, I must have been 160 IQ points smarter before!
That would give me an IQ greater than 310.

:D
Neo-Anarchists
22-02-2005, 02:58
I think the IQ jab was directed at blacks, the second part of my post.
Ah, I see that you seem to be right.
Damn, I was having fun wtih the IQ thing.
Although I've never heard you discuss it now that I think about it. Your ethnicity I mean. You don't happen to be black do you Neo?
Nope. White, mostly Irish.
Roach-Busters
22-02-2005, 03:00
That would give me an IQ greater than 310.

:D

:eek:
CSW
22-02-2005, 03:07
Seeing as I'm transsexual as well as being attracted to the same sex, I must be doubly more stupid! (even though in general supposedly transsexuals have higher IQ, I'll see if I can find an article on it)

Since stupid would mean below average...
150 to 70 would be a change of -80.
Therefore, I must have been 160 IQ points smarter before!
That would give me an IQ greater than 310.

:D
Wait, do you like your old gender or your new one? I must say that's quite a trick to be transsexual and like your new gender as well.
Dakini
22-02-2005, 03:11
bad idea. AIDS and HIV will be spread. BAD IDEA.
AIDS IS NOT A GAY DISEASE!

The highest rate of new infection is among heterosexual women.
Bottle
22-02-2005, 03:13
AIDS IS NOT A GAY DISEASE!

The highest rate of new infection is among heterosexual women.
in this day and age, in view of the global pandemic of STDs facing us, i think that any person who believes AIDS is a gay disease should be required to register their genitals as a deadly weapon...their ignorance represents a clear and present danger to public health and safety.
THE LOST PLANET
22-02-2005, 03:23
Arthur De Gobineau was a very good ethnologist, he knew what he was talking about. Y'know, I was taking you serious until you threw this little gem in.

Too over the top.



For the rest of NS, De Gobineau came up with the model of the "Master Race" that Hitler used. His writings were the nazi gospel on race.
Neo-Anarchists
22-02-2005, 03:35
Wait, do you like your old gender or your new one? I must say that's quite a trick to be transsexual and like your new gender as well.
My new one.
It's not really a trick, it's just that I always was attracted to girls rather than guys.
Bodies Without Organs
22-02-2005, 03:35
It's the navy, for God's sake. It's not like there weren't any homosexuals in it before.

"Don't talk to me of naval tradition, its all rum, sodomy and the lash"
- Churchill
CSW
22-02-2005, 03:45
My new one.
It's not really a trick, it's just that I always was attracted to girls rather than guys.
Ah, well a trick in the sense of...interesting.
Engineering chaos
22-02-2005, 03:46
I'm impressed. Somehow you know all gays have HIV and that they will be shagging everyone they can. Well done guys. Seriously I doubt this will change anything that wasn't already happening.
Bodies Without Organs
22-02-2005, 03:48
Kahta: what's your opinion on lesbians being welcomed into the Royal Navy? So far you seem to have exhibited a marked fascination with the male side of things...
I_Hate_Cows
22-02-2005, 03:49
Kahta: what's your opinion on lesbians being welcomed into the Royal Navy? So far you seem to have exhibited a marked fascination with the male side of things...
Shh, you'll be reported for accusing him of being gay.
Engineering chaos
22-02-2005, 03:49
Actually where the hell has "recruiting Gays" come from! They are merely recruiting; the fact is that gays are now allowed to join.
Anarchic Conceptions
22-02-2005, 03:50
Kahta: what's your opinion on lesbians being welcomed into the Royal Navy? So far you seem to have exhibited a marked fascination with the male side of things...
Since he probably still has you on his block list I think I'd better quote this ;)
I_Hate_Cows
22-02-2005, 03:51
Actually where the hell has "recruiting Gays" come from! They are merely recruiting; the fact is that gays are now allowed to join.
The depths of Kahta's imagination that everyone is explicitly out to do things with people he hates
CSW
22-02-2005, 03:53
Don't lesbians have a far lower HIV infection rate then the society at large? So shouldn't we be trying to stock our navy with lesbians?
Bodies Without Organs
22-02-2005, 03:54
Shh, you'll be reported for accusing him of being gay.

No, no, I just want to know if he shares the same opinion of lesbianism as Queen Victoria: certainly throughout this thread for all the mention he has made of them that would seem to be the case - for example he is concerned that men will join up so as to meet men, whereas the fact that women might join up to meet women doesn't seem to be a pressing concern to him.
Engineering chaos
22-02-2005, 03:56
No, no, I just want to know if he shares the same opinion of lesbianism as Queen Victoria: certainly throughout this thread for all the mention he has made of them that would seem to be the case - for example he is concerned that men will join up so as to meet men, whereas the fact that women might join up to meet women doesn't seem to be a pressing concern to him.
Well he wouldn't would he! If he is not thinking with it, he is acting directly on it's behalf!
New Fuglies
22-02-2005, 03:56
Don't lesbians have a far lower HIV infection rate then the society at large? So shouldn't we be trying to stock our navy with lesbians?

More proof lebsians are God's chosen people. :D
Bodies Without Organs
22-02-2005, 03:56
Don't lesbians have a far lower HIV infection rate then the society at large? So shouldn't we be trying to stock our navy with lesbians?

Lets just step back from the precipice here: any statistical distribution of who has a higher rate of HIV infection is utterly irrelevant. What may be relevant is if a particular person in the armed forces is HIV positive or not.
UpwardThrust
22-02-2005, 03:56
Many gay men do have the HIV and the AIDs in them, correct?
higher percentage in strait affrican males ... does that mean they should not be accepted?
Bitchkitten
22-02-2005, 04:02
Perhaps Kahta feels he has a particuliar reason to fear getting AIDS from gay males. :eek:
United Vaults
22-02-2005, 04:26
http://xtramsn.co.nz/news/0,,11965-4133689,00.html

bad idea. AIDS and HIV will be spread. BAD IDEA.
Congratulations: YOU'RE RETARDED
VoteEarly
22-02-2005, 04:29
Y'know, I was taking you serious until you threw this little gem in.

Too over the top.



For the rest of NS, De Gobineau came up with the model of the "Master Race" that Hitler used. His writings were the nazi gospel on race.


The Inequality of Human Races by Count Charles Arthur De Gobineau, is possibly the greatest piece of sociological and ethnological science ever written.
CSW
22-02-2005, 04:31
The Inequality of Human Races by Count Charles Arthur De Gobineau, is possibly the greatest piece of sociological and ethnological science ever written.
FLLAAMMMEEEEEBAIIITTTT.
United Vaults
22-02-2005, 04:31
Its not ignorance, its the truth.

The reason I'm opposed to all gays, and anyone with AIDS/HIV in the military is because they are more likley to spread the disease in combat when blood starts flying.

I like how you can't debate on the facts, so you start calling names. Real mature.
Not all gays have aids. It's just you always hear about the ones that do have it.
Also, the reason you only hear about gay guys getting aids is because moralistic nuts are just looking for any excuse they can to try and beat down gayity.
UpwardThrust
22-02-2005, 04:32
The Inequality of Human Races by Count Charles Arthur De Gobineau, is possibly the greatest piece of sociological and ethnological science ever written.
Come give me a kiss you little flamer you :fluffle: :fluffle: :fluffle:
Eichen
22-02-2005, 04:38
This whole conversation makes me sick to my stomache.

Gays will give the Royal Navy HIV? WTF? Like military boys don't catch every fucking available disease without gay help?

Anyone against their integration, you are fucktards. Bigot fucktards of the worst kind.

Gays have every right to die for your country as someone who puts their pecker elsewhere.
If you complain, please enroll and show us what a str8 man can do for their country, preferably on the front line.
To prove your heterovalour, of course.
THE LOST PLANET
22-02-2005, 04:39
The Inequality of Human Races by Count Charles Arthur De Gobineau, is possibly the greatest piece of sociological and ethnological science ever written.
There's so much wrong with the statement above I don't know where to begin.




So I'll just point out that there is no "ethnological science".

At least none recognized by anyone who doesn't hold the same assinine, racist beliefs that De Gobineau did.

To put it in perspective for the rest of NS, if you're interested in reading the essays VoteEarly refers to, Stormfront has a link to them on their site.
UpwardThrust
22-02-2005, 04:41
There's so much wrong with the statement above I don't know where to begin.




So I'll just point out that there is no "ethnological science".

At least none recognized by anyone who doesn't hold the same assinine, racist beliefs that De Gobineau did.

To put it in perspective for the rest of NS, if you're interested in reading the essays VoteEarly refers to, Stormfront has a link to them on their site.
Wow stormfront ... I did not know the refferences he was making but I am aware of stormfront
THE LOST PLANET
22-02-2005, 04:48
Wow stormfront ... I did not know the refferences he was making but I am aware of stormfrontOk, I know. I bit on on VE's little troll, you don't have to rub it in.
New Foxxinnia
22-02-2005, 04:52
How do they know they're gay? How do they know they're not straight?
Eichen
22-02-2005, 04:52
So I'll just point out that there is no "ethnological science".
Thanks for saying that. Someone needed to.
It's quotable.
UpwardThrust
22-02-2005, 04:53
Ok, I know. I bit on on VE's little troll, you don't have to rub it in.
I was not trying to rub it in I was really suprized he would be blatent enough to pull from stormfront (sorry did not mean to seem sarcastic)
Rarne
22-02-2005, 04:53
What scares me is that Kahta actually thinks like this. There are people who actually believe statements like this. This is absolutely terrifying and I think we're taking this way too lightly.
THE LOST PLANET
22-02-2005, 04:59
I was not trying to rub it in I was really suprized he would be blatent enough to pull from stormfront (sorry did not mean to seem sarcastic)I actually think VE's having a little fun and wasn't serious in his original post, something I missed at first. Your post came up right after I came to this conclusion.


So naturally.........



Oh nevermind.

*wanders off muttering*
VoteEarly
22-02-2005, 05:27
FLLAAMMMEEEEEBAIIITTTT.


How? It's a book I really like. Are you okay?
Kahta
22-02-2005, 05:27
The depths of Kahta's imagination that everyone is explicitly out to do things with people he hates

Who is your ex-nation?
THE LOST PLANET
22-02-2005, 05:35
How? It's a book I really like. Are you okay?Ok I know you can't be serious.


White punks with shaved heads and guys in white sheets are the only reason that book hasn't been lost to the trash heap of history.
VoteEarly
22-02-2005, 05:43
Ok I know you can't be serious.


White punks with shaved heads and guys in white sheets are the only reason that book hasn't been lost to the trash heap of history.


I wear a suit and tie and am in a school of business, I'm not some poor trash with a shaved head. I have a proper haircut and a fine upbringing with proper manners and etiquette.
Kahta
22-02-2005, 05:48
Ok I know you can't be serious.


White punks with shaved heads and guys in white sheets are the only reason that book hasn't been lost to the trash heap of history.


I don't have a shaved head, those are for poor people that can't afford to keep their hair kept right. I have class, I keep my hair not too short, and not too long. I'm neither a punk, nor am I a member of the KKK, nor do I ever intend to become one, thats an organization for people that don't look at the problems, and just want to think they're "cool"
UpwardThrust
22-02-2005, 05:54
I wear a suit and tie and am in a school of business, I'm not some poor trash with a shaved head. I have a proper haircut and a fine upbringing with proper manners and etiquette.
Yet you have trouble treating others equaly ... not good manners by my book

And what is the proper haircut? I shave my head sometimes (not now but ehh) so what?
THE LOST PLANET
22-02-2005, 06:01
I don't have a shaved head, those are for poor people that can't afford to keep their hair kept right. I have class, I keep my hair not too short, and not too long. I'm neither a punk, nor am I a member of the KKK, nor do I ever intend to become one, thats an organization for people that don't look at the problems, and just want to think they're "cool"Thanks for the pointless information on your hairstyle.

And the little dance you did around the subject wasn't bad either.

I didn't say you were a skinhead or a member of the KKK, I said that those guys were the reason that the particular piece of drival we've been talking about is not just a footnote in an infamous and unfortunate bit of history.

But I think you know that.
THE LOST PLANET
22-02-2005, 06:04
I wear a suit and tie and am in a school of business, I'm not some poor trash with a shaved head. I have a proper haircut and a fine upbringing with proper manners and etiquette.You should check with Emily Post.


I don't think racist views are considered proper etiquette or good manners. ;)
Kahta
22-02-2005, 06:11
I don't think racist views are considered proper etiquette or good manners. ;)

What does that have anything to do with saying "please or thank you"?

Plently of "equal opportunists" like yourself are very rude, as are most people on NS, as soon as I come around, they get rude because they don't agree with me. I always have good manners and proper etiquette, even around people I know I'm better than (whites, blacks, and mexicans, race doesn't matter I'm polite to everyone) in case you're wondering.
Kahta
22-02-2005, 06:12
Yet you have trouble treating others equaly ... not good manners by my book

And what is the proper haircut? I shave my head sometimes (not now but ehh) so what?


Treating other's equally does not necesitate manners. Most people [wrongly] think that all races are equal, and all people are equal, and they have no manners, or class.
THE LOST PLANET
22-02-2005, 06:21
What does that have anything to do with saying "please or thank you"?

Plently of "equal opportunists" like yourself are very rude, as are most people on NS, as soon as I come around, they get rude because they don't agree with me. I always have good manners and proper etiquette, even around people I know I'm better than (whites, blacks, and mexicans, race doesn't matter I'm polite to everyone) in case you're wondering.Thanks for the info. I'll update my social register.





*Adds "arrogant" in front of "asshole" next to Kahta's name*
UpwardThrust
22-02-2005, 06:33
Treating other's equally does not necesitate manners. Most people [wrongly] think that all races are equal, and all people are equal, and they have no manners, or class.
Lets use your statement
A lot of people [wrongly] think that all races should not legaly be treated equal, and that all people are not equal, some of them also have no manners, or class
Antebellum South
22-02-2005, 06:39
Cool, you could sign up and swab the poop decks.
:D
JRV
22-02-2005, 06:43
Hmmm… the link is to a New Zealand site.
Preebles
22-02-2005, 06:49
About time is all I have to say.
Bitchkitten
22-02-2005, 08:13
I think we should have a special season of Survivor. Cast consisting of maybe VoteEarly, Commando2, JesusSaves or whoever. Maybe Wadd could join them, or maybe not. There probably isn't need for comic relief. They could whittle down the numbers by something other than voting them out. Hmmm. Just musing. And amusing myself. Sort of mental mastrubation.
Cogitation
22-02-2005, 16:05
I don't have time to investigate this. iLock pending Moderator review of this complaint (http://www.forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=399744).

--The Modified Democratic States of Cogitation