NationStates Jolt Archive

Ban straights. Then we'll have sorted all the world's problems out.

Seriously, though, a male child is 100 times more likely to be raped by a practising heterosexual than a practising homosexual. And for girls, it's even more.

If Hitler hadn't been brought up on homophobic attitudes and beliefs, would he still have started the 2nd World War?

"Therapy" to "cure" homosexuals changes sexual orientation about once in every thousand cases. It is more likely to cause suicide than change your sexual preference.

Jesus never said anything about gays, even though it was a common practice amongst the Romans. If you're about to bring up that verse where Jesus says something like, "The Kingdom of Heaven does not belong to the sinners; it does not belong to... homosexuals etc.", well you have a badly translated Bible - a much more accurate translation of the ancient greek word "arsenokoitai" would be "Male pagan temple prostitute".

Jesus, on the other hand, did say that it is not what enters your body that matters, but what you feel.

Ban straights. Then we'll have sorted all the world's problems out.

No more people after this generation. Great no global warming, dimming, over population etc.

exactly!

It would technically solve all of the world's problems, wouldn't it?

And have you seen the way they touch and hold hands in public? THAT IS NOT APPROPRIATE MATERIAL FOR THE EYES OF INNOCENT CHILDREN.
Why can't hetrosexuals show some decency like the rest of us and deny all love. Because if society says its wrong, there's a reason!

hehe this topic reminds me of a Protest Warrior sign.

http://www.protestwarrior.com/nimages/signs/large/pw_sign_07.gif

Hey, that's a thought, white males...

But, think about it, who messed the World up for everyone? That's right, Adam and Eve - two HETEROSEXUALS!!!

When the bible said it's not what goes into the body thats important, it was talking about food, not penises.

my last post on this its retarded, your lucky I didn't type in the back label of my ketchup bottle again..........

When the bible said it's not what goes into the body thats important, it was talking about food, not penises.

What about if its a chocolate coated penis? Please don;t tell me what I do on my saturday nights is wrong. There was other food involved too

Mondilia wrote:
a much more accurate translation of the ancient greek word "arsenokoitai" would be "Male pagan temple prostitute".

Lol sorry, couldnt control myself. Carry on :D

Why does it just go for penises? And why do you assume you are correct and that homosexuality isn't part of the ritual uncleanness laws of the Tanakh that Jesus got rid of with the new Covenant?

Where would the music industry be without gays? Brian Epstein wouldn't have discovered the Beatles and Elton John wouldn't exist.

I'd also like to point out that by banning straights, no more hip hop would exist.

I know i said that was my last post but, you asked for it so here it is,

introducing heinz easy squeeze!!
now get the same great thick & rich taste of heinz tomato ketchup when you want it and where you want it with
Heinz Easy Squeeze

No wait, No Mess

Shake well before first use

Ingredients: Tomato concentrate made from red ripe tomatos, distilled vinegar, high fructose corn syrup, corn syrup, salt, spice onion powder, natural flavoring

MFD in USA by heinz north america division of
HJ heinz north america division of
pittsburgh, pa 15222

Question or comments?
call 1-800-255-5750 8:30-4:30 (ET),
monday-friday

visit us at www.heinz.com

Dont kill me please :(


:( :fluffle: :(


homosexuality would end the human race

*blank stare*

#14 - and? Where's the problem there?

I like women. and if any of you immoral/confused homosexuals try and take my right away to get jiggy with it with another woman I will kill you.

Ok seriously, thats insane. Heterosexuals have been around for centuries. And if you are evolutionist (which many of you are, so I'll stfu and just cater to your guys thoughts) heterosexuals have been around for millions of years. Unless homosexuals get a hive mind and begin to kill heterosexuals, heterosexuals will be the controlling race for many millions of years to come. So please be quiet and accept the fact that your genetic make up will not come to dominate the world. :gundge:

Ban straights. Then we'll have sorted all the world's problems out.

Seriously, though, a male child is 100 times more likely to be raped by a practising heterosexual than a practising homosexual. And for girls, it's even more.

If Hitler hadn't been brought up on homophobic attitudes and beliefs, would he still have started the 2nd World War?

"Therapy" to "cure" homosexuals changes sexual orientation about once in every thousand cases. It is more likely to cause suicide than change your sexual preference.

Jesus never said anything about gays, even though it was a common practice amongst the Romans. If you're about to bring up that verse where Jesus says something like, "The Kingdom of Heaven does not belong to the sinners; it does not belong to... homosexuals etc.", well you have a badly translated Bible - a much more accurate translation of the ancient greek word "arsenokoitai" would be "Male pagan temple prostitute".

Jesus, on the other hand, did say that it is not what enters your body that matters, but what you feel.
***applauds***

Yep, sarcasm - that's the way to promote understanding...

As the official voice of Jack Chick* i wholly endorse this movement


*lie

I like women. and if any of you immoral/confused homosexuals try and take my right away to get jiggy with it with another woman I will kill you.

Ok seriously, thats insane. Heterosexuals have been around for centuries. And if you are evolutionist (which many of you are, so I'll stfu and just cater to your guys thoughts) heterosexuals have been around for millions of years. Unless homosexuals get a hive mind and begin to kill heterosexuals, heterosexuals will be the controlling race for many millions of years to come. So please be quiet and accept the fact that your genetic make up will not come to dominate the world. :gundge:
Please, calm down.
Did you actually believe this thread was serious? It's a joke.

I like women. and if any of you immoral/confused homosexuals try and take my right away to get jiggy with it with another woman I will kill you.

Ok seriously, thats insane. Heterosexuals have been around for centuries. And if you are evolutionist (which many of you are, so I'll stfu and just cater to your guys thoughts) heterosexuals have been around for millions of years. Unless homosexuals get a hive mind and begin to kill heterosexuals, heterosexuals will be the controlling race for many millions of years to come. So please be quiet and accept the fact that your genetic make up will not come to dominate the world. :gundge:

Besides, if we are slipping back into seriousness, very few of us actually want to dominate the world. Personally i'd just prefer to have equal rights and an end to discrimination. But that may just be that evil degenerate homo gene in me.

Besides, if we are slipping back into seriousness, very few of us actually want to dominate the world. Personally i'd just prefer to have equal rights and an end to discrimination. But that may just be that evil degenerate homo gene in me.
No seriousness!
I won't stand for it!
:D
*puts on clown wig*

Heterosexual filth is EVERYWHERE, pervading our society and corrupting our young innocent children - holding hands, laughing, preaching to the word how abominably 'wonderful' heterosexual relationships are. Just two days ago I saw a movie in which there were two heterosexuals KISSING. It's disgusting, I tell you.
And if anyone tries to take away my right to get jiggy with another woman ... well. :mp5: :p

Faster way to solve all the world's problems or make them irrelevant is nuclear war. Complete and utter destruction of the entire planet. Dont have to wait for the current population to die... force them :P

Jesus wept. You know, gays are fine with me. I can live with gays and maybe even sleep in the same room as a homosexual, despite being a bit uncomfortable with it. But it's you bigot homosexuals who believe gays are superior to straights that really piss me off. Yes, members of minorities can be bigots. If Hitler had been a gay and ordered the execution of all straights, it would be bigotry. You don't want gay equality, you want gay superiority. You people are wrong. I've said it before, but apparently I need to say it again: when you post something like this, expect people to be pissed off at you, even if you're a minority. The letters: "PC" have become an invincible suit of armor these days. It is politically correct for me to defend my way of life, just like it's fine for you to defend yours. But now you're attacking mine when I have never said anything to you. Ban straights? The fact that you're stupid enough to even start a thread like this makes me wonder if you're stupid enough to mean half of the things you're saying. If you really mean any of this stuff, you're a complete idiot my friend. Not trying to be mean, it's just true. If you don't mean it, then I guess you just select items to talk about from your "Controversial Topics List" and post something as stupid as this. I'm just fine with gays. But you, sir, are retarded.

They are an abomination on this Earth! Walking around as if they own everything. They cannot be allowed to continue their culturally oppresive actions! Convert all heterosexuals! Only can society be clean once they no longer exists.


(and if anyone reads this and takes this seriously, I swear, you're just a retard)

I would rather burn in hell than be in a heaven without good fashion sense. :D

Don't look now; two homo smilies making out!!!
:fluffle:

Jesus wept. You know, gays are fine with me. I can live with gays and maybe even sleep in the same room as a homosexual, despite being a bit uncomfortable with it. But it's you bigot homosexuals who believe gays are superior to straights that really piss me off. Yes, members of minorities can be bigots. If Hitler had been a gay and ordered the execution of all straights, it would be bigotry. You don't want gay equality, you want gay superiority. You people are wrong. I've said it before, but apparently I need to say it again: when you post something like this, expect people to be pissed off at you, even if you're a minority. The letters: "PC" have become an invincible suit of armor these days. It is politically correct for me to defend my way of life, just like it's fine for you to defend yours. But now you're attacking mine when I have never said anything to you. Ban straights? The fact that you're stupid enough to even start a thread like this makes me wonder if you're stupid enough to mean half of the things you're saying. If you really mean any of this stuff, you're a complete idiot my friend. Not trying to be mean, it's just true. If you don't mean it, then I guess you just select items to talk about from your "Controversial Topics List" and post something as stupid as this. I'm just fine with gays. But you, sir, are retarded.
Everybody, calm down a little.
Did you take the time to read this thread?
I would suggest you do.
This thread is a joke. Nothing more, nothing less. Nothing to see here.

Jesus wept. You know, gays are fine with me. I can live with gays and maybe even sleep in the same room as a homosexual, despite being a bit uncomfortable with it. But it's you bigot homosexuals who believe gays are superior to straights that really piss me off. Yes, members of minorities can be bigots. If Hitler had been a gay and ordered the execution of all straights, it would be bigotry. You don't want gay equality, you want gay superiority. You people are wrong. I've said it before, but apparently I need to say it again: when you post something like this, expect people to be pissed off at you, even if you're a minority. The letters: "PC" have become an invincible suit of armor these days. It is politically correct for me to defend my way of life, just like it's fine for you to defend yours. But now you're attacking mine when I have never said anything to you. Ban straights? The fact that you're stupid enough to even start a thread like this makes me wonder if you're stupid enough to mean half of the things you're saying. If you really mean any of this stuff, you're a complete idiot my friend. Not trying to be mean, it's just true. If you don't mean it, then I guess you just select items to talk about from your "Controversial Topics List" and post something as stupid as this. I'm just fine with gays. But you, sir, are retarded.
Ah, somebody forgot to plug in their sarcasm detector... Who looks like the idiot now?

Jesus wept. You know, gays are fine with me. I can live with gays and maybe even sleep in the same room as a homosexual, despite being a bit uncomfortable with it. But it's you bigot homosexuals who believe gays are superior to straights that really piss me off. Yes, members of minorities can be bigots. If Hitler had been a gay and ordered the execution of all straights, it would be bigotry. You don't want gay equality, you want gay superiority. You people are wrong. I've said it before, but apparently I need to say it again: when you post something like this, expect people to be pissed off at you, even if you're a minority. The letters: "PC" have become an invincible suit of armor these days. It is politically correct for me to defend my way of life, just like it's fine for you to defend yours. But now you're attacking mine when I have never said anything to you. Ban straights? The fact that you're stupid enough to even start a thread like this makes me wonder if you're stupid enough to mean half of the things you're saying. If you really mean any of this stuff, you're a complete idiot my friend. Not trying to be mean, it's just true. If you don't mean it, then I guess you just select items to talk about from your "Controversial Topics List" and post something as stupid as this. I'm just fine with gays. But you, sir, are retarded.

Mate, i may be wrong, but i'm fairly sure this thread was started in response to a similar thread saying that gays are a bad influence and should be banned from making public displays of their love.
We are joking, either take it in that spirit, or peace be with you and sod off. How else are we to fight such discrimination at ourselves from the majority, than by laughing?

Please, calm down.
Did you actually believe this thread was serious? It's a joke.

You chose a pretty stupid topic to joke about. Hey, I have a joke! Let's put all the Jews in concentration camps! Get it? Ha ha ha ha ha! Isn't bigotry just freaking hilarious?

Ah, somebody forgot to plug in their sarcasm detector... Who looks like the idiot now?
A. Jay Leno?

Jesus wept. You know, gays are fine with me. I can live with gays and maybe even sleep in the same room as a homosexual, despite being a bit uncomfortable with it. But it's you bigot homosexuals who believe gays are superior to straights that really piss me off. Yes, members of minorities can be bigots. If Hitler had been a gay and ordered the execution of all straights, it would be bigotry. You don't want gay equality, you want gay superiority. You people are wrong. I've said it before, but apparently I need to say it again: when you post something like this, expect people to be pissed off at you, even if you're a minority. The letters: "PC" have become an invincible suit of armor these days. It is politically correct for me to defend my way of life, just like it's fine for you to defend yours. But now you're attacking mine when I have never said anything to you. Ban straights? The fact that you're stupid enough to even start a thread like this makes me wonder if you're stupid enough to mean half of the things you're saying. If you really mean any of this stuff, you're a complete idiot my friend. Not trying to be mean, it's just true. If you don't mean it, then I guess you just select items to talk about from your "Controversial Topics List" and post something as stupid as this. I'm just fine with gays. But you, sir, are retarded.


Apparently you are not fine with it if you don't realize we are making fun of the message heteros send us every fucking day of our lives. Learn to take a joke, then realize that homosexuals are probably the most discriminated against group in the entire planet. So give us a break if we make one little unPC joke. The real joke is people who take the teachings of someone who only promoted love and understanding and use it to make policies out of fear and ignorance.

You chose a pretty stupid topic to joke about. Hey, I have a joke! Let's put all the Jews in concentration camps! Get it? Ha ha ha ha ha! Isn't bigotry just freaking hilarious?
Really. Please, let's not make this into a flame thread.
This was meant as a parody of the "Why Homosexuality is a Negative Influence" thread.
If you have a problem with this, please take it up with the moderators, not me.

You chose a pretty stupid topic to joke about. Hey, I have a joke! Let's put all the Jews in concentration camps! Get it? Ha ha ha ha ha! Isn't bigotry just freaking hilarious?

The other day i got spat on in front of my mother for being gay
Isn't that fu*king funny you prick?

Mate, i may be wrong, but i'm fairly sure this thread was started in response to a similar thread saying that gays are a bad influence and should be banned from making public displays of their love.
We are joking, either take it in that spirit, or peace be with you and sod off. How else are we to fight such discrimination at ourselves from the majority, than by laughing?indeed. the thread was "Why homosexuals are a bad influence..." yes, with those unneccessary elipses. anyway, the reason was that there were two guys holding hands, christmas shopping, and they kissed! right in front of kids waiting to go see Santa! OMFG! All gays are evil!

Personally if i was one of those guys, i'd ditch the other one and go for Santa. That red suit really does things for me

As a straight white male I agree, I am a negative influence on society. :D It's true!

...but if you ban hetrosexualality, we wont have anything to do.
Fire, the wheel, modern day medicine, walking on the moon, computers...we only did these things to impress women! So that's why Billy Everyteen shouldn't have sex with his Marylyn MonRobot...wait...sorry, too much Futurama :)

...and computers still didn't help us nerds in the ladies department, hehe....:(

(BTW this is all in jest, well I am a negative influence still)

Jesus wept. You know, gays are fine with me. I can live with gays and maybe even sleep in the same room as a homosexual, despite being a bit uncomfortable with it. But it's you bigot homosexuals who believe gays are superior to straights that really piss me off. Yes, members of minorities can be bigots. If Hitler had been a gay and ordered the execution of all straights, it would be bigotry. You don't want gay equality, you want gay superiority. You people are wrong. I've said it before, but apparently I need to say it again: when you post something like this, expect people to be pissed off at you, even if you're a minority. The letters: "PC" have become an invincible suit of armor these days. It is politically correct for me to defend my way of life, just like it's fine for you to defend yours. But now you're attacking mine when I have never said anything to you. Ban straights? The fact that you're stupid enough to even start a thread like this makes me wonder if you're stupid enough to mean half of the things you're saying. If you really mean any of this stuff, you're a complete idiot my friend. Not trying to be mean, it's just true. If you don't mean it, then I guess you just select items to talk about from your "Controversial Topics List" and post something as stupid as this. I'm just fine with gays. But you, sir, are retarded.
...
You chose a pretty stupid topic to joke about. Hey, I have a joke! Let's put all the Jews in concentration camps! Get it? Ha ha ha ha ha! Isn't bigotry just freaking hilarious?I'll lend you my sarcasm detector if you want. This thread is a parody, a joke, an attempt to lighten the day by humour. We are not serious. C'mon, learn to read between the lines.
So: either join us and enjoy the thread, or take umbrage and sod off.
Crikey.

Crikey indeed. :p

Best.
Thread.
Evar.

Oh. And for the stupid who don't realize that this is a freaking joke...
*stabs in the head*
Stupidity is even more of an abomination than homosexuality supposedly is.

Ban straights. Then we'll have sorted all the world's problems out.

Seriously, though, a male child is 100 times more likely to be raped by a practising heterosexual than a practising homosexual. And for girls, it's even more.

If Hitler hadn't been brought up on homophobic attitudes and beliefs, would he still have started the 2nd World War?

"Therapy" to "cure" homosexuals changes sexual orientation about once in every thousand cases. It is more likely to cause suicide than change your sexual preference.

Jesus never said anything about gays, even though it was a common practice amongst the Romans. If you're about to bring up that verse where Jesus says something like, "The Kingdom of Heaven does not belong to the sinners; it does not belong to... homosexuals etc.", well you have a badly translated Bible - a much more accurate translation of the ancient greek word "arsenokoitai" would be "Male pagan temple prostitute".

Jesus, on the other hand, did say that it is not what enters your body that matters, but what you feel.

WAH WAH some straight guys are mean! Let's ban those evil straight people!! Also Jesus is awesome - SO AWESOME I AM IN A STATE OF RELIGIOUS PSYCHOSIS GOOD SIR!!

Hitler hated Jews as well as gays. Let's ban everyone that isn't Jewish! The Gay Jew world order will be a utopia!

/sarcasm

Ban straights. Then we'll have sorted all the world's problems out.

Seriously, though, a male child is 100 times more likely to be raped by a practising heterosexual than a practising homosexual. And for girls, it's even more.

If Hitler hadn't been brought up on homophobic attitudes and beliefs, would he still have started the 2nd World War?

"Therapy" to "cure" homosexuals changes sexual orientation about once in every thousand cases. It is more likely to cause suicide than change your sexual preference.

Jesus never said anything about gays, even though it was a common practice amongst the Romans. If you're about to bring up that verse where Jesus says something like, "The Kingdom of Heaven does not belong to the sinners; it does not belong to... homosexuals etc.", well you have a badly translated Bible - a much more accurate translation of the ancient greek word "arsenokoitai" would be "Male pagan temple prostitute".

Jesus, on the other hand, did say that it is not what enters your body that matters, but what you feel.

As soon as a hetero rapes a boy he is either Bisexual or Homosexual. So there are by definition no raping boy heteros.

As soon as a hetero rapes a boy he is either Bisexual or Homosexual. So there are by definition no raping boy heteros.
He's only bisexual or homosexual if he's attracted to boys. Having sex with them has nothing to do with being gay.

Of course, I don't see why someone not sexually attracted to boys would rape them...

You know what I saw?

I was out with a friend of mine, and we were minding our own business, when the most sinful sight crossed our path - two straight people kissing! Yes, we saw a man and woman kissing!

There was a nearby school and one of those little girls asked her teacher why those two people were kissing. I pity the poor teacher for she'll now have to explain that abomination!

Heterosexuals make me sick! We must strip them of their rights!

disclamer: this is meant to mock the original post from the gays are a negative influence thread

Jesus never directly mentioned homosexuality, but it's this lack of mention that is significant. The only things Christ changed from the religion the Jews (and now Christians) follow are the things he specifically mentioned, such as turning the other cheek instead of an eye for an eye, and the lack of necessity of animal sacrifices following his sacrifice. Jesus never mentioned that it was wrong to steal or take his name in vain, and yet it is still considered a sin. So therefore the laws in the old testement specifically Leviticus 18:22 A man shalt not lie with another man, as with a woman: it is a detestable sin, denouncing homosexuality hold true.

Jesus never directly mentioned homosexuality, but it's this lack of mention that is significant. The only things Christ changed from the religion the Jews (and now Christians) follow are the things he specifically mentioned, such as turning the other cheek instead of an eye for an eye, and the lack of necessity of animal sacrifices following his sacrifice. Jesus never mentioned that it was wrong to steal or take his name in vain, and yet it is still considered a sin. So therefore the laws in the old testement specifically Leviticus 18:22 A man shalt not lie with another man, as with a woman: it is a detestable sin, denouncing homosexuality hold true.
I think this post might have been better put in the thread entitled "Why homosexuality is a negative influence..."
This is a parody thread.
I repeat:
This is a parody thread.

Yes, this thread is designed to mock the "Why homosexuality is a negative influence" thread. :D This is for anyone who wishes to mock that thread and the ignorance of the thread....

Hmm, I have a problem here. Not being gay, I can see that I'm being not so subtley edged out. Is there away to avoid being first up against the wall when the revolution comes?

Hmm, I have a problem here. Not being gay, I can see that I'm being not so subtley edged out. Is there away to avoid being first up against the wall when the revolution comes?
Simple, don't irritate them.

The idea of parody fades away pretty fast when certain people hear the word 'homosexual'. And when did this turn into a Christianity thing? Anyways..

The worst thing a homosexual ever did to me was help me get softer skin...and my girlfriend loves it!! (crazy man...hair conditioner...who would have thunk it? :))

Hmm, I have a problem here. Not being gay, I can see that I'm being not so subtley edged out. Is there away to avoid being first up against the wall when the revolution comes?
Hmm...
It might not matter much, since the human race will be extinct 1 generation after the revolution.
:D

to first clear things up, i am heterosexual. next, there is nothing wrong with gays. why dont you simple-minded people see that. people are different. i have some special talent, ability, and disability just like you and everyone else do.

Simple, don't irritate them.

I was thinking more along the lines of some quality toadying for our new overlords. :p

This thread = 13.5/10 on the awesomeness scale

Ban straights. Then we'll have sorted all the world's problems out.

Seriously, though, a male child is 100 times more likely to be raped by a practising heterosexual than a practising homosexual. And for girls, it's even more.

If Hitler hadn't been brought up on homophobic attitudes and beliefs, would he still have started the 2nd World War?

"Therapy" to "cure" homosexuals changes sexual orientation about once in every thousand cases. It is more likely to cause suicide than change your sexual preference.

Jesus never said anything about gays, even though it was a common practice amongst the Romans. If you're about to bring up that verse where Jesus says something like, "The Kingdom of Heaven does not belong to the sinners; it does not belong to... homosexuals etc.", well you have a badly translated Bible - a much more accurate translation of the ancient greek word "arsenokoitai" would be "Male pagan temple prostitute".

Jesus, on the other hand, did say that it is not what enters your body that matters, but what you feel.

dude their is a verse in the bible it says homosexuallity is a sin also adultery, and bestiarlity or soething. and plese if we banned straights that would be the end of humanity and by the sounds of your complaits you are the negative one.

to first clear things up, i am heterosexual. next, there is nothing wrong with gays. why dont you simple-minded people see that. people are different. i have some special talent, ability, and disability just like you and everyone else do.

this may contradic what is just said i dont know but i agree with you respect others i was just saying that the guy that started this thread doesnt respect straights.
now if he were more like the queer eye guys trying to clean the straights look up.........it wouldnt be any different....

this may contradic what is just said i dont know but i agree with you respect others i was just saying that the guy that started this thread doesnt respect straights.
now if he were more like the queer eye guys trying to clean the straights look up.........it wouldnt be any different....
Now really, did you take the time to read the thread?
This thread is a parody of the thread "WHy homosexuality is a negative influence..."
This is just a joke.

This must be the 5th time I and others have said this.

Please read the thread before you post in it.

This is my favorite thread ever. Okay so I only read the first page, so I guess a more accurate statement would be, the first page of this thread is my favorite ever.

Now I'm gonna go have some hot lesbian sex with my girlfriend. :fluffle:

The thing that pisses me off is, the religious right says Jesus doesnt like Homos, because it says in the bible, but it says that in the old testament, which has no relation to Jesus, and less relation to Christians, more to Jews, but the Jews arent electing Bush. Its just that the priests are feeding bullshit to the blind followers.

This is my favorite thread ever. Okay so I only read the first page, so I guess a more accurate statement would be, the first page of this thread is my favorite ever.

Now I'm gonna go have some hot lesbian sex with my girlfriend. :fluffle:

Can I watch?

I was thinking more along the lines of some quality toadying for our new overlords. :p
That also works.

The thing that pisses me off is, the religious right says Jesus doesnt like Homos, because it says in the bible, but it says that in the old testament, which has no relation to Jesus, and less relation to Christians, more to Jews, but the Jews arent electing Bush. Its just that the priests are feeding bullshit to the blind followers.
The thing is, that has nothing to do with this thread...

The thing that pisses me off is, the religious right says Jesus doesnt like Homos, because it says in the bible, but it says that in the old testament, which has no relation to Jesus, and less relation to Christians, more to Jews, but the Jews arent electing Bush. Its just that the priests are feeding bullshit to the blind followers.

Do you know anything about christianity? The old testament is the foundation for the christian beliefs. It sets up everything for Christianity. The comming of a savior? Yeah because that has nothing to do with Christianity.(Sarcasm) The only thing that Jesus changed were some of the laws. The one about homosexualtiy still holds true and there are numerous references in the new testament to back up what the old testament says. Romans specifically has versus that denounce homosexuality. Yes I am aware of the irony of The Book of Romans having anti homosexuality versus when the romans engaged in homosexuality. But to say that the old testament has nothing to do with the new testament is just... dumb.

Jesus never directly mentioned homosexuality, but it's this lack of mention that is significant. The only things Christ changed from the religion the Jews (and now Christians) follow are the things he specifically mentioned, such as turning the other cheek instead of an eye for an eye, and the lack of necessity of animal sacrifices following his sacrifice. Jesus never mentioned that it was wrong to steal or take his name in vain, and yet it is still considered a sin. So therefore the laws in the old testement specifically Leviticus 18:22 A man shalt not lie with another man, as with a woman: it is a detestable sin, denouncing homosexuality hold true.

So are you telling we when one of the 10 Commandmants says "Thou shalt not lie" that God was condemned sex as a sin? Whew, glad I'm still a virgin! All you sinner who have ever had sex are going straigth to Hell!

Do you know anything about christianity? The old testament is the foundation for the christian beliefs. It sets up everything for Christianity. The comming of a savior? Yeah because that has nothing to do with Christianity.(Sarcasm) The only thing that Jesus changed were some of the laws. The one about homosexualtiy still holds true and there are numerous references in the new testament to back up what the old testament says. Romans specifically has versus that denounce homosexuality. Yes I am aware of the irony of The Book of Romans having anti homosexuality versus when the romans engaged in homosexuality. But to say that the old testament has nothing to do with the new testament is just... dumb.

Why don't you start a new thread, "Old Testament Vs New Testament." It's way off topic in this one.

Hmm, I have a problem here. Not being gay, I can see that I'm being not so subtley edged out. Is there away to avoid being first up against the wall when the revolution comes?

Yup, there is. Give a blowjob to the next gay guy to meet. That way, when the evil, sinful gays take ove the world, you won't be killed because they'll know you are at least good for something. You'll just be enslaved and giving head for the rest of your life (but hey, it's better than death, right?)

Why the fuck do we continue to create topics about this stupid topic?

Can't anybody just shut the fuck up about this topic?

Why don't you start a new thread, "Old Testament Vs New Testament." It's way off topic in this one.
Seconded.
This is, as stated before, not a debate thread.
Nor is it a flame thread.
It is a simple parody.

Can anyone be bothered to read the thread before they post? I am losing my faith in humanity...
And my sanity.
hee, it rhymes!!

I'm no expert, but I believe the Bible mentions sodomy as a sin every now again. correct me if I'm wrong but isn't sodomy "gay sex"

I personally have nothing against homosexuals (odd for a practising christian I'm told, which is weird cause we're supposed to love everybody whether or not they're sinners.)

Straights shouuld not be allowed to marry!!!

They are desecrating marriage. Divorce rates are at an all time high. This proves straight people will not make good parents!!!

Marriage is a sin. It is only for those people who cannot resist their temptations of fornication!!! Straights are destroying the image of being married by being married!!!

Republicans are going to Hell!!! See quote:

Rom 13:1-6 (NAS) "1 Let every person be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God. 2 Therefore he who resists authority has opposed the ordinance of God; and they who have opposed will receive condemnation upon themselves. 3 For rulers are not a cause of fear for good behavior, but for evil. Do you want to have no fear of authority? Do what is good, and you will have praise from the same; 4 for it is a minister of God to you for good. But if you do what is evil, be afraid; for it does not bear the sword for nothing; for it is a minister of God, an avenger who brings wrath upon the one who practices evil. 5 Wherefore it is necessary to be in subjection, not only because of wrath, but also for conscience' sake. 6 For because of this you also pay taxes, for {rulers} are servants of God, devoting themselves to this very thing."

God wants you to have HIGH TAXES so you should vote for liberals!! ALL REPUBLICANS ARE GOING TO HELL. They are not serving their rulers who serve God.

God commands us to have gay relationships:

6“So then, they are no longer two but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let not man separate.”

By this verse we determine that men should join together in flesh!

God wants gays to be married (even though we determined earlier straight marriage leads to damnation):

"4Marriage is honorable among ALL, and the bed undefiled; but fornicators and adulterers God will judge."

Surely by the world ALL, God simply forgot that might include sinful straight people.

These things we hold true. So help us God.
-The United Chuch of Flamboyance.

I'm no expert, but I believe the Bible mentions sodomy as a sin every now again. correct me if I'm wrong but isn't sodomy "gay sex"

I personally have nothing against homosexuals (odd for a practising christian I'm told, which is weird cause we're supposed to love everybody whether or not they're sinners.)

Some people say sodomy is anything other than missionary position. The Bible also says a lot of other stuff (owning slaves, not wearing fabric or more than one material, ect)... Nobody really cares about that stuff anymore. They only care about the gay stuff because they're afraid they might "turn gay" (or just let themselve be who they really are). Christians are usually the first to say "free will" and such but are quick to say the gays turn everyone into sinners. It makes no sense, so I just laugh at them. :D

Ban straights. Then we'll have sorted all the world's problems out.

Seriously, though, a male child is 100 times more likely to be raped by a practising heterosexual than a practising homosexual. And for girls, it's even more.

If Hitler hadn't been brought up on homophobic attitudes and beliefs, would he still have started the 2nd World War?

"Therapy" to "cure" homosexuals changes sexual orientation about once in every thousand cases. It is more likely to cause suicide than change your sexual preference.

Jesus never said anything about gays, even though it was a common practice amongst the Romans. If you're about to bring up that verse where Jesus says something like, "The Kingdom of Heaven does not belong to the sinners; it does not belong to... homosexuals etc.", well you have a badly translated Bible - a much more accurate translation of the ancient greek word "arsenokoitai" would be "Male pagan temple prostitute".

Jesus, on the other hand, did say that it is not what enters your body that matters, but what you feel.

What? Do you really think every straight guy would go willingly over to the Gay side? If that happened all you'd be doing is oppressing straights instead, instead of gays.

What? Do you really think every straight guy would go willingly over to the Gay side? If that happened all you'd be doing is oppressing straights instead, instead of gays.
:rolleyes:
I'm not typing this whole "Read the thread!" thing over again, so I'll just quote myself.

1:

Please, calm down.
Did you actually believe this thread was serious? It's a joke.
2:

Everybody, calm down a little.
Did you take the time to read this thread?
I would suggest you do.
This thread is a joke. Nothing more, nothing less. Nothing to see here.
3:

Really. Please, let's not make this into a flame thread.
This was meant as a parody of the "Why Homosexuality is a Negative Influence" thread.
If you have a problem with this, please take it up with the moderators, not me.
4:

I think this post might have been better put in the thread entitled "Why homosexuality is a negative influence..."
This is a parody thread.
I repeat:
This is a parody thread.
5:

Now really, did you take the time to read the thread?
This thread is a parody of the thread "Why homosexuality is a negative influence..."
This is just a joke.

This must be the 5th time I and others have said this.

Please read the thread before you post in it.
6:

Seconded.
This is, as stated before, not a debate thread.
Nor is it a flame thread.
It is a simple parody.

Can anyone be bothered to read the thread before they post? I am losing my faith in humanity...
And my sanity.
hee, it rhymes!!

And those are just from me. I found 2 from others too!

7:
Mate, i may be wrong, but i'm fairly sure this thread was started in response to a similar thread saying that gays are a bad influence and should be banned from making public displays of their love.
We are joking, either take it in that spirit, or peace be with you and sod off. How else are we to fight such discrimination at ourselves from the majority, than by laughing?
8:
I'll lend you my sarcasm detector if you want. This thread is a parody, a joke, an attempt to lighten the day by humour. We are not serious. C'mon, learn to read between the lines.
So: either join us and enjoy the thread, or take umbrage and sod off.
Crikey.
I'd say that counts as a warning that this thread is a joke.
A parody.
Please read the thread in the future before posting in it.

:I'd say that counts as a warning that this thread is a joke.
A parody.
Please read the thread in the future before posting in it.

Oh, so this is a parody thread. Well bugger me! ;)

I'd say that counts as a warning that this thread is a joke.
A parody.
Please read the thread in the future before posting in it.

Wait! Wait a minute! This is a parody? It's not serious?? Why didn't someone inform me of this before??

Oh come on, surely this can't be the first time you've seen:

a.) Thread hijacking/a thread taking an unexpected turn

b.) People who jump in and reply to a thread after only reading the first post

c.) People who cannot recognise parody/sarcasm

d.) People who INTENTIONALLY respond to a parody/sarcastic thread as if it were serious simply to get a reaction

Well bugger me! ;)*applauds* Thanks for the invite, but I have to have some hot lesbian sex with my girlfriends.
:fluffle: :fluffle:

c.) People who cannot recognise parody/sarcasm
d.) People who INTENTIONALLY respond to a parody/sarcastic thread as if it were serious simply to get a reactionWow. They're welcome to come and watch Monty Python's The Life Of Brian with me if they want.

Do you know anything about christianity? The old testament is the foundation for the christian beliefs. It sets up everything for Christianity. The comming of a savior? Yeah because that has nothing to do with Christianity.(Sarcasm) The only thing that Jesus changed were some of the laws. The one about homosexualtiy still holds true and there are numerous references in the new testament to back up what the old testament says. Romans specifically has versus that denounce homosexuality. Yes I am aware of the irony of The Book of Romans having anti homosexuality versus when the romans engaged in homosexuality. But to say that the old testament has nothing to do with the new testament is just... dumb.

And we all know that the Bible was originally written in English and that the fact that many such references have been shown to be likely translations means absolutely nothing.

Edit: Couldn't help it, sorry!

Um....er.....DEATH TO THE HETEROS!

Wait, that means that I might be targetted, since I'm mostly hetero!

Um...er...CAKE TO THE HETEROS!

And we all know that the Bible was originally written in English and that the fact that many such references have been shown to be likely translations means absolutely nothing.Points for sarcasm, now if you start talking about those filthy hets we'll accept you into the fold... :D

Points for sarcasm, now if you start talking about those filthy hets we'll accept you into the fold... :D

See my edit. =)

YEAH BABY! but now we're going to harrass you for not giving us cake too :mad:

YEAH BABY! but now we're going to harrass you for not giving us cake too :mad:

Ok, ok, I'm a pushover. Cake for everyone!

this is the dumbest thing i've ever heard of

You're the dumbest person I've ever listened to! *Turns off Robo-Ears*

Yes, this is officially the best thread of all time :)

*Starts imitating Raligious Fanatics, yelling that 'Jesus kills Heteros'* :D

[FONT=Arial Black][QUOTE=Mondiala]Ban straights. Then we'll have sorted all the world's problems out.

Seriously, though, a male child is 100 times more likely to be raped by a practising heterosexual than a practising homosexual. And for girls, it's even more.

If Hitler hadn't been brought up on homophobic attitudes and beliefs, would he still have started the 2nd World War?
QUOTE]Umm, wow. Rational much? Oh yea, this must be, for a second I thought everybody was aurguing like 13yr old prepubesant children. For the love of (OH NO!!!!! HE'S GONNA SAY IT......"sigh of exasperation" as it's only a saying) God, if your a homosexual then live your lifestlye as you do being confident in your sexuality. If your a heterosexual the do the same. I myself do not all together look to fondly upon the ideals of homosexuality but quite frankly it's not my decision what other people do! Banning homosexuals will only instagate more problems that continualy waste taxpayers money. Besides, its a life style that some people have taken to. It dosent hurt anyone, just a decision that two men or women have made that does not affect the rest of us. Furthermore the argument about banning heterosexuals is posibly the most utterly ridiculas thing I have ever heard. You stand for gay rights and all you can do is come up with some retarded but none the less taunted retalitory remark? Perhaps you should ask yourself how comfertable with your sexual preference you actualy are and maybe.............I know I'm asking an awfuly lot here......We can all behave like ADULTS!

*Tapping my foot obnoxiosly in anticipation for MY piece of cake*
"Where's my cake............I WAS PROMISED CAKE!!!"

I DONT CARE THAT THIS WAS STARTED AS A JOKE! MOST OF US ARENT TROLLER LOSERS, WHO GO THROUGH THE FORUMS POSTING EVERYTHING. SOME OF US JUST FIND A FREAKING FORUM ON THE NATIONSTATES.NET PAGE AND GO TO IT FROM THERE! I FIND SOMETHING I FIND INTERESTING TO TALK ABOUT AND GO TO IT! I DON'T HAVE ANY FREAKING TIME TO CHECK THE ORIGINAL REASON THIS FORUM WAS CREATED, NOR DO I CARE! CAN'T YOU GUYS SEE? THE FORUM IS NO LONGER A JOKE, FORGET ABOUT IT!

WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE??

if you guys were smart enough to READ what is going on, this is NOT parody. I hate when people just say what they want to with no relation to what is going on (i find this to be of relevance, because people keep insisting this is a parody).

IT IS A DEBATE FORUM NOW, AND WHOEVER STILL INSISTS IT IS NOT WITH ALL OF THE DEBATE GOING ON SHOULD JUST LEAVE! :sniper:

next time, CALL IT A PARODY!

let the debate continue guys... :)

Ban straights. Then we'll have sorted all the world's problems out.
Seriously, though, a male child is 100 times more likely to be raped by a practising heterosexual than a practising homosexual. And for girls, it's even more.
If Hitler hadn't been brought up on homophobic attitudes and beliefs, would he still have started the 2nd World War?
"Therapy" to "cure" homosexuals changes sexual orientation about once in every thousand cases. It is more likely to cause suicide than change your sexual preference.
Jesus never said anything about gays, even though it was a common practice amongst the Romans. If you're about to bring up that verse where Jesus says something like, "The Kingdom of Heaven does not belong to the sinners; it does not belong to... homosexuals etc.", well you have a badly translated Bible - a much more accurate translation of the ancient greek word "arsenokoitai" would be "Male pagan temple prostitute".
Jesus, on the other hand, did say that it is not what enters your body that matters, but what you feel.
If you actually read the Bible you will find that Sodom and Gahmora were destroyed for all sorts of sexual perversions including, at the top of the list, Homosexuality. The men (all of them) came to Lot's house to rape the two angels and were all struck blind. This is only one example. God even ordered David to wipe out an entire nation for the same problems. So you can not even claim that in any way Jesus and God the Father have anything but contempt for the homosexual lifestyle. On the other side this opinion does not sto[ me from being friends with those in that lifestyle. I follow the word of God in that I love my neighbor but that does not mean that I am required to approve of their life choices.

I DONT CARE THAT THIS WAS STARTED AS A JOKE! MOST OF US ARENT TROLLER LOSERS, WHO GO THROUGH THE FORUMS POSTING EVERYTHING. SOME OF US JUST FIND A FREAKING FORUM ON THE NATIONSTATES.NET PAGE AND GO TO IT FROM THERE! I FIND SOMETHING I FIND INTERESTING TO TALK ABOUT AND GO TO IT! I DON'T HAVE ANY FREAKING TIME TO CHECK THE ORIGINAL REASON THIS FORUM WAS CREATED, NOR DO I CARE! CAN'T YOU GUYS SEE? THE FORUM IS NO LONGER A JOKE, FORGET ABOUT IT!

WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE??

if you guys were smart enough to READ what is going on, this is NOT parody. I hate when people just say what they want to with no relation to what is going on (i find this to be of relevance, because people keep insisting this is a parody).

IT IS A DEBATE FORUM NOW, AND WHOEVER STILL INSISTS IT IS NOT WITH ALL OF THE DEBATE GOING ON SHOULD JUST LEAVE! :sniper:

next time, CALL IT A PARODY!

let the debate continue guys... :) I'm trying to decide whether this is a masterful piece of satire... jury's still out.

If you actually read the Bible you will find that Sodom and Gahmora were destroyed for all sorts of sexual perversions including, at the top of the list, Homosexuality. The men (all of them) came to Lot's house to rape the two angels and were all struck blind.All right, let's get some debate going then.
4. If you actually read the Bible you will find that there are differing references in the Bible to what the actual crime was, and only one book of five refer to homosexuality.
2. Angels? Nothing about angels in my version of that story. Nothing 'bout blindness either. Hey, how do you rape angels anyway? Wouldn't they have some divinely-given anti-rape powers?
3. It's Gomorrah. Sorry to nit-pick, but...
And for the requisite link to the title and SPIRIT of the thread...
Actually, in my edition of the Bible, the men came to demand Lot's two daughters. What debauched and sorry individuals they must have been... Further proof that heterosexuals are evil, a negative influence, and should all be condemned to HELL, muahahaha! (or whichever afterlife you prefer to subscribe to ...)

And I want my cake. Chocolate or banana, please :D

The idea of parody fades away pretty fast when certain people hear the word 'homosexual'. And when did this turn into a Christianity thing? Anyways..

The worst thing a homosexual ever did to me was help me get softer skin...and my girlfriend loves it!! (crazy man...hair conditioner...who would have thunk it? :))

Uh, BTW. Hate to get off topic but I gotta agree, and yes, wife loves the soft skin.

Why can't this arguement just die? It's not like there's a question as to who's right and who's crazy. Can't we just get off of it?

Oh, BTW. Hate to get off topic but I gotta agree, and yes, wife loves the soft skin.:D
Why can't this arguement just die? It's not like there's a question as to who's right and who's crazy. Can't we just get off of it?Are you advocating the untimely malnourishment of an extremely entertaining thread? I see the other thread is still going...

Why can't this arguement just die? It's not like there's a question as to who's right and who's crazy. Can't we just get off of it?
Peoples never-ending instinct to antagonize others.
And yes, much like you I feel dumber having read this string.
But it's entertaining. I'll give it that

I DONT CARE THAT THIS WAS STARTED AS A JOKE! MOST OF US ARENT TROLLER LOSERS, WHO GO THROUGH THE FORUMS POSTING EVERYTHING.

[blah, blah, blah...]

It seems like actually reading the thread is too time-consuming, as well. The understated humour was about as subtle as a brick. A big one. Painted fluorescent yellow. With racing stripes.

BTW, Swift wasn't serious when he wrote A Modest Proposal either, before you get too upset about his ideas. Maybe he should have edited the title as well.

The thread must continue as long as its sister thread is still on. In other news, my barber was gay. I onnly went to him twice. But he made me loook HOT. The women were ALL over me. (Read: He made me look sharper than my regular nerdy self. The girls said I looked nice and then tried to get away from the smell of "no-shower-in-5-weeks-because-I-leveled-in-everquest")
And to seriously debate, why do we have to debate on the bible and jesus, no one is going to believe anyone. GUNDGE :gundge:

All right, let's get some debate going then.
4. If you actually read the Bible you will find that there are differing references in the Bible to what the actual crime was, and only one book of five refer to homosexuality.
2. Angels? Nothing about angels in my version of that story. Nothing 'bout blindness either. Hey, how do you rape angels anyway? Wouldn't they have some divinely-given anti-rape powers?
3. It's Gomorrah. Sorry to nit-pick, but...
And for the requisite link to the title and SPIRIT of the thread...
Actually, in my edition of the Bible, the men came to demand Lot's two daughters. What debauched and sorry individuals they must have been... Further proof that heterosexuals are evil, a negative influence, and should all be condemned to HELL, muahahaha! (or whichever afterlife you prefer to subscribe to ...)And I want my cake. Chocolate or banana, please :D
3. Touche, and fair correction!
2 & 4. Genesis 19 clearly states that 2 angels came to the home of Lot and his family in Sodom. Vs 5 And they called out to Lot and said to him, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may know them carnally." New King James version. The NKJ is the version with the least variation from the Dead Sea Scrolls, usually only variing in spelling. Lot in an attempt to save his visitors offered up his daughters, they did not demand the girls and in fact wanted nothing to do with them. Vs 11 And they struck the men who were at the doorway of the house with blindness, both small and great, so that they became weary trying to find the door.
:p

And I want my cake. Chocolate or banana, please :D

I prefer banana cake with cream cheese & lemon icing. Mmmmm.

Why can't this arguement just die? It's not like there's a question as to who's right and who's crazy. Can't we just get off of it?
If you don't want to be in the debate then don't come back.

I'm just wondering, where will the bisexuals fit into the world after the revolution? I just don't know if I could live with only women. I know it's evil, but I can't resist my tasty husband. :fluffle:

oh child, when homosexuality takes over. it will take over in the form of male dominance. no way *mere* lesbians could over...throw. The heterosexuals....we are

I am a strong minded.....uh strongminded.........oo! lesbians!!!!!!!!!

S & G, according to Jesus, was about not treating visitors right.

The Bible is full of wrongdoing straights. Who will go to Heaven? 144,000 Male virgins who have not defiled themselves with women.

There seems to be a lot of resentment on this thread towards the revolution, so let me explain:

We do not hate heterosexuals. We just hate what they do.

S & G, according to Jesus, was about not treating visitors right.

Where is that from? And by no means have I said that all hetros are good and all homos are bad. The best person at my weading is a lesbian and we welcomed both her and her girlfriend. I believe in accepting a person for who they are not what! I do try to maintain a non-judgment position but I am in no way shy about sharing my perspective.

The Bible. Sorry, don't know the book/chapter/verse.

No one is born straight.

Banning straights would not fix the world and solve all our problems. Homosexuals and heterosexuals are both vital.

-Asylum Nova

No one is born straight.
My son is the living example of the old say. He really did, almost literally, come out of the womb and start flirting with the nurses. He doesn't have much use for guys but if there is a female nearby then he is giving her all the attention. When we have the TV on and the Bacardi commercial with the Hot black haired woman on the float comes on he MUST be allowed to watch or he will push you out of the way. The same happened with a commercial for MS research staring only a Nurse in training, again a cute brunnette. So you can not even come close to convincing that no one is born straight. From stories I have heard from my childhood I was much along the same lines and to this day the thought of another man naked is completely repulsive but give me a naked woman and...well ;D My wife is still laughing over your comment in relation to our son!
:fluffle:

No one is born straight.
...umm, OK...explain this for we "unenlightened"?

this whole topic is stupid.

i can't believe how many people took this thread seriously...jonathan swift is rolling in his grave.

i can't believe how many people took this thread seriously...jonathan swift is rolling in his grave.

Naw, I ate him :D

Are we there yet?

oh child, when homosexuality takes over. it will take over in the form of male dominance. no way *mere* lesbians could over...throw. The heterosexuals....we are
I am a strong minded.....uh strongminded.........oo! lesbians!!!!!!!!!There seems to be a lot of resentment on this thread towards the revolution, so let me explain:
We do not hate heterosexuals. We just hate what they do.These are gold. :fluffle:

The Book of Enlightenment, vs 4:

And Alexander did shake his head, and proclaim:
"In the words of our prophet Elton John, those who sin will never make it through the pearly-gates adorned with sombre yet tasteful black sequins and gold trim, but will instead be condemned to the bitter purgatory of paisley dressing-gowns and music by Prince."
And yea, all those who had sinned by defiling themselves with a member of the opposite sex did raise up their voices and beg for forgiveness, that they may kneel before the mighty Freddie Mercury.

No more people after this generation. Great no global warming, dimming, over population etc.

Wow. Hmmm. Genius.

*goes out, and gets (hetreosexually) thourouglhly fluffled :fluffle: :fluffle: *

Heterosexuals have been around for a couple of million years, and so have homosexuals. Homosexuality even exists in the animal kingdom. And Viruses don't even have sex at all, but still multiply very fast.

If god had a reason do do what he did, then he must have had a reason to create homosexuality. I wouldn't question his motives too much.

Actually, families with homosexuals have a greater chance to get their genes through, as the woman with a gay brother has two men to take care of their children, or actually at least one, if her husband is going to get killed for some stupid reason such as war or jealousy or car racing.

And, if life in those early days as hunter and gatherer was really so difficult - and everybody had lots of kids to feed, who found the time to invent the fire or the wheel, if not those who only had to feed themselves?

"We do not hate heterosexuals. We just hate what they do."


Not even that.

After all, all homosexuals are the product of heterosexuals.

So basically, the only way to get rid of homosexuality is to get rid of heterosexuals.

After all, all homosexuals are the product of heterosexuals.

So basically, the only way to get rid of homosexuality is to get rid of heterosexuals.
not necessarily...in this day and age, there are many people who were not the product of any form of sexual intercourse. artificial conceptions are becoming increasingly common, and the people born from such methods may be straight or gay just as any other person may be. thus, you can very easily have a gay person who was not produced by heterosexuals.

I guess the fact that God freakin' nuked Sodom & Gomorrah (due to all their sins, but mainly their homosexuality) has nothing to do with it. Besides - God intended that a man and woman get married - basically, a representation of Himself and the church. Gays pervert this idea by even by, well, doing that crazy thing they do...

I guess the fact that God freakin' nuked Sodom & Gomorrah (due to all their sins, but mainly their homosexuality) has nothing to do with it. Besides - God intended that a man and woman get married - basically, a representation of Himself and the church. Gays pervert this idea by even by, well, doing that crazy thing they do...
1. Prove that God actually "nuked" Soddom and Gomorrah
2. Prove that the original Biblical text states the primary reason for His "nuking" was the homosexuality of the residents (use direct quotations, please)
3. Prove that the Bible, written by humans, can accurately describe the motivations of God. Oh, and please prove God exists.
4. Prove that anybody should care what the Christian faith believes in, other than Christians themselves.
5. Prove that God does not like gay people or homosexuality.

if you cannot do the above, you are wasting space.

I guess the fact that God freakin' nuked Sodom & Gomorrah (due to all their sins, but mainly their homosexuality) has nothing to do with it. Besides - God intended that a man and woman get married - basically, a representation of Himself and the church. Gays pervert this idea by even by, well, doing that crazy thing they do...


So then God the man, teh church is the bitch and...wtf are the believers...splooge?

Talk about perverted.

*sheesh*

:eek:

I guess the fact that God freakin' nuked Sodom & Gomorrah (due to all their sins, but mainly their homosexuality) has nothing to do with it. Besides - God intended that a man and woman get married - basically, a representation of Himself and the church. Gays pervert this idea by even by, well, doing that crazy thing they do...

Of course, because it does make God squirm when he sees men doing that thing! Thats if he exists in the first place.

How do you know that its "crazy" does it have a label there saying (it is crazy to put a penis here)?

And yes, God intended us all to get married, after all, he founded the church and wrote the wedding sermons. He picks out your dress, and your hymns doesn't he?

Grow Up.

-A "pervert"

How do you know that its "crazy" does it have a label there saying (it is crazy to put a penis here)?




The vagina was designed for the penis.

I guess the fact that God freakin' nuked Sodom & Gomorrah (due to all their sins, but mainly their homosexuality) has nothing to do with it. Besides - God intended that a man and woman get married - basically, a representation of Himself and the church. Gays pervert this idea by even by, well, doing that crazy thing they do...

Hmm, let's see...


Genesis 19:4-8

But before they lay down, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, both young and old, all the people to the last man, surrounded the house; and they called to Lot, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us, that we may know them." Lot went out of the door to the men, shut the door after him, and said, "I beg you, my brothers, do not act so wickedly. Behold, I have two daughters who have not known man; let me bring them out to you, and do to them as you please; only do nothing to these men, for they have come under the shelter of my roof."

Jesus made it clear in Luke 10:10-12 that the sin of Sodom was inhospitality. No mention of homosexuality is ever made. Also, why do most Christians here seem to ignore the fact that Lot is pimping out his daughters to appease the mob?

Alright, I realize that this is over my head (dodges some stones being hurled at him), I think that as a straight I must be missing some important points. Sincere apologies to all, my bad.

So, if the people of Sodom were really gay, why did Lot offer them his daughters?

"To know them" can have also different meanings, like "I like to punch their face", "If you want to find out, then you have to find out".

just like fu**ing can mean procreation, but also fu**ing sth up or fu**ing with someone.

In short, the people of Sodom were inhospitable, a bit like the Germans are towards foreigners and Jews.

In short, the people of Sodom were inhospitable, a bit like the Germans are towards foreigners and Jews.
Yes, us germans form mobs and control what sort of visitors our neighbours have. Only at least two virgins can deter us from doing so. :rolleyes:
If we are so unfriendly to immigrants and jews, how come so many jews emigrate to germany? 22k per year, should anyone ask. And no, Sieg Heil! isnt the official greeting anymore. Moron!
I am far from being patriotic, but when i hear stupid bullshit like this being spouted off i get mad.

On topic, what destiny awaits bisexuals? Are they half-evil and only get shot in the leg? ;)

The vagina was designed for the penis.
actually, the vagina is primarily designed for the delivering of young. the vast majority of the construction of the vagina arose based on the need to pass young out of the female body, and the penis developed secondarily as a means to place sperm within reach of the inner reproductive organs of the female. so, actually, the penis was designed for the vagina.

of course, the hands were designed for effective grasping and removal of husks from food items, and certainly are not designed for playing the piano. yet, for some reason, nobody seems to scream about the immorality of using hands for the "unnatural" purpose of playing Mozart or Stevie Wonder ditties.

perhaps the prohibition only exists for sexual activities, you say? well, mouths weren't designed for kissing, they were designed for receiving and processing food. i guess that means that kissing is as immoral as homosexual sex, since we are using our mouths for a purpose other than the one they originally developed to carry out.

No, they are not. Neither are gays. People are what they are and that is that. This and the other threads are both absured generalizations.

perhaps the prohibition only exists for sexual activities, you say? well, mouths weren't designed for kissing, they were designed for receiving and processing food. i guess that means that kissing is as immoral as homosexual sex, since we are using our mouths for a purpose other than the one they originally developed to carry out.

mouths weren't designed for breathing or speaking either... and yet still, we filthy heathens breath and speak with our mouths... rather than breathing only with our noses and screaming "ook, eek, ARGH!" whenever we wish to communicate


No, they are not. Neither are gays. People are what they are and that is that. This and the other threads are both absured generalizations.

actually... this was *supposed* to be a parody of said "other threads"

mouths weren't designed for breathing or speaking either... and yet still, we filthy heathens breath and speak with our mouths... rather than breathing only with our noses and screaming "ook, eek, ARGH!" whenever we wish to communicate

excellent point. vocal chords did not develop until later on, and our lips, tongue, and cheek muscles did not originally arise with the intent of being used for communication. we are all grossly immoral for our use of these organs for unnatural purposes.

For those bisexuals worried about their part in the revolution: You shall be spared, as long as you give up your sinful ways of sexual intercourse with the opposite sex.

We understand that some people practise "straightness" because of a genetic mutation. But these people are to practise cellibacy, as instructed by Paul and Jesus. Those who do not must surely be exiled!

What about if its a chocolate coated penis? Please don;t tell me what I do on my saturday nights is wrong. There was other food involved too Far removed from the "unnatural" arguments, I simply say it's wrong because God tells me to several times in the Bible - you filthy whores of nature :rolleyes: and God's law :mad: (that made me feel a LOT better! ;) )please don't get mad at me :( I had to do that.

Too right, Liskeinland! These filthy heteros should be banned! Instead, programs like Friends, Sex and the City, Will and Grace and the Osbournes glorify them. Enough is enough! Stop ramming heterosexual ideologies down the throats of innocent children! We normal people don't need your heterosexual evils, thank you very much!

Too right, Liskeinland! These filthy heteros should be banned! Instead, programs like Friends, Sex and the City, Will and Grace and the Osbournes glorify them. Enough is enough! Stop ramming heterosexual ideologies down the throats of innocent children! We normal people don't need your heterosexual evils, thank you very much! Since you're going to be that way, I will use my forum flamer.

Hang on… I misread the title. Negative influence? No. I do not believe they influence "innocent children", gays that is. I do believe that what they do is wrong. But I don't believe it influences children.

I don't watch Friends
I don't watch Sex and the City
In fact, I don't watch TV at all

Normally I would go for tolerance, but I cannot do that.

Frankly, you can't have a homosexual revolution because there aren't enough of you. It worked in Sparta, mind you… I discovered my school piano piece was based on a dance for naked men and boys…

It is true that we cannot tolerate these unnatural heterosexuals. I am glad you and I agree.

Hooray!
There's actually funny stuff going on!
Yaaaay!
:fluffle:

When we have the TV on and the Bacardi commercial with the Hot black haired woman on the float comes on he MUST be allowed to watch or he will push you out of the way. The same happened with a commercial for MS research staring only a Nurse in training, again a cute brunnette.


I just don't know if that's a good thing or not. He might be in training to be a pervert around women if all he gets out of them is looks. I'd keep a close eye on him and his bedsheets.

Good luck with all that. :D

Oh, and as to the bisexuals giving up the opposite sex... well, I'm sure my girlfriend and I can use my husband for manual labor after the revolution. Since I doubt his homosexual tendencies. ;)

It seems no-one has commented on what must be one of the better parodical statements in this thread:

The NKJ is the version with the least variation from the Dead Sea Scrolls, usually only variing [sic] in spelling.
I didn't know the texts on the Dead Sea scrolls were in modern English. That might just account for some of the problems of KJV, not to mention Tyndale... I thought they struggled with the Hebrew, turns out they were trying to translate from a language that didn't exist yet! :eek: One learns something new every day :rolleyes:

Oh, and I think most heteros can be saved with therapy.

Can I have chocolate cake? :cool:

The ex-straight movement is a lie. There are no such things. The only way to save heteros is to force God's love on them.

As for men molesting little boys (or girls), the vast majority of them prefer women when not preying on children. Hence they are predominately hetero. Ask anyone who works with sex offenders. :headbang:

BTW since I'm a predominately hetero female, can I at least watch if I have to give up men? I would keep me off those damn slash sites fo a while.
:fluffle:

It seems no-one has commented on what must be one of the better parodical statements in this thread:
The NKJ is the version with the least variation from the Dead Sea Scrolls, usually only variing [sic] in spelling.
I didn't know the texts on the Dead Sea scrolls were in modern English. That might just account for some of the problems of KJV, not to mention Tyndale... I thought they struggled with the Hebrew, turns out they were trying to translate from a language that didn't exist yet! :eek: One learns something new every day :rolleyes:

Oh, and I think most heteros can be saved with therapy.

Can I have chocolate cake? :cool:

Ye Gods! You're right! I completely missed this post! Unless you can read ancient Hebrew (which is as radically different to modern Hebrew as Old English is to English), then you're reading a translation of the Bible ... and as we all know, the same word can have more than one meaning. The classic English example is the word 'round', which has more than ten meanings. Certain books were also written or translated into Greek, then into Latin.
Bye bye KJV ... :sniper:
Cake all round ;)

Mmm, the bible. Can you say flawed? Makes a good coaster though...

Anyway, a pointless post here to say howdy to my dear Helennia. *kissyface*

exactly!
If you're into depopulation, what've you got against Hitler?

Well, the other thread's alive and unwell again, so for all you evil straights out there:

GOD HATES STRAIGHTS!

(Hey - ours actually rhymes!)

When the bible said it's not what goes into the body thats important, it was talking about food, not penises.

who are you to tell me what jesus meant

Ye Gods! You're right! I completely missed this post! Unless you can read ancient Hebrew (which is as radically different to modern Hebrew as Old English is to English), then you're reading a translation of the Bible ... and as we all know, the same word can have more than one meaning. The classic English example is the word 'round', which has more than ten meanings. Certain books were also written or translated into Greek, then into Latin.
Bye bye KJV ... :sniper:
Cake all round ;)
not to mention that the KJV is recognized by Bible scholars as the LEAST accurate translation of the original text. but hey, why trust people who can actually read the original text...why trust people who actually know what the original Bible says...why trust people who have spent their lives studying the Bible? why not just decide that our own version MUST be the right one, and condemn everybody who disagrees to suffer for eternity in a nightmare torture dimension?

3. Touche, and fair correction!
2 & 4. Genesis 19 clearly states that 2 angels came to the home of Lot and his family in Sodom. Vs 5 And they called out to Lot and said to him, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may know them carnally." New King James version. The NKJ is the version with the least variation from the Dead Sea Scrolls, usually only variing in spelling. Lot in an attempt to save his visitors offered up his daughters, they did not demand the girls and in fact wanted nothing to do with them. Vs 11 And they struck the men who were at the doorway of the house with blindness, both small and great, so that they became weary trying to find the door.
:p

I know this is a joke thread, but anyone who states that any King James Version is the closest to any scrolls doesn't have a clue what they are talking about.

Well, girls and boys, what have we learnt here tonight?

1: SOME people can't take jokes...
2: Seems most of those people are straights...
3: SOME people think that wearing clothes made of two different kinds of material will get you a one-way ticket to Hell.
4: SOME people believe that 144,000 male virgins not defiled with women will be the only people to go to Heaven. Pardon me, but this sounds a bit like a gay paradise rather than a straight one...
5: Women must wear hats when in church, but no gold.
6: Jesus was cool.

Peace, guys.

I didn't read this whole thread, but I gotta say: if you're a male and you rape a male, that's the homosexual activity. This is in response to the original post, which claimed, ridiculously and surely as parody, that most homosexual rape is performed by heterosexuals... I just thought that was funny, sorrry. ;)

Ban straights. Then we'll have sorted all the world's problems out.
You are a very strange person.
Do you really believe we can ban a sexual affiliation? Isn't that a breach of our amendement rights?

#149 - actually, it's considered paedophilia (or pedofilia for those of you in that country near Mexico), and not homosexuality.

Anywho, it's a genuine stat - practising heterosexuals are more likely to rape children than practising homosexuals.

#150 - Sorry if it wasn't clear, but I'm not a nutjob, and don't believe straights should be qiped out. Some of my best friends are straight.

#149 - actually, it's considered paedophilia (or pedofilia for those of you in that country near Mexico), and not homosexuality.

Anywho, it's a genuine stat - practising heterosexuals are more likely to rape children than practising homosexuals.

#150 - Sorry if it wasn't clear, but I'm not a nutjob, and don't believe straights should be qiped out. Some of my best friends are straight.

Eh? So, If I rape an 18 year-old man (I'm male), It'd be homosexual rape, whereas if I rape a 17-year old man/boy, it'd be neither homosexual nor heterosexual, but simply pedophilia? I guess I'd have to disagree. A person who commits homosexual rape is at that point acting as a homosexual, whether the majority of their consentual sexual activites are heterosexual or not.

Ah, but the "attraction" isn't either homo or hetero, merely paedo.

Ah, but the "attraction" isn't either homo or hetero, merely paedo.
No I would have to agree with Pepe Dominguez. This is the reason that it is extremely rare for a pedofile to molest both boys and girls. Once he chooses to molest boys then he becomes a homosexual pedofile not just a pedofile. Any one in the field of Special Victims Investigation or treating pedofiles will tell you the same thing. The base attraction is still the same. It is no different than a married guy going out and sleeping with a guy from a club or raping a male and then going home to his wife. It is usually a cry for help in a sexually confused man.

Ok, how about...

a paedophile is more likely to have a "grown-up" sexual relationship with a member of opposite sex

?

That's what I meant.

Eh? So, If I rape an 18 year-old man (I'm male), It'd be homosexual rape, whereas if I rape a 17-year old man/boy, it'd be neither homosexual nor heterosexual, but simply pedophilia? I guess I'd have to disagree. A person who commits homosexual rape is at that point acting as a homosexual, whether the majority of their consentual sexual activites are heterosexual or not.


i thoughtrape wasn't about sexual attraction - its about power. and ppower can be manifested otver either boys, girls, men or women.

On a side note why is it homosexuals feel the need to define themselves by their sexuality? and repeatedly thurst the fact their gay into everyones faces? The majority dont care, your gay, fine, get on with it.

#157 - You have no idea what disgusting ideas came into my head when I read that.

On a side note why is it homosexuals feel the need to define themselves by their sexuality? and repeatedly thurst the fact their gay into everyones faces?



Holy generalization Batman! I wasn't aware they did...

Eh? So, If I rape an 18 year-old man (I'm male), It'd be homosexual rape, whereas if I rape a 17-year old man/boy, it'd be neither homosexual nor heterosexual, but simply pedophilia? I guess I'd have to disagree. A person who commits homosexual rape is at that point acting as a homosexual, whether the majority of their consentual sexual activites are heterosexual or not.
acts of rape don't have sexual orientation. rape is violence, domination, cruelty, and debasement of the victim, and has nothing whatsoever to do with sexuality. if you honestly think you can draw a parallel between sexual orientation and rape then i am seriously sorry for you and any sex partner who is unlucky enough to share themselves with you.

On a side note why is it homosexuals feel the need to define themselves by their sexuality? and repeatedly thurst the fact their gay into everyones faces?
i can answer that quite easily for you:

they don't. in fact, the only people who think they do are homophobes. educate yourself and you won't embarass yourself with such ignorant generalizations in the future.


The majority dont care, your gay, fine, get on with it.
actually, the majority are determined to keep gay citizens from attaining equal rights at this time. not that it matters what the majority wants, in this case, but that's the simple reality: the majority of people believe that homosexuals don't deserve equal rights, just as the majority once believed persons of other races didn't deserve equal rights. if gay people had equal rights they wouldn't have to force so many issues, but until homophobes can get over themselves we are just going to have to keep making noise until justice is carried out.

I didn't read this whole thread, but I gotta say: if you're a male and you rape a male, that's the homosexual activity. This is in response to the original post, which claimed, ridiculously and surely as parody, that most homosexual rape is performed by heterosexuals... I just thought that was funny, sorrry. ;)

Wrong.

Pedophilia is it's own sexual disorder, and has nothing whatsoever to do with the normal sexuality of the person. In fact, most pedophilia (on same or opposite sex children) is perpetrated by those who are otherwise heterosexual.

Eh? So, If I rape an 18 year-old man (I'm male), It'd be homosexual rape, whereas if I rape a 17-year old man/boy, it'd be neither homosexual nor heterosexual, but simply pedophilia? I guess I'd have to disagree. A person who commits homosexual rape is at that point acting as a homosexual, whether the majority of their consentual sexual activites are heterosexual or not.

Pedophilia does not refer to any sexual attraction to post-pubescent human beings. A pedophile is sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children, thus, your example does not apply.