NationStates Jolt Archive

Recently I received an email from someone saying that Condi is the only person who could be Hillary Clinton.
I could think of thousands of other people who could be Clinton if they were on the ballot. Specially since Hillary is extremist anti american commie.

She's certainly a big enough liar to be president. Seems to be the only quality our last few presidents share.

Recently I received an email from someone saying that Condi is the only person who could be Hillary Clinton.
I could think of thousands of other people who could be Clinton if they were on the ballot. Specially since Hillary is extremist anti american commie.
Roflmao whitter, you get wittier every time you open your mouth.

Specially since Hillary is extremist anti american commie.
Objectivness is such a beautiful thing, isn't it?

Recently I received an email from someone saying that Condi is the only person who could be Hillary Clinton.
I could think of thousands of other people who could be Clinton if they were on the ballot. Specially since Hillary is extremist anti american commie.

And I thought Hillary was the only person who could be Hillary Clinton. Does that mean Condi Rice is an extremist anti american commie?

Why don't we first concentrate on getting a non-Christian rich white male into office?

If either of them make it to the white house in 2008, I just might move to the Great White North myself...

If the qualifications for President are not having any job skills for the position you have, willingness to to blindly follow a poor leader for the sake of money, and a general disregard to the American public, and a willingness to blatantly LIE to them...

...Then yes, Condi is perfect for the job.

Why don't we first concentrate on getting a non-Christian rich white male into office?


We got one.

His name is George.

If the qualifications for President are not having any job skills for the position you have, willingness to to blindly follow a poor leader for the sake of money, and a general disregard to the American public, and a willingness to blatantly LIE to them...

...Then yes, Condi is perfect for the job.

Those must be the qualifications. That's what we have now.

We got one.

His name is George.

He's not Christian?

Recently I received an email from someone saying that Condi is the only person who could be Hillary Clinton.
I could think of thousands of other people who could be Clinton if they were on the ballot. Specially since Hillary is extremist anti american commie.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v427/vonbek/tard1.gif <----- person who sent you the email

1 Hillary can't win. You think people in the red states hated Kerry? Wait till they get a load of Hillary and the attack ads aimed at her.

2 Condi can't win. Sad as it is, a huge number of people won't vote for a black person for president. Another huge number of people won't vote for a woman president. There is some overlap between the two groups, but it's not complete overlap.

3 Our next president will be either Howard Dean, or Tom DeLay. I'm hoping for Dean.

Specially since Hillary is[sic!] extremist anti american[sic!] commie.

Oh, Whittier, that's such poor trolling. Cookie denied!

1 Hillary can't win. You think people in the red states hated Kerry? Wait till they get a load of Hillary and the attack ads aimed at her.

2 Condi can't win. Sad as it is, a huge number of people won't vote for a black person for president. Another huge number of people won't vote for a woman president. There is some overlap between the two groups, but it's not complete overlap.

3 Our next president will be either Howard Dean, or Tom DeLay. I'm hoping for Dean.

Dean has no chance mate....for all the wrong reasons he is associated with the 'Dean Scream'....

Hils will run in the Primaries and prob get the nomination and loose in the Electoral College.

I'd love to see McCain run as an independent...

But then I'd rather see all pols lined up against the wall so who am I say anything! DOH!

Dean has no chance mate....for all the wrong reasons he is associated with the 'Dean Scream'....

Hils will run in the Primaries and prob get the nomination and loose in the Electoral College.

I'd love to see McCain run as an independent...

But then I'd rather see all pols lined up against the wall so who am I say anything! DOH!
McCain is a good choice, but he's wedded to the Republican party, and they will never elect him.

McCain is a good choice, but he's wedded to the Republican party, and they will never elect him.

Don't be too sure of that....

http://www.azdailysun.com/non_sec/nav_includes/story.cfm?storyID=103160

Several veteran Republican lawmakers want voters to give up their right to choose who gets to run for the U.S. Senate.

The proposed constitutional amendment would have each party's elected state legislators choose its nominees. Voters would get their say only at the general election, selecting among the party chosen and any independents who still would be able to get their names on the ballot.

Rep. Russell Pearce, R-Mesa, who crafted the measure, said the change would make whoever is elected more beholden to the state's interests. But Pearce said it also would force Arizona's senators to hew a little closer to the line of the party that chose them.

According to Pearce, the current system of nomination by primary leads to the election of senators who do not give proper respect for states' rights. He said requiring would-be nominees to gain the support of state legislators would make them more likely to oppose legislation imposing new requirements and costs on the states.

Pearce insisted he's not unhappy with either of the state's two senators. But he suggested the change he wants might affect the chances of Sen.
John McCain to get the party's nod if and when he runs for reelection in 2010.

"Maybe he'd have to cater to the Republican principles if he did," said Pearce. He has openly disagreed with McCain on several issues, including immigration, border security and gun rights.

"John's a little weak on a couple of those issues," he said.

So what would happen if Pearce pushes through his change?

"Would I vote for John McCain if there were a better candidate?" Pearce asked rhetorically. "That's a tough call."

Sen. Bob Burns, R-Peoria, co-sponsoring the bill with Pearce, agreed the change probably would lead to "more responsive" Arizona senators in Congress "if there was at least the concern that they might have some serious challenges brought in from another angle if they didn't address the states' rights issue."

Would he vote for McCain if the decision were left to state lawmakers?

"That's a hypothetical I'm not prepared to answer," Burns responded. Burns said while he has some disagreements with the state's senior senator on issues, at least McCain has a record.

Neither McCain nor Sen. Jon Kyl returned calls seeking comment.

Four other veteran GOP lawmakers also signed on the bill as supporters.

Pearce said if he had his way voters would have no say at all about who are the state's two U.S. senators.

He would prefer to have them chosen directly by the Legislature, the way it was when the original U.S. Constitution was adopted. But that option was foreclosed with the adoption of the 17th Amendment to in 1913 which guarantees voters a voice.

I say only this: Screw Hillary and screw Condi.
I'm voting for McCain or Powell.

I say only this: Screw Hillary and screw Condi.
I'm voting for McCain or Powell.

Powell is tarnished goods....failed to stand up to the Bushco