NationStates Jolt Archive

Pentagon reveals rejected chemical weapons

THE Pentagon considered developing a host of non-lethal chemical weapons that would disrupt discipline and morale among enemy troops, newly declassified documents reveal.

Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an "aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually irresistible to each other. Provoking widespread homosexual behaviour among troops would cause a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to morale, the proposal says.

Other ideas included chemical weapons that attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats to troop positions, making them uninhabitable. Another was to develop a chemical that caused "severe and lasting halitosis", making it easy to identify guerrillas trying to blend in with civilians. There was also the idea of making troops' skin unbearably sensitive to sunlight.

The proposals, from the US Air Force Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio, date from 1994. The lab sought Pentagon funding for research into what it called "harassing, annoying and 'bad guy'-identifying chemicals". The plans have been posted online by the Sunshine Project, an organisation that exposes research into chemical and biological weapons.

Spokesman Edward Hammond says it was not known if the proposed $7.5 million, six-year research plan was ever pursued.


Oh, Pentagon, we'll never get tried of you, hahaha.

This isn't such a great idea, mainly because history has shown that armies with widespread homosexuality can often be more effective than regular armies. Not only this, but it's a pretty judeo-christian-centric morality based thing- i.e not all cultures find homosexuality as repulsive as America. For example it'd be a pretty crap weapon against the Dutch :P
I guess if they all went off shagging at least it'd divert their attention for a while. Perhaps we should fire this bomb on everyone, and we'd have love, not war.

Ah, Dr. Stangelove is hard at work still then.

This is kinda funny, because I resently saw a scetch about how the conservative belives that the gay are developing weapons of mass gayness to bomb cities. I just wish I could remeber where I saw it. :D

If the gays do plan to do this...it won't promote incest will it? I don't want the bomb to be dropped, and suddenly i start eyeing my father or brother! :eek:

This isn't such a great idea, mainly because history has shown that armies with widespread homosexuality can often be more effective than regular armies. Not only this, but it's a pretty judeo-christian-centric morality based thing- i.e not all cultures find homosexuality as repulsive as America. For example it'd be a pretty crap weapon against the Dutch :P
I guess if they all went off shagging at least it'd divert their attention for a while. Perhaps we should fire this bomb on everyone, and we'd have love, not war.
We wouldn't be fighting the Dutch though. We would probably be fighting Muslims, and Muslim culture are even more opposed to homosexuality than the USA is. Other than that I agree this world needs more love. Or just unbridled sexual excesses.

The best idea would be to drop the gay sex one on all the troops on both sides. "Put down that AK, we're playing international grab-ass..."

Maybe if they make a homophobia one too...

You realise that homosexual people dont have non-stop sex their whole lives right? IF you somehow could 'make' people homosexual, however idiotic that sounds, they wouldnt be any more inclined to neglect their duty as soldiers than any heterosexual army.

If the gays do plan to do this...it won't promote incest will it? I don't want the bomb to be dropped, and suddenly i start eyeing my father or brother!

So you have sex with your female cousins do you? I mean, you are heterosexual.

You realise that homosexual people dont have non-stop sex their whole lives right? IF you somehow could 'make' people homosexual, however idiotic that sounds, they wouldnt be any more inclined to neglect their duty as soldiers than any heterosexual army.


Heh, tell that to the Pentagon!

Any chemical that could do that would be in great demand at parties and clubs.

Great for protests and riots, too.

Maybe if they make a homophobia one too...


Wait... so you suggest to make them, be Homophobic Gays? hehehehehhehe that would be an extremely interesting result.

You realise that homosexual people dont have non-stop sex their whole lives right? IF you somehow could 'make' people homosexual, however idiotic that sounds, they wouldnt be any more inclined to neglect their duty as soldiers than any heterosexual army.


But the point isn't that they'd be turned homosexual, its that they'd be hard-out attracted to each other. At least I think that was the point.

That would be better than rohypnol. Imagine carrying around a sprayer of it, and running into someone you fancy...

They would be actively trying to get busy with you...

You realise that homosexual people dont have non-stop sex their whole lives right? IF you somehow could 'make' people homosexual, however idiotic that sounds, they wouldnt be any more inclined to neglect their duty as soldiers than any heterosexual army.



So you have sex with your female cousins do you? I mean, you are heterosexual.

Indeed, the problem that nobody seems to understand. Many arguments that are against gays can easily be turned around to straight people. But bravo for pointing that out.

Indeed, the problem that nobody seems to understand. Many arguments that are against gays can easily be turned around to straight people. But bravo for pointing that out.

err, actually it made no sense. I was making a comment, that if there was such a thing as "gay bomb" would it make me be attracted to any man? Because if so... there'd be lots of incest going around the house... how he confused it with me sleeping with female cousin is beyond me... It's like you saying you have a cat, and i twist it to saying, you have sex with cat every night... does that make sense?

That would be better than rohypnol. Imagine carrying around a sprayer of it, and running into someone you fancy...

They would be actively trying to get busy with you...

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that highly illegal?

Back on topic; wonders never cease... and neither do laughs.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that highly illegal?

Back on topic; wonders never cease... and neither do laughs.

Yes, it's illegal. But that doesn't stop people from making it, selling it, buying it, and using it.

If the formula for this sex gas ever gets out ---- whoa Nellie! :fluffle:

err, actually it made no sense. I was making a comment, that if there was such a thing as "gay bomb" would it make me be attracted to any man? Because if so... there'd be lots of incest going around the house... how he confused it with me sleeping with female cousin is beyond me... It's like you saying you have a cat, and i twist it to saying, you have sex with cat every night... does that make sense?

I didnt 'confuse' it with anything, you dont seem to understand the logic of your own argument. Let's have a look at what you said,

"If the gays do plan to do this...it won't promote incest will it? I don't want the bomb to be dropped, and suddenly i start eyeing my father or brother!"

You dont seem to grasp the idea that homosexual people, are in fact, normal sexual creatures, like, you for example. My point was, do you have sex with your female cousins purely because you're heterosexual? The answer is (hopefully) obvious, ie. no, because even though you're attracted to women (as a heterosexual), you are not attracted to EVERY woman, and certain women in particular are complete turn-offs, your family obviously.

Why therefore would you even be the least bit uncertain as to the effects of a so-called 'gay bomb'? You asked, 'it wont promote incest will it?', why would it? You dont 'eye' your sister or your mother, why would being homosexual suddenly make you more open to having incest? Homosexual people are not attracted to EVERY person of the same sex, just as heterosexual people are not attracted to everyone of the opposite sex. I dont understand how you could ever be unsure of the outcome, hence i used the example of you and a female cousin. Ie. your heterosexuality does not mean any woman is a potential sexual partner.

You all realise this news story is fake right?

I don't think it was a "gay sex bomb".

I think it's just gas that makes you horny.

I suppose that if you were alone, you would start servicing yourself.

I think the "gay" implication comes from the idea that most soldiers are groups of men, and that the men may do each other as a result of this gas.

They may, of course, just form a world-record circle jerk.

I didnt 'confuse' it with anything, you dont seem to understand the logic of your own argument. Let's have a look at what you said,

"If the gays do plan to do this...it won't promote incest will it? I don't want the bomb to be dropped, and suddenly i start eyeing my father or brother!"

You dont seem to grasp the idea that homosexual people, are in fact, normal sexual creatures, like, you for example. My point was, do you have sex with your female cousins purely because you're heterosexual? The answer is (hopefully) obvious, ie. no, because even though you're attracted to women (as a heterosexual), you are not attracted to EVERY woman, and certain women in particular are complete turn-offs, your family obviously.

Why therefore would you even be the least bit uncertain as to the effects of a so-called 'gay bomb'? You asked, 'it wont promote incest will it?', why would it? You dont 'eye' your sister or your mother, why would being homosexual suddenly make you more open to having incest? Homosexual people are not attracted to EVERY person of the same sex, just as heterosexual people are not attracted to everyone of the opposite sex. I dont understand how you could ever be unsure of the outcome, hence i used the example of you and a female cousin. Ie. your heterosexuality does not mean any woman is a potential sexual partner.


Your going to be one of those people, where i have to explain what i said a million times, before you start to understand what i meant... so in this new knowledge, there's no point in replying. I just hope, you'll review the original comment over and over, before you realize "Wow... i'm such an idiot, that's what he meant! No wonder he thinks i'm a retard"

Hopefully for mankind, you will come to this conclusion rapidly..

That would be better than rohypnol. Imagine carrying around a sprayer of it, and running into someone you fancy...

They would be actively trying to get busy with you...
It would suck for me. I'd be turning women into lesbians at an even faster rate. Interesting fact about me: The first girl I had sex with is now a lesbian. Was it something I did?

It would suck for me. I'd be turning women into lesbians at an even faster rate. Interesting fact about me: The first girl I had sex with is now a lesbian. Was it something I did?

You don't turn women into lesbians. She just discovered that's the way she really is. Before that, she probably hadn't given it much thought.

You don't turn women into lesbians. She just discovered that's the way she really is. Before that, she probably hadn't given it much thought.
But sex with Drunk Commies made her think about it. :eek:

How do you know she's not Bi-Sexual?

Lots of women these days are.... i talked to one, and they seem to like girls for pleasure, and men... just because they're "silly and cute". Oo;

But sex with Drunk Commies made her think about it. :eek:
Actually it was several years between me and lesbianism, but it does make you think, doesn't it?

How do you know she's not Bi-Sexual?

Lots of women these days are.... i talked to one, and they seem to like girls for pleasure, and men... just because they're "silly and cute". Oo;
No, she's full on lesbian. She lives with her girlfriend and they're serious about each other.

Actually it was several years between me and lesbianism, but it does make you think, doesn't it?
Have you tried getting her straight again?

I'd love to see that

If the bomb really exists, can we drop it on Rev. Fred Phelps church?

If the bomb really exists, can we drop it on Rev. Fred Phelps church?

I'm not sure it would work. You might have to throw some Viagra in there, too.

Pentagon reveals rejected chemical weapons

THE Pentagon considered developing a host of non-lethal chemical weapons that would disrupt discipline and morale among enemy troops, newly declassified documents reveal.

Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an "aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually irresistible to each other. Provoking widespread homosexual behaviour among troops would cause a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to morale, the proposal says.

Other ideas included chemical weapons that attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats to troop positions, making them uninhabitable. Another was to develop a chemical that caused "severe and lasting halitosis", making it easy to identify guerrillas trying to blend in with civilians. There was also the idea of making troops' skin unbearably sensitive to sunlight.

The proposals, from the US Air Force Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio, date from 1994. The lab sought Pentagon funding for research into what it called "harassing, annoying and 'bad guy'-identifying chemicals". The plans have been posted online by the Sunshine Project, an organisation that exposes research into chemical and biological weapons.

Spokesman Edward Hammond says it was not known if the proposed $7.5 million, six-year research plan was ever pursued.


Oh, Pentagon, we'll never get tried of you, hahaha.Umm...drop 'em some lube, too. Otherwise, you're just being cruel.

No the funniest part isn't the "gay sex" part of it but the enraged wasps and angry rats. Imagine an army seeing wasps and rats coming at them. LOL. That's just funny. Man I'd be wishing for an Abrams or an Apache to surrender to at that point.

(Repost)

Maybe half the United States aren't just a bunch of Bible-thumping homophobes anymore. Maybe this was a genuine threat that got them voting for Bush.

But honestly... can you imagine what a weapon of mass terror this could be? Imagine if Al Qaeda had managed to acquire a (use your best Ian McDiarmid voice here) Fully Operational Gay Bomb or two, and set them off at the Southern Baptist Conference... or even more devastating, at the Shrub's re-inauguration? The psychological damage to the Religious Right would be unspeakable.

(Repost)

Maybe half the United States aren't just a bunch of Bible-thumping homophobes anymore. Maybe this was a genuine threat that got them voting for Bush.

But honestly... can you imagine what a weapon of mass terror this could be? Imagine if Al Qaeda had managed to acquire a (use your best Ian McDiarmid voice here) Fully Operational Gay Bomb or two, and set them off at the Southern Baptist Conference... or even more devastating, at the Shrub's re-inauguration? The psychological damage to the Religious Right would be unspeakable.

The proposals, from the US Air Force Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio, date from 1994. The lab sought Pentagon funding for research into what it called "harassing, annoying and 'bad guy'-identifying chemicals". The plans have been posted online by the Sunshine Project, an organisation that exposes research into chemical and biological weapons.

1994. Bush wasn't even a twinkle for the Presidency.

When did viagra start making chemical weopons?

Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an "aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually irresistible to each other. Provoking widespread homosexual behaviour among troops would cause a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to morale, the proposal says.

You're fucking kidding me, aren't you? O_o

Does that thing also come in spray or pills? *evil grin*

When did viagra start making chemical weopons?


They needed more business. :D

If the bomb really exists, can we drop it on Rev. Fred Phelps church?

I think I can safely say on behalf of the gay community, they don't want him!!! :eek:

You all realise this news story is fake right?

It's on several reliable news carries, and quite a few unreliable ones. All of this was covered in a previous thread of similar name with multiple sources quoted and linked.

Wait... so you suggest to make them, be Homophobic Gays? hehehehehhehe that would be an extremely interesting result.

Roy Cohn, Anti-sematic homophobic gay Jew and a HUGE arsehole! He was Sen McCarth's right hand man at one stage, give you an idea?

I could tell by the thread's title it would be positively flaming!

You all realise this news story is fake right?
I think ABC and Paul Harvey ran a little while with it today .... heard it before i read it.
Paul also covered that hunter in Ohio (?) who shot the unicorn. There's pix.
And Bush from his personal acct. $1.6 mil to Al Sharpton to say unbecoming things of Kerry during the campaign. Haven't got much on that one yet but it wouldn't surprise me.
But then ...
Duff man says a lot of things! Ooh yeah!

No the funniest part isn't the "gay sex" part of it but the enraged wasps and angry rats. Imagine an army seeing wasps and rats coming at them. LOL. That's just funny. Man I'd be wishing for an Abrams or an Apache to surrender to at that point.
Warped. This one and Bill Mutz's post just above it.

It reminds me of my plan to build tentacled, orgone powered mecha and use hentai as a psychological weapon against conservatives.

When did viagra start making chemical weopons?
:confused:
When'd Viagra come in?

I immediately thought of that "Sex-bomb" song when I saw this thread. Extremely dumb IMO.

Would the 'gay bomb' work in a cheerleader convention? :D

Damocles Hegemony

I immediately thought of that "Sex-bomb" song when I saw this thread. Extremely dumb IMO.
The thread, the idea, or the song?

Ok I can see a problem here, how would the solders know which is the gay sex bomb, the Army has a don't ask don't tell policy. :p

I personally look forward to the day that I can watch the news and hear a General say that the military is currently using gay sex bombs in the Armed Forces. That he had if fact tested one and it fulfilled his every expectation.

[QUOTE=John Browning]Any chemical that could do that would be in great demand at parties and clubs.

Hell yeah. I need some of that when I go clubbing! Where do I get it?? :D :fluffle:

err, actually it made no sense. I was making a comment, that if there was such a thing as "gay bomb" would it make me be attracted to any man? Because if so... there'd be lots of incest going around the house... how he confused it with me sleeping with female cousin is beyond me... It's like you saying you have a cat, and i twist it to saying, you have sex with cat every night... does that make sense?
I understand the irrelevance there, but I was merely commenting on where that idea span from. Or at least where it Most likely span from.

I don't think it was a "gay sex bomb".

I think it's just gas that makes you horny.

I suppose that if you were alone, you would start servicing yourself.

I think the "gay" implication comes from the idea that most soldiers are groups of men, and that the men may do each other as a result of this gas.

They may, of course, just form a world-record circle jerk.
Excuse the double post but... FAKE!!! NEVER! I say that something as obviously based in fact can be fake. Holy Goat Cheese!

March 13, 2007

We watched the bomb fall from the B-52 plane with the American flag across it's big, bold bottom. My brother and I stared in horror as it slowly fell closer and closer to the center of our beloved city. All the townspeople looked up and gaped in awe. We all just knew that it was futile to run, it need not be said.

The bomb impacted the ground. Several seconds later, I was making mad love with my brother.

God Bless America.



- The Diary of Andy Frank!

I personally look forward to the day that I can watch the news and hear a General say that the military is currently using gay sex bombs in the Armed Forces. That he had if fact tested one and it fulfilled his every expectation.

*Has a mental image of someone like Rumsfeld saying that*

Ewww. GROSS!

This thread reminds me of that song "Gay Bar" by Electric Six.

"you!
I wanna take you to a gay bar,
I wanna take you to a gay bar,
I wanna take you to a gay bar, gay bar, gay bar.

Let's start a war, start a nuclear war,
At the gay bar, gay bar, gay bar.
Wow!
At the gay bar.

I just wonna do ya, but do ya have any money?
I wanna spend all your money,
at the gay bar, gay bar, gay bar.

(Pause)

I've got something to put in you,
I've got something to put in you,
I've got something to put in you,
At the gay bar, gay bar, gay bar.
Wow!

You're a superstar, at the gay bar.
You're a superstar, at the gay bar.
Yeah! you're a superstar, at the gay bar.
You're a superstar, at the gay bar.
Superstar.
Super, super, superstar"

Starting a nuclear war in a gay bar sounds like an odd thing to do to me, but whatever floats their boats...

EDIT:
Oh right, I forgot why I posted this.
Here it is:
BUMP!

This thread reminds me of that song "Gay Bar" by Electric Six.

"you!
I wanna take you to a gay bar,
I wanna take you to a gay bar,
I wanna take you to a gay bar, gay bar, gay bar.

Let's start a war, start a nuclear war,
At the gay bar, gay bar, gay bar.
Wow!
At the gay bar.

I just wonna do ya, but do ya have any money?
I wanna spend all your money,
at the gay bar, gay bar, gay bar.

(Pause)

I've got something to put in you,
I've got something to put in you,
I've got something to put in you,
At the gay bar, gay bar, gay bar.
Wow!

You're a superstar, at the gay bar.
You're a superstar, at the gay bar.
Yeah! you're a superstar, at the gay bar.
You're a superstar, at the gay bar.
Superstar.
Super, super, superstar"

Starting a nuclear war in a gay bar sounds like an odd thing to do to me, but whatever floats their boats...

EDIT:
Oh right, I forgot why I posted this.
Here it is:
BUMP!

:eek: My tv is playing another electric 6 music vid as I type this (radio gaga)