NationStates Jolt Archive

how should any country handly some one raping or perpuring sex acts on childern and teenagers?

i believe the child that the act was do to has the right to kill the man or woman that did it to them...

if the child can not for any reason then the takes of killing is up to the parents to kill the person that did the act...

if it is a one of the parents that did the act to thier child then that parents should never be alowed to have any more childern and should be catstaied and/or shot by the child or other parent...


- i open the floor to idleas on how to make them pay and how to tstop it all togeter

p.s. i know my views are very exstriam in these matters, and thank you

I remembered another one!

Why did Michael Jackson go to WalMart?

He heard boys underwear was half off.

Now that was coherent, thoughtfull and presented rather suave.
Not.

how should any country handle some one raping or performing (perpetrating?) sex acts on children and teenagers?

i believe the child that the act was done to has the right to kill the man or woman that did it to them...

if the child can not for any reason then the task of killing is up to the parents to kill the person that did the act...

if it is one of the parents that did the act to thier child then that parent should never be allowed to have any more children and should be castrated and/or shot by the child or other parent...

- i open the floor to ideas on how to make them pay and how to stop it all together

p.s. i know my views are very extreme in these matters, and thank you

I'm not judging the content of the post, I just thought it would be a good idea to edit it in order to make it easier to understand.

Jesussaves...is that you? VoteEarly? This all seems so familiar..."Bottle, get in here and see if I'm close..."

What's an aboue? Is it like Caillou?

I think all children should be sealed in airtight containers for their protection and to preserve their freshness. :D

I dont believe that 'having the right' to kill the perpetrator of the crime is helpful to such children. I'm not convinced that the perpetrator being killed is necessarily helpful to such children. I dont think it is a good idea.

If the perpetrator is caught in the act and/or there is video and DNA evidence then just shoot the sick fuck.

If I was on a jury and a kid was on trial for killing his/her molester, I wouldn't convict.

If the perpetrator is caught in the act and/or there is video and DNA evidence then just shoot the sick fuck.
a quick death is too good for a peadophile

a quick death is too good for a peadophile
Perhaps, but it gets the job done. They can never prey on a young innocent again.

I might have agreed with you if your arguement was a little bit better thought out, and had better grammar and spelling.

That aside. Whether you like it or not, a person must be convicted of a crime in a court of law before anything is done. Vigilante justice is no justice at all, no matter how perverse the crime.

I think peadophiles should get governmental scolarships to be able to live out the remainders of their lives in Miami beach houses.

Perhaps, but it gets the job done. They can never prey on a young innocent again.
just lock them in a cell for the rest of their lives, with no food and barely enough water (so there lives wont really be that long)

alone

While I would never convict a child accused of killing his/her abuser, I think locking them (the abuser) up and throwing away the key would be sufficient.

"how should any country handly some one raping or perpuring sex acts on childern and teenagers? "
--------------------------------------



Pedophilia should be dealt with harshly, and with supreme prejudice.

Personally I don't believe anyone who gets off on little kids can be rehabilitated. They might refrain from it.. but will still have thoughts and urges. But more times than not it's just a matter of time before they will do it again.

Therefore I don't think they should get a slap on the wrist with some counceling and be let back out on the streets.

Angers me greatly when I read about someone who got busted with some personal use marajuana in their home (or something of a similar unthreatening crime) are still sitting in prison while child molestors (and similar threatening crimes) are going in and out of jail like it has revolving doors.
---------------------------------------


Consentual sex between two teens is usually just that. Can be a grey area > 19 with a 13 yr old? Hmm .. dunno. Too far of an age gap IMO.

An adult having consentual sex with a teen.. also a grey area. It depends heavily on the age gap > 20 year old has consentual sex with a 17 yr old. The 20 yr old shouldn't be portrayed as a pedophile.

By 16 and 17 most are aware enough to consent (unless they have some sort of emotional/mental disability). Many are aware earlier than that.

A 20 year old having sex with a 10 yr old is a 20 yr old pedophile. 10 is too young for rightful consent and something is wrong that person wanting to go with someone who hasn't even lost all their baby teeth or reached puberty.

Some kids become sexually active (more like curious) at 9 and 10. And they fool around with other 9 and 10yr olds.

Many married couples met and were sexually active young. Just because the future husband had sex with his future wife when he was 19 and she was 16 or vise versa, doesn't make them a sexual predator.

When in that grey area it should be dealt with on a case by case basis using common sense.


Rapist by all means should be dealt with harshly.

Although I hate to appear to defend pædophiles, don't you think psychological treatment may be a better idea than killing them? And remember, pædos don't just appear on their own. Social conditions and parenting play a huge rôle in their development.

I think all children should be sealed in airtight containers for their protection and to preserve their freshness. :D

Oops. I forgot to poke holes for them to breath. :D

Do you know there's a japanese vacuuming aphyxiation fetish? Where they put girls into a plastic see-through bag and vacuum out all the air, then let them suffocate in there for about a minute before releasing them.

Do you know there's a japanese vacuuming aphyxiation fetish? Where they put girls into a plastic see-through bag and vacuum out all the air, then let them suffocate in there for about a minute before releasing them.

I know, Japan seems to suffer from a preternaturally high level of paraphilia. Tokyo must be even more authoritarian than the deep south (which would probably make it downright totalitarian). I've heard that pædophilia is endemic in Japan.

Authoritarian? Totalitarian? What does that have to do with anything? Explain more?

There was a freak in Denver who was caught just a few minutes ago. He (or it, more correctly) perpetrated six sexual assaults in the last week. In one of the incidents, the victims were a grandmother and her granddaughters. I had mixed feelings about the capture- happy that the sick b@stard was caught, but dissapointed that he was captured alive. But he'll get it in jail. :D

Although I hate to appear to defend pædophiles, don't you think psychological treatment may be a better idea than killing them? And remember, pædos don't just appear on their own. Social conditions and parenting play a huge rôle in their development.Only pedophiles use the æ character.

Solution: Move 'em to Gitmo, or ship off to Syria. ^_^

Oops. I forgot to poke holes for them to breath. :D

Do you know there's a japanese vacuuming aphyxiation fetish? Where they put girls into a plastic see-through bag and vacuum out all the air, then let them suffocate in there for about a minute before releasing them.

Nutty. :)

Only pedophiles use the æ character.
LOL

sexal aboues of childern.
how should any country handly some one raping or perpuring sex acts on childern and teenagers?

i believe the child that the act was do to has the right to kill the man or woman that did it to them...

if the child can not for any reason then the takes of killing is up to the parents to kill the person that did the act...

if it is a one of the parents that did the act to thier child then that parents should never be alowed to have any more childern and should be catstaied and/or shot by the child or other parent...


- i open the floor to idleas on how to make them pay and how to tstop it all togeter

p.s. i know my views are very exstriam in these matters, and thank you
have you seen the anal sex/english lessons swedish video?

Why doesn't anyone use chemical castration? Without the...um...urges they're safe.

I might have agreed with you if your arguement was a little bit better thought out, and had better grammar and spelling.

That aside. Whether you like it or not, a person must be convicted of a crime in a court of law before anything is done. Vigilante justice is no justice at all, no matter how perverse the crime.

Hear, hear! I do believe this is why we have a criminal justice system in the first place. Granted it isn't perfect, but name one thing that humans have done that is.

Also, as was mentioned earlier, killing the offender is not a good solution. The child is going to be overwhelmed with confusing emotions, and those cannot always be fixed with a bullet, knife, or lethal injection.

In fact, the child might think that they did something in order to cause the person to die, and then would carry the weight of that burden forever. It's not rational, but neither are humans.

Why doesn't anyone use chemical castration? Without the...um...urges they're safe.

Better yet, ACTUAL castration. You know, lop off their best mate, thereby preventing them from re-offending? Or simply put them in with the general prison population. Paedophiles are reviled above almost everyone on the inside, most of them would last about 5 minutes.

Prisons are too full as it is and some pc program would give them a 'cover crime' etc.
I think actual castration would come under 'cruel and unusual'

Why doesn't anyone use chemical castration? Without the...um...urges they're safe.
Not necessarily. While they might no longer be able to get direct sexual pleasure from the act they might still do it if they are the type who like to inflict suffering upon others.

yar, pirates go to court to much because the dumb children blame their problems on me. But I shoot the children with me cannons :mp5:

Only pedophiles use the æ character.

It was once used all the time for borrowed words that had ae in them. Old encyclopædias often have it on them. Does that make people from that time all pædophiles?

Authoritarian? Totalitarian? What does that have to do with anything? Explain more?

I have this theory that authoritarianism causes paraphilias. TG me for details.

Rapists and sex offenders should be publicly castrated without anesthesia, with butter knives, then hot tar should be applied to stem the bleeding.

(Mods, if this post is too graphic, I'll gladly delete it.)

Why doesn't anyone use chemical castration? Without the...um...urges they're safe.


Because, as I understand it, chemical castration, while it might keep them from being able to 'get it up' , it will not prevent them from wanting to use it.

And someone that unbalanced WILL find a way to rape, even if the scumbag rapist doesn't use its own equiptment on the victim.

Casteration is all well and good, but what if, by some wild chance, the rapist/pedophile was a woman?

Do we cut off her boobs or something?

What I find interesting about this series of posts is that although everyone here has been using the word pedophile (thus admitting that this is a mental condition), most still choose to inflict torture on the people who suffer from this mental condition.

In my opinion, people who commit crimes because of a mental condition they suffer from need to be imprisoned in a mental institution where they can get the help they need. Whether they are ever let out or not depends entirely on the nature of the crime. Someone who brutally rapes a child should obviously never be released from a mental institution, but one who only fondled a child and can be rehabilitated should eventually be released.

What I find interesting about this series of posts is that although everyone here has been using the word pedophile (thus admitting that this is a mental condition), most still choose to inflict torture on the people who suffer from this mental condition.

In my opinion, people who commit crimes because of a mental condition they suffer from need to be imprisoned in a mental institution where they can get the help they need. Whether they are ever let out or not depends entirely on the nature of the crime. Someone who brutally rapes a child should obviously never be released from a mental institution, but one who only fondled a child and can be rehabilitated should eventually be released.

Exactly. In Japan, pædophilia is extremely common. Should we send an army armed with machetes and kill or castrate Japanese salarymen who have engaged in enjo kosai?

Exactly. In Japan, pædophilia is extremely common. Should we send an army armed with machetes and kill or castrate Japanese salarymen who have engaged in enjo kosai?

Pedophilia be damned! I'd send them in just for the entertainment! :)

I don't post often, but I have been a foster father for 4 sexually abused little girls...ages 4-10. I don't believe that anyone who sexually abuses a child can be rehabilitated and I don't want to support their sorry butts in prison or a mental institute. When convicted, they should be executed, not by the child and not in the presence of the child...this isn't revenge, it is ridding the world of a dangerous animal.

I don't post often, but I have been a foster father for 4 sexually abused little girls...ages 4-10. I don't believe that anyone who sexually abuses a child can be rehabilitated and I don't want to support their sorry butts in prison or a mental institute. When convicted, they should be executed, not by the child and not in the presence of the child...this isn't revenge, it is ridding the world of a dangerous animal.

Even if it means a holocaust on Japan? (Ask Daistallia2104 about the pædophilia thing).

Pedophile != Child Molester.

90% of Child Molestation is commited by Non pedophiles.

Pedophiles are just sexually attracted to children. They don't necessarily have sex with them.

The ticking "time-bomb" argument is a fallacy, namely due to the basis on which it rests - that a Pedophile is a sex addict - this is simply untrue. Sexual Addiction is a problem in and of itself, and exists with all sexual orientations, Hetero, Homo, and Pedo - it is not a concept exclusive to pedophilia.

Of course due to people misunderstanding this, a pedophile who is public about his attraction will have an impossible time finding a job, finding friends, and even family will desert them, meaning he will be cut off from other contacts, causing him to be lonely. This is an unhealthy state of being for anyone, and anyone who is cut off from human contact ends up with issues.

Yet people believe being a Pedophile is the problem. People are ignorant.

Pedophile != Child Molester.

90% of Child Molestation is commited by Non pedophiles.

Pedophiles are just sexually attracted to children. They don't necessarily have sex with them.

The ticking "time-bomb" argument is a fallacy, namely due to the basis on which it rests - that a Pedophile is a sex addict - this is simply untrue. Sexual Addiction is a problem in and of itself, and exists with all sexual orientations, Hetero, Homo, and Pedo - it is not a concept exclusive to pedophilia.

Of course due to people misunderstanding this, a pedophile who is public about his attraction will have an impossible time finding a job, finding friends, and even family will desert them, meaning he will be cut off from other contacts, causing him to be lonely. This is an unhealthy state of being for anyone, and anyone who is cut off from human contact ends up with issues.

Yet people believe being a Pedophile is the problem. People are ignorant.
Wait a second. Pedophile is someone who is sexually attracted to children according to your post. Then you say that 90% of kids who are molested are molested by non-pedophiles. That doesn't make sense. Why would someone not attracted to little kids want to molest them? That would be like me going around grabbing guy's asses. I don't because I'm not gay.

I guess this means we need to nuke Japan again to get rid of the lolicon.

...I have been a foster father for 4 sexually abused little girls...ages 4-10. I don't believe that anyone who sexually abuses a child can be rehabilitated and I don't want to support their sorry butts in prison or a mental institute. When convicted, they should be executed, not by the child and not in the presence of the child...this isn't revenge, it is ridding the world of a dangerous animal.

I have just two words for those who engage in truly criminal pedophilia, and I'm not talking about the aforementioned "gray" areas:

Frontal lobotomy.

Primarily because Rape is about power/violence.. not about sexual attraction.

Heck, I'm not the one who made these figures up.

FBI did...

http://web.archive.org/web/20010502193516/http://www.valleyadvocate.com/articles/pedophile.html