NationStates Jolt Archive

Lookylooky!
Proof!

http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com/

It must be true, it was in peer-reviewed literature!
Or not.
Oh yeah, and if you see any mistakes, it must just be that you can't understand what he's saying. Of course, in that case, you aren't worth explaining it to. Because you aren't "qualified" enough.

This guy is hilarious when talking to him on Usenet.
:D

Erm....


http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com/indpage3_files/img0.gif
In Fig. 7, A and B are two identical twins who were raised in vastly different circumstances. A is more alert and stronger than B. He has more growth than B. In this particular case we have given A a menacing perhaps even dangerous personality. Person B on the other hand is depicted as an indifferent type, obviously quite harmless. Face C is a superposition of these two faces. Face C is more of an average personality type. Now, this theory advances the following deduction. When the public looks at C no one sees the same person. Who you see depends on your own personal growth deficit. A high growth person looking at C will see face B, whereas a low growth person will see face A. This simply because there is a large growth difference between A and B. If in fact A was a dangerous adversary, and suddenly the urgency of the situation caused a mental block to break lifting Repression, you might see person A suddenly turn into person B right in front of your eyes. This is called a miracle, particularly if it involves saving your life.

Erm....
EXACTLY!
This man is inspired!
Of course, "inspired" is nothing like "correct", but damn is he inspired!

*coughbumpcough*

*coughbumpcough*
Is there a rule against bumping twice in a row?

wow. A professional level paper with spelling errors. I thought I'd never see it. This and despite the fact that he defines 'secular' as human growth and not as absence of belief in religion. I got through the first page and couldn't stop laughing at it.

'brain growth deficit'? Did he just make that curve up? Umm yes, I need another curve. . .I know! brain growth deficit. here, I'll just steal the curve of e and use that. Ah ha! Now it looks like science!

Anybody that clicked that link should scan their system for spyware.

I saw gator list out and they tend to install their crap without permission.

That is if you don't already have a decent anti-spyware setup! ;)

wow. A professional level paper with spelling errors. I thought I'd never see it. This and despite the fact that he defines 'secular' as human growth and not as absence of belief in religion. I got through the first page and couldn't stop laughing at it.

'brain growth deficit'? Did he just make that curve up? Umm yes, I need another curve. . .I know! brain growth deficit. here, I'll just steal the curve of e and use that. Ah ha! Now it looks like science!
Yeah.
He's so funny when people try and debate him. Stuff like "You don't have the correct college degrees, so you can't possibly understand it. It's not possible."
Like people only learn in a college course or something.

Anybody that clicked that link should scan their system for spyware.

I saw gator list out and they tend to install their crap without permission.

That is if you don't already have a decent anti-spyware setup! ;)
Oh, wonderful.
Time to get out all the anti-spyware stuffl

im not quite sure how he could even take himself seriously. this reminds me, was anyone here lucky enough to see that guy who sold a lecture on ebay because he knew the truth about god? some thing about after death, everyones soul becomes a star in space, and that the sun ("the center of the universe") was god. i emailed him, asking him what happens when a star implodes, and he gave me something about how a soul just goes on to a new star. and that space was heaven. there were some other things too, equally funny, but i trashed the email.