Why Is This??
Liberal Robenia
07-02-2005, 07:28
OK.. this is what I don't understand.
I basically povide my people everything economically, so shouldnt it be a socialist nation or something and not a Capatalizt. The tax rate is 100% and my economy is Powerhouse, I just don't understand.. I DON'T UNDERSTAND!!!
See everyone? Even the Canadians have problems running their government.
Panhandlia
07-02-2005, 07:31
Mine should be a Libertarian paradise, or Capitalizt...yet it shows as Inoffensive Centrist Democracy...go figure.
Liberal Robenia
07-02-2005, 07:35
42
Really.... I'd say 51
Really.... I'd say 51
nono....42 is right.
Armed Bookworms
07-02-2005, 07:37
Really.... I'd say 51
Nope, 42's correct.
Neo-Anarchists
07-02-2005, 07:37
Mine should be a Libertarian paradise, or Capitalizt...yet it shows as Inoffensive Centrist Democracy...go figure.
Mine is supposed to be an anarchy, but somehow it turned into a New York Times Democracy while I wasn't looking. Go figure.
Those damn democracies, always sneaking up behind you when you aren't looking...
Liberal Robenia
07-02-2005, 07:41
Mine is supposed to be an anarchy, but somehow it turned into a New York Times Democracy while I wasn't looking. Go figure.
Those damn democracies, always sneaking up behind you when you aren't looking...
So..uh.. If the people want to have a fascist, communist, or anarchist government, would it still be a democracy??
And anarchy is like a democracy, isn't it? Hell, if a majority wants something they can take it, lol.
MissDefied
07-02-2005, 07:46
Your decisions when taking positions have far-reaching ramifications, the likes of which you really have to think hard about to conceive. Welcome to the game. It has its limitations.
Here's a question I'd really like to know; how do you shape your nation's social and economic position as you play the game? I know your nation's population goes up the more posts you have, but do you have the play Earth (I-VI) in order to shape it more finely?
Armed Bookworms
07-02-2005, 07:59
Mine is supposed to be an anarchy, but somehow it turned into a New York Times Democracy while I wasn't looking. Go figure.
Those damn democracies, always sneaking up behind you when you aren't looking...
Proof positive that the New York Times is evil incarnate.
Robbopolis
07-02-2005, 09:14
So..uh.. If the people want to have a fascist, communist, or anarchist government, would it still be a democracy??
And anarchy is like a democracy, isn't it? Hell, if a majority wants something they can take it, lol.
I suppose so. After all, Hitler was elected democratically.