NationStates Jolt Archive

I wanted to hear peoples opinions on wether they like they United States President, George Bush. Thank you for visiting....

I wanted to hear peoples opinions on wether they like they United States President, George Bush. Thank you for visiting....

He seems like a nice fella to go out and have a lemonade with on the porch. Too bad I can't stand his politics. :D

He seems like a nice man. I like the fact that he doesn't govern by polls like other politicians have.

I'd have a beer with him and chop some wood with him (if I had my limbs).

He seems like a nice man. I like the fact that he doesn't govern by polls like other politicians have.

I'd have a beer with him and chop some wood with him (if I had my limbs).
yeah, im sure alot of other people would too that dont want him as president

I honestly think that he's pretty nice - I'm sure I could agree with him on somethings

I wanted to hear peoples opinions on wether they like they United States President, George Bush. Thank you for visiting....

NAY.

NAY.

How about Clinton?

yeah, im sure alot of other people would too that dont want him as president

You are a dink! It is really sad to see someone hate a person whom they do not know personally (illogical at best) with such passion, that they'd want to see them die.

How about Clinton?
YAY. :D

Another pro/anti Bush thread?

How many have we had this week?

YAY. :D

I thought you'd say that. I guess character doesn't matter. Since I take it that you are a "woman", can you honestly defend a cheating mans' character? I'm sorry but my friends who cheat on their wives do not have my trust. How do you trust a man who breaks the most important vow in their life?


Cool, you can be my side dish, as character doesn't matter. Remember you have to buff the chrome on my wheelchair once a day. Thanks!

I wanted to hear peoples opinions on wether they like they United States President, George Bush. Thank you for visiting....
Never a Lee Harvy Oswald around when you need one.

I thought you'd say that. I guess character doesn't matter. Since I take it that you are a "woman", can you honestly defend a cheating mans' character? I'm sorry but my friends who cheat on their wives do not have my trust. How do you trust a man who breaks the most important vow in their life?


Cool, you can be my side dish, as character doesn't matter. Remember you have to buff the chrome on my wheelchair once a day. Thanks!
Personally I couldn't care less what they do in their private lives as long as it doesn't affect the job that they perform in their public life.
On the Bush "Yay or Nay", personally it's a nay, but for his politics only. I've never met him, so for all I know he's a nice enough guy, just don't like his polictics.

Never a Lee Harvy Oswald around when you need one.


Why don't you come over here and try to do it? You sound tough enough. Just remember to smile nice when you get blown away by the Secret Service.
Typical impotent euro-trash, all talk, no action.

I say Aye and Nay.

There are things I support him on and others I do not support him on.

I thought you'd say that. I guess character doesn't matter. Since I take it that you are a "woman", can you honestly defend a cheating mans' character? I'm sorry but my friends who cheat on their wives do not have my trust. How do you trust a man who breaks the most important vow in their life?


Cool, you can be my side dish, as character doesn't matter. Remember you have to buff the chrome on my wheelchair once a day. Thanks!

I bet you Bush has two Japenese twins sucking his cock right about now.

Really. It happens all the time in politics. Politicians are just that... politicians.

But if you want to debate character, I really don't think you can say much for Bush, either.

Personally I couldn't care less what they do in their private lives as long as it doesn't affect the job that they perform in their public life.
On the Bush "Yay or Nay", personally it's a nay, but for his politics only. I've never met him, so for all I know he's a nice enough guy, just don't like his polictics.

It did affect the job as we sort of launched cruise missiles to throw off the attention of the American people. If you can't trust a man to be honest to his wife how do you expect him to be honest with the rest of us?

Can't really blame Bubba for cheating on Hillary. She's a lesbo and not a lipstick one at that.

Never a Lee Harvy Oswald around when you need one.

Your kinda a sick person...

Your kinda a sick person...
Why? It's just Bush.

One word for Bush: moron

It did affect the job as we sort of launched cruise missiles to throw off the attention of the American people. If you can't trust a man to be honest to his wife how do you expect him to be honest with the rest of us?
Quite simply in that if the media weren't interested in reporting every sordid affair that anyone in public life has, then there wouldn't be any need for said person to do anything to take peoples attention away from said affair, allowing them to concentrate on what they're supposed to be doing, i.e. running the country.

Why don't you come over here and try to do it? You sound tough enough. Just remember to smile nice when you get blown away by the Secret Service.
Typical impotent euro-trash, all talk, no action.
A typical Ameri-scum reaction. It's OK for Ameri-scums to want the leaders of other countries dead. But their president is to good to be shot.

I bet you Bush has two Japenese twins sucking his cock right about now.

Really. It happens all the time in politics. Politicians are just that... politicians.

But if you want to debate character, I really don't think you can say much for Bush, either.

Even if they are sucking him off, I'm sure they are so much better looking then anything Bill tagged. Besides you don't hear rumors of infidelity coming out of Washington, do you.

Bush does have character:

Stands by his guns
Does what he thinks is right
Doesn't govern by opinion poll
Faithful to his wife
Has a good sense of style

I like Bush. Of course, I get rediculed every day for supporting him.

A typical Ameri-scum reaction. It's OK for Ameri-scums to want the leaders of other countries dead. But their president is to good to be shot.


Hey little buddy, you said you wanted him dead. He is my president. When did I advocate an assassin take out a world leader or even your pathetic leader?
Just realize that you are from an impotent nation and that the USA is not the great Satan, and you'll be ok. Jealousy of one nation is not a reason to want to kill said nations' leaders.

Never a Lee Harvy Oswald around when you need one.

You're terrible.

In a very very funny way.

Quite simply in that if the media weren't interested in reporting every sordid affair that anyone in public life has, then there wouldn't be any need for said person to do anything to take peoples attention away from said affair, allowing them to concentrate on what they're supposed to be doing, i.e. running the country.

Hey little buddy, the President does not run this country. It is the public sector which runs this country. Politicians are just leaders

Why? It's just Bush.

It's one thing from not liking someone's politics and another thing wishing someone dead. It's a pretty funny thing to see how much people can take it so seriously.

One word for Bush: moron

You should try to be elected President! I'm sure you are such a genius. Besides Bush plays dumb alot to appear as a regular Joe.

I wanted to hear peoples opinions on wether they like they United States President, George Bush. Thank you for visiting....

Resounding "Nay" from the Canadian.

Why don't you come over here and try to do it? You sound tough enough. Just remember to smile nice when you get blown away by the Secret Service.
Typical impotent euro-trash, all talk, no action.

awesome answer. it is so true. for all of the crying left that LOST the election, here is some advice- Bush won. go listen to some Rush Limbaugh.

Hey little buddy, the President does not run this country. It is the public sector which runs this country. Politicians are just leaders
But is it not the president, through his advisors and other governmental bodies, that set the agenda for the public to follow? If not, why bother having a President and not just leave the public sector to work everything out by itself?

Hey little buddy, you said you wanted him dead. He is my president. When did I advocate an assassin take out a world leader or even your pathetic leader?
Wasn't just for you. But the likes of you.

Just realize that you are from an impotent nation and that the USA is not the great Satan, and you'll be ok.
Oh yeah. Sweet words like these are bound to win me over. To see that the US is not our enemy. Which they are.

Jealousy of one nation is not a reason to want to kill said nations' leaders.
What makes you think I'm jealouse? :rolleyes:

But is it not the president, through his advisors and other governmental bodies, that set the agenda for the public to follow? If not, why bother having a President and not just leave the public sector to work everything out by itself?

The President sets the agenda true but most of his policies have to be approved by Congress.

awesome answer. it is so true. for all of the crying left that LOST the election, here is some advice- Bush won. go listen to some Rush Limbaugh.
No thank you. I was asked my opinion and gave it, now run along and play nice. :rolleyes:

A typical Ameri-scum reaction. It's OK for Ameri-scums to want the leaders of other countries dead. But their president is to good to be shot.
Hey- you - one question? who is the world superpower? hhm?? want to answer that one?

And Von, it is Europes fault for all of the troubles of the world anyway. Inbred royal families never really make the best judgement calls, like their inbred populations. If anything, the US has been trying for over 50 year, to clean up the shit that Europe left. Nice world you left us.

No thank you. I was asked my opinion and gave it, now run along and play nice. :rolleyes:
your opinion was that the president should be shot?? and I should play nice? get over yourself.

And Von, it is Europes fault for all of the troubles of the world anyway. Inbred royal families never really make the best judgement calls, like their inbred populations. If anything, the US has been trying for over 50 year, to clean up the shit that Europe left. Nice world you left us.

Europe is also trying to clean up its act! Look at Britain. They are trying to clean up their acts and Poland is doing the same because of Soviet Occupation. Most of the former Soviet Block is cleaning up the mess left behind by Soviet Occupation. and most of the Soviet block was in Europe.

You should try to be elected President! I'm sure you are such a genius. Besides Bush plays dumb alot to appear as a regular Joe.

LOL, I can't be elected president because:
1. I don't come from a rich family
2. I don't have the backing of mulitnational corporation, esp oil
3. I'm not a christian
4. I don't belong to Skull & Bones or similar boys-clubs
5. I'm not a Senator nor a Governor
6. I'm an "Average" Joe

Bush don't have to play dumb, he is dumb.

Quite simply in that if the media weren't interested in reporting every sordid affair that anyone in public life has, then there wouldn't be any need for said person to do anything to take peoples attention away from said affair, allowing them to concentrate on what they're supposed to be doing, i.e. running the country.
said affair took place in the oval office while he was supposed to be running the country. move here, buy a house, pay taxes, and you would be pissed that some hillbilly is greasing up chubby interns on the nations time too.

your opinion was that the president should be shot?? and I should play nice? get over yourself.
I believe you have me confused with someone else, nice try though ;)

LOL, I can't be elected president because:
1. I don't come from a rich family
2. I don't have the backing of mulitnational corporation, esp oil
3. I'm not a christian
4. I don't belong to Skull & Bones or similar boys-clubs
5. I'm not a Senator nor a Governor
6. I'm an "Average" Joe

Bush don't have to play dumb, he is dumb.
Clinton didn't have any of that either- check your facts. those are just details about our current president.

I believe you have me confused with someone else, nice try though ;)

And did it nicely! He got you mixed up with Von and that is no easy feat.

Bush's character?

Well, I don't know the man personally, of course, and he may actually be a real nice guy, but I don't think I could stand being around him for too long. I have this horrible feeling that, whenever Bush is quiet, he's not carefully thinking about what he's going to say next, but that he's waiting for the next thought to turn up.

I just don't have the patience.

Bush don't have to play dumb, he is dumb.

Nice. You are a real quiz-kid! Thomas Einstein me thinks!

First off between repubs and democrats their isnt that much of a differance they both have been sleeping with big bussiness for years just republicans do it in public. And also the media barely reports on a lot of stuff like CIA involvement in government Coups that is buried on page 6. and you say GW makes himself seem like a regular joe by the way he talks then isn't he lieing/misleading us. I think that is true and it makes it worse than if he was just an Idiot.

And did it nicely! He got you mixed up with Von and that is no easy feat.
I know. I don't know whether to be insulted, or to feel good that someones actually reading what I post in order to get me confused with someone else... :)

As a person (I.E. Likability, personality): YAY!

Moral Views: Mostly Nay

Economic issues: Yay!

War/Military Actions: YAY!

Grammar: Nay!

I believe you have me confused with someone else, nice try though ;)
whoops sorry. should not do this hungover. you dont want hin shot. but you do think a total moral breakdown is okay, as long as it is a Democrat ;)

I know. I don't know whether to be insulted, or to feel good that someones actually reading what I post in order to get me confused with someone else... :)

LOL!!! People make assumptions about me too but then, if they get to know me personally they learn otherwise.

I always say, never judge a book by its cover. I'm sure that many people on here are nice individuals but come off like morons when they get into debates like these.

Hey- you - one question? who is the world superpower? hhm?? want to answer that one?
Hey you -one question- wtf are you trying to say with that? Hmmm?? Answer that one.

Bush is awsome, yay.

Hey you -one question- wtf are you trying to say with that? Hmmm?? Answer that one.

Basically that we aren't impotent and we aren't small like Napoleons genitalia!

LOL!!! People make assumptions about me too but then, if they get to know me personally they learn otherwise.

I always say, never judge a book by its cover. I'm sure that many people on here are nice individuals but come off like morons when they get into debates like these.
cover?? i see no pic posted by anyones name on here....

And Von, it is Europes fault for all of the troubles of the world anyway. Inbred royal families never really make the best judgement calls, like their inbred populations. If anything, the US has been trying for over 50 year, to clean up the shit that Europe left. Nice world you left us.
Yeah. I do blame the Royal family of France that they helped the Americans out against the British. That realy is the start of all problems we have today.

Plus Bush has a cool personality as opposed to Kerry. Imagine having a party at Kerrys' place. Hahaha that would be as fun as root canal without painkillers.

"Reporting for duty!"

Hey you -one question- wtf are you trying to say with that? Hmmm?? Answer that one.
your scum quote. but i expect nothing less from a french person. i dont expect anything more though either. not much too offer, your country, know what i mean?

cover?? i see no pic posted by anyones name on here....

Way to miss the obvious.

What I mean is, don't judge people unless you know them. Its fine to disagree with someone but to say you flat out hate someone that you don't know, that is being immature.

Yes I am guilty of this but I am learning to take what people say on here with a grain of salt wether I agree with it or not.

Yeah. I do blame the Royal family of France that they helped the Americans out against the British. That realy is the start of all problems we have today.

Even if the French didn't get involved, we still would have won our independence as the Brits couldn't really afford to keep fighting us.

whoops sorry. should not do this hungover. you dont want hin shot. but you do think a total moral breakdown is okay, as long as it is a Democrat ;)
To be honest, I couldn't care less if they're a Democrat, Republican, Labour, Conservative, Fascist, Communist...err...Green...as long as they do the job that they were elected to do, let them do it. I only have a problem if the job they are doing is under par or they are not doing something that I feel would be beneficial for: a) me, b) my family, c) my country, d)the international stage (to do all these things requires using social and economic policies).

Basically that we aren't impotent and we aren't small like Napoleons genitalia!
No. Americans aren't small. Can't argue with that. (http://img172.exs.cx/img172/4326/fatyanks2cp.jpg)

Yeah. I do blame the Royal family of France that they helped the Americans out against the British. That realy is the start of all problems we have today.
blame. take responsibility for what your country, in which you live and vote,we did. i know we americans take responsibility for all kinds of mistakes, all the time.

Yeah. I do blame the Royal family of France that they helped the Americans out against the British. That realy is the start of all problems we have today.

Though they did help us out, their motive was to spite the British, not to necessarily aid the American cause.

Yeah. I do blame the Royal family of France that they helped the Americans out against the British. That realy is the start of all problems we have today.

And then you should blame King George III of Great Britain too for if he didn't ignore the Colonies, then we could still be under the crown.

Remember Von Witzleben, the American Colonies wanted to remain part of Great Britain but good ole Mad King George wouldn't listen to us and decided to rule with a tyranical hand.

I suggest you go back and relearn history from the events of the French and Indian War ( 7 Years War) through the American Revolutionary War.

Even if the French didn't get involved, we still would have won our independence as the Brits couldn't really afford to keep fighting us.
Of course.

And then you should blame King George III of Great Britain too for if he didn't ignore the Colonies, then we could still be under the crown.
I blame George for not beeing tough enough on the colonial peasants. He was too humane.

Though they did help us out, their motive was to spite the British, not to necessarily aid the American cause.

Agreed. Just like Spain sided with the French and helped us out and then when the Brits sent an ultimatum to the Hague, that got the Hague to side with Americans.

Then the British found themselves Diplomatically isolated from the rest of the World by the year 1783 and thus the Treaty of Paris of 1783 that ended the American Revolution.

blame. take responsibility for what your country, in which you live and vote,we did. i know we americans take responsibility for all kinds of mistakes, all the time.
Like when?

Nay on Bush ........ I am neither a democrat nor a republican so keep the "liberal right wing"BS comments to yourself :cool:

I blame George for not beeing tough enough on the colonial peasants. He was too humane.

HAHAHAHA!!!! Oppressive Taxes, no trial by jury, No self governing body, violating our rights as BRITISH CITIZENS!

Yep, he was too humane.

Don't forget that it was some of our founding Fathers that defended the British Soldiers after the Boston Massacre.

I blame George for not beeing tough enough on the colonial peasants. He was too humane.

Yeah, but In the end we woulda won. We just became too expensive. I mean, whose going to pay millions of Pounds just to have some cold, wet, dangerous coastline with angry people who talk funny?

Even if the French didn't get involved, we still would have won our independence as the Brits couldn't really afford to keep fighting us.

Actually, I would disagree with this.

I hate him.

Boston Massacre.
Irrelevant incident.

Irrelevant incident.
They probably though it was relevant.

Irrelevant incident.

Actually, it kinda help feed the flames for seperation from England so NO it wasn't an irrelevant incident.

Uh, nay..

Never a Lee Harvy Oswald around when you need one.

I love this guy with a passion.

Oh, and as for Bush, it's a nay. He is a silly slobbering monkey-man with appalling politics, an even worse dress sense, a endless falabilities regarding running a country hell bent on stopping terrorism. Oh, and he manages to rig elections by installing fear into the electorate so they see they have no other choice. And I don't need to have met him to say that were I to, I would have a strong urge to stuff his tongue down his pathetic rich-kid throat and make him apologise for every single death in Iraq. Twice.

HAHAHAHA!!!! Oppressive Taxes, no trial by jury, No self governing body, violating our rights as BRITISH CITIZENS!

Yep, he was too humane.

Don't forget that it was some of our founding Fathers that defended the British Soldiers after the Boston Massacre.

Y'know, I'm probably more patriotic than most people here, but I have to point out a few things.

1. It wasn't really a massacre. Rather, A bunch of Angry Bostonians(Yay Boston!) got pissed off at some British guards and threw rocks, snowballs, sticks, bricks, etc at them. Then, after one of the Brits gets ouchie boo-boo, they begin to fight back. The Bostonians run away(smart thing to do, actually).

2. The Taxes weren't that harsh. It would have been equal to paying an extra cent on a $20 book. It was the principle that got people pissed off.

3. Colonies don't HAVE self-governing bodies! They are COLONIES. Not Provinces, states, Oblasts, etc., they are COLONIES!

They probably though it was relevant.

It kinda help feed the flames of revolt but then, they were given fair trials and some of our founding fathers defended the soldiers and got most of the acquitted too ironically.

of course, that was before Mad King George ended Trial by Jury

Nay on everything bush. personality wise, I'd rather drive by and splash a puddle of mud on him than sit down and have a beer, he's whiney and arrogant.

Nay on everything bush. personality wise, I'd rather drive by and splash a puddle of mud on him than sit down and have a beer, he's whiney and arrogant.

...

And you aren't?

Nay. Nay on everything about him.

Not a big fan of him as a president. Besides the fact that he's put this nation in a huge hole, I don't like that he mixes religion with politics.

As for Clinton, big yay!

he's whiney and arrogant.

wow, how would you describe the "intellectual" left like Kerry and Dean?

Nah.

Jenn it is nei or yea not nay or yay.

my opinion requires one fact. is he a nice or mean drunk? If he's nice then get him drunk and have him sign over his power of attorny to a dog. If he's mean go to titan.

Now i will laugh

hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
:rolleyes: who did that

Y'know, I'm probably more patriotic than most people here, but I have to point out a few things.

I'm probably more patriotic than you but then, I try to keep it on the low key.

1. It wasn't really a massacre. Rather, A bunch of Angry Bostonians(Yay Boston!) got pissed off at some British guards and threw rocks, snowballs, sticks, bricks, etc at them. Then, after one of the Brits gets ouchie boo-boo, they begin to fight back. The Bostonians run away(smart thing to do, actually).

Here I will disagree. It may not, in reality be a massacre, but civilians did die so it probably was a massacre at that time and the name stuck ever since. As for the soldiers, someone, no one knows who, shouted fire and the soldiers fired into the crowd killing like 5 Bostonians.

2. The Taxes weren't that harsh. It would have been equal to paying an extra cent on a $20 book. It was the principle that got people pissed off.

At the time, they were harsh. Remember that most people at the time were poor farmers. Industry was there yea but not to such an extent to keep people from being poor. Most people at the time, as I said, were farmers and they didn't have much money either. Paying taxes on everything from Tea to Stamps to Sugar at that time? No Taxation without Representation. The Taxes in reality, violated the Charters of the Colonies.

3. Colonies don't HAVE self-governing bodies! They are COLONIES. Not Provinces, states, Oblasts, etc., they are COLONIES!

However, they had state assemblies which were self-governing. Many of these were disbanded. Also, the King Prohibited the formation of a self-governing body to handle the domestic affairs of the Colonies. If he had just allowed us to do so, I don't think there would've been a massive revolt.

How about Clinton?
how bout dem sox?

Like when?
if i felt like typing all day, i would. but here is one example. we have service men on court martial right now because they exposed interrogating people on film. thats classified military business, and common tactics used by every army in this world and now they have to be charged with abuse to shut everyone up-

I love this guy with a passion.

Oh, and as for Bush, it's a nay. He is a silly slobbering monkey-man with appalling politics, an even worse dress sense, a endless falabilities regarding running a country hell bent on stopping terrorism. Oh, and he manages to rig elections by installing fear into the electorate so they see they have no other choice. And I don't need to have met him to say that were I to, I would have a strong urge to stuff his tongue down his pathetic rich-kid throat and make him apologise for every single death in Iraq. Twice.
make the iraquis apologize for killing their people. dress sense? is that what you other worlders elect officials based on? figures.

I'm probably more patriotic than you but then, I try to keep it on the low key.

Ah well. I don't see YOU putting your life in danger for you country.



Here I will disagree. It may not, in reality be a massacre, but civilians did die so it probably was a massacre at that time and the name stuck ever since. As for the soldiers, someone, no one knows who, shouted fire and the soldiers fired into the crowd killing like 5 Bostonians.

No, it was never PROVED that someone yelled "Fire". However, the most credible idea in the Historical Community is that the rioters were yelling "Fire". It was proven on Discovery Channel that it would have been impossible for the British Commander to order his men to fire due to all the noise. What prolly happened was that one British Soldier fired, and the rest followed.


At the time, they were harsh. Remember that most people at the time were poor farmers. Industry was there yea but not to such an extent to keep people from being poor. Most people at the time, as I said, were farmers and they didn't have much money either. Paying taxes on everything from Tea to Stamps to Sugar at that time? No Taxation without Representation. The Taxes in reality, violated the Charters of the Colonies.

Yes, but most taxes were gone by 1773. The only one left was the Tea tax. And about 90% of the Colonists didn't even drink tea on a regular basis. It was mainly a drink for the rich. It was a miniscule tax, EXTREMELY small.

However, they had state assemblies which were self-governing. Many of these were disbanded. Also, the King Prohibited the formation of a self-governing body to handle the domestic affairs of the Colonies. If he had just allowed us to do so, I don't think there would've been a massive revolt.

Yes, but colonies don't HAVE to be self-governing. Throughout history, most Colonies were run by people slected by the King. Did the Canadians elect their colonial leaders? Did the inhabitants of New Spain? Of South America? Of India? Of Australia?

Of course, they did AFTER they became free, but thats a different story.

how bout dem sox?

It is rather cold outside. I could use a nice wool sock to sheath my manhood.
Thanks!! :)

He seems like a nice man. I like the fact that he doesn't govern by polls like other politicians have.

I'd have a beer with him and chop some wood with him (if I had my limbs).
That sounds fair i still think hes better than Gore or Kerry so he won by Default.

Ah well. I don't see YOU putting your life in danger for you country.

I have spent my entire life around the military. I know what our soldiers go through for training and how it is to have a loved one overseas. My mother served 6 years in the Service and my father is still in the service and is currently overseas doing his duty that his country called upon him to do. I have done alot on the homefront by supporting our soldiers and praying for them. Most of my family has served in the military in one branch or another. I'm not going to list them but I have had a family member in all FOUR branches of the service. I may not be going into the military but that makes no less patriotic than those that are. Don't you ever say anything about it again to me because the next time, I won't be as leninent as I am being right now.

No, it was never PROVED that someone yelled "Fire". However, the most credible idea in the Historical Community is that the rioters were yelling "Fire". It was proven on Discovery Channel that it would have been impossible for the British Commander to order his men to fire due to all the noise. What prolly happened was that one British Soldier fired, and the rest followed.

No one proved that it wasn't said either. Its a moot point anyway.

Yes, but most taxes were gone by 1773. The only one left was the Tea tax. And about 90% of the Colonists didn't even drink tea on a regular basis. It was mainly a drink for the rich. It was a miniscule tax, EXTREMELY small.

Maybe gone by 1773 but then, most of the taxes were illegal under the colonial charters.

Yes, but colonies don't HAVE to be self-governing. Throughout history, most Colonies were run by people slected by the King. Did the Canadians elect their colonial leaders? Did the inhabitants of New Spain? Of South America? Of India? Of Australia?

Your right they don't have to be but when a charter authorizes representative government and then has it stripped, don't you think that'll piss people off?

Of course, they did AFTER they became free, but thats a different story.

Your right it is a different story

I must say that I support our president - I don't see how anyone could avoid doing so. He's leading the nation in the right direction, the liberal socialist activist suckups have been checkmated once again, and Europe hates him (which means I like him).

There are one or two things I don't like about his policies, however (Iraq is not one of them); I don't support the American Gestapo (i.e., Homeland Security) which has come into play under George Bush - sure, the Secret Service has been around a long time, but not like this!

But, all in all, I think the guy's a good leader.

P.S. As to my having a beer with him, I'd much prefer some Riesling wine. :D

Pardon me for butting in, but it is very likely that the rioters were shouting "fire!" - I'd stake my reputation on the possibility that one of the soldiers either slipped and shot of his gun by mistake, or was extremely nervous and didn't heed the order of his superior; this would obviously excite the troops and get them to fire.

well, i think he's a stupid, illiterate puppet, tied to the strings of the oil companys, who can't think for himself when he's not attached to a mike, a complete republican asshat, who enjoys listening to the speeches of dumb southern bible bashers who think: being black, homosexual or of a different religion is evil. And therefore i dislike him. And he cannot do any public speaking to save his life.

Also, he rigs elections. A lot.

My answer to that is, "The sound a horse makes."

I must say that I support our president - I don't see how anyone could avoid doing so. He's leading the nation in the right direction, the liberal socialist activist suckups have been checkmated once again, and Europe hates him (which means I like him).

There are one or two things I don't like about his policies, however (Iraq is not one of them); I don't support the American Gestapo (i.e., Homeland Security) which has come into play under George Bush - sure, the Secret Service has been around a long time, but not like this!

But, all in all, I think the guy's a good leader.

P.S. As to my having a beer with him, I'd much prefer some Riesling wine. :D

I agree very much.

Nay, on many issues.
A few things he could do to seem like a nicer person:

-Have the whole westboro babtist chruch arrested and put in those nice cages on guantanamo.
-Learn how to speak properly, or atleast how to read from a pre-written speach.
-Realise that politics and religion doesn't go hand in hand.
-Let women decide over their own bodies.
-Let people express their love in marriage no matter their sexuality.
-Learn that there are countrys outside of the U.S. and that all people are of equal value, no matter where you're born, your race or gender.
-Stop being a war mongering fundamentalist christian gun-nut.

But hey, I don't live in the states, you guys elected him, you can deal with him too, not my problem.
Peace :)

Yay for Dubya

Hey Mr. Von Witzleben, what country do you live in???

I wanted to hear peoples opinions on wether they like they United States President, George Bush. Thank you for visiting....
A good, moral man with a clear vision for the nation that doesn't involve caving in to special interests and extreme leftism as does the typical democrat.