Willamena
26-01-2005, 15:19
This was written on another forum by a fellow in response to the statement, "I don't see how people can be Christian and liberal at the same time." Feel free to offer your insights.
Why I'm a "conservative" Christian who votes Democrat. (txt)
I put "conservative" in quotes because that term has a lot of political meanings attached to it that don't necessarily describe me. I believe in God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, ever three and ever one. I believe that Jesus Christ was God incarnate upon the earth, who showed us how to live by his life, redeemed us from captivity to sin by his death, and demonstrated God's power over darkness and death by his resurrection. I believe that humankind is inherently sinful and separated by God, and is unable to restore itself by its own efforts, but only through the grace of God as expressed through Christ. I believe that the Bible is the inspired word of God. That's what I mean when I say I am a "conservative" Christian. Strip away any political meanings you may have attached to that. Perhaps "orthodox" is a better word. Anyway, now that that's out of the way:
The first, and deepest problem is that the Republican party has a number of beliefs that are at odds with Biblical teaching, regardless of what many conservatives would have you think. The conservative mindset is focused on the individual -- individual rights, individual responsibilities, individual consequences. I've heard several talk about people reaping what they sow, that the wealthy deserve their riches and that the poor deserve their plight. Lassiez-faire capitalism, which relies on human greed, is never questioned. This is in stark contrast to the Scriptures, which teach that people should live lives of service and self-sacrifice. In the Bible, it is the wealthy who are condemned, and the poor who are declared blessed. The heart of Biblical instruction is a focus on a collective good, not individual good. One can find dozens of teachings on serving others, both spiritually and physically; one would be hard pressed to find passages that praise individual or personal gain in a material sense, and in fact there are many passages that directly oppose that. (The Prayer of Jabez doesn't count. It's a faddish, theologically unsound conceit based on one verse stripped away from the context of the rest of Scripture.) As far as economic systems go, the apostolic community was closer to communist than anything else (read the book of Acts). And although communism cannot work apart from the grace of the Holy Spirit because it relies on human perfection, capitalism is no better from a spiritual perspective because its basis is the exploitation and idolization of human imperfection, where the one who wins is the one who is greediest and most selfish. Although conservative teaching claims to be in line with Christian doctrine on specific issues of abortion or gay marriage (never mind that the Christian church is far from united on these issues), when it comes to the broader, overarching themes that run all through Scripture, the Republican party falls far short in many places.
Also, I'm puzzled about Christians supporting aggressive, militaristic foreign policy. Although the Bible does not totally condemn the use of force, the New Testament is extraordinarily clear that it should only be used as a last resort. Read Romans 12:14-21, or the Sermon on the Mount, and tell me how that is reconciled with neo-conservative foreign policy. "As far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone." Yes, there is an "as far as it depends on you" that allows for use of force when absolutely necessary. But invading Iraq on shady and constantly shifting reasons that have all been proven wrong, ignoring world opinion, and Bush surrounding onesself with hawkish warmongers (Cheney and Rumsfeld in particular) really doesn't say "as far as it depends on you."
Why I'm a "conservative" Christian who votes Democrat. (txt)
I put "conservative" in quotes because that term has a lot of political meanings attached to it that don't necessarily describe me. I believe in God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, ever three and ever one. I believe that Jesus Christ was God incarnate upon the earth, who showed us how to live by his life, redeemed us from captivity to sin by his death, and demonstrated God's power over darkness and death by his resurrection. I believe that humankind is inherently sinful and separated by God, and is unable to restore itself by its own efforts, but only through the grace of God as expressed through Christ. I believe that the Bible is the inspired word of God. That's what I mean when I say I am a "conservative" Christian. Strip away any political meanings you may have attached to that. Perhaps "orthodox" is a better word. Anyway, now that that's out of the way:
The first, and deepest problem is that the Republican party has a number of beliefs that are at odds with Biblical teaching, regardless of what many conservatives would have you think. The conservative mindset is focused on the individual -- individual rights, individual responsibilities, individual consequences. I've heard several talk about people reaping what they sow, that the wealthy deserve their riches and that the poor deserve their plight. Lassiez-faire capitalism, which relies on human greed, is never questioned. This is in stark contrast to the Scriptures, which teach that people should live lives of service and self-sacrifice. In the Bible, it is the wealthy who are condemned, and the poor who are declared blessed. The heart of Biblical instruction is a focus on a collective good, not individual good. One can find dozens of teachings on serving others, both spiritually and physically; one would be hard pressed to find passages that praise individual or personal gain in a material sense, and in fact there are many passages that directly oppose that. (The Prayer of Jabez doesn't count. It's a faddish, theologically unsound conceit based on one verse stripped away from the context of the rest of Scripture.) As far as economic systems go, the apostolic community was closer to communist than anything else (read the book of Acts). And although communism cannot work apart from the grace of the Holy Spirit because it relies on human perfection, capitalism is no better from a spiritual perspective because its basis is the exploitation and idolization of human imperfection, where the one who wins is the one who is greediest and most selfish. Although conservative teaching claims to be in line with Christian doctrine on specific issues of abortion or gay marriage (never mind that the Christian church is far from united on these issues), when it comes to the broader, overarching themes that run all through Scripture, the Republican party falls far short in many places.
Also, I'm puzzled about Christians supporting aggressive, militaristic foreign policy. Although the Bible does not totally condemn the use of force, the New Testament is extraordinarily clear that it should only be used as a last resort. Read Romans 12:14-21, or the Sermon on the Mount, and tell me how that is reconciled with neo-conservative foreign policy. "As far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone." Yes, there is an "as far as it depends on you" that allows for use of force when absolutely necessary. But invading Iraq on shady and constantly shifting reasons that have all been proven wrong, ignoring world opinion, and Bush surrounding onesself with hawkish warmongers (Cheney and Rumsfeld in particular) really doesn't say "as far as it depends on you."